You bet! Warp their little minds at an early age and they’ll feel guilty for even being alive!!
What a load of horse crap!
Eyuk!
This is.. unbelivable. And this is supposed to be a frugging CHILDREN’S SITE!
Ok, I can understand the need to protect the enviroment, and to conserve our resources. However, this is just beyond the pale. I support the idea of conserving the enviroment by increasing the efficiency of our technology and trying to strike a balance between the needs of the human race and how much strain we put on our natural resources. It seems like these guys are dropping such a difficult and complicated system in favor of simply “disposing of” those who have outlived their “share” of the planet’s resources.
I can only say that this reminds me of two movies I have recently seen. The first is Logan’s Run.
The second is Life is Beautiful. Specifically the “math problem” mentioned at the dinner.
Chilling.
Today, it may be merely be an unsettling feature on a website. Tommorow, it may STILL be that.
But next year?
Even worse is a quote from the horrifying but insightful butcher of the USSR, Vladimir Illych Lenin.
“Give me a year to teach the children and the he seed I have planted with never be removed.”
God help us all.
I love it - the religious ‘right’ (i.e. fundamentalists) can mention armageddon, the rapture and/or end times - and be branded nuts forever. These people intentionally warp kids toward hating their parents, hating their livestyle and hating themselves - and hey they are the ‘good guys’ simply because they have good intentions.
Such utter bs and hypocrisy.
I wonder if it ever backfires. You know, “Planet Slayer? Can I get a Death Star of my very own? COOL!!!!”
Actually what it reminds me of is an article I’ve only seen in the front pages of “The Poor Man’s James Bond Vol. I” titled, “Carrying Capacity as an Ethical Concept.” About how if the inefficiency of a people’s tech and culture is causing them to live beyond the carrying capacity of their land, and they are therefore starving, feeding them does them no favors. It just means there will be a larger population to starve NEXT year. In order to actually solve the problem, you have to show them how to adjust their tech and culture so as to increase the carrying capacity of their land. Kinda like the Californians did when they decided they could use electricity to make water, and ended up growing grapes and Christmas trees in the desert.
But of course, that assumes that it’s possible for technology to solve a problem rather than just contributing to or causing it, so you’ll never see a reference to anything like that on THAT kind of website.
Freakin Luddite idiots.
What all you deniers don’t understand is Global Warming, and all other social and ecological problems of the world, are caused by Rich Americans! (Cue sinister organ fanfare: Da-da-da-daaa!)
Oops. Allow me to correct that; Rich White Americans!
The only way to expiate your overwhelming guilt is to vote Marxist, preferably black Marxist. And turn all your 401k assets over to Al Sharpton or Louis Farakhan. Adopt two families of illegal aliens to live in your house with you.
(Don’t you feel better already just knowing that?)
I Did my part.. I should die at 1.1 LOL.. weird how if your majority of air travel is for work, it rates it higher..I would think if your air travel was 0% for work I.E 100% for Pleasure that it should rate you as more of a hog.. guess everybody should just quit working and fly everywhere so they are less of an energy hog.. is that the idea it is trying to promote????? still stupid
and how come 0% car usage paid for by work and Fuel Guzzler = less Tonnes CO2 then I Don’t Usually use a car? seems flawed…
Hurray for junk science!
I went in and looked at the “science” behind the results… According to their brand of methodology, the world is flat, Leprechauns are real, and televisions are Maaaaagic!
These people deserve the golden moonbat award with diamond flourishes, and Doctor Marvelo’s Hypno-glasses for excelence in brainwashing, along with most school districts.
Bah, I feel sorry for kids who are growing up now.
Bill
Oh, just played with it again.. If I set everything for it’s worse, YET I invest in green schemes, and environmentally correct investments, I make up for ALL my sins! Wheee!
JUNK SCIENCE!
Bill
for more fun check out this is your lifestyle game at same site
http://www.abc.net.au/science/planetslayer/tiyl.htm
go tell kids they suck because they aren’t good environmentalists.. good idea…
err huh? Going through it I was about expecting, 1 prompting me if you were to commit suicide would you choose to slash your wrists, use a pistol or by carbon monoxide in the Garage.....
sorry I’d much rather use a paper towel then a hair dryer to dry my hands and then have to use my shirt to finish drying them.. only have come across a few hand blowers that do much to dry hands in a hurry..
ohh and the 7 questions on this is your life seem to be random.. this time it is asking me about cotton nappies(Diapers) or disposables for 1 of the questions… Hmm which 1 would contain their crap better.. maybe thats how i should choose LOL
Well at least they dont go offending their viewers.. Beer is the correct choice between Wine and Beer for environmental cost..although with most of the site seeming to be geared toward children the alcohol and nappies questions seem out of place
Junk Science, I say!!!
It looks like it was put together by someone who was pulling their data out of their asses!
bah