BMEWS
 

I’m Mad As Hell ….

 
 


Posted by The Skipper    United States   on 08/25/2004 at 07:04 PM   
 
  1. It just go to show ya how dumb the demicrooks ar,
    Kerry’s shit is so heavy a blind man can see it.

    Posted by Gutterman    United States   08/25/2004  at  07:36 PM  

  2. Why can’t this asswipe just agree with Bush that ALL 527 groups need to be hauled in on a leash and let the candidates discuss issues instead of dirt on each other’s past?

    Uh...Allan...take a pill…

    The 527 groups do NOT need to be ‘hauled in’. There’s still that clause in the 1st Amendment about ‘free speech’. Even the Chairman of the FEC says “I think it’s great we live in a country where 260 average guys can go out and put their point of view out there before the public and influence a major presidential race,’’ Smith said... (source: WorldNetDaily.)

    As for the issues… Kerry has made his four month tour in Vietnam the centerpiece of his campaign. It IS the issue. Remember...Kerry is ‘Reporting for Duty!’ That was at the DNC convention.

    If we can’t trust John ‘Effing’ Kerry to tell the truth about the four months of his life in Vietnam, how can we trust anything he has to say about his plans for the nation?

    Ehhh, Comrade Allan?

    Gotta go, the NRA has a 527 group I want to donate to…

    Posted by Christopher    United States   08/25/2004  at  07:57 PM  

  3. You reached the same conclusion I did, and beat ot to posting by about 30 minutes.

    Damn you.  I wanted to be first! 

    I’m going to pout now.

    Posted by Heartless Libertarian    United States   08/25/2004  at  08:23 PM  

  4. It’s a one way street with Kerry and his crowd and hopefully the American Public can see that.  Why are these poop shoots calling on Bush to condemn the Swift Vets since they said it wasn’t about Bush and wouldn’t listen to him if he did ask them to stop? I believe it’s personal for the Swift Boat Vets.  When Kerry testified of the war atrocities he witnessed, he wasn’t talking about Army Special Forces, Infantry, Rangers, or US Marines.  He had no dealings with them as he was on the river.  He pointed his accusing finger at US Navy personnel who manned the Swift Boats.  They were the ones he was with every day.  They were the ones he bunked with, ate with, and fought with.  They were the ones he accused.

    Posted by Bob    United States   08/25/2004  at  08:31 PM  

  5. Christopher, I can’t speak for Allan but I am going to assume to supports freedom of speech as much as you and I do.

    What I believe he meant is for Kerry to either stop calling for an end to the Swifties’ ads or if he insists they stop then he must insist Soros and those other assholes stop too.

    You can’t have one group shutting down another here.  Either they both stop or both continue but with Kerry shutting the fuck up.

    Posted by Vilmar    United States   08/25/2004  at  08:40 PM  

  6. Kerry is a bad joke and this stuff is not going to save him.

    Posted by Dex    Canada   08/25/2004  at  08:51 PM  

  7. Vilmar, that is exactly what I meant. I support freedom of speech but it’s time for all this shit to stop! Why won’t Kerry call off his 527 dogs of war? Why does he insist on hacking away at the SBVFT and blaming Bush for their ads? GODDAMMIT! I’M MAD AS HELL AT THIS SOB!

    Posted by The Skipper    United States   08/25/2004  at  09:13 PM  

  8. Maybe Tu Ree Zuh can buy John boy a teething ring, he’s acting like a spoiled brat, of course that behaviour started 4 years ago with Gore. Like spoiled brats the rest of the pack picked the mantra and here we are. They act just like those tantrum throwers at the checkout stand that want mommie to buy them candy. They started shit slinging 4 years ago, when rebutted with the truth they behave this way. I for one support the Swift Boat Vets, Kerry you are a traitor and communist collaborator.

    Posted by Jack    United States   08/25/2004  at  09:59 PM  

  9. Kerry can’t stand the heat.  He should get out of the kitchen..  President Bush has had to endure many more attacks on him than Kerry has so far.  IN 200 they started with his National Guard duty and stil won’t let go. they lost the election and still won’t let it go.  They are shwing truly how hypocitical they are on this one and hopefully people will see thru the bullshit spouting out of thier mouthes,

    Posted by Stix    United States   08/25/2004  at  10:55 PM  

  10. Kudos and if you want to REALLY get pissed off,
    visit a site called http://www.quantumphilosophy.net
    ... I’ve been buttin’ heads with that guy for 2
    years.

    Steel

    Posted by Steel    United States   08/25/2004  at  11:50 PM  

  11. if you could would you write yes or no questions that I can send to the Kerry campaingn, I am sure that if we had a top 25 yes or no questions that we could send to the Kerry Institute of camouflauge some one on the campangn would screw up on at least one or two and actualy answer them in a yes or no way....yea I knw this is silly, but please top 25 yes or no questions to ask would be nice, I saw FOIX tonight the idiot Kerry rep could not answer one yes or no questoin, he had to make a speach with each question....dam it...yes or no

    Posted by Sir Knight    United States   08/26/2004  at  12:42 AM  

  12. Just because Mr. Bush repeatedly says he doesn’t have connections to the group, doesn’t mean he doesn’t have connections to the group.  It just means he’s lying.  Which he is.

    In fact, two people on Bush’s campaign have already resigned because of their connection to the group, and there are more to come.

    Of course Kerry doesn’t want to get rid of all 527s.  There’s a difference between wanting to rid a country of free speech and wanting to abolish libelous slander from politics.  SBVFT flat out lie about Kerry’s service, and their own, in an attempt to undercut the man.  Not only was this bullshit pulled on John McCain and Al Gore during the 2000 election, it was also pulled on the governor of Texas in 1995, when Bush sought to unseat her.

    This is how your hero, Mr. Bush works.  Smiles and handshakes up front.  Slander and Libel front groups do the dirty work.

    you know I’m right.

    Posted by instantkevin    United States   08/26/2004  at  12:43 AM  

  13. ok sorry, next time I will speel check, but dam it how hard is it to answer yes or no...was kerry in cambodia?...yes or no...well he was near it he was close he was there ..he was in Viet Nam, he ...whatever was he there yes or no

    Posted by Sir Knight    United States   08/26/2004  at  12:44 AM  

  14. instantkevin, the people who quit for Bush quit so as not to cause contaversy, they quit because they could be linked in a fashion to the swifties, they wanted it to be clean they were not asked to quit they did it to make a clean break with any tie with a 527. Now I ask ya how many of the 527 supporters on the Kerry staff are coming clean...oh yea I forgot ..none, it is ok for moveon.org to be supported by Kerry and his wife, I forgot that it is ok for the dimocrats to do for months what teh swifties have done for days, and the swifties who ARE speaking the truth are tasked????? well now who is tasking the support that Kerry and his wife gave to Moveon.org that for months called Bush Hitler......that makes me Mad do these peons not know history at all to call him Hitler is to slap every man and woman that serves in the US Military

    Posted by Sir Knight    United States   08/26/2004  at  12:53 AM  

  15. LOL instantkevin.

    *Sigh* Your comments aren’t even worth a good fisk, so I’ll just say...take your kerry kool-aid drinking talking points and shove them up, left.

    God! Just once I’d like to hear from a troll with a brain.

    Posted by Phi    United States   08/26/2004  at  01:11 AM  

  16. "You know I’m right”

    I know you’re a fucking mental midget. Even if everything you said about Bush is true, it’s also true of Kerry. Look it up you fucking dupe.

    Posted by Phi    United States   08/26/2004  at  01:13 AM  

  17. TRIPLE POST!!!

    this is a few weeks old, but good for reference anyway.

    Moveon.org 2004 election cycle:
    527 Activity:
    Total Receipts: $9,086,102
    Total Expenditures: $17,435,782

    Swift Vote Veterans for Truth 2004 election cycle:
    527 Activity:
    Total Receipts: $158,750
    Total Expenditures: $60,403

    17.5 million to smear Bush...nothing sticks.

    60 grand from Vets for truth has Kerry shrieking to ban the book, supporters shriek “foul”, his numbers are dropping, and all this going in to the Republican Convention! I smell fear.

    Posted by Phi    United States   08/26/2004  at  01:20 AM  

  18. Hey Phi, what do you have against midgets? InstaKevin suffers from a disease and the
    only cure is a rectal lobotomy OR a cranial
    hemmorhoidectomy. He’ll never see the light
    from where his head is at.

    Posted by Steel    United States   08/26/2004  at  01:52 AM  

  19. First, let me apologize to Heartless Libertarian for beating him/her by 30 minutes...hopefully he/she is done pouting by now…

    Vilmar, I also ‘assume’ that Allan supports free speech. I still disagree with “...calling for an end to the Swifties’ ads or if he insists they stop then he must insist Soros and those other assholes stop too.”
    I don’t call for an end to any of the ads. Let ‘em rip! If they piss me off, my TV has an ON/OFF switch...which I use regularly.

    Allan has weighed in agreeing with Vilmar’s assumption. Allan states: Why won’t Kerry call off his 527 dogs of war? This is a rhetorical question...right? (I still think Allan needs a Valium. He’s too angry over this.)

    To be blunt: If a candidate can ‘call off’ their 527 dogs of war, then the candidate can also call off their blogs of war.

    Allan, Vilmar, will you back down when sKerry attacks you? Will you sit back and accept the premise that you are coordinating with the Bush campaign? Will I?

    Nah. Let the 527 dogs/blogs loose.

    I expect blogs will be attacked as violations of McCain/Feingold shortly. The FEC will weigh in and say that a private blog is a campaign contribution...IF the blog is pro-Republican…

    What was that Chinese curse? Oh yes...’May you live in interesting times.’ I think the blogosphere is coming upon ‘interesting times.’

    Gotta go. I have much work to do on my blog. I want to be charged for violating McCain/Feingold.

    Posted by Christopher    United States   08/26/2004  at  03:12 AM  

  20. This is not the first time Kerry has used disabled vets for his own political ambitions.

    http://www.c-span.org/vote2004/jkerrytestimony.asp

    From Kerry’s 1971 Senate appearance

    “Of course, we don’t have the position of power to get our ideas out. I said, “If I take some crippled veterans doesn’t to the White House and we chain ourselves to the gates, will we get coverage?” “Oh, yes, we will cover that.”

    Pretty sick, no?

    Posted by marc    Europe   08/26/2004  at  04:22 AM  

  21. Next Kerry will send some leukemia stricken Make a Wish kid to go ask W why he took away her chemo. Sending poor dumb Max, his balding pate sizzling in the sun, his fragile stumps displayed for the world to see. Shameful. The press is playing right in to it too.

    I wonder if sending poor old Max Cleland (who happens to be a Bush political appointee)to beg the president for mercy will be Kerry’s “Dukakis Tank Photo” moment. Seriously, why couldn’t Kerry be “Presidential” and call George to just talk it over? Of course I know the answer, political theater at it’s worst, and a fairly shrewd (though weak) attempt to trap the President at best. Bush declines, he’s an asshole. Bush accepts, he looks weak and conciliatory. I think this cheap shot will further damage Kerry’s credibility.

    Posted by Phi    United States   08/26/2004  at  06:34 AM  

  22. Chris,

    I must be blunt.  Is there something about the English language I used that you do not understand?  Must every “I” be dotted and every “T” crossed?

    Allan and I both agree (and yes I had to “assume” he did because I can not speak for him) that 527 groups should be allowed to do what they want.  After all, it is legal.  Remember, we say “YES” to 527s. I will repeat, Vilmar and Allan concur/agree/feel the same/have no disagreement /think alike about 527s

    What we object to is Kerry demanding Republican groups be shut down while allowing his groups to blather on.

    What part of that concept do you find dificult to comprehend?  Or is your version of fairness and free speech one where one group can shut down another?

    You may turn off your TV but you fail to understand the nature of most American voters---they DO NOT turn off their TVs.  At all.  So by default some of the mendacious advertising done by other groups will be absorbed by the idiot public--who, by the way, vote.

    Just like as a blogger you say you will not shut down, why should I as a politician meekly allow my 527s to be shut down without demanding my opponents do the same?

    So again I ask, why is it that I should allow my groups to be shut down while my opponents’ allowed to broadcast his propaganda?  If one shuts down, the other MUST to maintain parity.  It is the same concept used in political advertising and devates by the netwroks.  If one party gets 10 minutes, the other MUST get 10 minutes also.

    Now, have I connected enough of our dots for you?

    Posted by Vilmar    United States   08/26/2004  at  06:49 AM  

  23. Can’t wait for the debates. Dubya is going to kick his ass. The johns won’t be able to hide behind moveon.org and fat ass michael moore on stages with Bush and Cheney. They’re gonna actually have to answer real questions and they won’t be able to. That will be the official END of jF’n kerry’s time in the spotlight. Good freakin’ riddance you dirtbags.

    And for the record.....democratsocialisthandwringinglibs PISS ME OFF....too.

    Posted by Roy    United States   08/26/2004  at  09:33 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Daily Dose

Previous entry: A Question For Kerry Supporters

<< BMEWS Main Page >>