Gay rights campaigner led a double life as leader of paedophile ring.
on 05/13/2009 at 12:28 PM
Filthy bastards, this is where a hanging rope would be usefull, also just why are they allowed to serve in solitary? perhaps a life of “could you pick up my soap please??"would cause some education.
On a similar note, some years back the kindly Americans sent our dept of justice hundreds of names, including some high profile members of the church and politics, all we saw was a very high profile arrest of one of the Who (I think it was Entwhistle who wrote Tommy and was researching peadophiles) what happened to the rest??Posted by Chris Edwards
05/13/2009 at 06:33 PM
Chris: It wouldn’t be that kind of life for them. People who sexually abuse children don’t last very long in the general prison population. The other prisoners find them to be just as reprehensible as the rest of us do, but they’re not quite as constrained by rule of law in dealing with them, and are quite willing to remove them from the gene pool.
Since it would be tyrannical of the state to look the other way and allow these prisoners to be murdered at the hands of other prisoners (guards are NOT executioners unless duly empowered by the courts in certain cases, and they’re certainly not torturers - this is NOT some backwater despotic hellhole like Iran), these prisoners are kept in solitary confinement.
Myself, I would prefer due process end up in the legitimate application of the death penalty as this ensures no re-offense occurs. We know from the past that this of sexual child abuser can’t be rehabilitated. That was dangerous wishful thinking coming from the bleeding-heart portion of our society. May they be soundly slapped for that, but that’s a rant for another day.
Unfortunately, we seem to have gotten mighty squeamish about justly using the death penalty as of late. Where death is not an option, I’m actually okay with solitary confinement. Isolation can be its own very terrible fate. In many cases, death would be kinder.
"It may be ‘normal’ for them but I’m unconvinced as ever that it doesn’t fly in the face of nature.”
It is not a normal condition at all. At least by my definition of what “normal” is. My definition is; any attribute, behavior, characteristic, trait; any inter-personal/intra-personal action, and interaction that ensures the short and long term survivability of the individual and the species.
After I came up with a definition, I then came up with what I call the 0-100-1000 test. So let’s look at blindness for example. Many would say that because millions are blind that that is a normal condition. They confuse frequency of occurrence with an actual normal condition. So let’s run it through the 0-100-1000 test. If 0% of the population were blind, would man still be around 1000 years from now? Yes would be the correct answer here. If 100% of the population (and progeny) were blind would there be people 1000 years from now? Very, very doubtful.
Now run the test with homosexuality. Yes, I know because of scientific advances that babies could still be produced through in-vitro fertilization, but that would not be able to sustain a population base with which to maintain a viable “infrastructure” population. 1000 years from now there would be a planet Mankind free.
Just as we wouldn’t kick the white cane from a blind man because he is not “normal”, we shouldn’t mistreat, discriminate etc, homosexuals. BUT, just as you wouldn’t give a blind man a drivers license, why give homosexuals a marriage license?
Sorry, this may be a little off topic concerning the sicko, but I’m tired of the presses push to normalize something that clearly is not normal.It is my opinion that these persons are merely missing trace metals in their bloodstreams. This can be cured you know! High velocity injection of copper and lead will correct this problem.
If you do not wish this course, there is an alternative. Castration and release. With a chainsaw.Argentum, I realise that what you say should be right, but as the state looks the other way all the time and from where I stand neither the state , the law or the church have any morals or consience so I personaly believe that anyone who violates anothers human rights should forfeit most of theirs. Some years back one of these filth was found in the morning, in solitary,top security 23 hour lockdown and he appears to have removed the batteries from his stereo, put them in a sock and beaten his brains out of the back of his head, an enquiry found no evidence of collusion between the warders and the inmate who proudly owned up to it ( he was a multiple lifer and claimed the high security, can only be opened by remote warders was just open, as was his) the Lord Chief Justice had just been changed and the outgoing one made a statement that it was sad that a murderer who had scant regard for human life, both out and inside prison had higher standards than the current house of commons (both sides)
So for me when there are no doubts that a queer, child diddling sadistic shitbag should not be allowed solitary and the inmates should use and abuse as they see fit, this would result in a precipitous drop in the pastime of abusing kids, actually perhaps applying an opposite sex rule would help those poor gender confused deviants.Posted by Chris Edwards
05/14/2009 at 06:16 PM
I’ve asked this question for years. Never an answer.
“What’s so ‘gay’ about being queer?”
Gay implies happy and carefree. (as in “We’ll all have a gay old time!” as the old Flintstones cartoons said.)
I’ve yet to meet such a homosexual. The one I did know who came close to that died of AIDS when he was 35.
Homosexuality is just another facet of the death culture. Islam is also such a facet.
Rock on Christopher! also why the pride about hiding behind an assumed inapt word?? having known a fair few homosexual folk, of both flavours it seems to be the males who mis-use the gay name, most women I met used the lesbian name I hate to be fair but the male terms are not quite"nice" allthough I have met some eccentrics who liked to call themselves queer! I have no worries about homosexuality but I feel it should be a discrete life choice, sadly it is heavily connected with illegal perversions, corruption, children and all things bad, dont get me started on advertising it in schools!!
Posted by Chris Edwards
05/14/2009 at 10:33 PM
Corsair. Right. That’s what I was trying to say. It isn’t normal at all. But they sure work hard at trying to convince us it is. But they see it as such. And to prove it they hold parades and tell us all how proud they are. Sometimes I wonder if maybe they aren’t trying very hard to convince themselves. What’s ta be proud of?
As for this group of sickos ... not enough words. And I would not bet that their jail time will be as long in reality as the sentence given at trial. Which reminds me. Trial. Why, for gosh sake. Why a trial for these monsters? There aren’t any open questions re. guilt.
Authorities have em dead to rights.Dollars to doughnuts that the press will slowly mute the fact that the victims were male or the pictures were of boys and only report on the pedophilia portion of the cases. Just like they did a few years ago when they “covered” the Catholic priests’ abusing chior boys. The important part was that they were priests. The fact that they were also homosexuals apparently wasn’t worth the ink.
05/14/2009 at 08:20 AM
