Britain should get rid of the monarchy, says UN (Well SCREW the UN)
on 06/13/2008 at 10:24 AM
What do you need a written constitution for at this point? You’ve got the EU surrender document; that’s enough isn’t it?? Or is the UN just pushing you to draw one up ... in arabic?
Must? I beg your ^%#$@#@*( pardon? MUST?!?
Actually, this is a GOOD thing. I mean, if you ever wanted to manufacture an excuse to punt the gang of wannabe dictators at the UN, what more could you ask for? They have called for a regime change in Great Britain!!!
How about a motion to end the monarchy in Saudi Arabia? Or the (functional) monarchy in Cuba?
I think the United Kingdom should keep the monarchy - at their pleasure - and get rid of the United Nations. And I think the United States should do the same in ‘solidarity’ with our British bretheren and sistern.
Once again, the UN shows itself to be a hypocritical pack of sleazeballs. And I cleaned that up because this is a family website.
I call for the UNoHWN, the United Nations of Honest White Nations. It’s what the UN should have been in the beginning. It’s what the League of Nations tried to be. Unfortunately, membership today would be open to 3 or 4 countries at the most. It would be UNknown.
Boy howdy, was that a politically incorrect thing to say, or what?
Well, for what it is worth, the British have my permission to bomb the UN at any time!
Hopefully while the wretched scum and villains are there!
Posted by Randy in Arizona
06/13/2008 at 05:38 PM
My question is when are they gonna be installing the minarets at Buckingham Palace and Windsor with the resultant calls to prayer? It’s obvious that Europe and Great Britain are parts of the great unwashed dhimmitude sought so long for by the muzzies.
As far as the UN goes, it’s past time that a referendum was held in the US and UK if we want to be part of that toothless tiger that’s more interested in forcing human rights issues by the human rights violators. Something is seriously wrong with this picture, folks!
