an open and honest opinion is now a hate crime among some in poland

 

1. I like him, it is how I believe. You want to be homosexual - fine just keep it in the bedroom. This public display is just another aspect of cultural rot. But they continue to take it too far.

   Always happens with the Liberals - look at Philly - the trial for the Butcher of the ‘Womens Medical Society’ is beginning. All of those charged with protecting the women who used these services looked the other way as he butchered women and abortion surviving human babies (scissors to the neck, to cut the spinal cord - what a painfree and wonderful way to die). But even though the reason none of those people in the agencies designed to protect those women from harm (not to mention the living human babies) - looked the other way was to ‘protect the right to choice’) - Can’t have any rights or protection when you are dead, there has been no repercussions to them. Just look at Kathleen Sebelious who ignored all the charges against George ‘Killer’ Tiller - she’s the head of the HHS.

   Star Parker is against gun control and did a provocative commercial

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMV1hNXt1JM&list=FLZpR9xeZVOhmbHAxOZwnrVw

   - Like Mr Walesa - the personal, disgusting attacks will begin in 3, 2, 1…

   Tolerance in action, Liberal style [Meanwhile the ‘news’ reporting on the Butcher of the ‘Womens Medical Society’ is non-existant, except on Michele Malkins website]

   Posted by wardmama4       03/05/2013  at  09:09 AM  



2. Ever heard this one?

   Two guys walk into a bar
   One says to the other; Kiss my Ass.
   The other says back; Suck my Dick.
   They stare each other down for a few moments and say,almost in unison;
   Your place or mine?
   

   Posted by Rich K       03/05/2013  at  10:40 AM  



3. This reminds me of the recent Canadian Supreme court Decision.

   I could spend time blasting the Supreme Court for a terrible decision, but honestly, they’re just a symptom of a larger underlying problem.

   Prior to 1982, Canada’s “Constitution” wasn’t really a constitution at all, but rather an act of the British Parliament, called the BNA (British North America) act.  Any time we wanted to amend this, our Parliament would pass such an amendment, and the Governor General would take it to the British Parliament.  Generally it was a rubber-stamp process over there as they didn’t dictate what Canada did anymore, though they could, if they wanted, debate our passed change and refuse to change the BNA act if they thought it wasn’t wise.

   That changed in 1982 when the Constitution was repatriated to Canada, and we truly became our own Sovereign nation.  We kept Queen Elizabeth as our Monarch, and she now has an actual separate Crown and title for “Queen of Canada”.

   We set up a new framework for our constitution, bringing in the text of the BNA act as the basic framework of our new Constitution, but we also enacted a document called the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is similar in function to the United States’ “Bill of Rights”.  (Part of the Constitution, binding on all government layers within the country, etc...etc....)

   Here’s where things went horribly off the rails:

   They left in something called a “Notwithstanding Clause”, which allows a legislature to pass a law in contravention to certain sections of the Charter, simply by using the phrase “Notwithstanding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms” at the beginning.  Although the Charter puts a limit on such a law to a time period of 5 years, it weakens that limit by allowing it to be re-enacted infinitely, and such has already happened in the Province of Quebec regarding their offensive French-over-all Language Laws.

   Click here:  CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

   (No really, I want you to see how bad this is, follow along with me.)

   Scroll down to section 33 to read about the Notwithstanding Clause.

   Pay special attention to which sections of the Charter the Notwithstanding Clause can be used on:  2, and 7 through 15 inclusive.  Just section 2 alone is a jaw-dropper when you realize they can deny you those rights with a few additional words written at the beginning of a law…

   Read those sections.  Be absolutely appalled at what may be ignored through the use of the Notwithstanding clause.

   Posted by Argentium G. Tiger       03/06/2013  at  07:54 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.