It just keeps getting queerer and queerer

 

1. So, XX:XX or XY:XY would be considered infertile after trying for a year?  Have I missed a new development?  I always thought we could tell such matches at the outset they weren’t going to be reproducing.  Or is the year just to confirm the couple so stupid that withholding fertility services would be somehow inhumane?

   Posted by Mr Evilwrench       04/10/2013  at  09:48 PM  



2. Christopher, Mr. Evil, you’ve found the loophole that will hang them. In an ordinary world that is. In the upside down world we live in, the gov will probably find them all infertile, and rush to spend every last fertility dollar on the alternate pairing people, leaving nothing for those who may have had the possibility of actually breeding.

   OTOH, WTH is government doing having any “fertility money” (by which I mean the ability to spend csah to help those looking to conceive) in the first place? That is not their job.

   Posted by Drew458       04/11/2013  at  06:33 AM  



3. In an ordinary world That is not their job.

   In the upside down world we live in, that has become their job.

   Posted by peiper       04/11/2013  at  10:39 AM  



4. Well, just think of all the new business for Surrogates, and yes I’m being serious about that.
   

   Posted by Rich K       04/11/2013  at  11:07 AM  



5. I feel the queer lot are being used just as the blacks have been by the socialist / new world order (it used to be called serfdom) to undermine society, and they can expect a backlash when people wake up! when I was a kid the oiks went out either paki bashing or queer bashing, I had no idea they were so ahead of their time I just thought they were thugs!

   Posted by Chris Edwards       04/11/2013  at  05:49 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.