Wednesday - December 08, 2004

Our Friends in the UN

Graft, corruption, bribery, ineffective, useless, fucktards, forons, worthless.

All these words (and more) describe the United Nations.

Let’s add another:  Practitioners of genocide.

Think anything will ever get done?  Of course not.  But, hey, who’s surprised?  Just take a look at all the countries who defend the UN and Kofi Annan---China, North Korea, Syria, Sudan, Iran, Germany, etc.

Read what the International Herald Tribune has to say about our boy, Kofi, and the pedestal he’s standing on.

Here’s another of “friends” in the UN, the French.

You remember them, right?  They were yelling and screaming at us because we wanted to attack Iraq.  They did not.  They criticize us for killing innocent civilians when we attack terrorists within the cities.  They called us unilateralists but, of course, they had a vested interest in doing this given their implication in the oil-for-food scandal.  Don’t believe me?  Read this.

But our cheese-eating-surrender-monkey friends decided they needed to intervene in the Ivory Coast’s internal squabbles.  All by themselves.

No cries of unilateralism from anyone on the planet.

No recriminative appeals when they fire on civilian crowds.

Amazing, isn’t it?

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 12/08/2004 at 08:49 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - December 06, 2004

Rewarding Ineptitude at the United Nations

God!  How I hate this fucking organization!!  If there were ever a more worthless piece of shit accumulation of people and ideas I am not aware of it.

They fuck up by the numbers, attempt to thwart our efforts at every turn, pass useless resolutions, think that organizing and meeting to discuss a process are infinitely better than actually doing anything about a problem, engage in blatant theft, graft, pay-offs and bribery which, in effect, take food and medical care from those needing it most, engage in genocide and for all this think they should be rewarded at United States’ expense by....................(drum roll, please!) .......................tearing down a park and putting up a 35 story building for their little empire while their original building gets re-furbished. 

35 stories!?!?!?!?! 

And does anyone think the UN will give it back up once the old building is re-habbed?  FAT CHANCE!!!.  Of course, it will be tax free and generate no revenues to the city of New York. Nor will the assholes working there ever have to pay for all the parking violations they are sure to generate.

Where’s a good terrorist when you need one?

OBTW, I almost shit when I read that this was said by a Democrat, state Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn):

“(this is)...a wonderful opportunity to stick it in the eye of these bastards.”

You gotta love it!

I don’t have time right now but can someone dig up the email addresses of the folks mentioned in the article who oppose this?  I’d like to send them an email thanking them for their views and wishing them luck in defeating this “power grab.”

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 12/06/2004 at 07:09 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

More UN Claptrap

Given all that’s going on in the UN today and its total ineptitude at getting anything done in the past, I am amazed that this sort of tripe is still published.

We now have a UN “expert” saying there is too much violence in Iraq for elections to take place.

How fucking stupid can these people be?  Can’t they understand that the motivation behind these asshole terrorists is to do JUST THAT----create terror and generate violence such that elections would NEVER take place?

Stupid fucking waste of human skin.  The fucktard goes on to say:

“The international community, hopefully together with the Americans, must help the Iraqis to clean up this mess. If you let it deteriorate, the situation will become even more dangerous.”

Yep, the Americans need to do more!  Whatever happened to Iraqis standing up for their own fucking country and shooting these terrorist bastards where they stand?  Thanks to the UN we keep creating nothing more than a bunch of victi-crat nations and peoples, forever with their hands out and demanding others do what THEY should be doing.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 12/06/2004 at 06:36 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - December 05, 2004

Allan’s Revelation About Frank J.

Don’t bother asking me in the hopes of trying to get a “sneak peek” about what Allan will be revealing Monday.  No amount of money will allow me to tell you or give you any hints.

However, what I can do is provide you a link to a story written by Glenn Reynolds.  It has nothing to do with puppies becoming slushies in a blender but...........................hmmm, that gives me an idea----why not put Kofi Anan in a blender, chop him up and them use his remains as chum to attract sharks. Hell, we’ll even let the Annoying Little Twerp cast his remains into the water and she can pet those sharks if she’d like.

Here’s Glenn’s article in the Wall Street Journal. He posits that, given all that’s happening in the news about the UN (stories which the media would increase 10 fold if it had been the United States involved in these scandals) Kofi Anan may be on his way out.  His third from the last paragraph basically sums up the UN.

In any case:  Vaclav Havel for Secretary General!!!

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 12/05/2004 at 07:14 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - December 03, 2004

Solving The UN Problem

Dick Morris writes about what we need to do to bring accountability to the UN--he proposes we stop paying them.

I can not remember where I heard it but someone in New York (I think) proposed that every dollar given by the Congress to the UN be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the amount of fines and penalties UN members have accrued throughout the US for illegal parking, traffic offenses, etc.----- all of which they refuse to pay citing diplomatic immunity.

I think it is a great idea.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 12/03/2004 at 07:15 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

Well!!  Well!!  Well!!

I knew it would not take too long before someone got information linking an American to the oil-for-food scandal at the UN.

I saw the headline and read it with trepidation fully expecting to see the names of a prominent Bush administrator.

As Gomer Pyle used to say: “Suh-Prize!!  Suh-Prize!!  Suh-Prize!!”

Turns out our little scandal monger is none other than Mark Rich, the piece of shit that Bill “blowjob” Clinton pardoned when he left office (probably after having a blow job from Rich’s wife.)

Let’s see how long before the media circles its wagons and engages in a massive effort to sanitize Clinton and shelter him from this.  Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if the media also tries to defend Rich, too.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 12/03/2004 at 07:14 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

Making Progress

Ambassador Danforth, former Missouri Senator, has just resigned his position at the UN.

Of course, the media is painting this as another Bush appointee bailing out but take away the negative spin, turn it around and I believe you will agree that his departure is a message to the UN--"YOU SUCK and I can’t stand working with you fucktards any more!”

Among his reasons:

he was not accustomed to having a policy statement vetted by State Department bureaucrats and transformed into “mush” before he could issue it.

Bravo! Senator!!

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 12/03/2004 at 07:10 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 30, 2004

Why The UN is Absolutely Useless

Imagine the following scenario:

You drive your 1973 Gremlin, dressed in blue jeans and raggedy sneakers, to your local car dealer and find yourself a nice, used 2001 Ferrari Testarossa with only 30,000 miles on the clock.  You talk to the salesman. He looks you up and down, a frown on his face but.......you know he’s desperate for a sale.  He needs to prove to his bosses that he can sell a car.  You attempt to convince him to take the car on a test drive by placing $500 on the table in good faith.  Against his better judgment, but desperate, he lets you.

Much to his surprise you appear 10 minutes later with a HUGE grin on your face and 3 cop cars screaming after you.  You glibly talk your way out of a ticket further impressing the salesman.

Now it’s time to get down to brass tacks.  You offer to trade in your Gremlin and the financing department produces a contract for 48 months at $2000 per month.  You know you can’t afford it but......... you also know the salesman is desperate.  So you insist the salesman insert the following line in the contract:  seller acknowledges that this contract is non-binding on the buyer.

Incredible, huh?  Imagine being able to do that?

Well, Iran just did.  The useless piece of shit IAEA, an arm of the UN is crowing about this great deal they had Iran agree to.  What they do not crow about is the “non-binding” part.

NPR has done three stories talking about this success in orgasmic tones.  Never once did they mention that this agreement is non-binding on the Iranians.

Useless?  You bet!!

I found this in an article and bookmarked it. When I went back to verify what I’d read was correct I found the AP had changed the story to get rid of the “non-binding” part.  Guess they, too, are in this cabal that does not want the UN to appear as useless as they truly are. 

So I dug for half an hour until I found this article which I cut and pasted below. Click on the link to see if it’s changed again by the time you read it.

IAEA Passes Milder Iran Nuke Resolution Mon Nov 29,11:45 AM ET by GEORGE JAHN, Associated Press Writer

VIENNA, Austria - The U.N. nuclear watchdog agency passed a toned-down resolution Monday on policing Iran’s commitment to freeze all programs linked to uranium enrichment in an effort to defuse a dispute that had threatened to go to the Security Council.

However, confusion over what the freeze encompassed appeared to give Iran loopholes in interpreting its commitments. The vote by the International Atomic Energy Agency board came after a senior Iranian official seemed to cast doubt on his country’s latest commitment to a total suspension of nuclear activities capable of producing weapons-grade uranium.

The United States, which maintains Iran is trying to make nuclear arms, accused Tehran of representing a “growing threat to peace and security” and said that if it failed to find international consensus to have Iran referred to the U.N. Security Council, it could do it itself.

At issue is whether Iran has promised not to operate any of its centrifuges that spin gas into uranium for fuel or for use in nuclear weapons. European nations say Iran agreed not to operate any centrifuges at all, but Iran has said it wanted to use 20 centrifuges for research purposes.

Diplomats from the European Union and elsewhere said the Iranian commitment - sent by letter to the IAEA in Vienna on Sunday - fulfilled demands that Tehran include centrifuges in its total suspension of uranium-enrichment programs.

The letter commits Tehran “not to conduct any testing with these sets of components,” IAEA spokesman Mark Gwozdecky said Monday, quoting excerpts.

Hossein Mousavian, the chief Iranian delegate to the meeting, told reporters: “We (only) said there would no testing.”

“Definitely we are not going to introduce material or any gas” into the centrifuges, he added, declining to answer whether Iran’s understanding of a freeze matched that of international demands that the devices be left at a complete standstill.

France, Germany and Britain, who negotiated a Nov. 7 agreement with Iran on suspension, went into the IAEA board meeting last week saying full suspension meant that all equipment used for uranium enrichment must not be used. That full suspension would be in effect while the two sides discuss a pact meant to provide Iran with EU technical and economic aid and other concessions. Those talks are set for mid-December.

Delegates and other diplomats with nuclear expertise agreed Mousavian’s remarks did not meet the European definition of suspension.

But they suggested the comments were meant to ease fears among Iranian hard-liners that Tehran gave up too much in exchange for a softly worded resolution on policing its commitment. They said they still believed Iran would not run any centrifuges during the suspension.

In Tehran, government spokesman Abdollah Ramezanzadeh said Iran had agreed not to test any centrifuges “for now.”

In return, France, Germany and Britain accepted Iran’s demand to further water down a draft resolution on policing the suspension - a text adopted Monday afternoon by the IAEA board. It included an extra phrase insisted on by the Iranians emphasizing that suspension is not a legal or binding obligation on Tehran’s part. (emphasis mine)

The United States - which has labeled Iran part of an “axis of evil” with North Korea and prewar Iraq and wants it referred to the Security Council for allegedly violating the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty - was unhappy with the resolution.

Listing a series of open questions about Iran’s past nuclear activities, which only became public about two years ago, chief U.S. delegate Jackie Sanders told the meeting Tehran could not be trusted.

“We believe Iran’s nuclear weapons program poses a growing threat to international peace and security,” she said.

“Any member of the United Nations may bring to the attention of the Security Council any situation that might endanger the maintenance of international peace and security,” she said, alluding to the possibility of a unilateral U.S. push to refer Iran to the Council.

Under the European agreement, the 20 centrifuges Iran had previously wanted exempted would not be placed under IAEA seals but monitored by cameras.

IAEA head Mohamed ElBaradei evaded questions on whether the commitment not to test was enough, telling reporters only that the centrifuges were not operating presently and “we clearly would report to the board should there be any change of status.”

The proposed deal also commits Iran to a pledge not to reprocess plutonium - which it would be able to do in several years’ time, once it completes work on a heavy water reactor in the city of Arak.

With the EU deal envisaging a light-water reactor for Iran - from which extraction of weapons-grade nuclear material is difficult - diplomats said the Europeans hoped Iran would not complete its heavy-water facility. 

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 11/30/2004 at 07:27 AM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias • United-Nations •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

Surprise! Surprise!

Aw gee!  Kofi Annan is DISAPPOINTED that his son took payments in the Iraqi oil-for-food program.  He started working for this company in 1992 and quit in 1998.  But he was paid until February 2004.  For doing nothing!!!!!!  (yeah, right!!!)

Imagine that! 

No word yet on whether Kofi will mount a process for investigating this or even prosecuting his son.

For a different view, read Claudia Rossett’s take on this.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 11/30/2004 at 07:19 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - November 26, 2004

Worthless UN

The MSM would have you believe that American soldiers are sick perverted freaks because they had Iraqi prisoners wear women’s panties on their heads.

But for some reason when there is an organization whose people engage in sexual abuse to include pedophilia, prostitution and rape in the name of “peacekeeping” that same mainstream media is strangely quiet.  Yep!  You guessed it!  They are UN peacekeepers!

Sure, you’ll hear the occasional 5 second news announcement but no saturation of the networks like Abu Ghraib.

Why can’t I shake this feeling that the MSM is shielding these scumbags?  Some would argue that since these UN assholes are not US soldiers it is not so “newsworthy” within the US but there is a large fallacy in this train of thought simply because the Abu Ghraib story was trumpeted as a “great abuse” by WORLDWIDE media for weeks and weeks.

This selfsame media does not utter as much as a peep when TRUE abuses take place.

Why is it that so many want to protect this worthless piece of shit organization?  First we have resolution after resolution ignored (emasculating the agency.) Then we have atrocities taking place all over the world and the UN, instead of trying to stop them, makes unilateral decisions that those areas are “too dangerous” so they pull their people out.  Then their oversight and inspection teams take forever to detect instances of violations related to chemical, nuclear and biological weapons coupled with those teams’ infiltration by Iraqi agents allowing those infiltrators to determine where the team was headed next (all the while the “team” blissfully unaware of what was going on.)

Oh, and let’s not forget the oil-for-food scandal.

And now we have all these instances of sexual abuse by these UN peacekeepers.

How can we EVER respect such worthless fucks?

So explain to me why we need to be in the UN?

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 11/26/2004 at 06:51 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 23, 2004

Good News, Bad News, More Good News

On Saturday I put up this little post about the UN and a non-confidence vote about to take place.

I have good news. The UN employees voted and passed a no-confidence vote against Kofi Annan for:

“stonewalling independent investigations into the Oil-for-Food scandal; for failing to provide adequate security to U.N. staff in Iraq last year, and failing to hold accountable those who were in charge of Iraq security operations; and for pardoning Dileep Nair, the U.N.’s top oversight official, who U.N. employees accused of sexual harassment and violating U.N. rules governing employment practices.  After all, if Kofi Annan’s own employees can’t trust him, why should the American people?”

The bad news?  Whereas these people want this moonbat assclown out they are not averse to replacing him with:

“a more charismatic, high-profile figure before his second term lapses in 2008. One of the names frequently mentioned is former President Bill Clinton.”

But I can not allow this to end on a bad note.  The conservative group, Move America Forward is running an ad on TV in an attempt to boot the UN out of the US because:

“The U.N. has become an apologist and defender of terrorist organizations and their agents.  Billions of dollars intended for humanitarian aid instead went to pay the families of Palestinian terrorists, and to buy weapons for Iraq-based terrorists. Millions more went to bribe journalists and officials in countries opposing Operation Iraqi Freedom, like France, Germany and Russia, the most vocal critics of the war. What a coincidence.”

Well, hell’s bells.  I’ve been saying that for the longest time!

Let’s hope they are successful.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 11/23/2004 at 06:24 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - November 20, 2004

Another Two-Fer

Claudia Rossett has been an attack dog on this subject for months now.  The subject?  The scandal of the “oil-for-food” program at the UN run by and abused by none other than Kofi Anan.

Why is it that this organization has to be so politically correct that it needs to appoint corrupt Black bastards from the fetid depths of Africa?  Oh, I forget.  Political Correctness trumps ability.

Please read this article to refresh your memory about how corrupt this son of a bitch really is.  She walks you through his M.O. and how he set up this sweet deal for himself and his cronies.  Great stuff.

In another related occurrence we find that the UN’s Staff is now preparing to vote on a no-confidence measure to express their displeasure with Shitbird Anan.  It’s the first time in 60 years this has ever been done.  Which goes to show just how corrupt this guy is.

I hope the vote is overwhlemingly a “NO-CONFIDENCE” one.  Maybe then we can remove him and prosecute the son of a bitch.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 11/20/2004 at 07:08 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - October 16, 2004

Barking Moonbat Of The Week Award

This week’s winner is not a person but a building and all the people in it. Actually, it’s a tower .... the tower that should have been hit on September 11, 2001. If the terrorists had hit this tower instead of the World Trade Center, the citizens of the US would probably have given them a medal for it. They would have my vote.

Why this week’s award winner? Because the ass-hats in this building rage against the US which pays for most of the upkeep on this shitty organization. They rant and rage against the US removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and attempting to stabilize that country while running away from Iraq (leaving the US to finish the job) and, on the other hand, they ignore genocide in Sudan .... probably waiting for the US to go in and clean up another cess-pit of their own making so they can have something else to complain about the US to each other. This week, the UN has finally gotten together with the “African Union” to send in troops to stop the genocide in Sudan .... 4,500 troops in all. Yeah, that ought to make an impression on the tens of thousands of Muslim outlaws slaughtering black Africans daily.

Here is what is happening in Sudan while the UN sits on its collective ass complaining about the US in Iraq:

- 70,000 dead in the last year
- 10,000 dying each month
- More than 1,500,000 black Africans displaced and living in refugee camps
- More at risk from disease, starvation and lack of aid
- Arab militias stealing food and medicine dropped in by the US

This tower should be blasted and razed to the ground and all the “diplomats” sent home. Oh, yeah .... and in it’s place we should erect a memorial to all the US troops who have died doing the work of the UN abroad. For now, the weekly award goes to the shit-fer-brains, ungrateful, mealy-mouthed, crooks, liars and cheats who occupy this building. This one is for you, you bastards.

And when you leave, please take John Kerry and his fucking “global test” with you! And for no extra charge, we’ll even throw in Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and all the other race-baiting warlords in the US who have turned their backs on their ancestral homeland and allowed members of their “race” to be brutally slaughtered without speaking out a single word of protest. None of them deserve to live in America. Go build your fucking tower somewhere else in the world. Don’t call us, we’ll call you ....

Posted by The Skipper     on 10/16/2004 at 11:19 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - October 13, 2004

A Great Case For Evicting the UN

Burt Prelutsky makes a great case in this piece. Among the ones we are familiar with such as the corruption of their own governments; the law breaking of their diplomats within the US; their hatred of the US; etc. he lists another I never really thought about and you probably didnt either.

Try this on for size.  Among the nations in the UN that get to vote on how the world is shaped are many legitimate powers:  China, Russia, Brazil, Germany, Italy, France, England, Japan, Indonesia, etc.  But did you know he brings perspective into this whole mess with the finding that there are:

“33 member nations with populations under 1 million. In fact, there are a baker’s dozen with populations under 100,000! We don’t call places that size countries - we can them counties or neighborhoods. The total population of those 33 countries, ranging alphabetically from Andorra (67,509) to San Marino (24,521), is slightly in excess of 10 million, the same as Seoul, Korea, for crying out loud! If you can believe it, there are only 16,952 people in Palau. Palau has a seat in the United Nations, and, what’s more, their ambassador can park anywhere he damn well pleases!”

Hell, that’s like trying to buy a house and allowing the neighborhood kids to decide if you are allowed to do so. 

Therefore I can think of no better reason than that to shut down this corrupt organization.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/13/2004 at 06:09 AM   
Filed Under: • United-Nations •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner