Mother ‘not clever enough to raise child’ has baby snatched. Nanny knows best always.

 

1. Let them keep their child. Good grief. This nanny-state shite is out of control. Will the kid have the best upbringing? Probably not. So what? Neither did the parents.

   So maybe mom is a bit of a slow learner. That doesn’t mean she’s a drooling imbecile. Anyone who can express a thought like

   Miss Robertson said: ‘Holding him made me upset all over again. I’ve told the social workers I don’t want him to have bottled milk or a dummy. I feel breastfeeding is so important and at least then he is still having some of me.’

   is not “slow” or “unclever”. And she actually seems to be part of a couple, two young folks who were even attempting to get married.

   Our social services are run and staffed by arrogant dimwits that wouldn’t stand out at an ACORN meeting. What’s England’s excuse?

   Posted by Drew458       01/28/2010  at  03:37 PM  



2. The fact is she might have learning difficulties but then the school system has teaching difficulties that are catastrophic, maybe she is just socialist propaganda resistant?and I would say that the nanny state and the social workers have an average IQ that classifies them as idiots, mind you what does that make those who vote for them?

   Posted by Chris Edwards       01/28/2010  at  07:11 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.