MOMS ARE NOW BANNED FROM LOOKING AFTER EACH OTHERS KIDDIES.
on 09/26/2009 at 12:00 PM
On the subject of dirty rat-fink snitching bastards: They seem to thrive in an environment like what the Labour Party has set up. They’re petty, nosy, small-minded and small-hearted people, and in a better community, we’d shun people like this and teach them that their behavior is unacceptable.
Labour of course, loves this because it transfers even more power into the hands of the government, and once you get your citizenry ratting each other out for the smallest of “offenses”, they’ll be too busy sniping at each other to pay attention to how the government is lining them up for more screwage.
Damn the Labour Party. Damn it straight to HELL where it belongs.
Underlying this though is the attitude I’ve NEVER understood: Submissively begging and scraping to the government for permission for every-day activities in our daily lives. Not just no, but HELL NO. My business is MY business, not the government’s, and I will not seek permission to go about doing the things I do to live my life. I’ll accept that some regulation and law has to be present to keep society’s wheels from coming off, but western society countries are now well into the red-zone on the “too much law” meter, and it’s showing very openly and often by all of the “crazy” that’s starting to happen.
Oh, and Peiper: Whatever’s stopping you and your wife from getting out of England now, I hope you find a way to expedite making the jump. Sometimes it is easier to get forgiveness than to get permission - something to keep in mind as you plan. It pains me to see you stuck there, and I’ll bet I’m speaking for a whole lot of other good folks on this site when I say that.
Peiper, I read these posts of yours and I am amazed that you stay there. Of course, if Odipstick* and his freaks get their way we aren’t going to be any better off in a few years.
* Note: What I really wanted to say is Odumbsh!t. I am at the point of barfing every time I hear or see him.
Maybe I’m just not seeing it? But UMMM citations Needed?
Posted by Farker
09/26/2009 at 06:50 PM
Hrm. You’re right, Farker, Peiper’s articles to seem to be missing the links back to the original articles. Right… Time to fire up http://www.google.co.uk…
Mothers are banned from looking after each other’s children
...
Had to use Google directly for this one, kept getting blacklist warnings on Guardian, Telegraph, AND TelcoNews articles I tried to link to. Must have been a keyword in the URL like ‘broadband’ it didn’t like. Anyway: £6 broadband tax tax for everyone with a phone to be introduced before next election
...
I couldn’t find any citation for the £600 tax on grocery stores, per parking space, that Peiper mentioned.
However, I did find this from 2007: Now Tories want us to pay for parking at the supermarket
Just goes to show that as bad as the Labour Party is, and how badly they all need to be thrown out on their ear, I’d say it’s a safe bet that all of the parties are pretty much rat-bastards who pander to fringe elements in order to raise taxes and line their own pockets. Seriously, time to bring back the stocks and pillories in the town square, and start putting these bastards in them to be pelted by rotten food and garbage by the people. It worked in past, it can work again. If politicians had to directly face the people’s ire, perhaps they’d govern more responsibly and reasonably.
While I agree with Argentum the supermarkets get a super deal compared to normal busness owners regarding rates, as an unintended consiquence it would re-juvinate the town centre shops, socialists are a bit like zombies!
Posted by Chris Edwards
09/27/2009 at 10:24 AM
Thanks for the linkies Argentium
Posted by Farker
09/27/2009 at 11:14 AM
Ooops ..
Tiger, thanks for the help re. the links. I’m usually pretty good on adding those. Slipped up this time. btw .. that thing on markets and extra monie is being called a “Shopping Tax.”
Can you just imagine that? However ... the Tories now say they will fight it. Big of em.Now.
With an election coming up.Tiger ... Re. the Shopping Tax article.
The usual Telegraph cock-up. NO LINK on line. Telegraph does that so damn often it’s maddening.
But the writer was Christopher Hope, Whitehall Editor .
The headline ran as follows.
SHOPPERS TO BE HIT BY TAX ON SUPERSTORESI’ve tried to Google the thing and came up blank. And as usual with the rocket scientists at the Telegraph, when I enter his name on their search site, powered by Google, I get past articles but not this one.
Farker & Peiper: Most welcome.
Telegraph’s inability to get stories up to their web site in a timely fashion might be intentional; their income is a direct result of sales of the paper-print version of their paper, yes? Perhaps they’re trying to squeeze every possible bit of revenue from their stories prior to putting that content online for free consumption.
This is a little backwards-minded of course, as most papers are trying to figure out how to change their online version to a pay-to-read model like their papers. The business models don’t change, only the delivery methods.
Still, doesn’t make the practice any less annoying when you want to share the news with others (outside the UK) and they’re the only ones with the story.
