Maybe Later

 

1. The fact that she will not make her record public will be ignored by her staunch supporters.  For that matter, if they were made public and they contained damning information, she would still enjoy their support.  Prior presidential candidates have already proven they can withhold documents and information and still be viable (think John Kerry).  Sure, he was a dirtbag, but did manage to make it to the election and collect a very sizable number of votes.

   Posted by John C       08/15/2007  at  08:35 AM  



2. Here we have the question about Hillary that puzzles me the most.  Time after time, she has hidden bad behavior from her past (The Rose Law firm documents are an excellent example) and yet no one seems to care!  From other actions, it is obvious that she is power hungry and manipulative with little or no actual concern for her constituents or the welfare of the United States.

   Even the L.A. Times raises some important points and seems to understand the problem here.
   
   WHY ARE WE CONSIDERED NUT CASES FOR SEEING THIS AND WANTING A BETTER CANDIDATE?

   Posted by Dr. Jeff       08/15/2007  at  10:13 AM  



3. It’s my understanding that the Hildabeast’s graduate and post graduate dissertations are
   sealed as well (someone correct me if I’m wrong). Maybe I shouldn’t press the issue or my body will be found somwhere as an obvious suicide with a self inflicted bullet wound to the back of the head

   Posted by memoryleak       08/16/2007  at  02:01 AM  



4. Her dissertations should have been published and available.  Has anyone got more information?  My father was a university prof. - I can’t imagine her dissertations not being freely available.

   Posted by Dr. Jeff       08/16/2007  at  02:28 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.