Airport Security Thiefs

 

1. It makes one wonder just where in Hawaii they found 3 Mesicans to screen baggage?  I mean Gomes, Bardorna, and Arcano. The mind Boggles!!!

   Posted by bat crusher       03/31/2006  at  04:55 AM  



2. This is something that makes my blood boil. I appreciate they are only doing their job, but why do they have to hire morons? Also having worked in a government job where we had to on occasion search people, we always did this in private. However these yahoos give people rub down searches right in front of other passengers. It’s a bloody affront and it makes me seethe, if you cut up rough they f**k you about so you could miss your flight. Now we find out they are skells to boot!

   Bob I think you may be on to something. Their does seem to be a link between lardassity and “security” personnel.

   Posted by LyndonB       03/31/2006  at  07:47 AM  



3. This article adds yet more weight to my belief that increased airport security is bullshit. It’s common knowledge that none of the security policies in place right now would have stopped the 9/11 hijackings. 9/11 was an inside job perpetrated by or overlooked by airport employees (i.e. the weapons used were already planted aboard each plane under the seats before the hijackers boarded). So why do we the people have to be treated like criminals for something that was the fault of the airlines?

   Wait… I know. It’s because they have more money than we do.

   Posted by Jester       03/31/2006  at  12:07 PM  



4. Jester, no you got it all wrong. This is the Dummycrats way to side track that they really could give a crap less about National Defense - oops Homeland Security. And that THEY actually did something, which only sucks millions away from actual National Defense and does nothing for real security. It allows thousand of worthless, useless (and now criminals) federal employees to be employed accomplishing nothing at great national expense [in other words another great Dummycrat public assistance program]

   Besides, we have to have the program - there is no way to control those who want to terrorize/attack us without - gasp - racial profiling except employ thousand of worthless, useless federal employees who are accomplishing nothing at great national expense.

   Oh wait, I repeat myself - must be a Democratic idea!

   Posted by wardmama4       03/31/2006  at  12:58 PM  



5. I had the exact same idea a few years back Skipper. Prove you are an American at the gate and get issued a piece. Frangible bullets of course. All the foreigners have to wear a sign or sit in the middle. Wouldn’t need any Air Marshalls, wouldn’t ever have any problems on any flights. Turn in your gun or your sign on the way out. I’d go with a .44 Special revolver though; they’re a bit easier for the untrained to use.

   Posted by Drew458       03/31/2006  at  05:33 PM  



6. Hmmmm, I travel quite a bit and once had a run in with a TSA jerk.  The guy wanted to seperate me from my carry-ons.  I said “ Sorry, but I want my luggage in my sight at all times.  I don’t trust you.” The guy got his boss over there and said “he called me a thief.” I told his boss that there was quite a bit of difference in saying that “I didn’t trust the TSA goober and calling him a thief.” Now it turns out that he might very well be a thief.  That being said TSA does not inspire confidence that they are doing anything but holding down the carpet in the shakedown/inspection areas.  They are little more than potemkin security that makes the sheep feel comfortable.

   Posted by Kirk       03/31/2006  at  05:50 PM  



7. sounds like the good old days at thiefrow London.

   Posted by bulldog       04/02/2006  at  04:06 PM  



8. Here’s a spot dealing with the threat of 83 yr old women:

   spot

   Posted by Kirk       04/02/2006  at  06:56 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.