BMEWS
 

11 KIDS AND NUMBER 12 ON THE WAY. NO WORRY. TAXPAYER PICKS UP THE BILL. INCLUDE HOUSING PLEASE.

 
 


Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   on 08/16/2010 at 12:35 PM   
 
  1. And here in America - People rag, oops mag is on a jihad against the Duggar family as they won’t commit to ending their child bearing at 19 kids - even though they don’t owe a damn dime to anyone (not even a credit card), do not tax the public school system with a single one of their children, feed, clothe and care for their children on their own (go bite me, if you say, well their making bucks from TLC - so what - so are a lot of people with a lot worse, sleazy and just plain scummy shows) - who cares how many kids that they have.

    1 kid on the dole, ok we all have accidents or make mistakes - 2nd - nope and make a choice either get fixed or get off the dole.

    No one has ever cared if me & mine had 3 hots and a cot - so why in the heck should I be forced to support layabout slime, simply because they can reproduce?

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   08/16/2010  at  03:34 PM  

  2. Kids to foster care, abort parents.

    Posted by grayjohn    United States   08/16/2010  at  05:35 PM  

  3. If the state can spend all this money, and it should not, then why not sterilize the couple?

    Everywhere I read about this place in financial doldrums with no money for this and that, but they find money for the spongers.

    Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   08/17/2010  at  05:44 AM  

  4. Peiper that (why can’t the state sterilize) goes back to a couple of things - first it is racist to do it - the implication is that ‘The Man’ is choosing who to keep (yeah, yeah I know with the stunning hypocrisy of that when you look at abortion & exactly what group of people abortion (here in the US) targets - but then I digress using my brain cells) and a case in yepper you guessed it - Kalifornia. Mom beat child (can’t remember if this child was number one or two) and of course the state stepped in and the taxpayer is paying for all the medical care and she turns around a few years later and beats a second child to death. The judge wanted to put her on Norplant (not a permanent sterilization) until she had completely gone through parenting classes (i.e. drug rehab) - and the ACLU successfully fought that it violated her civil rights. And so we the taxpayer are supporting all of her children because thanks to the ACLU - she went to jail and received no (or at least not the proper care) and the kids went into the system - never to be adopted as they are damaged, she would never sign them away - she will need the welfare when she gets out - and of course there is no finding the biological father to get him to sign away his rights.

    About 100,000 kids a year fall into this crack because now it is about the ‘rights’ of drunks, druggies and violent scum over ‘the children.’ And they then become the next generation of drugged out, non-producers.

    But we have to be humane and caring to these people - they have ‘rights’ too.

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   08/17/2010  at  06:55 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Re-discovered. A treasure trove of JAZZ.

Previous entry: Terrorists on our doorstep. Again?

<< BMEWS Main Page >>