BMEWS
 

not guilty by reason of being muslim. again. anyone keeping score?

 
 


Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   on 08/31/2012 at 02:35 PM   
 
  1. OH BS. SUCH TOTAL MIND EFFIN BS.

    He can’t deal with western women, who are all WHORES in his mind. Thus his dirty conversations and pervy behavior. It is ABSOLUTELY sexual behavior in his mind.

    Muzzie boy needs a good Texas ass whuppin to larn him some respect. What’s wrong with you English pussy men? Can’t dish out a right proper thumping anymore? Limp. Leave it to the courts? Double limp. Might as well just snip your John Thomas off and let teh Official UK Sharia Court handle this ... and it sounds like they did! Pervo ought to have been defrocked and given the El-Booto back to catpanistan or wtf he’s from. A.S. A. bloody P.

    And it ain’t no damn excuse. Foreigners ought to learn how to behave or else they can stay home. Besides ... a bit of equality in the courts please ... had this guy been white and named Thomas Stanton or something English like that, he would have flayed alive - and that’s BEFORE he got to court, even if he’d been raised by wolves.

    One law for all, or it’s no law at all.

    Posted by Drew458    United States   08/31/2012  at  07:45 PM  

  2. Let’s consider a few simple things.

    The Koran and it’s related writings are supposed to very comprehensively tell Moslems how they should live their lives.

    Mohamed himself had to deal with non Islamic women in his lifetime.  They were free women who he had not conquered, enslaved or raped.

    So, what is said about the correct way for a Moslem to act in the presence of non Moslem women?

    The bits of the Koran I’m familiar with generally specify that in most daily situations, the Moslem is supposed to treat non Moslems with decency and courtesy.  That’s also part of the Moslem tradition of lieing, known as takiya, used to gain an advantage.  Takiya makes it very difficult to trust a Moslem in many important situations.  But I digress.

    I’d suggest that Mr. Jamil had been instructed by Islamic law in the proper ways to deal with non Moslem women.  Therefore even if he was innocent by reason of ignorance of violating British law and tradition, then he is certainly guilty of violating Islamic law.  1) He violated the general admonition to deal politely with non Moslems (it’s actually there).  2) He is a traitor to Jihad because his poor behavior taught the women involved that a Moslem man would not respect them, making all Moslem men suspect and delaying the triumph of the Umah.  That is a direct violation of Takiya.

    So, what’s the correct punishment under Islamic law; flogging, stoning, amputation?  In this particular case, I think I’d consider Sharia to be quite acceptable.

    Posted by Dr. Jeff    United States   08/31/2012  at  08:07 PM  

  3. NJY Solution:

    QUESTION, from Mooslime to female: What is your favourite love-making position?

    The woman ANSWERS: I’m glad you asked. I’ll demonstrate it you you if that’s OK.

    Mooslime: OH Yes (Praise be to Allah).

    Woman promptly and with full force kicks the Mooslime in the groin with her pointed-toe shoe.

    Mooslime: SCREAMS then collapses giving the female the opportunity to drive a horse hypodermic needle deep into the Mooslime’s ear.

    No need for the Politically Correct Professional Pharmaceutical Pannel to meet.

    Posted by New Jersey Yankee    Ireland   09/01/2012  at  04:14 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Not What I Expected

Previous entry: Squatting will now be a criminal offense. After all these miserable years. About time.

<< BMEWS Main Page >>