Boy who became father at 13 raises ‘worrying’ questions. NOT TO WORRY. TAXPAYER WILL COVER THE COST

 

1. A father.  At 13.  I’m speechless, Peiper.  Seriously, I have no words to properly express how badly I just want to slap some sense into this little bastard.

   Posted by Argentium G. Tiger       02/14/2009  at  11:42 PM  



2. the baby of course will grow up in an environment of welfare which will seem the norm, and herself more then likely become an early teen parent, collecting “benefits” and so onto the following generation.

   Posted by peiper       02/15/2009  at  05:21 AM  



3. well guess what?

   Just ran across a headline that now says there are two other boys claiming they “might” be the father instead. So all will be taking dna tests I guess.

   This is beginning to play like a silent movie comedy.

   Posted by peiper       02/15/2009  at  09:12 AM  



4. The benefits of socialism?

   Posted by LyndonB       02/15/2009  at  05:27 PM  



5. The structure of the family is turned inside out.  The children are completely clueless about the responsibility that comes with a child.  The people around them are obviously equally clueless.  Clueless as well about even basic birth control.  Without even approaching the question of whether or not a 13 year old should be sexually active, there are huge problems here.

   Posted by Dr. Jeff       02/17/2009  at  03:20 AM  



6. I’ve got to throw in a PS here.
   

   * Total: £568.75 a week, or £29,575 a year.

   As I understand it, that’s roughly $45,000 a year, tax free, just to stay home and boink my old lady, whether we’re married or not.

   I think I’ll renew my passport.

   Posted by Dr. Jeff       02/17/2009  at  03:59 AM  



7. Dr. Jeff in comment (5):

   So basically, breeding (and behaving) like rabid weasels is encouraged in England.  Got it.

   Posted by Argentium G. Tiger       02/17/2009  at  06:29 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.