The Scots, back in the mid-1600’s, when facing interference in their religious institutions from Charles I of England, had a defiant slogan backed up with sharp weapons.
The call went up, “No king but Christ! No lord but God!”
When a British army showed up to enforce Charles’ policies, the Scots rallied and kicked them back to the south.
This is a lesson worth remembering.
Yet there are freaks right here in our own country who claim that this is already happening!
MAJ MIKE, it wasent the British army it was the English army, go read what a fucking pain in the ass scotland was to england, banock burn i think was where they defeated the English, i should know this stuff my dad is scotish
and ive been there loads of times, being born in London im ENGLISH, but very proud of my tartan, sorry but i still find the scotish a pain in the ass, blair and brown, EG in a pub in london all you hear from a scot is how greate scotland is
if its that greate fuck off back there then, and take g galloway with you
they later got some sence and joind the union,and look what a greate flag it made
MAJ MIKE, braveheart is full of crap, its hollwierd stuff,
Yeah, our “free press” only censors itself and it’s enemies.
Bulldog—never mentioned Braveheart.
Believe it was the “Convenanteers”—Scottish Protestants who resisted Charles’ attempt to make the Scottish Church more like the Anglician Church in the south.
Charles was King of both England and Scotland. You’re right it was an English army in that this occured about 40 years prior to the Act of Union that abolished the Scottish monarchy and Parliment thus uniting all of the
However, I belive that the events did occur as I said.
IT MIGHT NOT BE TOO BAD if the Spit* MSM Spit* was controlled like that for about a week!!!
Not that cut and dry though MAJ the scots had an alince with the french to. the refrence to bravehart was the war cry bit, the big bad english bulling our poor little scotch neighabours and all that, why do you think the romans built that wall? to keep the mad bastards out thats why, still give it another 100 years maybe less and you will have bars full of mexicans telling you how great mexico is, oh sorry its going on now
saying that what have the mexicans ever invented? you need to get that wall built,
before they take over your airwaves, my point is how do those poor bastards in n korea know whats going on, they have been fed this shit for years, the UN makes me more sick than red ken,not preventing not helping just sitting there like vulturs, watching the USA waiting for you to fuck up and as for the msn well, you need an army to sort shit out, scotland then, iraq now, as far as im concerned GW is god, with bigger balls, and no i dont care how mutch gas costs, or your job loses ect in the USA,when he comes on tv and says we are winning that war in afganistan and iraq i beleave him, and now the Brits have got control in afganistan im just going to relax and make GW dance http://www.dancingbush.com/
The US press is far from the most free, as the yearly review that the same commitee that wrote this list will tell you. There are far less well-armed populaces in Scandinavia that have fewer restrictions on their press than the US does.
What should be keeping politicians honest is that the people that go into politics—real, grassrots people—are honest themselves. The problem is that we’re too kind to our politicians, and we vote for them even if they don’t do what we ask, inappropriately spend our money, etc.
A well-armed populace is what sets a democracy in motion in most cases. After that, it’s up to our political power—voting—and our decency as people that should keep the government in check. If your government has gotten to the point where you have to bear arms against it, your political process was either flawed, or insufficiently participated in.
Your press isn’t free, but for now, it’s free enough. You just have to make sure to defend it properly. (And for the record, I know that my press isn’t that much freer—but it’s also ‘free enough’.)