Obama won’t lose for being black but for not being American enough. (AWESOME EDITORIAL)

 

1. I like what this author is saying - to the point - Obamanation is not Black (i.e. American black), African nor American (in one sense), nor even White American. This does indeed explain the defensiveness and anger. He is attempting (at various times in his campaign) to be each one - started out Black, and holds up his African, American and White American - when he feels it suits a vote pandering moment.

   He is the essence of what is negative and wrong about Democrats in general and Liberals/Leftist specifically - it is all about class/race. No matter what the question, issue or situation - how can we couch it into an US vs THEM mantra.

   And that loses in America - big time. And oh, btw, isn’t that at total odds with their inclusive one big Glowball World of peace, love and justice for all?

   Hypocrisy thy name is Democrat.

   Posted by wardmama4       08/25/2008  at  08:17 AM  



2. i won’t vote for a black socialist for the same reason i won’t vote for a white socialist!!

   Posted by Rancino       08/25/2008  at  09:01 AM  



3. I won’t vote for him because of a long family tradition of ignoring fools and sons of bitches.

   Posted by kingaljr       08/25/2008  at  06:50 PM  



4. Quite frankly I doubt that in his heart of hearts Obaby has a clue what he is.  He latched onto “black” in a calculated attempt to blend in with the Chicago melanin enriched groups and gangs and this all but disclaimed his mother and his maternal grandparents.  After all, he had to prove to the “brothas” that he is/was one of them and that he wasn’t about to support “whitey” so the “brothas” would back him in everything he did.

   For all he yells about sharing the wealth he sure doesn’t seem to be in any hurry to assist his brother in Nairobi who’s living on $24 a year in a 2 meter by 3 meter ghetto shack.  Of course, socialists always are in a hurry to spread the wealth, as long as their wealth isn’t touched.  Can anyone say “socialist hypocrite”?

   The guy (I refuse to honor him with the title “man” out of respect to the men I know) is an elitist snob who’s already come out and said he’s running for President so when his daughters have beaus he can sic the Secret Service on them.  Welcome to what you can expect for your tax dollars at work should he win the presidency.

   He’s already proven he has no qualms pulling strings to put the quietus to anything that might look dicey.  IE: there’s a “no show” on his wife’s college thesis - put in effect by BHO until *after* the election - which looks suspiciously like there’s very damaging information to be gleaned from it.  This makes me wonder if we’d have a slew of “disappeared” people like we did under a not-too-far-in-the-past presidency if he is elected.

   Posted by Valgerd Gydhja       08/25/2008  at  07:10 PM  



5. i won’t vote for a black socialist for the same reason i won’t vote for a white socialist!!
   Posted by Rancino

   Indeed, again. My sentiments precisely. I don’t care, a communist/raghead is one regardless.

   Posted by cmblake6       08/26/2008  at  10:46 AM  



6. And that / was an either/or, not a combination/comparison. Although…

   Posted by cmblake6       08/26/2008  at  10:49 AM  



7. Im a brit, I really admire what your founding fathers tried to do, and to keep power out of individuals hands, the democrats are and have been allways , anti American, in the original meaning. They are power grabbers, why did the liberals act so damn blind and let the left hijack them?
   Perhaps we should list those we know who are sucked in by Obama and remember how good their judgement is?

   Posted by Chris Edwards       08/26/2008  at  02:56 PM  



8. What puzzles me is that the .mil has not taken their oath of enlistment to heart. ALL enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC!

   Posted by cmblake6       08/27/2008  at  05:33 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.