Cat out of bag, running
World Poverty can never be solved, except by utterly brutal and complete genocide. As soon as you give poor countries food and money, they breed themselves poor again. If you really want to stamp out world poverty and world hunger, then you have to kill all the poor people. That’s the only way that will work. 60 years of international aid hasn’t lifted the poor in Africa or South America as much as an inch. They are still poor, still hungry, still disease ridden. Except that there are a lot more of them now than in 1949.
I am not calling for such an action. It is an abhorrent idea. But it is the only idea that will ever work. You have two kinds of people in the world: those who contribute to the global economy, and those who depend on the charity of that economy. Think it through yourself. Now mix that awareness with this not-so-secret push for One Worldism, and add in a big dose of Obama’s reality of Universal Health Care. Bottom Line: the World Gov will solve poverty in the draconian manner. And they’ll “solve” every other problem or objection to their rule the same way.
Have I gone nuts, or have I finally seen through the fog? If you think “nuts” is the answer, recall super-leftist hippie-mummy Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s remark the other day about abortion - it’s a form of eugenics she’s all in favor of, because it limits the number of “undesirables”. Yeah, and for 8 solid years we had to hear every single day that it was Bush who was a Nazi.
Ein volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer. Does kind of ring a bell.
Undesirables… the meaning has changed. Ginsburg is talking about conservatives and christians.
I think what Drew had in mind might have been, Gorbel Governance. Maybe.
We are the world 10 years? Don’t think so. Been going on longer then that. You’d have be at least my age to recognize the signs earlier.
It wasn’t too long after coming here to Blair’s (now Brown’s) politically correct, socialist thinking paradise, that I began to read about the EU and then I began to worry about something similar that my own country could get caught up in. And Drew nailed it.
Then reading things from here as opposed to just the stuff I was exposed to in the states, I got very worried. Especially when I listened to or read Americans who think the one world we are all brothers after all, was the way to go. Whoa. That didn’t sound too good.
Oh sure in theory the idea that everyone wants the same thing looks great. ON PAPER.
On paper Communism and Fascism may appear reasonable. Till put into practice. The problem is they never take human nature into account. But the social engineers think they can bend and warp human nature into what they believe it ought to be.I think our founding fathers knew a bit more about human nature and so gave Americans the Right to keep arms. And carry them.
World Poverty can never be solved
That line reminded me.
This will surprise all I think.Headline in a paper this past week that said Obama gave a speech in Africa, in which he told his audience they must stop blaming their plight on America and start looking at themselves for the causes of misery.
That really did floor me. I didn’t think he’d really say something like that out loud. Did You? And did he really? Had too much happening here and never saved the paper.
Amazing how one word can let you know what the entire mindset of a bureaucracy is:
Prime Minister Harper (2:31) “We have to be able to allow institutions that are particularly badly run to fail without having systemic failure.” Most people will let this slide by as “reasonable”. If you did allow for systemic failure, that way lies anarchy and no government willingly goes there.
He could have used a different phrase, that of a man who is willing to act and work to prevent a financial catastrophe: “We must not stand by and do nothing.”
But he didn’t use that phrase, he used a word: ”Allow”. It speaks of a government that thinks it is in, or should be in complete control of EVERYTHING, where it permits/allows any and all actions. This is the real problem with Canadian Government regardless of the party in power: They’ve never met a law/regulation they didn’t like. If it means more control over the individual, they’re for it.
Global governance with Canada as part of the controlling body? They’ll go for that in a heartbeat, and we’ll all be sold down the river.
Two words: Arm up.
While I am not ready to panic over this yet (the Left is far less desperate, less intelligent, and less experienced than the Russians, the Islamists, and the Chinese, after all), it is telling that somebody can actually say this and get away unsinged by the implications.
Newsflash, people: The great experiment in benign global governance has- by and large- already happened. It was called the League of Nations. I think we all know what happened to THAT.
The fact is that history has shown that large-scale attempts at governance usually fall victim to inefficiency, corruption, and the critical flaw of trying to appease the very people you should be punishing (can you IMAGINE how long a bill on Tibet or Georgia would last on the floor before getting blown up by the Russians or Chinese? I’m betting around 10 SECONDS).
And now we are talking about giving yet MORE power to these people to persecute the most Quixotic quest that any modern organization has ever undertaken in the modern era(and given some of these Organizations and their goals, that is saying SOMETHING)?
Newsflash: Climate Change is hardly unprecedented, and particularly on this scale. Now, if things were to either to rapidly shoot up or down, THAT would be a problem that would be worth discussing. But right now, hardly.
I wonder what the bastards in the caves of Pakistan, in the Kremlin, in the CCP parties, or in the Juche Temple/Presidential Palace/Kim Il Sung memorial museum are thinking of us right now.
At least the League of Nations could get within the NEIGHBORHOOD of the correct action.
Posted by Turtler
07/14/2009 at 05:49 PM
"Climate Change” is a natural cycle. Ask any reputable geologist. It’s bull, and they know it, but it gives them a “crisis too good to waste”.
07/14/2009 at 03:59 AM
07/14/2009 at 07:50 AM
Next entry: A different, darker kind of gun porn
Previous entry: Pushing the Limits