Demands?

 

1. If we disregard this “demand,” what penalty can they enforce?--other than a continued horde of transient riffraff assaulting our borders?  And we are going to get that anyway, from all appearances.

   “Give me your poor, your hungry, your downtrodden” DOES NOT mean “Give me your scum of the earth!”

   Who do these diplomats think they are?  Ribbentrop?  They had better STFU before more than a few of us decide to take them seriously!

   

   Posted by Tannenberg       01/10/2006  at  07:45 AM  



2. US to Mexico: [color=red]F**K YOU!

   Posted by Macker       01/10/2006  at  08:14 AM  



3. Perhaps we should “demand” a ten acre parcel of Mexican territory for each and every border crosser. Make it retroactive.

   U.S. to mexico: Chinga su madre.

   Posted by Rat Patrol       01/10/2006  at  09:10 AM  



4. With balls like that, you’re dumbfounded before angry.  The only permanent solution is for Mexico to get its together politically and economically.  How and when that happens I have not a clue.

   Posted by Oink       01/10/2006  at  03:16 PM  



5. If we let them, our Senate will be trying to appease and emulate the arrogance of our leftist friends this February. You all know the drill.

   Posted by utahminuteman       01/10/2006  at  03:49 PM  



6. Nuts to those demands.  Just don’t let them cross over to here without our permission.

   Posted by Officer Pupp       01/10/2006  at  06:58 PM  



7. Answer to Mexico: I learned this in the Marine Corps, but it seems to be popular now.

   “Hey, Amigo, try this experiment: 1. Demand in one hand 2. in the other”

   “Now, tell me, which one filled up quicker?”

   Posted by Oink       01/10/2006  at  08:01 PM  



8. Time for some regime change down ‘ol Mexico way amigos! 

   Posted by rudebadger       01/11/2006  at  10:05 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.