Injuries included a broken back and eight broken ribs. And that’s just to start. This is beyond sick
on 08/11/2009 at 01:32 PM
Nuts I’m so screwed up tonight I forgot to mention something else.
The social workers who missed all this (read all of the Mail article please)
have either been suspended or have been canned,
AND THEY ARE NOW SUING THEIR FORMER AGENCY FOR UNFAIR DISMISSAL.They should be skinned, rolled in rock salt, and left in the sun for a few days, but kept alive and awake. Then forced to eat their own genitals, and then hanged.
Speaking as the father of four little boys, I think grayjohn is going to easy on them.
Truly. There should be strong acids and gasoline involved, as well as bolt cutters and long needles.
And the people who killed the baby should get even harsher punishment.
I say light them on fire, and then put it out with an icepick.
Every five minutes.
Boys, boys, boys - how can you be so uncivilized - don’t forget we are now in the era of John Holdren:
“The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being.”
Therefore Ms Connelly & Barker didn’t kill a human being.
What a disgusting story - however in that vast land of real, justice - IL comes this story where a child (4 I think) who was sent to his ‘father’ and his girlfriend/wife due to a court order - who killed him (beat him to death) and blocked the door while police attempted to get into the apartment - so they could clean up the blood (and then claim they don’t know why he suddenly died after falling down) - who were released by the Judge after 30 days - shock probation. . .
Illegitimate births were forced into societal acceptance (don’t be such a religious fanatic to be so cruel to a girl who simply made a mistake). . .
Abortion is forced into societal acceptance (don’t be such a religious fanatic to be so cruel to punish a girl with a baby) . . .
So should we find it so damn hard to accept ‘mothers’ and ‘fathers’ who kill the children whose only existence purpose is to garner welfare and/or child support payments?
[And people have the Audacity of Hope to question why We The People are questioning the Obamacare (section 404 - come into the home and tell you how to raise your children, section 1233 - counsel you on the proper end of life decisions)? It is there in history - both older (Nazi, Communists, Cuba et al) and current (see above) - the steps are there just follow them]
Meanwhile - a nice married couple loose their children based on the complaints of a nosy neighbor or a ‘religious’ stance.
What Britain needs is a cull of people like this! Trouble is that would be about 40% of the population. This is the ultimate result of the welfare state.
The generic type of welfare deadbeat generally exists on a diet of crisps (potato chips), mars bars, fizzy drinks and take away food. They invariably own a big dog, usually a rottweiler. They have generally not held down a steady job and live in council houses or have their rent paid for by the local authority. They all have satellite dishes and have enough money from the state to pay for Sky television subscriptions and they invariably have sufficient cash from the stet to be able to afford to smoke
They supplement their income by working in the black economy or through selling stolen goods. I had the delights of living next door to a family of low lifes like this for five years. They are sterotypical of many welfare claimants it is a way of life now.
The munter who allowed this (Connelly) wants to leave prison and have the state provide her with a new identity. Like the killers of Jamie Bulger she is probably hoping the state will provide her with a new life in Australia.
My solution to this would be to cut welfare to a bare minumum, give them food stamps and make these people do community work. If they refuse then they get nothing and starve. Under the current government nothing will change. They did try and make a start back in 1997 when they were first voted in. Bliar asked an MP called Frank Field to think the unthinkable of welfare reform. He did so they sidelined him. Labour are reliant on these people for much of their support so giving them a hard time would have been counterproductive. Now Britain is broke maybe the Conservatives when they get in next year will do something but I wont hold my breath waiting. There are still far too many bleeding hearts who will go berserk if the idea of food stamps is raised or any attempt made to clean up the current mess is attempted.
Jesus wept. I fear for the future when that kind of brutality can be inflicted on an innocent child and the animals who did it may be allowed to go free in a matter of years and with protection.
For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind: we have allowed this and if we don’t find a way to stop it......
Poor Britain has truly sunk beneath the waves.
08/11/2009 at 06:59 PM
08/12/2009 at 01:08 PM
