Not Sporting

 

1. Idiots like this make legit hunters and gun rights people cringe.

   Posted by mojoe       08/11/2009  at  09:34 PM  



2. What utter dumbshits.

   I’m glad they threw the book at them. Should hit ‘em even harder, IMHO.

   Posted by ooGcM taobmaetS       08/12/2009  at  05:21 AM  



3. Proof of Darwin’s theory at it’s best.

   //sarc off//

   Posted by wardmama4       08/12/2009  at  06:46 AM  



4. Good job by the Canadian court, eh.

   Posted by Macker       08/12/2009  at  09:54 AM  



5. Most (all?) U. S. states have laws regarding hunting; those laws usually include a prohibition against killing a game animal and leaving it.  If one kills game, one is responsible for removing it.  Hunting must serve a purpose other than killing something.  One hunts for meat or trophies at the least.  (I like venison.  Grouse is much more flavorful than chicken.)

   The ‘allowing game meat to spoil’ charge sounds like the Canadian wording of this sort of law.  I agree the wording sounds ‘quaint’ to my ears, but I agree with the concept.

   These guys are losers.  I’m just waiting for some subset of the looney left to promote this as a reason to ban hunting and firearms.

   Posted by Archie       08/12/2009  at  11:35 AM  



6. They should be neutered. We have enough idiots in the world and these three should never be allowed to reproduce.

   Posted by Punkins       08/12/2009  at  05:53 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.