BMEWS
 

Dog Abuse

 
 


Posted by Yellow Dog    United States   on 04/19/2005 at 01:47 PM   
 
  1. One too many canine copulations, I guess.

    Posted by Yellow Dog    United States   04/19/2005  at  02:55 PM  

  2. I saw this and thought “Hmmm, I didn’t know she joined the circus!”

    Found on imdb.com something that may explain her bizarre behavior:

    Was lesser known in the 1980s as ‘Little Opal’ on “Pee-wee’s Playhouse”

    Posted by itismedavid    United States   04/19/2005  at  03:09 PM  

  3. S he must be one sick puppy.........

    Posted by Dottie    United States   04/19/2005  at  03:18 PM  

  4. Dottie,

    We both reside in the same city as the BMEWS Master - and are apparently going to get some fairly interesting weather tomorrow.

    ...and that comment is really gnawing at me.

    Posted by Cheese_tensor    United States   04/19/2005  at  03:37 PM  

  5. Somebody needs to lock her makeup away.. and order it only to be put on by professionals.. maybe she bought the clown makeup by accident that time.. didnt think you could actually look worse with makeup but looks like she managed to do it there.

    Posted by Infinity    United States   04/19/2005  at  03:43 PM  

  6. Cheese - you are here in St.L? Woof, woof, ggggggrrrrrrrr

    Posted by Dottie    United States   04/19/2005  at  03:59 PM  

  7. Dottie,

    Yep. St. Bernard....er...Charles, actually.

    Posted by Cheese_tensor    United States   04/19/2005  at  04:32 PM  

  8. Infinity,

    I guess pooches aren’t very picky.

    Seriously, from the article I gather that this babe is not someone you want to party with if there’s an overabundance of alcohol. She might do your sofa. You could have nauga-kids.

    But something about her cleavage did remind me that the BMEWS Master has not put in an appearance (at least not in his usual - uh - guise) in days.

    Posted by Cheese_tensor    United States   04/19/2005  at  04:48 PM  

  9. Rabid animals of all descriptions some in every shape and form.

    The trend is that these Hollywierd individuals get away with so much more than the common person it is disgusting. When you look at the influence they have on their fans, the penalties should be as high as their salaries.

    Posted by Apathy or freedom    New Zealand (Aotearoa)   04/19/2005  at  06:12 PM  

  10. *some should be *come......darn not enough sleep again

    Posted by Apathy or freedom    New Zealand (Aotearoa)   04/19/2005  at  06:13 PM  

  11. I am going to go out on a limb and say I like the eye make up.  But, you know, I think not everybody would agree about that and that’s fine.

    The “copulate with the neighbor’s dog” link does not work for me, so I just googled her name and “dog” and came up with this

    at E! on line

    Apparently she was not really trying to screw the neighbor’s dog, but was quite out-of-line.  ‘sold news too - that E! on line thing was from December last year.

    Hollywood types, you know…

    Posted by ztucka    United States   04/19/2005  at  06:31 PM  

  12. Tweak, you are wrong about the canine copulation. She has been accused of that. This is from the link I referenced above.

    Lyonne racked up charges for criminal mischief, harassment and trespassing after she purportedly went postal on her New York neighbor, ripping a mirror off the woman’s wall and threatening to sexually molest her dog.

    As for the eye makeup, you have been spending too much of your time with hookers. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that.)

    Posted by Yellow Dog    United States   04/19/2005  at  06:53 PM  

  13. By the looks of her I am sure she could find ways to sexually molest the dog without copulating with it.  So you were technically incorrect, Stan, although the difference for her between copulation and other forms of molestation would probably be about 2 margaritas.  LOL

    Is that libel?  Do I care?

    Posted by Illegitimi Non Carborundum    New Zealand (Aotearoa)   04/19/2005  at  09:08 PM  

  14. You shouldn’t mate...after all she’s just another Hollywood SLUT to me!

    Posted by Macker    United States   04/20/2005  at  12:51 AM  

  15. In re post #15 - AY CARAMBA!

    Posted by ztucka    United States   04/20/2005  at  06:58 AM  

  16. I liked the term ‘copulate’. The website quote mentions going postal.

    I object.

    Postal workers never find dogs sexually attractive. Yes, I know, some of us are married to CENSORED

    Regardless, we don’t doggiestyle  them, we just stomp all over them…

    Gotta scrap the chihuahua off my boots… cool hmm

    Posted by Christopher    United States   04/20/2005  at  09:35 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Tom DeLay – The Sharks Are Circling

Previous entry: Fire! Fire!

<< BMEWS Main Page >>