Wednesday - September 01, 2010
A Prayer in your Heart and Money in your Pocket
I believe is was the current *sshole Attorney General Holder who stated: we are a nation of cowards about race.
The only cowards in my lifetime have been n*ggers like Eric Holder. I’ve been discussing ‘race’ for my whole 50+ years. Some of my best friends have been n*ggers. (sorry Wilfred, didn’t mean to ‘out’ you like this...) I might also add that I’ve two half-bros and a half-sis out there. So black is family to me.
This is NOT a ‘racist’ country. Otherwise, how do you explain the popularity of Oprah (okay, if you CAN explain that, get with me...), Eddie Murphy, Bill Cosby, and: the late, great, Richard Pryor:
Where has AG Eric Holder been? The discussion has been over for over 30 years. Do you think I’d laugh if I was ‘racist’?
So why did I post this? I just spent a few hours listening to the ‘complete Warner Bros. recordings of Richard Pryor. I’d forgotten how funny (and how vulgar) he was. It’s taken me a couple of hours to recover from my laughter…
Posted by Christopher
on 09/01/2010 at 07:37 PM
Filed Under: • Humor • Racism •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - July 23, 2010
“NOT the whiteman’s bi#ch”
Unfortunately, it appears that the bi#ch is the whiteman’s burden.
H/T Weasel Zippers:
State elections officials narrowly rejected a Milwaukee Assembly candidate’s attempt to run with the slogan “NOT the ‘whiteman’s bi#ch’ ” under her name on the ballot.
Ieshuh Griffin, a Milwaukee independent running to replace retiring Rep. Annette “Polly” Williams (D-Milwaukee), said in response she would sue the Government Accountability Board for infringing on her freedom of speech.
“I’m not making a derogatory statement toward an ethnic group. I’m stating what I’m not,” Griffin told board members. “It’s my constitutional right to freedom of speech.”
Okay…? Personally, I don’t mind if she uses that on her own campaign materials. But she’s asking the taxpayers to foot the bill to have that printed on ballots. The only thing I’ve ever seen on a ballot was a name and party affiliation. So unless NOT the ‘whiteman’s bi#ch is the name of her party… nyet.
Even Rush Limbaugh commented on this.
The only reason I posted this was because of the comments at Weasel Zippers:
Running Bare says:
July 21, 2010 at 9:19 PMSo… ummm… this begs the question – whose bitch IS she, then?
9-11 infidel says:
July 21, 2010 at 9:22 PM‘NOT the ‘whiteman’s bi#ch’ ? Hmmm…interesting slogan. I wonder what she would think if a white chick ran for the same job under the slogan “Not the “ni**er’s ho?” Would she then also be stating what she is not? Would that be her constitutional right too? Nah. Not with your double standard… bee-yatch.
Wiley C. says:
July 21, 2010 at 9:23 PMBut you are a BITCH – right?
Now we know who’s bitch she isn’t. But we’re still haggling over her price.
Posted by Christopher
on 07/23/2010 at 08:31 PM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Insanity • Racism •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - July 16, 2010
exZAKly
Grand Old Partisan’s Michael Zak reminds us that the renewal of the 1865 Freedman’s Bureau Act, (a forerunner of the 1866 Civil Rights Act that I wrote about the other day), was vetoed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, and had it’s veto overridden by the Radical Republicans who controlled Congress, 144 years ago today. Thanks Mike! The Freedmen’s Bureau brought education and medical care to the former slaves across the South. Johnson’s veto of this Act, his veto of the 1866 Civil Rights Act, and his generally racist views and pro-ante bellum attitudes would later culminate in his impeachment in 1868.
He also takes the opportunity to speak truth to power and schools Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), [link to speech right here] who clamored for a seat on the racism bandwagon at the NAACP meeting the other day and said that the Tea Party has ties to the KKK.
Silly Sheila. The Klan is a Democrat institution, not a Conservative/Independent one.
It would have been far more truthful for the congresswoman to have admitted the fact that all those who wore sheets a long time ago lifted them to wear Democratic Party clothing. Yes, the Ku Klux Klan was established by the Democratic Party. Yes, the Ku Klux Klan murdered thousands of Republicans — African-American and white – in the years following the Civil War. Yes, the Republican Party and a Republican President, Ulysses Grant, destroyed the KKK with their Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.
...
Starting in the 1980s, the Democratic Party elevated a recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan, Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), to third-in-line for the presidency.
Yes Sheila, it was your party that put a Klansman that close to the big chair.
No wonder the dems don’t want straight up history taught in schools anymore. If any black kid ever learned the truth, she’d realize quickly her people have sold their souls for 30 slices of government cheese.
I own a copy of Zak’s book, Back to basics for the Republican party. It’s a good concise read and covers a lot of history. Alright, I knew most of it already, but that’s only because I read a lot of history. I was surprised at just how anti-black Woodrow Wilson was. A real hater. They never told me that in school.
Posted by Drew458
on 07/16/2010 at 07:36 PM
Filed Under: • Racism • Republicans •
• Comments (7)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - July 15, 2010
Another Lost Post
Beats me what happened. I thought I put this up yesterday. So I’ll try again before I blame the government watchbirds.
Too true. I would have drawn the guy in the back to look a lot more like Eric Holder though.
The first time I did this post I put in a link to IBD’s From The Left column, written by D.J. Dionne, so you could all have a laugh at his expense. He wrote an essay supporting the NAACP’s accusation of racism in the Tea Party movement and calling for a purge from within that group. Pure projectionism and moonbattery. Perhaps suffering from his own form of White Guilt, Dionne agrees with everything that Jealous said the other day, takes Sarah Palin to task because she commiserated with the Tea Party folks because she herself has been the target of baseless accusations, and lashes out at Tom Tancredo because it was soooo racist of him to opine that BHO got elected because most Americans haven’t the slightest inkling of what Socialism, Communism, and Tyranny are all about. But let’s crucify Tancredo because he expressed that thought by brandishing the racial tar baby and calling such a lack a “civics literary test”. The irony was completely lost on Dionne. And the NAACP/NBPP I’m sure.
Ok, links restored. Let’s see if this iteration survives.
Posted by Drew458
on 07/15/2010 at 09:49 AM
Filed Under: • Politics • Racism •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - April 04, 2010
the new racism
From Rich K. I’m sure y’all have a reaction, so fire away!
Since we can’t seem to escape the term “racist,” I suggest that we embrace the term, and let other Americans understand what a conservative racist is:
I’m a racist because I believe that blacks are fully capable human beings who are perpetually demeaned by the liberal theory holding that blacks cannot function without handouts from condescending, rich white people.
I’m a racist because believe that blacks are just as academically capable as any other people in America, but that they are having their abilities systematically squished when condescending, rich white people assure them that they can’t make it without assistance—a heinous approach predicated on the liberal’s implicit assumption that blacks are inherently stupid, ill-informed and ill-suited for intellectual effort.
I’m a racist because I believe that vigorous (but still constitutional) law enforcement benefits blacks, who are disproportionately the victims of crimes by other blacks.
I’m a racist because I believe that excusing harmful behaviors in the black community (whether academic failures, teen pregnancies, drug use or crime), on the ground that blacks cannot help themselves because whites have essentially ruined them, is the ultimate insult to blacks, reducing them to the level of animals without intelligence, self-discipline, moral fiber, ambition or ordinary human decency.
I’m a racist because I think liberals have sold blacks a bill of goods by convincing them that, because slavery was work, all work is slavery.
I’m a racist because I believe that a rising tide lifts all boats—which means that I believe that social programs that destroy the economy will not raise up minorities, but will ensure that everyone wallows in poverty.
I’m a racist because, in San Francisco in the 1960s and 1970s, I saw non-English speaking Asians fresh from the Killing Fields of Cambodia, the prisons of Vietnam, and the horror of the Great Leap forward all arrive in America and immediately begin working and studying, so that their children could enjoy the American dream—and I believe that only liberal condescension and paralyzing social programs stand in the way of both blacks and Hispanics making the same strides.
Posted by Drew458
on 04/04/2010 at 02:30 PM
Filed Under: • Racism • The New Conservatives •
• Comments (9)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - March 19, 2010
Muzzies holler RACE! Judges says up yours and awards 400,000 to the victim. That a first?
Looks like this one time the one representing civilization worth saving wins one. Hope she gets every dime and has fun with the money and flaunts it at the spineless council.
Headmistress wrongly accused of racism by Muslim governors wins £400,000 payoutBy Daily Mail Reporter
A headmistress hounded out of her job after being falsely accused of racism by two Muslim governors is entitled to £400,000 damages, the Court of Appeal ruled today.
Erica Connor, 57, had run a ‘happy and successful’ primary school but was driven to a breakdown by the allegations.
She left the New Monument primary school in Woking, Surrey, after Paul Martin - a Muslim convert - and Mumtaz Saleem began monopolising meetings with the aim of turning New Monument in Woking into an Islamic faith school.
The Surrey town is home to the first purpose-built mosque in the country - the Shah Jahan Mosque - which dates from 1889.
A deputy High Court judge ruled in March last year that Surrey County Council had failed in its duty to protect her and to intervene when the actions of the governors created problems. He awarded her £407,700 damages.
Martin started making allegations about anti-Muslim comments by members of staff which led to an investigation by Mrs Connor.
She found that all the staff denied the allegations which she said had demoralised them.
An official review also found no evidence of deliberate racism or religious bias but said the governing body had become dysfunctional.
The High Court had been told Martin tried to stir up disaffection in the community against the school and Mr Saleem was verbally abusive in school meetings.
Although during the first five years that Mrs Connor was in charge of the school there had been good relations with the local Muslim community and improved results, the situation changed when the two men were elected as governors.
Judge John Leighton Williams ruled in the High Court that the men had an agenda to increase the role of the Muslim religion in the school and that this, combined with the authority’s failure to protect Mrs Connor, had led her to suffer serious depression.
Paul Martin: Primary school GovenorPaul Martin: Primary school Govenor
When Martin was removed from the board of governors in June 2005, he wrote a letter of complaint saying it was because he had been raising complaints of institutional racism within the school.
A few days later a petition was circulated calling for Mrs Connor’s removal from the school and containing “defamatory and offensive remarks”, the appeal judges were told.
Lord Justice Laws said the High Court judge was right to find there had been negligence on the part of the council.
He said it was an unusual case - “partly because of the council’s lamentable capitulation to aggression”.
the council’s lamentable capitulation to aggression
Kinda says it all, doesn’t it? That’s how they operate and that’s how they get away with things. Like the travelers. About the same thing.
Posted by peiper
on 03/19/2010 at 01:11 PM
Filed Under: • Racism • RoPMA • UK •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 11, 2010
Oh just shut up already
Outrage? WTF, are these folks taking lessons from the muzzies now?
Atlanta’s transit system will rename a train route into the heart of the city’s Asian community in response to complaints that calling it the “yellow line” showed a lack of racial sensitivity.
The Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority issued a statement Thursday afternoon announcing it would change the name of the line to the “gold line.”
“The expressed concerns regarding the use of the phrase ‘yellow line’ will be addressed in the most expeditious and cost-effective manner possible,” MARTA officials said in the statement.
The move to change the name to “gold” coincides with the demands of some advocates in the Asian community.
“Our thought is, why don’t you change it to gold? It’s really more of a ‘why not?’ question. Why not change it?” said Helen Kim, director of advocacy and education at the nonprofit Pan Asian Center for Community Services.
Naming it the “yellow line” was part of MARTA’s color-coding the entire transit systems by using primary colors.
“There was absolutely no intent to confer any negative connotation through the use of any of the colors chosen,” the statement released Thursday said.
MARTA also has a red line, a green line and a blue line. Several other cities — including San Francisco, Tokyo and Washington — utilize yellow within their color-coded systems.
...
“It’s not a term, it’s a color,” said Darcy Olsen, president and CEO of the Goldwater Institute, a conservative think tank based in Phoenix, “Should we outlaw yellow jackets, yellow traffic lights? How about the white nights of summer solstice? This is manufactured offense when clearly no offense is intended.”
Hey I know, let’s just deport all the Asians in Atlanta, and then there won’t be any left to get all offended. I wonder if any of them are actually legal immigrants to begin with. [/snark] Geez Luise, some people are some uppity little bitches aren’t they? Next thing we’ll have Jesse and Al picketing because there isn’t a brown line. And if MARTA puts one in, they’ll be sued for racism if that route goes past a single black neighborhood. Get a fuckin life already you losers.
Posted by Drew458
on 02/11/2010 at 10:11 PM
Filed Under: • Politically-Incorrect • Racism •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - February 06, 2010
How Do You Say “Kangaroo Court” in Dutch?
We’ve covered this outspoken critic of islam before but at the moment, things not going that well for our side. Seems the very PC Dutch ar quite happy to gag one of their own ELECTED politicians and give their country away to the islamists. If that’s really the case, what the heck did they fight the Germans for?
Nothing I have read on the subject and I confess I haven’t read everything, indicates that the Dutch are very happy with events there. Unfortunately for them, their country is in the hands of the left. They are concerned about immigration and they are worried about militant islam. In fact, many are just plain bothered about islam period, militant or not. Some have “quietly” said it has no place in their culture. I think the Dutch who said that have already moved out.
So anyway ... Geert Wilders is on trial. More like the Inquisition minus the burning then a trial. But you guys MUST read this to get a feel for how scary this actually is. Especially from muslim authorities.
H/T TUNDRA TABLOID
The Amsterdam District Court apparently doesn’t want to hear the truth about Islam. Nor is it interested to hear the opinion of top class legal experts in the field of freedom of expression. In one swift move, the Court brushed aside fifteen of the eighteen expert-witnesses the defence had requested to be summoned.Only Hans Jansen, Simon Admiraal and Wafa Sultan were allowed to be heard as expert-witnesses. Their testimony will be heard in a session behind closed doors. Apparently the truth about Islam must remain a secret.
Geert Wilders: “This Court is not interested in the truth. This Court doesn’t want me to have a fair trial. I can’t have any respect for this. This Court would not be out of place in a dictatorship”.
The Court also brushed aside the preliminary objections concerning its jurisdiction and the admissibility of the Public Prosecutor.Nevertheless, Geert Wilders remains extremely motivated to seek justice: “I’m still counting on an acquittal”.
THERE IS THIS FROM THE GATES OF VIENNA BLOG AND I ENCOURAGE ALL WHO HAVEN’T READ IT TO GO OVER THERE AND DO SO.
It isn’t a short read.
It’s obvious that the Dutch government wants Geert Wilders out of the way, and doesn’t much care how it happens.
In bygone days the Queen might have murmured to herself, “Who will rid me of this troublesome blond?” And then, to please his monarch, some eager courtier would have dispatched Mr. Wilders to meet his maker.
But today’s tactics have to be different. First the government demonizes the head of the PVV, eroding his official legitimacy and making it seem as if he almost deserves a violent end. Then it puts him on trial on trumped-up charges, and declines to provide the same courtroom security for a member of parliament that it gives to Islamic terrorists.
Photo from Gates of Vienna
I HAVE CRAMMED QUITE A BIT IN HERE BUT HAVE EDITED A LOT SO PLEASE GO TO THE LINK FOR MORE.
H/T Europe News for the following and see her site. This really does get bad and scary.
How Do You Say “Kangaroo Court” in Dutch?International Free Press Society 4 February 2010
By Diana WestEven if you have never been involved in a criminal prosecution wherein your very freedom is at risk, I want you to now imagine that you and your attorney have prepared a defense that includes a list of witnesses that will provide a mountain of exculpatory evidence. Then, imagine that the Court summarily and arbitrarily decides that it will not listen to nearly ninety percent of your case.
“This court is apparently not interested in the truth.” Wilders told De Telegraaph (translations from Gates of Vienna). “I cannot conclude anything but that the court does not award me a fair trial.”
“I have no respect for this,” Wilders added. He pointed out that in a typical criminal case there are often dozens of witnesses heard.
But this is not a typical trial. This is a rigged game, a fixed fight, a show trial that is premised not on Dutch law but on Islamic law. Indeed, the trial of Geert Wilders is a test case for sharia in the Netherlands, the grafting onto a free Western country the repressive cage of Islamic rule.
Discussing Muslim progress against “Islamophobia” at the 35th meeting of foreign ministers of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Kampala, Uganda in 2008, Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu made the following statement:
In confronting the Danish cartoons and the Dutch film “Fitna”, we sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines that should not be crossed. As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues. They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.
One reading doesn’t convey the chilling import of these words.
As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues.
Yes, and to the craven point where “the official West and its public opinion” are paralyzed and silenced by these same “sensitivities.”
They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.
When the OIC speaks about “freedom of expression,” it means freedom of expression as governed by the laws of Islam — sharia. When the OIC says we in the West have “started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility,” it means we in the West have started to regard expression from the perspective of sharia — from the perspective of the totalitarian Islamic system.
So here’s some unwashed creep with a name nobody outside his own country can pronounce ( Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu), and he’s telling the west how things are gonna be. And so far, a lot in the west seems to be caving in.
Posted by peiper
on 02/06/2010 at 12:52 PM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • FREEDOM • Government • Illegal-Aliens • Jack Booted Thugs • Oppression • Outrageous • Politically-Incorrect • Racism • Religion • RoPMA • Stoopid-People • Terrorists •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 04, 2010
Good Data, Bad Conclusion
The Violence Policy Center, a leftist anti-gun “think tank”, is aware that nearly half the violent crime in America is committed by black people against other black people. Their solution? Disarm the black folk. They aren’t “advanced” enough to responsibly own firearms.
Calls to limit the access of African-Americans to firearms specifically echo the “black codes” adopted immediately at the end of the Civil War. These laws were passed in southern states in response to the Thirteenth Amendment’s outlawing of slavery, and were specifically engineered to circumscribe the civil rights and liberties of newly freed slaves and freemen. The codes assured the second-class status of African-Americans, and were a forerunner to decades of “separate but equal” segregation under Jim Crow laws — which were only overcome during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Among the codes commonly passed were laws that forbid or restricted the ownership of firearms by African-Americans. The codes were “justified” with the explanation that African-Americans did not have the same rights as white citizens.
Calls to limit the access of African-Americans to firearms specifically echo the “black codes” adopted immediately at the end of the Civil War. These laws were passed in southern states in response to the Thirteenth Amendment’s outlawing of slavery, and were specifically engineered to circumscribe the civil rights and liberties of newly freed slaves and freemen. The codes assured the second-class status of African-Americans, and were a forerunner to decades of “separate but equal” segregation under Jim Crow laws — which were only overcome during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Among the codes commonly passed were laws that forbid or restricted the ownership of firearms by African-Americans. The codes were “justified” with the explanation that African-Americans did not have the same rights as white citizens.
From VPC’s report:
Introduction
America is facing an epidemic of homicide among young black males.
According to a recent study conducted by Professor James Alan Fox of Northeastern University, one of the nation’s leading criminal justice researchers, from 2002 to 2007 the number of black male juvenile homicide victims rose by 31 percent. The number of young black homicide victims killed by guns rose at an even sharper rate: 54 percent.
This study examines the growing problem of black homicide victimization at the state level.
The devastation homicide inflicts on black teens and adults is a national crisis, yet it is all too often ignored outside of affected communities. This study analyzes unpublished Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR)2 data for black homicide submitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The information used for this report is for the year 2007 and is the most recent data available. This is the first analysis of the 2007 data on black homicide victims to offer breakdowns of cases in the five states with the highest black homicide victimization rates and the first to rank the states by the rate of black homicides.
Gender
Of the 7,387 black homicide victims, 6,345 (86 percent) were male, and 1,042 (14 percent) were female. The homicide rate for black male victims was 37.59 per 100,000. In comparison, the overall rate for male homicide victims was 8.56 per 100,000. For white male homicide victims it was 4.63 per 100,000. The homicide rate for female black victims was 5.62 per 100,000. In comparison, the overall rate for female homicide victims was 2.11 per 100,000. For white female homicide victims it was 1.61 per 100,000.Age
Six hundred seventy-four black homicide victims (9 percent) were less than 18 years old and 150 black homicide victims (2 percent) were 65 years of age or older. The average age was 30 years old.Most Common Weapons
For homicides in which the weapon used could be identified, 82 percent of black victims (5,743 out of 7,011) were shot and killed with guns. Of these, 73 percent (4,204 victims) were killed with handguns. There were 701 victims killed with knives or other cutting instruments, 247 victims killed by bodily force, and 200 victims killed by a blunt object.Victim/Offender Relationship
For homicides in which the victim to offender relationship could be identified, 72 percent of black victims (2,474 out of 3,431) were murdered by someone they knew. Nine hundred fifty-seven victims were killed by strangers.
Conclusion
Blacks in the United States are disproportionately affected by homicide. For the year 2007, blacks represented 13 percent of the nation’s population, yet accounted for 49 percent of all homicide victims.
As noted at the beginning of this study, the devastation homicide inflicts on black teens and adults is a national crisis, yet it is all too often ignored outside of affected communities. For blacks, like all victims of homicide, guns—usually handguns—are far and away the number one murder tool. Successful efforts to reduce America’s black homicide toll must put a focus on reducing access to firearms.
Not one word about figuring out a way to teach these young men respect for human life, or anger management, or anything positive like that. Nope. Best to just disarm them all, since they’ve proven they can’t be trusted with a gun.
Like eugenics, the other left wing “solution” to a problem, this one draws the wrongest possible conclusion from otherwise accurate data. And this from the camp that is made up of our superiors, the folks who know better and believe they should be empowered to tell us what to do. For our own good, right Hillary?
[ to be completely fair to the VPC, they are for disarming everyone. But this paper of theirs speaks specifically about the violence endemic among black people. So their call to reduce access to firearms must be taken in context: they are talking about disarming black people. Later on they’ll get around to disarming everyone else. ]
One commenter at Pajamas Media put the proper solution in a golden nutshell: ”Laws don’t prevent crime, civilized culture prevents crime.” Darn shame we live in such a PC-delimited world. Once upon a time, in a more forthright age, the task of permeating civilized culture to the black races was called ”the white man’s burden”. But even then the perils were known:
Take up the White Man’s burden--
The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.
So who will tame the savage breast? The “savages” themselves. It’s a bootstrap lifting thing that has to come from within. Damn shame that 60+ years worth of “free footwear” has only given the “abos” more desire to go barefoot.
Posted by Drew458
on 02/04/2010 at 12:38 PM
Filed Under: • Guns and Gun Control • Racism •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - February 02, 2010
Taxi drivers accused of racism over St George stickers. Can’t do anything without offending some.
It isn’t a long article but it naturally caught my eye. So now under some circumstances, the English flag can be seen as offensive and oh my. Even, dare I say it here? racist. (whispered) Jerks.
Taxi drivers who put up St George stickers in their cabs saying they speak English have been accused of racism and warned they face suspension.
A group of drivers of licensed cabs in Southampton put up the signs because they claimed passengers complained to them that some drivers cannot speak English.
The matter came to a head in a meeting with drivers and the city council last week when some drivers told the council of the alleged problem.
Now the city council has said any cab that has the sign or a St George flag put up will have their licence suspended if they do not take them down within seven days.
Posted by peiper
on 02/02/2010 at 01:06 PM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Government • Nanny State • Racism • Stoopid-People • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - January 29, 2010
eBay Update … eBay Backtracks, says sorry and allows sale of a board game.
eBay Update
eBay says sorry for banning dad’s army game
Yorkshire Evening PostAuction giant eBay apologised to one of its users today after blocking the sale of a Dad’s Army board game because it could promote racial hatred.
Officials at eBay conceded that the game, based on the much-loved television series and being offered for sale by retired bank official David Davidson, had been wrongly classed as “offensive material” by its checking systems.A spokeswoman for eBay stressed that more than 100 million items were for sale on the site and that it did everything it could to bar items which promoted racial hatred.
The spokeswoman said: “While we are committed to keeping items that promote racial hatred off eBay, a Dad’s Army board game is clearly not one of these.
“We hope that Captain Mainwaring would have been impressed with our efficiency!”
I think the capt. would have given you guys the flat side of his sword.
BTW ... banning items that promote hatred won’t work or make fewer ppl racist. That is not what makes people that way. Not anymore. Those folks have already made up their minds. But there are collectors who don’t hate anyone who just are fascinated by a particular time in history and collect memorabilia. They probably also collect items to do with Ike and Churchill and Monty. I think the closer truth however is, ppl are also drawn to evil even when they personally are not themselves evil. The whole cult like popularity of AH and the Nazi movement apparently sell more then all the others mentioned. It’s almost like going to see a horror movie you know will scare you. I can’t explain it better then that. According to what I hear and read, books and items to do with the Nazis have not diminished over the years. In fact, interest has grown outside the holocaust issue. But there isn’t any evidence that it has produced more Nazis or turned those who are not so inclined into neo-Nazis.
The liberal left social engineers who get their panties in a wad at the sight of anything associated with that period, need to get their own lives and leave the rest of us alone. Fat chance of that when companies hire them and promote em all the time.
Posted by peiper
on 01/29/2010 at 06:17 AM
Filed Under: • Personal • Racism • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - October 31, 2009
THE STATE OF THE LAW AND THE WORLD ….. NOT SO GOOD!
Drew’s very disturbing post yesterday with regard to the gang rape and ppl taking pictures, shows just how far the left has carried us as a culture.
With hand wringing libs, the aclu and every other ‘rights’ group that scream “RACE” whenever a favored minority is injured or arrested, nothing surprises us anymore. We’re all disgusted, of that there is no doubt. But surprised? Not likely.
This past week two 10 year old boys were arrested for the rape of an eight year old girl. Outraged? Sure. Surprised? Nope. And worst of it is those boys will learn nothing and receive NO retribution. You can bet they’ll do it again at some point in the future.
Yet another man with a record of crime and who was supposed to have been watched, somehow managed to entice a young and very foolish girl of 17 to meet him. They met of course on the net. He killed her. He should have been in jail long ago and never released. His victim would still be foolish but perhaps alive. And how often have you heard that line? But they say the prisons here are crowded to overfilling, many have been let loose but the authorities say they don’t represent a danger to the public. HA! How often have we heard that in the past?
This past week the story about a man killing his cheating wife came to light. And this is one of two cases like it.
Married 21 years, he had problems (don’t they all?) and after putting up with him for a long time, his wife said she wanted a divorce and that she no longer loved him. Meanwhile, he somehow found a note or email that she sent to another man who she claimed she was in love with.
So, using more then one knife he repeatedly stabbed her, something like thirty times, in front of the kids.
The courts here accept the “driven to it by adultery excuse) and so there is no murder charge. It’s manslaughter and he’ll be out in three years.
He also claimed (as has the other guy in another case) diminished responsibility. Bullshit! The bastard knew exactly what he was doing 30 times.
Adultery is not a reason to take away another person’s future. Any court that accepts that is mad. But the age we live in makes all sorts of excuses for bad behavior. And not just capital crimes. And here’s another example and while not a capital crime, the reaction of the criminal’s friends and apologists is yet another sign of these sorry assed times. There is hardly any reason at all for the gremlins to be fearful unless it’s fear of an armed citizenry. And that would not have been an option in the gang rape case of a 15 year old girl in California.
Premier League star jailed for punching girl in face ‘will find another club when he is released’
By Sam Greenhill
Disgraced millionaire footballer Marlon King will be signed by another club when his jail sentence is finished, his agent insisted today.
The player was sacked by Wigan yesterday after being jailed for 18 months for groping a woman and then smashing her in the face after she rejected him.
But today his agent Tony Finnigan said that prison would change King for the better and that he would have good career prospects on release.
Oh right. This fugitive from a jungle where he belongs, is gonna change and be Mr. Nice Guy. He claims a case of mistaken identity in spite of the fact that dozens of folks on the scene saw and identified him including, A MEMBER OF HIS OWN FREEKIN TEAM!
Let’s take a quick peek at Mr. Nice Guy’s past to see where he’s come from.
If you have any trouble reading this here, see the link below the story.
In a criminal career that ran parallel to his sporting one, the 29-year-old was given a succession of fines and community service orders - but only once was he actually jailed.
Yesterday he lost both his liberty and his job as a soccer player after a Southwark Crown Court jury found him guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and sexual assault by touching.
Within minutes of the verdict, he was sacked by his club Wigan Athletic.
Chairman Dave Whelan, who said he learned details of the trial only days ago, said: ‘He is absolutely sacked.
‘We will not tolerate football players who get sent to jail for 18 months.’
But the £40,000-a-week star will still earn earn another £228,000 from behind bars during a 40-day notice period.
King is now a convicted sex attacker who must sign the Sex Offenders Register.
That means that if the Jamaican international ever returned to football in Britain he would have to notify police of any intention to travel abroad for matches.
King had been on a boozy night out with friends in December last year to celebrate news that his wife was expecting their third child and to mark scoring a winning goal for Hull City, where he was on loan.
Just two days earlier he had been banned from driving for eight weeks after speeding at 106mph on a 60mph road.
Onlookers said he appeared to be drunk or on drugs as he tried to force his attentions on girls in the Soho Revue Bar in London’s West End.
When a 20-year- old student objected to him touching her bottom, King sneered: ‘Don’t you know who I am? I’m a millionaire.
‘You’re not even in my league.’
Minutes later, after the slightly-built woman tried to stop him touching her hair, he swung his fist and knocked her to the ground, breaking her nose.
The blow was so hard that two of her friends were knocked to the floor with her.
Yesterday, after the jury brought in 10-2 guilty verdicts, Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith told King to pay his victim £3,125 compensation and £1,600 prosecution costs.
The player showed no reaction as he was convicted but sat open-mouthed as the judge told him: ‘You have shown not a hint of shame for your disgraceful and arrogant behaviour’.
As King’s victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, sat holding the hand of an aunt, the judge continued: ‘You broke her nose, and that can still be seen, and you cut her lip.‘You are 29, you are just over six feet and you are a professional footballer.
‘She is a comparatively slight woman, just over five feet tall.’
As the sentence was delivered , several of King’s supporters stormed from court, swearing at the judge.
One screamed: ‘This is a clear case of institutional racism.
‘You should not be up there… Up the National Front. Heil Hitler.’
And of course it isn’t the 6ft. bully boy buck who is guilty of anything. It’s all those white folks and a racist judge. No mention of the jury here altho how two of them didn’t see what ten others did may speak volumes as well.
Posted by peiper
on 10/31/2009 at 07:36 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Racism • Typical White People: Stupid AND Evil • UK •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - August 12, 2009
A VERY HIGH WOW FACTOR FROM PAT CONDELL ….. CAUTION, UNKIND WORDS FOR LIB-LEFT
Nothing for me to say except watch this ... I believe you’ll be most impressed. He has it right and he says it well.
My postings may be light today so happy I found this.
Cheers.
[ Drew watches the video and responds: ]
Posted by peiper
on 08/12/2009 at 09:27 AM
Filed Under: • Blog Stuff • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Racism • RoPMA •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - July 08, 2009
Williams on Reparations
Outstanding. Not only is the essay a concise bit of wonderful, the first few dozen comments are pure genius. Read, read, read! If “they” haven’t yet revoked Williams Race Card, taken away his government cheese, and reclassified him as a white guy, then this essay will do it.
by Walter E. Williams
It goes without saying that slavery was a gross violation of human rights. Justice would demand that all the perpetrators—that includes slave owners, and African and Arab slave sellers—make compensatory reparation payments to victims. Since slaves, slave owners and slave sellers are no longer with us, such compensation is beyond our reach and a matter to be settled in the world beyond.
Absent from the reparations debate is: Who pays? Don’t say the government because the government doesn’t have any money that it doesn’t first take from some American. So which Americans owe black people what? Reparations advocates don’t want that question asked but let’s you and I.
On black people’s side of the ledger, thorny issues also arise. Some blacks purchased other blacks as a means to free family members. But other blacks owned slaves for the same reason whites owned slaves—to work farms or plantations. Are descendants of these blacks eligible and deserving of reparations? There is no way that Europeans could have captured millions of Africans. They had African and Arab help. Should Congress haul representatives of Ghana, Ivory Coast, Nigeria and Muslim states before them and demand they compensate American blacks because of their ancestors’ involvement in capturing and selling slaves?
Reparations advocates make the foolish unchallenged pronouncement that United States became rich on the backs of free black labor. That’s utter nonsense. Slavery has never had a very good record of producing wealth. Think about it. Slavery was all over the South. Buying into the reparations nonsense, you’d have to conclude that the antebellum South was rich and the slave-starved North was poor. The truth of the matter is just the opposite.
The comments are ... superb!
Posted by Drew458
on 07/08/2009 at 11:41 AM
Filed Under: • Politically-Incorrect • Racism •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
Amazing aerial images taken by daring Allied pilots on secret missions during WW 2
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Hookers and Booze
peiper over at Barking Moonbat EWS found some absolutely kickass aerial photos from WWII. I grabbed this one because I’m a big fan of the movie A Bridge Too Far.…
On: 11/23/09 04:14
Clear Thinking and Straight Talk
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at baldilocks
Let Them Fight or Bring Them Home Read all of it--and tell every American you know to do so. (Thanks to BMEWS) UPDATE: The author of the above blog is…
On: 10/02/09 09:29
A Box With Four Sides
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Macker's World
See, Afghanistan was worth saving. I can't say the same about Pocky-stawn, especially since it possesses nuclear weapons and no thanks to North Korea, China, and AQ Khan. So they…
On: 05/07/09 02:37
Display it with pride
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Macker's World
Take a look at the sidebar and click on the "DHS Certificate" shown. You'll see what Crappy Nappy thinks of those who believe in Limited Government and Constitutional Rights. Therefore,…
On: 04/19/09 11:25
A Bad Time To Call
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Conservatism Today
Drew at Barking Moonbat Early Warning System was in a foul mood as he took a call from a guy with the Republican party while he was doing his taxes…
On: 04/14/09 06:46
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
