Silly woman, she would have not only gotten her complaint read, but dealt with and probably publicly praised if Q A was a NO, Q B was gay, Q C was muslim and/or Q D was single living with a partner (opposite sex preferable).
And that is the point - to ensure that certain special interest groups get priority treatment and/or perks and the rest become so damn frustrated with the non sequitur (or personally invasive) questions that we shut up, give up and go home. Much like calling someone racist.
And the liberal loons and the vile special interest groups they protect and promote continue to win.
She should fight back - ask for justification (i.e. the specific law or code) that requires such insane questions.
Make them defend themselves and their insane requirements.
Oh I don’t know, this sounds like the setup for a really corny joke.
“Why did the LGBT try to cross the road?”
“To get back from the other side!”
Or something like that.