BMEWS
 

Democratic Party Lunacy, Parts I and II

 
 


Posted by The Skipper    United States   on 07/28/2006 at 09:50 AM   
 
  1. ...black evil little heart
    but don’t forget her tiny mind…
    She said ...Greenland’s massive icecap is liquefying with unexpected speed....
    A couple years ago a team went to Greenland to recover a P-38 that landed in Greenland ~1944.  They found it 250 ft. under the ice.  The plane didn’t sink; the snowpack rose that much in the last 60 years.

    Posted by dick    United States   07/28/2006  at  11:38 AM  

  2. I hope that it gets 1 vote - hers (but of course with the Dems, Al Bore, Bill Clinton and JFK will also cast a vote) - so it will get 4 votes.

    I think that if we ended 50% (I’d vote for 100 but lets give them something) of all entitlement programs, do away with stupid laws like this one, deport any and all illegal immigrants, end all earmarks (good, bad and stupid) and cut the tax rate to a flat one - - within 10 years America would be an uber-economy and the deficit would not be a threat to my great, great, great grandchildren’s grandchildren.

    Notice that the dems screed on and on about the evil oil companies but the culprets in stealing zillions from Americans the pharma corps are given a pass for their stupid and deadly drugs for non-diseases while trying to funnel millions into a fake junk weird science project gone nowhere (embryonic stem cell research).

    If it’s worthless, stupid or a way to steal more money from Americans - you can bet the Dems will latch onto it.

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   07/28/2006  at  01:23 PM  

  3. How about, let’s shut down Washington DC?  They contribute more hot air and gas emmissions than all of the new cars produced in the last decade.  I’m so sick of these idiots screeching on and on about all of these “problems” we have to fix when most of these “problems” were created by them in the first place. 

    And Bolton?  He’s smarter than most of them put together and they know it and just can’t stand it.

    Posted by John C    United States   07/28/2006  at  05:19 PM  

  4. What if she issued a mandate, and nobody came?

    If she issues a mandate, will he be gay?

    Isn’t mandate sexist?

    Seriously, tho, what I’d like to see is not some frivilous mandate, rather, let’s see a specific plan, and method and means, to achieve that mandated goal. You know, stuff like,

    1) Shut down all coal fired power plants.

    2) Permit vehicles onto the public roads only on alternate days based on license plate numbers, i.e. plates ending in even numbers on even days, odd numbered plates on odd days.

    3) Forbit farting from sunup to sunset.

    Come on, Nancy, details, here babe, details!

    Posted by Rickvid    United States   07/28/2006  at  05:44 PM  

  5. Rickvid - the dems can’t do details - someone might actually hold them too ‘em. Great list, how about

    1) Dems can only bloviate on tv once a week, in odd # months?

    2) Dems stop issuing a ‘Democratic’ response (usually by more than one Dem) to every speech, plan, or idea promoted by anyone not a Dem.

    3) The old warbeast Helen Thomas be removed from the White House - comeon she’s been there since Washington, the dame needs a rest - and it would certainly cut down noxious emissions in DC by ten fold.

    4) Pelosi, Murtha, Kerry, Kennedy, Clinton, Boxer, McKinney, Jefferson and Reid must draw straws to see who comments that month - none of the others are allowed to speak.

    5) All monies for campaigns must be raised in the state one is running in to represent - that will cut an immense amount of travel that the Hildabest alone does to get $s from all over the country

    And yes, mandate is sexist - it must be persondate? goddessdate? or call it what it really is - garbage and meaningless.

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   07/29/2006  at  08:16 AM  

  6. Wardmama, number 5 is something that my father has long said should happen.  Money can only be raised and spent in the district a person represents.  The rule should apply to everyone who runs for office.  No more getting money from people and groups in California to win a New York race, etc.  It will never happen.

    Posted by John C    United States   07/29/2006  at  12:29 PM  

  7. But the scientific evidence of global warming is overwhelming

    Only in Al Bore’s pointed little head, Nancy!  crazy

    Posted by memoryleak    United States   07/30/2006  at  11:55 PM  

  8. No no, it is overwhelming… in DISproving it.

    RH

    Posted by RobertHuntingdon    United States   07/31/2006  at  04:45 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Media Morons, Parts I And II

Previous entry: Keep The Penny

<< BMEWS Main Page >>