BMEWS
 

NAUGHTY CIA MUST ANSWER TO amnasty intl. and civil rights groups.

 
 

Shami Chakrabarti

Damn, where do these folks with unpronounceable names come from?  And Shami?  Don’t know if I could say that name without laffing.
Hey… here’s a name for ya. Real name ... Lammy.  Yeah. Fer real. I can’t remember who or what he does here. I think he’s ...?
Lyndon ... who is he? Just doesn’t inspire a feeling of, yeah ... I’d charge thru hell for ole Lammy.  And I can’t charge anywhere (were I young enuff) trying to follow a name I can’t vocalize..  CHARGE ... Forward!!!  I’m right behind ya Shami.
Just doesn’t have that ring to it.
Hey ... just how many damn civil rights groups are there? One for every person on the planet?



Posted by Drew458    United States   on 02/25/2008 at 09:03 AM   
 
  1. So let me get this straight ... your pal Shami feels that the UK occassionally not demanding to see the flight manifest when a US plan stops by for a bit of petrol at a military base is state sponsored terrorism?

    Meanwhile Iran, et al, work as hard as possible to get their minions to plant more bombs in London.

    Bit of a difference, what what?

    Oh, and “Shami” is likely just a shortened version of his name. Some Indian names go on for quite some time, and are a challenge for newbies. Once you’ve worked with them for awhile it’s no big deal at all.

    Posted by Drew458    United States   02/25/2008  at  10:34 AM  

  2. Amnesty has never amounted to much more than the Snivel Liberties outfit in League of Nations drag.

    If you want to measure how far civilization has declined, you might begin by measuring the number, appeal, and effectiveness of such organizations as these, always on the side of degeneracy and decay, always on the side of vermin, and always against decent people.

    Drew, if you think Indian names can go on for quite some time, try to digest some of their philosophy (bon appetit!).

    LOL

    Posted by Tannenberg    United States   02/25/2008  at  12:55 PM  

  3. C.I.A. = Caught In the Act

    1) Why did we release any information about any of the flights to anyone?  Why not mix it up with civilian charter, Air Force and Army aircraft?  Where’s the pea?  The CIA is supposed to be able to keep its mouth shut.  Some secret spy agency, can’t move someone around without getting caught.  Take a hint from the Mafia - btw anyone seen Jimmy Hoffa lately?  How did we manage to release the information that embarrassed the Brits?  Why and how are these pisants getting the information?

    2) The FAA is a federal agency.  Since Amnesty International tracked the plane by its tail number,CHANGE THE FLIPPING TAIL NUMBER!

    3) If landing the aircraft on some foreign soil is a problem, do we have enough carriers to jump the assh*les around the world that way?  Could we transfer them from one carrier to another?  No need for anyone save the Captain to know what’s going on and he’s likely to be able to keep his mouth shut.  Wrap the guest of honor in a straight jacket, blindfold and chains, toss him in the baggage compartment and get on with it.

    I don’t have problem with rendition.  Considering the nature of the folks we’re dealing with, even extraordinary rendition doesn’t bother me much (just keep it over there - ok?).

    Posted by Dr. Jeff    United States   02/25/2008  at  05:24 PM  

  4. According to http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/ N134BR is registered to GSCP (NJ) INC

    Posted by bikerbob    United States   02/26/2008  at  09:10 AM  

  5. If we take out Amnesty International we’d have the problem that most people don’t like seeing their civilians assassinated.  Remember the stink when the French blew up that Green Peace ship? 

    Getting back to the original point, why are we reporting that we have these guys at all?  When we do have to admit it.  Why not play a shell game and move them around by differing modes of transport leased from differing corporations and the military?  Even GSCP could help by “selling” the aircraft to one of their other subsidiaries.

    Posted by Dr. Jeff    United States   02/26/2008  at  10:03 PM  

  6. I second the above we need to take the gloves off when dealing with these people.

    As an aside the light aircraft which ditched in the ladies backyard happened fairly near me. On the local tv news they interviewed the pilot. I said to the wife “he looks like a bit of a scrote” (petty criminal) They went on to say that his passenger was a convicted drug dealer who was on day release from prison wtf? Tonight they have added that the pilot has been arrested for drugs offences (growing cannabis) Now who says you can’t judge a book by the cover?

    Posted by LyndonB    United Kingdom   02/27/2008  at  02:03 PM  

  7. Link to the arrest..

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/7267333.stm

    Posted by LyndonB    United Kingdom   02/28/2008  at  05:19 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Don't bet on it

Previous entry: GLOVES COME OFF AS HILLARY FIGHTS FOR POLITICAL LIFE

<< BMEWS Main Page >>