Dirty Election?

 

1. Drew, I’ve heard that, since the NYS BOE did not certify the election yet, that Owens would have to step aside if Hoffman actually gets more votes than Owens.  In any event, what it will do is guarantee that Owens gets far fewer votes next year, as a lot of those people who voted for him--and find out that their victory was a fraud--won’t vote for him next year, but will instead vote for Hoffman.  (Then again, Owens will probably lose to Hoffman anyway next year.)

   Posted by BlueStateSaint       11/12/2009  at  07:29 PM  



2. Keep frakking up Demo☭rats...and in 2010, your losses could approach 100 SEATS!...as painful as your actions continue to be.

   Posted by Macker       11/13/2009  at  06:20 AM  



3. Vote outcomes based on the word “likely” have turned into god damned circuses.

   Here’s my suggestions to all candidates running for election in future: 

   1.  Be patient.  Once the votes are starting to be counted, keep your head ducked low and let the people counting and certifying do their jobs.
   2.  DO NOT CONCEDE EARLY.  Seriously, what does doing so gain you?
   3.  STOMP your opponent hard in public if they try to take office prior to the vote being certified.
   4.  Revisit (1) again.  Extra added advantage, it’ll piss the liberal media off when they can’t use you for the latest “if it bleeds, it leads” coverage-that-sucks.

   Posted by Argentium G. Tiger       11/13/2009  at  07:08 AM  



4. Was Hoffman’s campaign infiltrated by covert ACORN workers?

   Posted by harleycowboy58       11/13/2009  at  08:19 AM  



5. I think that We The People should quietly send ‘notes’ to every single one of our Representatives that 1) if the DNC is going to lie and cheat to steal elections - all of the legislation passed in this the least ethical 111th Congress should be declared null and void, 2) Owens and Hoffman should demand a complete recount and Owens should be ‘un-sworn’ in and stand aside until such recount is done and NY declares the winner and 3) that every bill from now on in the least ethical 111th Congress should be a stand alone bill, posted on the Internet for a full 2 weeks prior to an open and full reading in the House or Senate, debated upon and then voted on - or it will be declared null and void.

   It is obvious with the Franken/Coleman debacle and now this - that the DNC intention all along was to steal enough elections to force Obamacare through so that they could wrest enough control to be knight the new Father Barack of the 21st Century.

   God Help America.

   Posted by wardmama4       11/13/2009  at  08:22 AM  



6. IMHO, this means the “passage” of the Intolerable Act is null and void and must be recalled.

   Rotten bastards.

   Just like Franken, they’ll keep mysteriously “finding” more ballots until they put the AINO* over the top. 

   DD

   “AINO"== American In Name Only—aka commu-crat.

   Posted by Dedicated_dad       11/13/2009  at  06:40 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.