BMEWS
 

oh the poor dear boy. pity,pity. he’s 17 and his date looks like this.

 
 


Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   on 12/09/2011 at 10:29 AM   
 
  1. omg (gotta use the vernacular) - he looks 12 years old. If this torques you - view Private Lessons - been around (a lot of teens dreams) for quite a while. Just getting press nowdays.

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   12/09/2011  at  11:32 AM  

  2. Iain of Glasgow tells it like it is. I’ll raise a glass of Scotland’s finest to him tonight.

    Posted by CenTexTim    United States   12/09/2011  at  12:25 PM  

  3. I didn’t think he looked 12 but then, I think it’s how old they actually are that matters.
    I don’t think 17 is a child in today’s culture. Look at the images available every day. And not porn either. Run of the mill advertising is one example. Girlie ad posters for everything from eye glasses to travel ads.  Take a look at this evenings Daily Mail on line.
    Home page and look at the right column. FeMail. 
    Young people see all of this every day and so less and less over time, fewer and fewer understand the embarrassment or modesty of an older generation.
    Personally, I fail to see what a mature woman might have in common or talk about with this kid. But then again, who knows?  They might. They’re primarily in the same business and most likely know all the same ppl.
    Jan Moir however almost make it seem like child molestation. Which clearly it isn’t.
    I also don’t think she much likes women who do not follow the feminist line, based on her previous musings.  And finally .... GAK. She had nice things to say about that traitor Jane Fonda. GAK again.

    Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   12/09/2011  at  01:15 PM  

  4. She looks like a horse to me. Nice figure, butter face. Grizzly hair. And she has massive feet.

    But it’s legal, so what’s the fuss? Everyone in the entertainment business is a gutter slut anyway, so who cares?

    I’ve heard it said by women that the thing about young boys is that they have no idea what they’re doing, all night long. Maybe this is a Teacher Teacher situation.

    Posted by Drew458    United States   12/09/2011  at  01:16 PM  

  5. Damn!  Never had an opportunity like that when I was 17.  Twenty-five, but not 16.

    Posted by MAJ Mike    United States   12/09/2011  at  06:53 PM  

  6. When I was 17, I had a desire to go out with the understudy of my HS Choir teacher, who was a senior at Western Michigan University.  Never got to fulfill that desire. Oh well....

    Posted by Macker    United States   12/09/2011  at  10:07 PM  

  7. I’m approaching 70 and the photo of this babe has inspired me to get a “woodie”.

    Unfortunately, that about all I’ll get from the lady.

    Do the maths:

    17 goes into 32 more times that 70 does!

    Posted by New Jersey Yankee    Ireland   12/10/2011  at  02:15 AM  

  8. Grizzly hair ?????  Huh?  No.

    The way I heard it, boys don’t know what they’re doing but can keep it up all night.

    Large feet?  Hmmmm. Thought comes to mind that unless one had a foot fetish which I don’t, it wouldn’t be her feet I was a slave to.

    Kind of a broad (no pun) brush with regard to “everyone” in the entertainment field. Though there is an awful of that goin’ round it’s true. I think they generally do what civilians do but it’s news cos of who they are. Must be difficult come to think of it. I mean, if one is an actor as an example, and in movies and young and always kissing some gor-jus babe if lucky enough to have the looks and play leading roles, well , I can understand folks being in a perpetual state of randiness. I am aware of course that men wear something so as not to show or embarrass he or his co-star or whoever he’s rolling in the hay with. But still.
    It’s gotta be .... ?  .... difficult at the least unless he’s a Rock Hudson type.

    New Jersey Yankee .... can’t add anything to that and if I could I’d have to wait till the laffing stopped.  Good one.

    Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   12/10/2011  at  04:56 AM  

  9. That would be - do it all night long (not quite the same thing) - Peiper. And I don’t agree with the 17 is not a child in today’s culture. Maybe exposed to waaaaay too much - innocence lost - but not an adult. This is done on purpose and reverse the genders - if this was a 32 year old guy and a 17 year old girl - Yuck and the police would be on it in a sec. But then most police are guys and this (as I pointed out) is a teen boy’s fantasy come true.

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   12/10/2011  at  08:51 AM  

  10. Well, Wardmom. The age of consent here in the UK is 16. So while he may not be thought an adult, and you’re right, 17 probably isn’t, he isn’t a child either. In Spain, the age of consent is 13. The lowest in Europe. So in theory, while many would look askance at at male of 32 and a girl of 17, ??? Not much to be done.  Then too, who can explain the attraction that a young girl might have for an older guy? Generally I think age seeks it’s own generation. But there’s always gonna be the exceptions.

    Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   12/10/2011  at  03:07 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Under Pressure

Previous entry: Abandoned technology.

<< BMEWS Main Page >>