Hang ‘Em High
on 11/05/2006 at 01:11 PM
We could open the tower, strech him, then let him have lunch with red ken, Ok so he would be 9 foot tall but every one looks down on ken, then back to the river thames to be tied up just as the tide is comming in, thats dreaming
I noticed that the NYTimes calls the cowardly babykiller “Mr. Hussein”. Just goes to show how much respect they have for him. Those effing bastards.
Aidios MoFo. It couldn’t happen to a better SOB.
It hasn’t happened yet, Stan, and that’s the problem.
And it must happen before we pull out of there. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If we leave while Sodomy Hussein is still alive, he will be back in power within a month, and everything we have done since 9/11 goes for lost, and for more than lost. Where will our stature and credibility be after that? We will be the laughingstock of the globe, and worse!
And rest assured that if it would please our enemies abroad, it would please our internal enemies even more. And there is no need to remind anyone of who they are. They do entirely too good a job of reminding us of their identity, day in, day out.
I agree, Skip, it’s past time to knock every leftist appeaser and fifth columnist absolutely shitless. And if nothing happens to be left of them thereafter (as nothing should be), why then, so be it!
PS: Even if the effendis at the NY Slimes show their respect for a friend (meaning, a fellow enemy of GWB) by calling him “mister,” at least they admit that the “insurgency” (or whatever it is) is largely driven by Sodomy Hussein’s supporters!
Ah, I hope we get to see Saddam dance the tyburn jig!
Tannenberg,
Don’t worry about it bud. From what I have read, his appeal won’t last much longer than spring of next year. No matter who wins the election this time around, we are not likely to be out of there by then.
Al-Maliki seems to want him dead as soon as possible and he actually seems to be the one calling the shots over there right now. We can’t have a roadblock unless he approves it. Remember Goering. Saddam’s Tylenol might accidently get mixed up with cyanide sometime in the near future.
The liberals are not in control of Saddam’s fate at the moment. I seem to remember from reading Nicolo Machiavelli, that it is a very bad idea for the new Prince to leave the old Prince alive. I looked for the exact quote, but I am not able to find it at the moment. Perhaps you can help. I am sure that this time honered tradition will be respected.
OK, I have the actual book in my library. It is easier to find what you are looking for with the actual paper pages in front of you, rather than a Google search. The right chapter and verse is: The Prince, Chapter III, Of Mixed Princedoms. Al-Maliki seems to be heeding this advice at this point. I am not real sure that this is going to wind up being a western style democracy if he does, but hopefully we can keep them as a trading partner and get the Hell out of Dodge.
Now I say that those dominions which, when acquired, are added to an ancient state by him who acquires them, are either of the same country and language, or they are not. When they are, it is easier to hold them, especially when they have not been accustomed to self-government; and to hold them securely it is enough to have destroyed the family of the prince who was ruling them; because the two peoples, preserving in other things the old conditions, and not being unlike in customs, will live quietly together, as one has seen in Brittany, Burgundy, Gascony, and Normandy, which have been bound to France for so long a time: and, although there may be some difference in language, nevertheless the customs are alike, and the people will easily be able to get on amongst themselves. He who has annexed them, if he wishes to hold them, has only to bear in mind two considerations: the one, that the family of their former lord is extinguished; the other, that neither their laws nor their taxes are altered, so that in a very short time they will become entirely one body with the old principality.
I appreciate your input, Stan, especially the excerpt from Machiavelli. Sad to say, I have never got around to reading Machiavelli, even after promising myself at least a dozen times that I would do so. I suppose you can’t read everything! Right now I am bogged down on an Andre Norton blitz.
I sincerely hope you are right in supposing that Al-Maliki intends to expedite the process. I will settle for the arsenic-and-old-lace route as readily as hanging. And if Al-Maliki does wrap this matter up as you predict, let no one be surprised when the so-called “insurgency” loses a lot of its punch.
PS: Would that we had followed Machiavelli’s advice after the 2000 election!
You should read him sometime. “The Prince” is only 86 pages long. I reread it again last night. Calling somebody “Machiavellian” has a negative shading to it, but he really did have a keen insight into conquest and politics.
It would behoove our President to follow Nicolo’s advice a little more closely on occassions.
The fleabitten ratbag had earlier asked, no, demanded that he face the firing squad, as it was a death suitable for a “military hero”. No, he should have the medeival version of hanging by the neck until dead, and that could take hours or even days. Let the ravens peck out his eyes, the red ants chew on his genitals, and wild dogs gnaw at his feet. What goes ‘roud comes ‘round, and he has a huge karmic debt to pay… Satan is already stoking the fires of hell and preparing a particularly nasty sulfur pit just for ole Saddam, who will fry for an eternity.
What is an eternity, you ask… Just imagine a little tiny sparrow, which once a year flies to the top of Mount Everest, to sharpen its beak. The amount of time that sparrow would take to wear Everest down to a grain of sand, is but a second in eternity… As the freakizoid radicals of the “peace and love” 1960s once said: Burn, baby, burn
11/05/2006 at 03:41 PM
