Tuesday - April 14, 2009

A Bad Time To Call

So I’m sitting here at the computer, with half a dozen .pdf forms open, trying to get my taxes done, hoping that I can get my bottom line small enough so that the check I mail in won’t bounce.

And the phone rings. It’s this guy from the Republican Party, who wants me to send them some money. “Oooh, now we’ve got Michael Steele and how much they need my support what with the crazy budgets the Democrats have rammed through and ... “

I cut the mother off at the knees. Bad time to call dude.

I gave him both barrels, and told him everything that was wrong with the GOP going all the way back to Nixon. All the broken promises, from Reagan getting rid of the Department of Education, to the failed Contract With America (anybody remember term limits?) right up to weak foreign policy and through the greed, corruption, and pork barrel spending of the current crop. How today’s Republicans aren’t Conservatives by any stretch, and shut up already with the abortion issue you’re never going to overturn Roe, how they’re all actually Democrats who only appear conservative because all the Democrats are now Socialists. And so on and so on. I apologized to the guy, because he’s just doing a job, but I let him know that if the ‘pubs wanted another dime out of me that they’d better man up and git ‘er done. And then I told him just what “‘er” meant, from border security to lower taxes to a greatly smaller federal government that stayed within it’s constitutional bounds to overturning Kelo to thinning out the crazy amount of stupid laws to better tax policy to responsible spending and accounting practices to keeping the damn Democrats the hell out of our primaries, which is what gave us Juan Fucking McAmnesty (yes, I said exactly that) who isn’t even a Republican much less a Conservative, oooh, I’m a Maverick!, sure I’m proud of his military service but that was a long time ago and I won’t forget how he sold Sarah Palin down the river and ran the most limp dick campaign since Bob Dole. And, yippity fuckin yahoo, we’ve got Michael Steele, a black guy. Why is it that he’s almost the only black guy in the party, when it was the Republicans who were founded to eliminate slavery, it was the Republicans who got the 14th and 15th Amendment passed when every last Democrat voted against them, it was the Republicans who forced through the Civil Rights Act etc etc, right up to Bush and his No Child Left Behind which should have raised the education standards all over the country even in the ghettos but all we ever heard was that he didn’t fund it, even though he did even though funding education is none of the federal government’s damn business and the wishy washy GOP has allowed themselves to be demagogued as the party that only cares about big business and doesn’t like black people, hell it was said they even sabotaged the levies in the 9th Ward so they’d all drown, and not one of them had the guts to say what a crock that statement was?

He was laughing his ass off on the other end of the phone. I apologized again, and told him he was going to have an awful lot of responses like mine. He said that part of his job was to pass comments along. So I told him that when the Republican party got over being Upper East Side Gentlemen and started fighting fire with fire against the Democrats - who lie, cheat, steal, rig elections, plus the whole corrupt ACORN mess, AND the financial breakdown that is heavily their fault and thieves like Dodd are getting away with it scot-free, and they have brainwashed generations of technically savvy young people into mindless leftist minions - THEN maybe I’d think about it. But only after I saw some REAL PROGRESS against some of my outlined issues. And I’m not seeing any progress at all on any of them, AND I didn’t see any of it when Bush was in the White House, EVEN WHEN the GOP had control of the House and the Senate. Find me a stand up guy who can talk the talk and walk the walk and get things done, hey maybe Bobby Jindal?, then they’d see some money from me. Until then, save yourselves the cost of a phone call and don’t bother me.




Well, I feel better now.

Remember, Buy A Gun Day is tomorrow. If you can find one to buy. My wife did her taxes and can rationalize buying a nice piece. All I have left in my bank account is some of Obama’s loose Change.

Posted by Drew458     on 04/14/2009 at 04:42 PM   
Filed Under: • Republicans • Taxes •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(1)  Permalink •  

MOM SMACKS HER KID, MOM HAS KID TAKEN AWAY AND FACES ARREST.

OK BMEWS, what do ya make of this?

Doesn’t sound like she beat the little brat. More like a tap with a brush.  Who knows?

There have been cases of late where parents have actually killed babies.  Kids have been very badly abused and social services missed the clues and so have come under a lot of fire.  I guess they now aren’t taking any chances.  Some parents have been accused of child abuse, lost the kids and then been found innocent.  Sticky situation. 
This case has been in the news for a couple of days. 

Mother whose son, 8, was taken into care after she hit him with a hairbrush defends parental right to smack children

By David Wilkes
Last updated at 4:51 PM on 14th April 2009

A mother whose eight-year-old son was taken into care after she smacked him with a hairbrush for refusing to get ready for school has defended her right to punish him.

Speaking for the first time about the incident, she said today: ‘Every parent should be able to bring up their child as they think is best. If they don’t respect you it’s hard to know what to do.’

The 42-year-old single mother says she snapped and ‘saw red’ after months of disobedience by her son and stress over her battle with breast cancer.

A mother whose son was taken into care after she smacked him with a hairbrush has defended her right to punish him (file picture)

She was holding a hairbrush at the time and struck him twice on the shoulder then apologised with a cuddle. The boy told his teachers at school and was immediately taken into protective custody by socials services.

Last week his mother pleaded guilty to assault and could now permanently lose custody of her son when she is sentenced later this month.

At her home today she told of her anxiety over what may happen.

‘It’s been nearly two months now and we still don’t know what’s going on,’ she said. ‘I know he wants to come back and I would love for us to be together again.’

She added: ‘I was hit as a child and I’m still here. At the end of the day me smacking him with a hairbrush isn’t half as bad as what you see mothers doing to their children in supermarkets.’

A single mother, her illness has resulted in her undergoing a mastectomy. She has been receiving help from social services for monts as she juggles her cancer fight with controlling her disruptive son. Neither of the pair can be named for legal reasons.

She said: ‘Working with social services is like treading on eggshells sometimes.

‘I know what they’re trying to do but I know my son better than they do. Not everything works with him, he can be very stubborn.

‘Social services are helping me with strategies to help him go to school but at the end of the day some children are more difficult than others.

‘I’ve been under so much pressure with my illness. The whole thing has been a nightmare.’

She said that on the morning of the incident, February 5, they were running late after oversleeping.

‘He needed to have a bath but he just sat on the landing outside the bathroom door and said he wasn’t going to school,’ she said.

‘He went into a huge sulk and just refused to move. I had just woken up myself and was trying to get ready. I had a hairbrush in my hand and I just saw red and hit him in a moment of madness.

‘He is a problem child but that morning he was a total nightmare and refused to do anything I asked.

‘I didn’t hit him hard at all but I felt awful for doing so. As soon as I did it I realised what I had done. said sorry and gave him a cuddle.’

She was arrested days later and hauled before South Somerset Magistrates’ Court in Yeovil when she pleaded guilty to assault by beating.

She is due back at the same court for sentencing on April 30, when the long-term future of the boy will be decided. She currently only has two hour access to him per week.

David Taylor, director of children’s services at Somerset County Council, said the incident was a culmination of a number of issues following a ‘stressful two years’ for the mother.

He said: ‘We are working with the mother in this case. It would be our intention to return the child to her as soon as possible.

‘We always try to work in the least restrictive way we can, and do not remove children unless we have to. We want to work with the mother in a positive manner and are talking to her about how best to support her.’

CHILD ABUSE?

Posted by peiper     on 04/14/2009 at 04:02 PM   
Filed Under: • Miscellaneous • Nanny State • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

POLICE BRUTALITY …. YEAH, RIGHT.  GO AWAY.  GO FAR AWAY.

Alright people, am I seeing this incorrectly?

It appears to me that the woman in the video is crowding that officer. He turns away but back she comes.  Then she tells him he can’t hit a woman.
Oh really?  In this kind of situation, why the hell not?  That’s like saying she can do anything she pleases and there should be no price to pay for her own actions.  I don’t buy that.  There has been and continues to be a ton of criticism leveled at the cops during the recent G-20 meeting.  A minority of the mob were abusive, breaking windows, breaking into a building, throwing missiles at the police and name calling and spiting at the cops.
So, folks are saying that’s what cops are trained for. No.  They aren’t trained to be used a spitting targets. Far as I am concerned, if you abuse anyone in that manner, they have a right to break-a-you face!

Now it is also true that during these “demonstrations” a totally innocent (we think) man had a heart attack as a result of being hit by cops. They say he was trying to get out of the area.  But he was also a heavy drinker, living in a shelter and having little or no family contact due to his drinking problem.
Now suddenly they miss him and no doubt will sue.  But I’m getting off track with that.

Take a look at the video and listen to the ITV reporter.  Does the action really match what she is reporting?

You decide.

Met investigates new claims of policeman hitting G20 woman
The police watchdog is to investigate a fresh claim of alleged police brutality after new video footage emerged showing a woman being hit by an officer during the G20 protests.

By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor
Last Updated: 8:07PM BST 14 Apr 2009

The new incident, which appeared on the website You Tube, is another blow for the Met which has already faced intense criticism over Mr Tomlinson.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission has already received around 120 complaints about police actions during the G20 protests.

The Met police were last night trying to trace the officer in the latest incident, although images on some campaigners websites appeared to show him clearly.

The fact he is not showing his police ID number is reminiscent of the Tomlinson incident where the officer in question also failed to have his number on show.

There was also an online appeal by activists to track down the woman involved.

TELEGRAPH

Posted by peiper     on 04/14/2009 at 02:39 PM   
Filed Under: • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

All world’s Bengal tiger types reared at wildlife centre.  Pussy Cats..

I really go ape over this sort of stuff but most especially when it cats. Big cats.  Hmm, like small ones too but this is special you have to agree.

A wildlife centre has raised a collection of the rarest tigers on the planet, including the only known complete group of all four varieties of Bengal tiger.

Last Updated: 4:09PM BST 14 Apr 2009

Loka, a 2-year-old female, Royal White Bengal Tiger, and Sundari, a 2-year-old female, Snow White Bengal Tiger Photo: BARCROFT MEDIA

The Institute of Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (T.I.G.E.R.S.), in South Carolina, has animals of the Royal Standard Bengal (which is orange and black), the Royal White Bengal (white with black stripes), the Snow White Bengal (all white or with ghost stripes), and the Golden Tabby Bengal (red to pale orange cream stripes and saddle).
The wildlife education organisation, which hand-rears its tigers, has 67 at its base in Myrtle Beach, which it claims is the largest group of ‘working’ tigers in the world.

Matsu, a 2-year-old female Standard Royal Bengal Tiger, and Karupa, a 2-year-old female Golden Tabby Bengal Tiger Photo: BARCROFT MEDIA

Dr Bhagavan Antle said: “Standard Bengal tigers are found throughout India, Loas, Cambodia, Thailand and Malaysia, where there have been an enormous drop in populations and there only a few thousand remaining.
“It is thought thousands of years ago tigers originally came from Siberia, where they were orange and black. But during the last Ice Age tigers were forced to migrate south as far the island of Bali and west to the Caspian Sea.

“During this great migration, tigers went through many adaptations in order to fit into very specific environments.
“Over time they became smaller in size and unique colour changes helped them adapt to specific ecological niches.”

There are now only around 300 to 400 Royal White tigers left in the world, which all live in captivity; only 30 Golden Tabby tigers; around 10,000 Royal Standard Bengal tigers left in captivity with two to four thousand in the wild; and around just a dozen Snow White tigers, four of which are at the centre.
Dr Antle said: “Historically all of these tigers started disappearing at the turn of the century. So there have been only sporadic reports from explorers and locals who saw these animals in the wild.

“These types of tigers were always in very small numbers and found throughout south east Asia in specialised niches.
“But in previous centuries, these types of Bengals were seen in India, North Korea, throughout south east Asia and even up to Iraq and Iran.”

Dr Antle added: “Like human photographs, you can see the difference in their age as some of them look a little more grizzled and haggard than others.
“Tigers do have a tendency to stay pristine generally for the first seven or eight years of their lines.
“After this point they start to get more character as gravity takes effect.”

HERE KITTY,KITTY

Posted by peiper     on 04/14/2009 at 12:54 PM   
Filed Under: • Animals •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

Taliban executes 14-year-old girl for planning to elope.  Oh those Tali-Killers .. always on the job

And these are the slugs that the authorities in Pakistan have allowed, by agreement, to keep sharia law in their province.
True, this story doesn’t come from Pakistan.  I’m simply pointing out they are the same merciless, stone age ignorant bastards.

A 14-year-old girl and her boyfriend have been executed by a Taliban firing squad after being caught eloping.

By Ben Farmer in Kabul
Last Updated: 1:24PM BST 14 Apr 2009

The pair were shot dead in front of their village mosque as their villagers looked on in south western Afghanistan, a district official said.
Hashim Noorzai, head of Khash Rud district of Nimroz province, said the girl, called Gulsima, had been unhappily engaged to marry when she fell in love with Aziz, aged 17.

The pair attempted to escape the village of Lokhi and planned to head to Iran and marry, but were captured by villagers and dragged back.
After two days of deliberation, a council of elders had been unable to decide how to resolve the dispute, Mr Noorzai said.
Half the elders favoured some way of allowing them to marry, while the other half favoured execution.

As the council was deadlocked, local Taliban militants stepped in, overruled village religious leaders and declared the lovers must be executed, he said.
Ghulam Dastageer Azad, governor of the province, said the execution was an “insult to Islam”.
Nimroz, a sparsely-populated, desert province on the borders of Iran and Pakistan has little or no Afghan government or foreign presence.

Taliban militants rule large swathes of the province with impunity and dispense justice based on their own interpretations of Sharia law and tribal code.
Abdul Jabar, police chief of the province, admitted he had no police stations in the district and said and many of the fighters who summarily judged cases were themselves often no more than 18 or 19.

Across the border in Pakistan, a deal to allow Sharia law in the Swat valley has seen Taliban militants hold public executions.

Mobile phone footage appearing to show a 17-year-old woman being publicly flogged for adultery in the valley sparked international outrage earlier this month.
Under Pashtunwali, the tribal morality code in southern Afghanistan, relations between unmarried or unrelated members of opposite sexes are strictly regulated.
Extrajudicial “honour killings” are also practised by families who believe a relative has brought them shame, including by refusing to marry a chosen partner.

The Taliban swept to power in the mid 1990s by offering strict justice and Islamic order after years of chaotic rule by predatory and rapacious warlords.
Their travelling justice commissions continue to settle disputes in much of the lawless south where the government has no power and traditional tribal power has been eroded by decades of war.

EXECUTION

Posted by peiper     on 04/14/2009 at 12:35 PM   
Filed Under: • Jack Booted Thugs • RoPMA • Terrorists •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

Not Enough Gun

Here’s a news story that begs for Snopes.com to verify ...

This story comes to us from the eternally cold and icy land of Brazil, where folks have to bundle up in heavy layers of wool and leather just to survive. NOT!! [ I’m pretty sure Brazil is one of those “clothing optional” countries. I’ve seen some of the pictures from Carnival, and even the sequins are small. Forget modesty. Hell, forget clothing. ]

Bra saves woman’s life in robbery shooting

Local media reported that the woman was travelling on the bus on Saturday in the northeastern Brazilian state of Bahia when it was held up by two armed men. The incident took place in Bahia’s capital, Salvador, where 58-year-old Ivonete Pereira travelling to her summer home in the nearby town of Lauro de Freitas.

Because of frequent bus attacks in the region, she hid 150 reals (£45) in 20 and 10-real notes coiled inside the left cup of her bra. When the bus passed through the Boca do Rio neighborhood, the robbers suddenly announced their intention. A shoot out ensued with a police officer on the scene and a stray bullet hit Miss Pereira.

Her bra was stuffed with just enough cash to absorb most of the impact, although she still had to be taken to hospital to have the bullet removed. A retired police sergeant was shot dead during the clash with the assailants, who managed to escape.

I’m just pointing out that this is an odd bit of news, and it’s pretty obvious that one of the reporters wasn’t doing such a good job of actually getting the whole story. Which isn’t exactly news either.

Posted by Drew458     on 04/14/2009 at 11:55 AM   
Filed Under: • News-Briefs •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - April 13, 2009

FLYING SCHOOL APPLIES FOR PLANNING PERMISSION. BUT CITY COUNCIL IS LAUREL AND HARDY,

The Goons ...
Abbott and Costello
THE KEYSTONE COPS ....

This little blurb appeared last week in a Richard Littlejohn column. Sorry, no link so am copying. It’s funny but it’s stupid too and shows how much thinking does not go into a council’s decision. Jeesh.

A FLYING school at an airport in Essex applied for planning permission to build an accommodation block for trainee pilots.

They were initially turned down because they didn’t have a bathroom with disabled access.  EVEN THOUGH THEY PROTESTED THAT THE FLIGHT DECK OF A BOEING 737 wasn’t wheelchair compatible, the council insisted.  So now they have a huge bike storage room complete with disabled toilet.

HOW DID DOUGLAS BADER MANAGE?

I should explain for Yanks who may not know.  Bader was a highly decorated RAF fighter pilot in last war.  Had no legs.  Check out the link below. This guy was Unbelievable.
He was shot down by Germans, escaped and was captured and tried again.
The Germans so admired his bravery, they allowed an artificial leg to be air dropped at POW camp.

DOUGLAS BADER - “personification of RAF heroism during the Second World War.”

Posted by peiper     on 04/13/2009 at 01:51 PM   
Filed Under: • Heroes • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

WELL NOW, IT ALL DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU MEAN BY …. PIRATES.

Mary Beard is a wickedly subversive commentator on both the modern and the ancient world. She is a professor in classics at Cambridge and classics editor of the TLS.  (That’s what it say on the site where I found this.)

Help me here guys.  Is she being “wickedly funny” or just plain dumb? 

Am I not reading her correctly?  But then, she’s a professor. So that could explain it. 

Pirates? Try the Pompey-the-Great solution?
By, Mary Beard
Times Literary Supplement

Exactly who is to count as a “pirate” as such will always remain a matter of opinion and dispute. for ‘pirates’ are no more objectively defined than ‘terrorists’. To most of the world, after all, Sir Francis Drake was a dreadful pirate, to the British he still somehow manages to qualify as an ‘explorer’.

But however you define them, the Romans had plenty of trouble with criminals sailing around the Mediterranean. It must sometimes have seemed hard to decide which was the greater danger of a sea voyage in antiquity: shipwreck or kidnapping by one of the many gangs of thugs looking to make quick money by getting ransom for the wealthy individuals they captured (or alternatively by selling them into slavery).

The most famous victim of this was the young Julius Caesar, who fell into pirate hands in the 70s BC. The story of this crime was almost certainly later embellished to make it a nice prequel of Caesar’s later character and career. It is said that when the pirates told him that they were going to demand 20 talents ransom money (a hefty sum), Caesar replied that he was worth much more than that —and insisted that they double it.

Some of his party went off to get the cash, leaving Caesar to live for a month or so with this captors. He is supposed to have treated them as servants, telling them not to make too much noise when he wanted to rest, making them listen to him practising his oratory, and threatening that when he was released he would have them crucified. When the ransom arrived, he was set free—and indeed, in due course, he did crucify the lot of them.

But it was Caesar’s great rival Pompey the Great who had greatest success against the pirates, with a rather more liberal approach.

By the early 60s BC, pirates had become such a menace to Mediterranean shipping that in 67 Rome gave Pompey a “special command” and vast resources to try to get rid of them. It was great opportunity for this general ‘on the make’ to demonstrate his military genius. So he divided the sea into separate operational regions and, using loyal subordinate officers, he swept the pirates off the waters in just a few months.

But Pompey was smart enough to realise that, unless they were given some other form of livelihood, they would soon be back. (This is basically the Afghanistan problem: if they don’t make their money out of the poppy crop how ARE they going to survive.) So in a wonderful, early ‘resettlement of offenders’ initiative he offered the pirates small-holdings near the coast, where they could make an honest living for themselves.

In fact Servius, the late Roman commentator on the works of Virgil, was convinced that his poet had given one of these reformed characters a walk-on part in the Georgics (4, 125ff): a old man, living near Tarentum in South Italy, peacefully keeping bees, his days of piracy long behind him.

Might this not be a better solution than a shoot out for the Somali pirates?

TIMES

Posted by peiper     on 04/13/2009 at 11:59 AM   
Filed Under: • Pirates, aarrgh! •  
• Comments (7) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

Dear DoD Wonk: You’re Fired

Defense officials said the U.S. military is considering attacks on Somali pirate bases on land and aid for the people there to help stop the hijacking of ships off Africa’s coast, Bloomberg.com reported.

The plan would include helping Somalia create their own coast guard and train security forces, the officials, who requested anonymity, told Bloomberg.com.

Officials said the plan would be submitted to the Obama administration as they decide how best to tackle the increase in pirate attacks off the Somali coast.

The only way to make shipping routes safe from pirates would be to disrupt their support network on land, security analysts have said.

Any actions against the pirates, defense officials said, would require the support of the Somali people, who are usually not in favor of foreign intervention.

First up, ass biscuit, the Somali government, or whatever passes for it these days, said months ago that anybody in the world could do whatever they wanted to the pirates. So, you are fired because you have ZERO awareness of what’s going on.

Next, when the ships of one nation attack and hijack the ships of another nation, it is an act of war. Go back and read your books; I think this one is on page 2. Do you have the slightest idea what a proxy is? Or a cut-out? Since the “official” Somali navy consists of 3 hungry kids with slingshots floating on a log, and Somali forces have done EXACTLY NOTHING to stem these pirates for several years, then they are actually, de facto, supporting and encouraging the pirates.

Do I need a “Thirdly”? Doctrine of hot pursuit? This is why we have Marines? Ever hear of Tripoli? Don’t Tread On Me? Being the World’s Policeman? Remember Mogadishu? Revenge? War On Terror?

You are a wiener. Go get a job with the Sierra Club. You have no business working for, or being a spokesman for, the Department of Defense. You’re fired.

The rest of the dickless dribble can be read here. Send them food! Send them aid! Send them money! Help them rebuild! Blame America! Understand their problems and provide a multi-billion dollar cure!

NO. Kill them. In quantities unseen since Dresden and Hiroshima. Without warning. Find 50 of their ships at sea and sink them. Burn everything that floats up and down their entire coast, then leave them to suffer. Scare the living hell out of the entire world. Then find another bunch and do it again. Send the message, Chicago Boy. That’s the Chicago Way.

Posted by Drew458     on 04/13/2009 at 10:38 AM   
Filed Under: • Military • Pirates, aarrgh! • Politics •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

Canada’s Green Party urges U.S. booksellers to ban hate material.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
Oh good grief.  Do people actually believe that to be the truth, the whole truth and nothin’ but?  I know the answer before you tell me.
Unfortunately, yeah.  It is mind boggling that anyone today with all the research at hand, would still buy that out and out forgery. Even worse is the fact that if looked at rationally, it isn’t even logical. Ah, never mind.  The issue is censorship.  The kind of people who want to buy that, along with The Turner Diaries, already have their minds made up.  These books merely confirm for them what they already believe.

I have another issue though.  It’s The Green Party. My take on them is that they’re very left and I have this (I admit it) propensity to be against anything they are for.  And if they’re against it, well. There may be times I have ta be for it. 

They say (as does the Simon Wiesenthal Center) that the book sellers are “distributing hate material.” I say, NO THEY ARE NOT.  They are selling to individuals who are looking for and buying that material.  But I question the idea of distribution as it has connotations (to me anyway) of some sort of official agency of the govt. responsible for seeing to it that material is “pushed” on the public.  It’s commerce.  All the bans in the world will not stop people from reading what they want to.  Ban it and all ya do is build a conspiracy theory with people saying, ah ha. I knew it. They don’t want me to have any information. Why? Because it’s possible that it’s all true.

I think the Wiesenthal Center was correct in asking (ok, they demanded) that the seller in question also post a notice that the Protocols were a forgery.  Of course, that won’t make any difference to those buying the book who already “know” the truth.  Not to make light of a serious subject but I’m even surprised that so many of those folks can read at all. 

But I believe they were dead WRONG to insist that “Mein Kampf"not be sold in Germany.  It’s an over long and thoroughly boring book.  I tried to read the damn thing once in a school project.  Couldn’t finish it.  Have since read extracts and it’s still a bore and still badly written. The point is, I do know those who have read the whole damn thing (? How?) and they weren’t turned into raving anti-Semitic sword waving Nazis.

Honestly I don’t even think the ban that some countries have (Germany,Austria,France) on Nazis or on Nazi art and memorabilia and the Nazi salute (which we once used in America when pledging to our flag in school long before the NSDAP), I don’t believe that ban has any effect on those who are already predisposed that way.  On the other hand, perhaps their experience is different enough from ours, that is the USA, that they fear if allowed to be open then the hate mongers will again gain the upper hand.  I suppose because I am American and because all those things are easily available in the US, and so far we haven’t turned ourselves into a Nazi state, I guess I have a hard time understanding the extent of that censorship.

Or to put it another way, and pardon me please if I have to quote a Nazi to do this but it is appropriate in this case.
When the NSDAP (Nazis) were banned once, Dr. Gobbels issued the following line.

TROTZ VERBOT, NICHT TOT.

BANNED BUT NOT DEAD.

April 13, 2000 2:00 PM PDT
Canadian group urges U.S. booksellers to ban hate material
By Troy Wolverton
Staff Writer, CNET News

Leading Internet bookstores are under fire again for selling hate literature abroad, this time from Canada.

The Green Party of Canada has accused Amazon.com and Barnesandnoble.com of violating Canadian criminal and customs laws by selling racist and anti-Semitic books such as “The Turner Diaries” and “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” in the country. Party leaders say that although they notified the companies in February, Amazon and Barnesandnoble.com have not yet responded.

“It’s important that they take responsibility for what they are distributing out into the public,” Green Party spokesman Richard Warman said. “They have to respect the laws of other countries.”

But Canadian officials expressed doubts about whether the sale of such books over the Internet by foreign companies constitutes a crime.

“This is not straight cut,” Royal Canadian Mounted Police spokesman Paul Marsh said. “It’s not straight-forward when you look at the sections.”

Representatives for Amazon were not available to comment. A Barnesandnoble spokesperson declined to comment.

The controversy is the latest incident in which an e-commerce player has been taken to task for carrying hate-related merchandise. Last month, Amazon and Barnesandnoble.com agreed to post a statement from the Anti-Defamation League calling the “Protocols of Zion” an anti-Semitic forgery.

Earlier this year, online auction giant eBay bowed to pressure from outside groups and banned the sale of items that promote hate groups such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Aryan Nation.

And last August, Amazon, Barnesandnoble and Borders Online came under fire from the Nazi-hunting Simon Wiesenthal Center for selling Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” in Germany. The companies later banned sales of the publication in the country.

Canada prohibits advocating genocide or publicly inciting hatred via spoken or written words. The country also bans the importation of hate propaganda.

The “Turner Diaries” and the “Protocols of Zion” are on a list of books that the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency consider illegal to import into the country, agency spokesman Michel Cl?roux confirmed. But with $1 billion worth of goods crossing the border from the United States into Canada every day, the agency cannot check every package that comes over the border, Cl?roux said. In any case, if the agency intercepted a shipment of banned books, it would contact the Canadian importer, not the U.S. exporter, he said. He added that the agency did not have authority to regulate the actual online sales of the books.

“Electronic commerce is outside our jurisdiction as customs officers,” Cl?roux said.

Complying with scores of complex international laws is a “classic issue” of doing business on the Internet, said Maureen Dorney, an attorney with Palo Alto, Calif.-based Gray, Cary, Ware & Freidenrich. Amazon and Barnesandnoble could have some criminal liability for the sales of banned books even if they don’t have a presence in the countries they are shipping to, she said.

“If you are willing to make your products available internationally, you are potentially subject to the laws of all those jurisdictions that you are shipping to,” Dorney said.

Regardless of whether the sales are illegal, Green Party officials said the companies had a moral obligation to refrain from profiting from the sale of hate literature.

“We would like to express our general concern about the decision by Amazon.com to carry works that are self-evidently racist,” the party said in a letter to the leading e-tailer. “We do not doubt the right of these individuals to hold racist ideas, but we do question the moral and ethical basis of Amazon’s decision to profit from their distribution and how this reflects upon Amazon’s presumed desire to be a responsible corporate citizen.”

CNET NEWS

Posted by peiper     on 04/13/2009 at 09:46 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Economics • Editorials • Racism and race relations •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

Three Flawless Shots

US captain freed; Somali pirates vow to retaliate

Bracing themselves on a rolling warship in choppy seas, U.S. Navy snipers fired three flawless shots to kill a trio of Somali pirates and free the American sea captain being held at gunpoint, a Navy commander said Monday.

Angry pirates vowed retaliation for the deaths, raising fears for the safety of some 230 foreign sailors still held hostage in more than a dozen ships anchored off the coast of lawless Somalia.

“From now on, if we capture foreign ships and their respective countries try to attack us, we will kill them (the hostages),” Jamac Habeb, a 30-year-old pirate, told the Associated Press from one of Somalia’s piracy hubs, Eyl. “(U.S. forces have) become our No. 1 enemy.”

The nighttime operation was a victory for the world’s most powerful military, but few experts believed it would quell a rising tide of attacks in one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

Interviewed from Bahrain, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command chief Vice Adm. Bill Gortney said the takedown happened shortly after the hostage-takers were observed by sailors aboard the USS Bainbridge “with their heads and shoulders exposed.”

U.S. Defense officials said snipers got the go-ahead to fire after one pirate held an AK-47 so close to Capt. Richard Phillips’ back that the weapon appeared to be touching him. Two other pirates popped their heads up, giving snipers three clear targets, one official said.

Asked how the snipers could have killed each pirate with a single shot in the dark, Gortney described them as “extremely, extremely well-trained.” He told NBC’s “Today” show that the shooting was ordered by the captain of the Bainbridge.

“This could escalate violence in this part of the world, no question about it,” said Gortney, the commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command.

A Somali pirate agreed.

“Every country will be treated the way it treats us. In the future, America will be the one mourning and crying,” Abdullahi Lami, one of the pirates holding a Greek ship anchored in the Somali town of Gaan, told The Associated Press on Monday. “We will retaliate (for) the killings of our men.”

Posted by Drew458     on 04/13/2009 at 09:40 AM   
Filed Under: • Pirates, aarrgh! •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

The Free World Bars Free Speech.

After years of international scorn, the United States can claim the high ground by supporting the right of all to speak openly about religion. Otherwise, free speech in the West could die with hope of little more than a requiem Mass.

That headline caught my eye this afternoon and I thought, hello.  Can it really be that bad outside a few places here and there?
Then I remembered the persecution of Bridget Bardot a couple of times for having the nerve to voice an opinion. And worse yet. She actually wrote a book giving her views on the world.

So I read the article here and while it may appear damned silly of me I must confess.  I had no idea it was quite this shaky.  I knew the UK was getting pretty bad in some areas. Mostly the usual PC BS.

This is from The Washington Post.  It’s quite long so I’m only posting a part of it. The rest of course can be found at the link.
As for the UN .... well nothing surprises me there and I do believe you all know how I regard the UN.

The Free World Bars Free Speech

By Jonathan Turley
Sunday, April 12, 2009; B03

For years, the Western world has listened aghast to stories out of Iran, Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern nations of citizens being imprisoned or executed for questioning or offending Islam. Even the most seemingly minor infractions elicit draconian punishments. Late last year, two Afghan journalists were sentenced to prison for blasphemy because they translated the Koran into a Farsi dialect that Afghans can read. In Jordan, a poet was arrested for incorporating Koranic verses into his work. And last week, an Egyptian court banned a magazine for running a similar poem.

But now an equally troubling trend is developing in the West. Ever since 2006, when Muslims worldwide rioted over newspaper cartoons picturing the prophet Muhammad, Western countries, too, have been prosecuting more individuals for criticizing religion. The “Free World,” it appears, may be losing faith in free speech.

Among the new blasphemers is legendary French actress Brigitte Bardot, who was convicted last June of “inciting religious hatred” for a letter she wrote in 2006 to then-Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy, saying that Muslims were ruining France. It was her fourth criminal citation for expressing intolerant views of Muslims and homosexuals. Other Western countries, including Canada and Britain, are also cracking down on religious critics.

Emblematic of the assault is the effort to pass an international ban on religious defamation supported by United Nations General Assembly President Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann. Brockmann is a suspended Roman Catholic priest who served as Nicaragua’s foreign minister in the 1980s under the Sandinista regime, the socialist government that had a penchant for crushing civil liberties before it was tossed out of power in 1990. Since then, Brockmann has literally embraced such free-speech-loving figures as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whom he wrapped in a bear hug at the U.N. last year.

The U.N. resolution, which has been introduced for the past couple of years, is backed by countries such as Saudi Arabia, one of the most repressive nations when it comes to the free exercise of religion. Blasphemers there are frequently executed. Most recently, the government arrested author Hamoud Bin Saleh simply for writing about his conversion to Christianity. 

While it hasn’t gone so far as to support the U.N. resolution, the West is prosecuting “religious hatred” cases under anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws. British citizens can be arrested and prosecuted under the 2006 Racial and Religious Hatred Act, which makes it a crime to “abuse” religion. In 2008, a 15-year-old boy was arrested for holding up a sign reading “Scientology is not a religion, it is a dangerous cult” outside the organization’s London headquarters. Earlier this year, the British police issued a public warning that insulting Scientology would now be treated as a crime.

Sure, I’m aware that there’s a lot going on under the banner of free speech.  But some of what we’ve seen and heard over the years does give one pause for thought.  And one thought comes to mind is, where will it end?

Posted by peiper     on 04/13/2009 at 08:49 AM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • EUro-peons •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - April 12, 2009

Barack Obama’s brother stopped from entering UK after lying to police over sex allegations.

I wonder if this fella will turn out to be the Billy Carter to Obama.

By MAIL ON SUNDAY REPORTER
Last updated at 7:20 PM on 12th April 2009

The half-brother of President Barack Obama was refused an entry visa to Britain after lying to police officers about an accusation of sexual assault.

The deception occurred in November when Samson Obama, who lives in Kenya, was in Britain staying with his mother, who lives in Berkshire.

He was questioned by police about the alleged assault – which he denied – but during the investigation he used a false name and he later received a police caution.

When he applied for another visa, hoping to visit Britain last week, he was refused.

The news will be embarrassing to the US President, who had given his younger half-brother a personal tour of the White House in January when he attended the historic inauguration.

Samson, 41, and Barack, 47, are sons of Barack Obama Snr, a former goat-herder from Kenya.

Samson’s mother Kezia was Barack Snr’s first wife in Kenya. The President’s mother is Barack Snr’s second wife Ann Denham, a white American from Kansas.

Barack Snr left America in 1965 with his third wife to return to Africa where he rekindled his relationship with Kezia and Samson was born. Barack Snr was killed in a car crash when the President was 21.

President Obama and Samson first met in 1987 when Barack traced his family in Kenya.

Samson’s mother now takes pride of place at family gatherings, after the death of President Obama’s mother in 1995.

It is understood that immigration officers scrutinising Samson’s recent visa application had discovered that, at the time of his arrest in November, he had been living illegally with Kezia in Bracknell for the previous seven years.

After the alleged sexual assault, Samson told police that he was a binman called Henry Aloo, giving them his mother’s address.

His DNA, fingerprints and photograph were taken. Samson was given a caution for a public order offence but he denied sexual assault.

Detectives did not take any further action over the alleged attack.

Samson returned to Kenya and successfully applied for a transit visa to the UK in order to travel to his half brother’s inauguration in January.

His plane landed at Heathrow during the trip and he spent a night there.

After returning to Kenya again, he applied for a tourist visa to visit his mother in Bracknell, and immigration officials discovered a mismatch.

His fingerprints matched details for Henry Aloo – the name he had given officers in Britain following the alleged sexual assault.

Samson was confronted at the UK Borders Agency office in Nairobi where he was denied a visa on the grounds of deception.

It is understood that Samson denied that the offences related to him and claimed his passport had been stolen.

To support his visa application, Samson is believed to have submitted documents showing that he had a business in Nairobi. Last night it was reported that the documents were forged.

A spokesman for the UK Border Agency said: ‘We oppose the entry of all individuals to the UK where we believe their presence is not conducive to the public good.’

In President Obama’s 1995 book, Dreams From My Father, he writes of meeting Samson for the first time and how he expressed disappointment that the portable tape recorder Barack brought for him as a gift was not a Sony.

Da Brotha

Posted by peiper     on 04/12/2009 at 01:39 PM   
Filed Under: • Miscellaneous • UK •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

US sea captain ‘released’ by Somali pirates.  NAVY SEALS … RESCUE .. 3 GREMLINS BYE,BYE!

The American sea captain held hostage by Somali pirates was freed unharmed last night when the US Navy mounted a rescue mission, according to news reports.

By Mike Pflanz in Mombasa
Last Updated: 7:04PM BST 12 Apr 2009

Richard Phillips, the captain of the Maersk Alabama, was captured last Wednesday when four Somali pirates stormed his ship in the Indian Ocean. He was held in one of the ship’s lifeboats, adrift in the Gulf of Aden, while the cargo vessel itself managed to escape. At least three American warships, including the USS Bainbridge, a guided missile destroyer from the Fifth Fleet, kept watch near the 15ft dinghy holding the American and his Somali captors.

Mr Phillips, 53, has now been released in an operation which saw three of his pirate captors killed and the fourth arrested, an American official told CNN. If so, this would be one of the few successful rescue missions mounted against Somalia’s pirates, who have captured scores of ships and hostages in recent years.

Earlier, Mr Phillips was hailed for his response to the attack on his ship. “He is a hero, he saved our lives,” said Ken Quinn, the second mate of the Maersk Alabama, which is now anchored in the Kenyan port of Mombasa. The sailors described how the pirates fired in the air and boarded the ship using “hooks and ropes”. One crew member, who gave his name as ATM Reza, said he lured one of the four armed pirates into the engine room. Then Mr Reza attacked the Somali with an ice pick, overpowering him and tying him up.

Meanwhile, Mr Phillips ordered the rest of his men to lock themselves in a cabin. He tried to ensure his colleagues’ safety by offering himself to the pirates as a prisoner.

Mr Phillips then suggested that they release him in return for their captive colleague. A deal was reached – and the American crew handed over the Somali. But the pirates reneged and bundled Mr Phillips into a lifeboat before escaping.

Before the rescue mission, the pirates were believed to have demanded their own freedom, as well as a ransom, in return for releasing Mr Phillips. This was seen as unacceptable. “The weight of American public opinion will not allow that,” said a diplomatic source in Kenya’s capital, Nairobi. “It would be too much of a humiliation for four guys with a couple of rifles to outwit the combined might of the USA.”

H/T GRAYJOHN who alerted me . Thanks John.

ARTICLE APPEARS IN THE TELEGRAPH

UPDATE
BBC NEWS REPORTS,

An unnamed US official told the Associated Press news agency that Capt Phillips was freed in what appeared to be a swift firefight.
Reports say he jumped overboard for a second time, and the pirates were shot and killed before they could take action to get him back.
US forces apparently took advantage of the fact one of the pirates was negotiating on the USS Bainbridge when the incident happened.

Posted by peiper     on 04/12/2009 at 01:18 PM   
Filed Under: • Pirates, aarrgh! •  
• Comments (10) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner