BMEWS
 

anyone who doesn’t subscribe to the feminazi pov is automatically, a misogynist.

 
 


Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   on 08/14/2015 at 08:20 AM   
 
  1. When folks say “breastfeeding is natural”, I respond with so is taking a crap, or how you got that baby in the first place.... and we don’t allow either of those in public.

    Posted by JimS    Australia   08/14/2015  at  09:59 AM  

  2. Good point Jim.
    Of course, the vast majority if not all of them, know well what they are doing.
    They’re looking for confrontation.  Criticize me, go ahead, I dare ya, seems to be their attitude. They are part of the crown who invite offense.  They go looking for it.
    They’re in the same boat with the queer crowd who go looking for (and find) B&B’s who do not cater to them, and then sue. Same types, same thinking, same actions.

    Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   08/14/2015  at  11:37 AM  

  3. 15 minutes of fame and god forbid you refuse to watch me make a fool of myself.
    Sums it up for me.
    two_thumbs_up

    Posted by Rich K    United States   08/14/2015  at  03:39 PM  

  4. You’re a Feminist?  Well isn’t that cute

    Posted by grayjohn    United States   08/14/2015  at  11:34 PM  

  5. Wow - the reaction here is really hostile.

    But here goes.

    Breastfeeding and feminazis don’t have a damn thing in common. At. All. Ever. Think about that for just a second. (hint: the real enemy to be destroyed and marginalized in any way possible for/by the feminazis is: The Child)

    Breastfeeding isn’t natural or unnatural - it is a biological function of the body. And for the mother, the baby, the father, the family, the family finances, society and healthcare breastfeeding should be a biological imperative.

    And for people (that would be men) who want to see boobs in any way (especially nekked) possible: to want to confine breastfeeding to the closed door arena - kind of makes that concept a real special kind of hypocrisy.

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   08/16/2015  at  08:48 AM  

  6. Hi Wardmom, I think the hostility comes from those folks who intentionally provoke controversy. That’s pretty much what the left does. Provoke and then accuse anyone who opposes their opinion, of race hate or in a case like this, hatred of the female.
    Which isn’t true at all. Yeah, there are weirdos out there and some would be misogynists.
    But aren’t most women generally a bit more modest when it comes to public exposure? Now I am aware these days some things have fallen by the wayside. I think without exception the ladies who breast feed a baby in a restaurant or on a bus are trying to make a statement which is usually, go ahead mister, challenge me. And there are lots of women who do not approve.  But their opinion would mean nothing to those on the left, and feminazis are, because all those women who oppose public feeding, are under the control of women hating men.  It’s how they think.

    Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   08/16/2015  at  10:11 AM  

  7. Breastfeeding isn’t natural or unnatural - it is a biological function of the body.

    .... uh… isn’t that what “natural” means?

    Anyway, I’m not particularly offended by a woman breastfeeding in public… what I am offended by is the bogus argument that because it’s a “natural function” of the body, it’s OK to do it it public.

    Posted by JimS    Australia   08/16/2015  at  11:08 AM  

  8. I sat next to a woman with a baby on a flight from Texas to Utah.  She breast fed twice, and I never saw a breast exposed.  I have dozens of nieces and nephews and great nieces and great nephews even a few great greats, and all their mothers breast fed in my presence and I never saw a breast exposed.  So yes, it must be deliberate and maybe even hostile trying to provoke a reaction. I think my reaction would be “Ha, poor kids gonna starve to death.”

    Posted by grayjohn    United States   08/16/2015  at  11:24 AM  

  9. It WOULD BE OK to do in public - if it was considered important. My last child was born in Germany - and they didn’t care at all about public breastfeeding. Because the majority of women still breastfed.

    As I said - it is a special kind of hypocrisy (the nudity vs breastfeeding). I always wonder of all the ‘bodily functions’ why breastfeeding is equated with going to the bathroom or sex. We all blow our noses and cough and eat in public (some more cultured and civilized than others) - we do not demand that adults go into the restroom to eat - why should infants. And yes - for some children giving a bottle does disrupt breastfeeding enough to destroy the process. It is why - Formula Pharmaceutical companies are the suppliers of both OB and L & D pamphlets on breastfeeding and ‘going home ‘gift’ packages of bottles and formula - most especially for breastfeeding mothers? Did you know that - if you check formula feeding at the OB or L&D -the companies usually only give a bottle and coupons - not the ‘full’ gift pack - they know that they already have you.

    I have nursed (all 4 of my surviving children) in public - no one really noticed or cared. But it took me until my second child to get the process down. It is something to be learned in ‘civilized’ society because women don’t do it much at all and in the 1950’s Hef gave boobs a job - and their biological function became the distasteful and ‘ewww not in public’ thing.

    If women knew how/why formula came about (and no - it wasn’t to save those babies whose mommies couldn’t make milk - it was GREED) - and that 90%+ are made by the pharmaceutical companies that make more money from the sicker formula fed children - maybe they would get it that breast is best.

    Mensa did a study of the top percentage of their highest scoring members - the ONLY thing that all of them had in common? They were all breastfed for 3 months - 3 months - that is 90 days.

    Medical researchers discovered in China - women had breast cancer in only one breast - when they did the research - they found that the women worked in the fields with the baby in a sling nursing throughout the day on the breast of their non-dominant hand. It is where the data came that breastfeeding for 72 weeks (18 months) CUMULATIVE (all breastfeeding experiences added together) nullify all causes of breast cancer except 1st degree genetic relationship.

    And finally - a researcher into cholesterol researched a group of people over 65 who had great ‘numbers’ - the only common variable that they had in common was that they had been breastfed for 6 months or more.

    Human milk contains a high cholesterol count - so formula in ‘mimicking’ it - did the same. Except one problem emerged - human cholesterol shuts down the infants system from producing cholesterol - which is why it is in human milk. Formula used (I don’t think most continue the same horrid stuff) - palm oils to hike it’s cholesterol numbers - which caused people like me (cardiac kid - automatically put on formula to monitor intake) - high cholesterol numbers in adult hood - no matter the lifestyle.

    Imagine the disease, healthcare and financial savings - if more children were breastfed. Because it is just Natural, biological and pure common sense - Babies should eat the milk of their mothers - for the best outcome possible.

    In case you haven’t figured it out - I was a lactation counselor (never got the certification to be a counsultant) and I worked for a couple of years as a Medical/Legal liaison.

    And no - in today’s US culture - Natural and Biological do not mean the same thing.

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   08/17/2015  at  07:42 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Dumber By The Day

Previous entry: some people really and truly should be dead. i'd even include their lawyers.

<< BMEWS Main Page >>