BMEWS
 

Memory Lapse

 
 


Posted by The Skipper    United States   on 02/06/2006 at 06:39 AM   
 
  1. Perhaps we should flood Amnesty Int with mail saying - who cares? and what about the 3,000 Americans killed by the terrorists on 9/11, it’s disgusting to me that the crimes, victims and their rights are completely forgotten by those whinning for the criminals ‘rights.’ No wonder civilized societies are careening into hell.

    We really need to bring accountability to all these programs which are sucking out funds (I’m sure) from our taxes that ‘pick ‘n choose’ their causes and who they go after.

    Such a hard decision - my gut [especially after this week of rioting over a few stupid cartoons] is to just shoot the terrorists where they stand rather than inter them - but then we become just like them, uncivilized.

    Damn them, they kill any and all in their way and then whine about how we treat them????

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   02/06/2006  at  07:49 AM  

  2. For all practical purposes, Amnesty International amounts to no more than the foreign ministry of the ACLU.  And we have always known what masters the ACLU serves.  Their revered founder and guru, Baldwin, himself removed any possible debate on that point, and nothing has changed.

    hmmm

    Posted by Tannenberg    United States   02/06/2006  at  07:59 AM  

  3. If I recall my classes in the Laws of Land Warfare, we could legally put a bullet in the back of each one of these terrorist heads.  Unless things have changed, according to the Geneva Convention these thugs don’t have the protection accorded to POWs.

    Little Johnny Walker should’ve been hanged, and the rest of these Warriors of Faith should have been sent to meet their 72 virgins.

    Posted by MAJ Mike    United States   02/06/2006  at  08:45 AM  

  4. I still want to know if their 72 virgins are virgins forever (because they can’t do anything with them), or if they can “return” their used virgins for fresh ones, or if these 72 virgins are going to make their lives a miserable hell.  It’s hard enough to put up with one screaming wife (if you happen to have one of those) and if you have 72 of them, there’s likely going to be some who are not pleasant all the time.  Come to think of it, they outnumber him 72 to 1, so who’s to say if he is the same there as he is here (after all, their thought is that women are subservient, end of story) that they won’t beat the holy crap out of him every day for eternity?

    Now I’ve done it...I’ve offended their belief.  Are they going to come burn down my house?  I’ll be waiting for them with shotgun in hand.

    Posted by John C    United States   02/06/2006  at  09:39 AM  

  5. “What disappoints me most is the unwillingness of the U.K. government to lift a finger for my brother.”

    Well, allow me finger

    Happy now?

    Posted by StinKerr    United States   02/06/2006  at  09:48 AM  

  6. Did anyone check to see if the BanSheehan was one of those Amnesty goons giving lovin’ to the enemy?

    Posted by shinjinrui    United States   02/06/2006  at  09:51 AM  

  7. Is there any need to check? You just know that she’s gonna get in bed with them too. After all, she’s been jumping from bed to bed for every damn lunatic fringe leftie that has so much as glared at the U.S..

    Posted by StinKerr    United States   02/06/2006  at  12:22 PM  

  8. Re the 72 virgins, just recall the old classic “Star Trek” episode of “Mudd’s Women” with Harcourt Fenton Mudd, and his harem of robotic women. The ST crew created 500 copies of his evil shrew nagging wife (think of it as having to live forever with 500 Hillarys) Perhaps there is a very good reason why these virgins remain as virgins…

    Posted by Rat Patrol    United States   02/06/2006  at  12:38 PM  

  9. (6)nice one stinker LOL

    Posted by bulldog    Europe   02/06/2006  at  02:10 PM  

  10. MAJ Mike-

    It hasn’t changed.  My unit had to have Law of Land Warfare briefing during Decmember drill, and we could do that, but we’re not.  Why?  Because we need to be better than everybody else.  Complete shit if you ask me.

    Posted by U2warrior05    United States   02/06/2006  at  03:20 PM  

  11. We must remember, they aren’t criminals, they aren’t POWs, They are Unlawful Enemy Combatants.  This is what allows us to hold them and not give them anything.  If we didn’t want the intel from them, we should have shot them where they were caught.  save us from having to worry about what they’ll do when we someday let them go. uzi

    Posted by pit638    United States   02/06/2006  at  06:11 PM  

  12. TY bulldog. I aim to please. wink

    Consider it a gesture towards appeasement. LOL

    Posted by StinKerr    United States   02/06/2006  at  06:12 PM  

  13. Yeah, pit638, it’s a damn shame we can’t milk them dry and make them disappear, but we don’t work that way no matter how much easier it would make things.

    If we were the nazis and fascists that some call us it would be an entirely different story, wouldn’t it?

    Posted by StinKerr    United States   02/06/2006  at  06:15 PM  

  14. Well, we could do that after we get what we want from them…

    Posted by U2warrior05    United States   02/06/2006  at  06:18 PM  

  15. They want all the prisoners to be held in Yemen so they can escape by digging a 500 ft tunnel while the guards turn their backs like the USS Cole bomber and some other Al-qaeda members this past weekend

    Posted by Infinity    United States   02/06/2006  at  08:10 PM  

  16. Yeah, it helps to have outside help digging the tunnel from the local mosque to the prison.

    Posted by StinKerr    United States   02/06/2006  at  08:28 PM  

  17. Yes, the law of war still says illegal combatants are to be given a summary court martial , and that the pentalty is still death.

    Amnesty international doesn’t know wtf they are talking about. If the U.S. ‘brings these’ terrorists ‘before proper courts’, as A.I. suggests, most of these guys, according to their highly vaunted ‘international law’, would be put in front of a firing squad.

    Posted by Draven    United States   02/08/2006  at  01:06 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Meanwhile In London ...

Previous entry: Burning Down The House

<< BMEWS Main Page >>