Hillary Says ‘NO’ To Freedom Of Speech

 

1. It sounds like the specimen is nervous and frightened, for reasons best known to herself.

   Good for you, Sean.  Keep up the good fight!

   

   Posted by Tannenberg       06/27/2005  at  11:48 AM  



2. Hillary is for Hillary,; nothing else counts for her.  I hope she is sweating over this book.  I wonder why Cutie Couric is not hosting the author?

   Posted by dick       06/27/2005  at  11:58 AM  



3. Skipper: Did Hillary contact you and pressure you in any way? 

   Hold out for some big money, George Soros is rich.

   Posted by Z Woof       06/27/2005  at  01:19 PM  



4. Compare the reaction to this piece of unsourced trash and inuendo to the reception Kitty Kelly’s unsourced trash and inuendo book about the Bush family received.

   Hint: She was feted on every “news” and talk show that the MSM has.

   Somebody tell me again about the “right-wing-corporate-media-that-controls-everything-we-are-told”.

   I don’t like Hillary and I shiver to think that she even stands a chance at higher office, I despise her plans for a Socialist America, but I don’t like unsubstantiated crap no matter where it is aimed. Give me real, documented facts with which I can oppose her.

   Posted by StinKerr       06/27/2005  at  03:59 PM  



5. Putting OCM and SKerr’s thoughts together, I wonder what she fears?  Perhaps some of the allegations in the book, damning ones, can be documented.  If the whole thing is a bundle of unprovable innuendo, she has nothing to fear and if she can disprove them, the basis for a very high-dollar lawsuit.  Methinks there might be some truth in it somewhere.

   After all, “one of the nation’s best lawyers”, as the MSM said some years ago, shouldn’t be afraid to sue if the facts are on her side.

   Posted by dick       06/27/2005  at  04:34 PM  



6. Dick Morris, who has made a career out of trashing Hillary, said the book was nothing but lies and innuendo.  If he says that, you have to think twice about the value of anything in the book.

   Posted by Phoenix       06/27/2005  at  06:22 PM  



7. The problem with stuff like this is that in some odd way it actually does the subject a favor of sorts. Many of these things go too far. An example would be the constant drumbeat from moveon.org, DU, Michael Moore-on and the like about Dubya.

   They went to extremes and became laughable. Once most of their claims were shown to be ridiculous lies and exaggerations it nullified any real point that they may have had and actually drove an increase in his support. I know it had that effect on me. I’d hate to see this kind of thing work to Shrillary’s favor.

   She needs to be opposed, but the opposition cannont afford to become a shrill grab-at-anything constant refrain. It must be calm and reasoned with a firm foundation of provable fact.

   Posted by StinKerr       06/27/2005  at  06:40 PM  



8. Stin,

   I thought the same thing.  If this book is so awful, it may glean some sympathy for Hillary.  It’s funny the direction outrage will go.  You’re right - opposition must be calm and reasoned and factual.

   Posted by Phoenix       06/27/2005  at  09:21 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.