Most Ridiculous Item Of The Day (so far)

 

1. The DA should sue all of them for attempted murder.

   Posted by Fine Old Cannibal       06/05/2006  at  06:43 PM  



2. Wait, so the suit is essentially the mother suing on behalf of the child that the abortion that would have killed the child was unsuccessful therefore the child has been afflicted with unlawful life?

   Okay, maybe that is not quite it. I think. Maybe. Hmmmmm

   Posted by Rickvid       06/05/2006  at  07:02 PM  



3. No Skipper the most ridiculous lawsuit I heard of was parents and wife sueing over the sperm of a guy who was dead (he’d banked his sperm when he got diagnosed with cancer) because the parents wanted a grandchild and the widow didn’t want his sperm put into ‘just’ anybody. . .  and we wonder why Al Gore gets away with saying the world has 10 years before glowball warming destroys it!

   Maybe he’s the sane one of the bunch. What a very, very scary thought.

   Posted by wardmama4       06/05/2006  at  07:24 PM  



4. So it’s OK to poke a hole in a kid in the womb, but only if you kill it.  Poke a hole and let the kid live, you’ve committed a crime or a tort.  Some of you forensics experts out there explain the logic to me.  I don’t get it.

   Posted by dick       06/05/2006  at  09:44 PM  



5. Okay.  This is nuts.  But, I think it might be a good thing.  I mean OB’s (and other MD’s) are complaining that lawsuits are making the cost of business so expensive that they can’t afford to operate......Although, I think Mommy Dearest is going to have a hard time explaining to little Billy why she tried to kill him.  Should make for interesting dinner conversation.

   Posted by Beccayinn       06/05/2006  at  11:34 PM  



6. I don’t know which is worse: this, or Dana L. blaming President Bush for her abortion because she forgot to fit her diaphragm before having sex with her husband!

   Posted by Macker       06/06/2006  at  12:43 AM  



7. My own spiritual beliefs about the soul make me believe that aborted babies never receive a soul, however, I find myself being pro life.  I wrestled with the issue for many years especially since I am a male and I believed that personally it is something that I wouldn’t want but maybe it works for other people.  However, I had never been in a situation in which I had gotten a woman pregnant and had to make that choice, or have the woman choose for me.  I am confident that had I been in that situation, I would have chosen NOT to have the abortion, but alas I would have NO RIGHTS in that situation and the woman could have just as easily done whatever she wanted.  I then came to the belief that if I think it is just plain wrong I can’t say morally “it is wrong for me but everybody else can do it.” It is either wrong or it isn’t wrong, and thusly I am pro choice although I would only like to see the matter discussed and voted on according to the constitution as it should be and not decided by a bank of elite judges.  In that case, I would simply vote “no abortion” and see where it goes.  I am not willing to march in the streets over it.  But this brings me back to my original point.  In my belief set, a soul, which is the essence of a person would not enter in an aborted human fetus, thus I can feel pretty good about what happens to that particular soul.  Now most abortion proponents are atheists from what I can gather, so what I really can’t understand about their viewpoint is that it seems to me that abortion is truly killing an innocent human (or in the softest language preventing a human from being born that would otherwise unmolested grow to full term).  It seems to me that an atheist believing in no god, and that earth is IT for a person SHOULD have a particular level of uncomfort in supporting the idea of not giving that human the chance that he or she had?  This I have a hard time understanding.  So in their worldview, they are lucky as hell that they were born before being aborted but they don’t want others to even get that chance?  That seems awfully cold.  They seem to feel for the condemned murderer in this way, but why not a person?  With all this arguing over “when does life begin?” no one can escape the fact that if the fetus were left alone, it would grow and be born and then live life. This person would have their chance to become an abortion proponent too, just like the others. So none of the definition of “life” stuff really matters.  I really don’t understand this line of thinking or the ethics of atheists on this matter.

   Posted by JGUNS       06/06/2006  at  07:39 AM  



8. All that will happen is it will go back street, like we had in the UK in the 1960s,theres a great British movie call, up the junction, where this girle dies having a back street abortion, that was just part of the story set in London in the 60s, with all the birth control stuff around today are they just fucking stupid?

   Posted by bulldog       06/06/2006  at  02:50 PM  



9. I think that was in the UK wardmama4.  it wasent a great movie because she died, (last post) all the cars and motorbikes where British and it was in London, thats why it was good.

   Posted by bulldog       06/06/2006  at  03:12 PM  



10. jguns, rubber johny, pill, coil, next day pill,snip (MEN) ECT ECT how mutch more do you need to keep away from the clnic?

    Posted by bulldog       06/06/2006  at  03:31 PM  



11. clinic, even.

    Posted by bulldog       06/06/2006  at  03:35 PM  



12. http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2001/55/mosher.html good song.

    Posted by bulldog       06/06/2006  at  05:00 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.