Thursday - December 22, 2011

not exactly just another rop story … this really exposes how stupid and backward they are

They are so damn pig ignorant. Barely even humans. Hey, are pigs really ignorant? Can’t be as ignorant as the sheep who follow the RoP.  Right?

The French have been trying, as I understand the reports, to make these stone age life forms assimilate more and become part of the French culture.  Waste of time and effort.  The only thing they (the French) will achieve will be the eventual watering down and demise of their own culture.  With traditions forgotten and apologies made to former colonies and with cross culture/ religion marriages etc., they will kiss goodbye to a 1,000 years of art, science, culture, language and learning, and a thousand years of annoying the Brits.  Of course, they’ll continue with that but by then all men will be bearded and women covered head to toe and French might become a dead language.
How’s that for a Christmas horror story?

Yeah I know, we do get our jollies cracking wise about them from time to time. Especially the Brits.  And especially now with the veto handed down recently by the Prime Minister, David Cameron, on the eurozone issue.  Pissed off Sarkozy of France so much, he had a few words to say about Call Me Dave and another minister in the French govt. mouthed off about the Brit economy and then backed down.
Well the long and the short of it was that instead of becoming the honcho calling the shots from Paris, poor Mr. Sarkozy suddenly found himself isolated as the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, showed her diplomatic skills by not threatening England but instead has offered a compromise to placate the Brits and be friends.  Sarko not a happy camper tonight.
Anyway .... the man in question below can’t be French as reported. Not if he’s a muzzie. No way.
But I got sidetracked again. Here’s what this post is all about.

French Muslim jailed for punching nurse who tried to remove wife’s burqa during childbirth
By IAN SPARKS

A Muslim man who punched a nurse for trying to remove his wife’s burqa during childbirth has been jailed in France.
Nassim Mimoune, 24, had already been expelled from the delivery room for branding the midwife a ‘rapist’ as she carried out an intimate examination of his wife.
Then through a window he spotted the nurse taking off his wife’s burqa as she prepared to give birth.
He smashed open the locked door and hit the woman in the face, demanding she replace the full Islamic face veil.
As his wife delivered a baby boy, Mimoune was ejected from the building by security men from the hospital in Marseille and arrested for assault.
A judge in the southern French port jailed Mimoune for six months on Wednesday, telling him: ‘Your religious values are not superior to the laws of the republic.’

SOURCE FOR MYTHICAL FRENCH MUZZIE STORY

Posted by peiper     on 12/22/2011 at 02:09 PM   
Filed Under: • FRANCE • muslims •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - December 21, 2011

honor killing BS. it’s murder period.

So they immigrate to a civilized country but continue as always to drag along their stone age religion and foreign ways.
Worse yet, the west continues to allow them in, where they thrive and they multiply like insects on the way to becoming the majority. Who will vote.
Welcome to multi culture and diversity in the 21st century.
Muzzies won’t do us in.  The political pygmies running things in the west will do it all for them.

There is no reasoning or any possible accommodation with ignorant turd world scum.
How would it possible to try and talk reason to a jerk who think honor means killing the baby AND the family. Funny thing, don’t hear much about them killing themselves. Do we? After all, surely if they carried that much ‘shame’ they’d want to check out of this life in search of their 72 virgins. Oh no. It’s always others have to buy the farm.

Baby born to Muslim mother after affair must be adopted to stop honour killing attempts by ‘shamed’ grandfather

Unmarried mother ran away after becoming pregnant because she feared what her father would do

One-year-old baby girl will be adopted by Muslim family
Natural father wanted child to live with him and his wife
By ROB COOPER

A baby born to a Muslim mother after an affair must be adopted to prevent the child becoming the victim of an honour killing, the Court of Appeal ruled today.

The baby’s mother, who is not married, was so ‘terrified’ of how her family would react to her affair with a married man and becoming pregnant that she ran away from home.

She then concealed her pregnancy by wearing loose clothes and travelling to the other side of town for her antenatal care.

The baby’s maternal grandmother had told police that if her husband found out about the child ‘he would consider himself honour-bound to kill the child, the mother, the grandmother herself and the grandmother’s other children’.

Today Lord Justice Munby, Lady Justice Black and Lord Justice Kitchin said in a joint ruling that the child was at risk if she was not adopted.

They said if the grandfather discovered the affair ‘it would be a matter of intense almost unimaginable shame to him and his family’.

SOURCE FOR MORE

Posted by peiper     on 12/21/2011 at 01:56 PM   
Filed Under: • muslims • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - December 19, 2011

more law and disorder and the joke named justice

Tiz always thus. One rule and law for one group, and another set of standards for another.
These stories have made the news and passed pretty quickly cos more important stories take their place. Like how the evil American empire, so described on the radio here by the lawyer of that queer traitor Bradley Manning, is treating his baby faced innocent client. The other person interviewed (for the prosecution) holds the view and correctly I believe, that Manning could not have had the time to read all 125,000 docs he stole and gave to Wikileaks. So the claim of his altruistic intention is rubbish.  I sidetracked myself again.  That isn’t the subject of this post.
This is.

Ok, fair is fair and if someone fiddles at the expense of the taxpayer, they damn well should face the humiliation of fines and exposure and jail time.  These are the leaches that sit on fat asses passing regs and new laws and more rules that the rest of the population is made to live by and with.  The average person doing the same thing sometimes does go to jail.  Ah but, some things depend on who and what you are.
The crooks here are white, so far. And not members of any favored minority.  They are, or were, members of the Labour Party. Think left wing. Or as Lyndon refers to it, the Lie-bour Party. I believe he has a few more colorful names as well.  They’ve wrecked this country.
(this does not let off crooks of a conservative bent btw)

MPs’ expenses: jailed trio ordered to pay back legal costs
Three former Labour MPs who were jailed for fiddling their expenses have been ordered to pay back a total of £125,000 – less than half of the money spent on their court cases.

But a fourth disgraced politician was spared any repayment on the grounds he is already bankrupt.
Elliot Morley, David Chaytor and Eric Illsley, exposed for claiming too much on their Parliamentary allowances after the landmark investigation by The Daily Telegraph, were told by a judge they must give back their legal aid funds and contribute to prosecution costs.
They have already been denied the “parachute” payments given to most MPs when they leave Westminster, and forced to pay back their fraudulently claimed expenses.

much more to read here

So that’s one little part of the expenses fiddle by crooks in control of the public purse.
Here’s another that made the news in the last week. Just a small item which set me to thinking.

Recently a fellow named James Lunn, was working for the Ministry of Justice.  Which as we all know doesn’t really exist anywhere in the world anymore. In addition to the crime of being white and middle class, Mr lunn apparently has sticky fingers and has been caught with his paws in the ministry cookie jar. The headline said that he used his MOJ credit card like a piggy bank. His piggy bank. So not an altogether honest man we may all agree.

His lawyer said that his client was working in an enviorenment where everyone abused their expenses.
Oh well, if everyone does it .... Anyway, Mr. Lunn is now facing a year in jail and well deserved as this is not the first time he’s tried to glom money from the public cookie jar. You might interested to learn that the sum he stole was £3,400. Or in our dollars at the current rate. $5,270.15. Not a small sum but then not the Great Train Robbery either.

But for real chutzpah (Yiddish for nerve, in spades. ) take a look at this one. And just so you know, she’ll be entitled to draw money just for signing in when the dust settles. But whatcha gonna do?  She came to this country at the age of 13 and has learned well how to fleece the infidel. She was made a Peer, the first muzzie female peer I believe. She’s a baroness FYI. Might be a token jest-ture to prove there isn’t any anti female anti islam feelings and it’s quite pc too.
Take a look at this.  Has she drawn a year in the pokey for a hundred thousand plus fiddle?  Uh huh. I see you know the answer already.

She was raised to the peerage as Baroness Uddin, of Bethnal Green in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, for life by Letters patent in the afternoon of 18 July 1998, at the House of Lords.

She was the youngest woman on the benches and the only Muslim and Bangladeshi woman to be appointed to the House of Lords. She was invited to the House of Lords for her contribution to the advancement of women and disability rights, swearing in by saying “Almighty Allah” as she took her seat in the parliament. Since entering the House of Lords, besides claiming the maximum possible amount she could fleece the taxpayer for, she has supported a handful of initiatives.

In 2010, The National Executive Committee of The Labour Party suspended Uddin indefinitely from the Party in light of the expenses claim allegations.
In October 2010, Under the recommendation of The Privileges and Conduct Committee of The House of Lords a suspension is to be handed down to Pola Uddin until Easter 2012 at the earliest for claiming expenses “to which she was not entitled”. The Committee also acknowledged a repayment agreement for expenses wrongly claimed.

Uddin claims on her House of Lords Expenses that a flat inMaidstone, Kent is her main residence on which she has claimed £30,000 per annum in tax-free expenses since 2005. This is said to have allowed her to also claim the second home allowance on her London property, a scheme that ostensibly exists to compensate politicians living outside London for the cost of accommodation close to Parliament. Residents living near the flat in Maidstone reportedly said they had not seen any occupiers in the flat since Uddin purchased it and that it has remained completely unfurnished, but Uddin claims: “The Maidstone property is furnished and I strongly deny that I have never lived there” Uddin’s husband even denied having a property in Kent when questioned on the issue

She also has one of the highest claims for overnight subsistence of any member of the Lords.
Uddin’s home in Wapping, where she lives and is registered to vote, is a housing association property. Spitalfields Housing Association received a public subsidy of £37.8 million in 2008. The average rent for its properties is £104 a week, a sixth of the market rate. The allegations of fraud led the Tory opposition leader in Tower Hamlets, Peter Golds, to state, “Lady Uddin is depriving a low-income family of a home which was built for the needy at public expense.” On 5 May 2009, one of the senior Lord’s official, Clerk of the Parliaments, has announced the House of Lords authorities are investigating the report by the Sunday Times. Uddin welcomed the review: “I welcome this review and will co-operate fully with him in the hope of a speedy resolution and clarity that I did not break the rules of the House.”
On 23 November 2009, Uddin’s cases was passed to the police for possible prosecution for fraud. The Daily Telegraph later reported that she was refusing to cooperate with the police investigation, refusing to answer any questions.

The Crown Prosecution Service announced on 10 March 2010 that Baroness Uddin would not face any charges on the grounds that a senior parliamentary official ruled that a Peers “main house” might be a place they visit only once a month. There were no indications that the expenses would be paid back.
On 18 October 2010, the House of Lords Privileges and Conduct Committee ruled that Baroness Uddin had ‘acted in bad faith’ and recommended that she should be asked to repay £125,349 as well as being suspended from Parliament until Easter 2012.

In November 2011, it was revealed that no formal mechanism existed to prevent Baroness Uddin’s return to the House of Lords, even if she refused to repay the expenses that were fraudulently claimed, leading many members of her own party to call for her to resign rather than bring the House of Lords into further disrepute.
The amount of money quoted in her case (£125,349) is probably the largest amount in any of the House of Commons or House of Lords expenses scandals.

Bangladesh Mansion

Further expenses claims by Uddin were later discovered when The Sunday Times revealed that she owns a mansion in Bangladesh. The mansion was described as made out of Italian marble with tiles, mosaics and with a balcony.’ An investigation of this has been acquired to whether she does have a home in Bangladesh. The mansion was believed to be built after Uddin became a peer in 1998, costing £140,000 which was organised by her husband Komar, located in Jawa Bazar in Chhatak; this is where many of her in-laws are originally from. However Uddin claims that the land was bought by her husband’s family, purchased by Kumar’s father in 1980.

FULL UNEDITED WIKIPEDIA VERSION HERE

OH BTW .... SHE IS NOT PAYING BACK ONE SINGLE DIME.

Now then, if Mr. Lunn, thief tho he may be were a member of her privileged group .... any questions? 

Posted by peiper     on 12/19/2011 at 07:10 AM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Finance and Investing • Government • muslims • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - December 14, 2011

a law to ban mosque loudspeakers is tabled by pc weaklings

For all their past wars and glories if that term even applies, Israel also has its cowardly pygmy politicians.

Netanyahu is absolutely correct.  Who the hell wants to listen to that caterwauling five times a day? Why should the rest of the population have to endure that crap? But even he has had to back down as he didn’t get enough support.  Yeah, it’s being tabled. For now.  Which translated probably means, fergitaboutit.  But he was right and he did try.

H/T India Times

Netanyahu backs law to ban loudspeakers at mosques

JERUSALEM: In a controversial move, Israel’s hawkish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed his support for a proposed law that would ban mosques from using loudspeakers to call people to pray, stressing that “there is no need to be more liberal than Europe”.

The law popularly known as the Muezzin Law, proposed by lawmaker Anastassia Michaeli of ultra-nationalist Yisrael Beiteinu party applies to all houses of worship, but the practice is mainly prevalent in mosques.

“There’s no need to be more liberal than Europe,” Netanyahu was quoted by Ha’aretz as telling ministers of the ruling Likud party during a discussion on the proposed law.

However, after intense pressure from Likud ministers Limor Livnat, Dan Meridor and Michael Eitan, who harshly criticised the bill, Netanyahu announced that he was postponing the scheduled debate in the Ministerial Committee for Legislation.

Michaeli has said that hundreds of thousands of Israeli citizens routinely suffer from the noise caused by the muezzin’s calls to prayer.

“The bill comes from a worldview whereby freedom of religion should not be a factor in undermining quality of life,” she emphasised.

“I do not want to turn the bill into a national, religious and cultural issue,” the lawmaker asserted.

“This is a green problem, not a black problem,” she added in reference to the opposition the bill has garnered from politicians and civil rights groups who say it would restrict freedom of religion.

Netanyahu echoed similar sentiments discussing the measure with Likud ministers.

“I have received numerous requests from people who are bothered by the noise from the mosques,” the Israeli Premier said.

“The same problem exists in all European countries, and they know how to deal with it. It’s legitimate in Belgium, it’s legitimate in France. Why isn’t it legitimate here? We don’t need to be more liberal than Europe,” the hawkish leader added.

Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor, however, opposed the move saying there was no need for such a law and that it would only escalate tensions.

“None of the ministers came to Netanyahu’s defence or supported his position,” a minister, who reportedly participated in the meeting, told the Israeli daily.

Realising that he would not be able to muster a majority in support of the law among his ministers, the Prime Minister announced that the bill would be removed from the agenda of the Ministerial Committee for Legislation, which convened a few hours after the Likud meeting.

TIMES

Posted by peiper     on 12/14/2011 at 12:29 PM   
Filed Under: • Israel • muslims •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DIY chain Lowe’s pulls advertising from American Muslim TV show.  muzzie cries foul

So it’s bigotry because a major company may have seen and doesn’t approve of the TV message, and pulls its advertising.
Mr. Ellison, good muzzie that he is, thinks it’s bigotry.  Of course.  Anyone questioning that group for any reason whatever is, bigoted. They’re islamophobic, to use the newer age word.

I’d be curious to know if any Lowes stores in the USA are being picketed.
If it were here in the UK, there’d already be riots.

US DIY chain defends boycott of Muslim TV show

US DIY chain Lowe’s has defended its decision to pull advertising from reality show “All-American Muslim” amid charges the company had given in to bigotry.

“All-American Muslim,” which airs on The Learning Channel and ends its first season Jan. 8, follows several Muslim families in and around the Detroit suburb of Dearborn, Michigan, which is home to one of the largest Muslim populations in the United States and its largest mosque.

It has been accused by one Florida group to be propaganda. But the decision by Lowe’s sparked an outcry by defenders of the show.

North Carolina-based Lowe’s employed its Facebook page to defend itself and called “All-American Muslim,” a “lighting rod” for “strong political and societal views.”
Lowe’s spokeswoman Karen Cobb said the company was one of “dozens” of companies to pull their advertising since late last month. Names of other companies were not immediately available.

Laurie Goldberg, a TLC spokeswoman, declined to say how many companies have pulled their advertising from the show, which attracts about a million viewers per week.

The Florida Family Association, a little-known group that has campaigned against the show, has branded “All-American Muslim” “propaganda” that is “clearly designed to counter legitimate and present-day concerns about many Muslims who are advancing Islamic fundamentalism and Sharia law.”

But U.S. Representative Keith Ellison, who is Muslim, said in a statement that Lowe’s had “chosen to uphold the beliefs of a fringe hate group” and given in to intolerance.

“Corporate America needs to take a stand against these anti-Muslim fringe groups and stand up for what is right because this is what it means to be an American,” he said.

source

Mr. Ellison I’d bet, got elected on a left wing and muslim block vote.  I might be wrong of course. But isn’t it typical that because he doesn’t think Lowes has it right, then of course they aren’t acting as Americans.  Interesting to note that a muslim is deciding what an American is or should be. I guess standing up for what is right, means what is right as defined by Mr. Ellison.

Posted by peiper     on 12/14/2011 at 08:16 AM   
Filed Under: • muslims •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - December 08, 2011

can it get any sillier? US Marines told not to piss in the direction of mecca. AAAaagggghhhhhh

People, honest.  I’m not certain if I wanna laugh or cry. Maybe both?  Or laugh till tears fall.

Now I should be honest about this and admit I haven’t checked it out fully.  OK, really not at all. But since she’s quoting a Marine media source ,, ?

Look, the world is so damn crazy now, even crazier then past generations thought about themselves. It’s so nuts that now I tend toward believing the unbelievable
cos the unbelievable is now the believable. 
Don’t believe that?  Fine.  Then read this.

Latrine directive another step on path to Islamification

By DIANA WEST
The Register-Mail

HAVING WRITTEN COUNTLESS COLUMNS AND BLOG POSTS arguing that the see-no-Islam counterinsurgency strategy (COIN) has led to failure in two wars in the umma (Muslim world) and the dhimmification of the U.S. military, it’s almost funny to see the debate more or less officially joined over my recent column on what appears to be simply the gross-out, PG-13 movie topic of peeing toward Mecca. Or, rather, not peeing toward Mecca.

The latter is the lesson that an Afghan Muslim contractor has been teaching Marines before they deploy to Afghanistan, in accordance with an Islamic canonical hadith called “The Prohibition of Facing the Qiblah When Relieving Oneself.” But maybe the debate had to take this excretory turn with the Pentagon awash in the phony fundamentals of Greg Mortenson’s discredited “Three Cups of Tea.”

Scatological or not, what we are talking about here is an untenable invasion of privacy of American citizens in uniform via religious dictate as taught by the U.S. Marine Corps.

The Nov. 28 print edition of Marine Corps Times carries both an article and a lead editorial on what the paper is politely calling “excretory etiquette” regarding Marines and Mecca—which, incidentally, is about 2,000 miles from Afghanistan. But this isn’t just about etiquette. Given its Islamic religious derivation, the Marines’ excretory instruction strikes me as a violation of religious freedom. Who is the U.S. Marine Corps to instruct American citizens to bring their personal hygiene practices into accord with Islamic law? The Corps in this case is acting as a vehicle of Islamic law, which comprehensively rules on all manner of personal habits, as well as on civil and legal affairs.

Needless to say, the Marine Corps doesn’t see it that way. Its spokesmen have contended narrowly that this lesson taught by a contractor (hired by the Corps) isn’t “formal Marine Corps doctrine,” as the Marine Corps Times editorial puts it. Formal or not, the editors also don’t think this Marine Shariah (Islamic law) is a bad idea. Headlined “Respect differences,” the editorial states: “Thing is, there’s value to this sort of insight.” Perhaps in the name of respecting “differences”?

Heavens, no. This is all about respecting Islam, not “differences.” After all, if it were about “differences,” the respect in question would extend to the non-Islamic belief that not all bodily functions taking place on planet Earth must key off the location of a town in Saudi Arabia. To each his own.

That’s not the editorial’s subject. The value, it says, comes “in light of the tense conditions under which both groups must coexist.”

Tense conditions—as in border firefights? Roadside bombs? No, again. The editorial refers to tensions between Muslims and infidels (BEGIN ITALS)inside the wire(END ITALS). “Consider that in the last four years,” the editorial continues, “nearly 60 coalition troops have been killed by their Afghan counterparts.”

So “respecting differences” here means pee straight or die. That’s the lesson the military wants to teach young Americans heading into the war zone—again, inside the wire. The only way it knows to increase their safety while on their own bases or when “partnering” with Afghans is to school them in the practice of Islamic law. In effect, then, collaboration with the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan requires the United States of America to Islamify its infidel forces, just a little, just to keep those religious crazies in the Afghan ranks from popping off.

More guidelines for U.S. forces: “If you must pass a man praying, pass at a respectful distance. Do not walk between a man praying and Mecca—always walk behind him. ... Do not touch Qurans or prayer rugs.” To be fair to the Marines, those rules come from the Center for Army Lessons Learned. But it’s all of a Pentagon piece. And guess where such “safety” education—the dhimmi rules of Shariah—will be taught next?

I bet it would surprise the brass at the Pentagon to learn that Islam means “submission,” and that the age-old choice Islam has offered infidels is to submit or die. Still, they seem to have learned, as the editorial puts it, that “certain behavior that wouldn’t get a second look stateside could lead to problems at a patrol base in Helmand province.”

“Problems.” What a way to invoke shootings of our people by Afghan forces—the spurting, flaring jihad none dares name. “Counseling Marines to aim east ultimately may head off trouble,” the editorial concludes. Submission always does.

galesburg.com

Posted by peiper     on 12/08/2011 at 07:17 AM   
Filed Under: • Military • muslims • USA •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - December 07, 2011

One rule for them, different one for us

Further to my earlier posting of that attack on the white girl by a gang of (we are told) muslim girls.

Paul Weston over at The Gates of Vienna has an editorial on the subject and more.  A couple of items I overlooked or was unaware of.
For example, I wasn’t aware of the wording with regard to hate or race crimes. He’s worth seeing and so I’ll just copy a sample here and let you read the rest at

H/T Gates of Vienna

One Rule for Them, One Rule for Us
by Paul Weston

Someone holding governmental authority badly needs to tell the British public why there appears to be one rule for them, and one rule for us, when it comes to racially aggravated crime and murder.

Today’s article about Rhea Page is a case in point. Kicked unconscious by a girl gang of drunken Somali Muslims, screaming ‘kill the white slag’: one would have thought this would be labelled a racist incident. Ms Page stated: ‘I honestly think they attacked me just because I was white. I can’t think of any other reason.’

But no, in the eyes of the perverse British judiciary this is not a racial incident, of course. Even worse: Judge Robert Brown allowed them to walk free because he accepted that as Muslims they were unused to drinking… Judge Brown also thought the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from Ms Page’s partner Lewis Moore, 23, who tried to defend her from the attack.

In the wake of the terrible Stephen Lawrence murder, the Macpherson Report defined a racial incident very clearly: “A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person.” Is it not a little odd that such a straightforward statement, eagerly embraced by the British police, is open to question only when the victim is white? Ms Page clearly believes this was a racial incident, so why don’t the police or the judiciary?

And this is not a solitary case. Only last week 19-year-old Danny O’Shea had his throat slashed by a gang of black youths outside his mother’s front door in Newham, east London. The police are not treating this as racist murder. Why not?

That last is only one of a growing list. See the link above. I hadn’t realized it was so long.

Posted by peiper     on 12/07/2011 at 10:41 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • muslims •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

girl gang attack white woman, gang a protected group and go free. SEE THE IDIOT REASONING by judge

You will no doubt recall a post from a week ago with regard to a racist rant in public by a white woman.

She should have known better.  White folks do NOT have a right to express publicly what many think.  That white woman is going to spend Christmas in jail for her own protection, as she’s received death threats, and her home address has been posted to Facebook and Twitter. And all not for what she did, but for what she said.

A woman accused of launching a vile racist rant on a tram is to spend Christmas behind bars after she was remanded in custody for her own safety.
Magistrates took the decision to refuse Emma West’s bail application after they heard she had received death threats and that her address had been circulated on social networking sites Facebook and Twitter.
There were outbursts from supporters of Miss West, who shouted ‘treason’ as she was denied bail at Croydon Magistrates’ Court.

‘Woman on a tram’ to spend Christmas behind bars

And the only reason I am bringing up her case now and here again, is because of the action of four filthy Somali niggers who beat hell out of a white woman, calling her white slags, and suggested killing her.  Of course, we are not surprised and expect this sort of thing from this particular group of life forms, as in general they are not capable of the thinking and feelings of a more civilized world.  You can dress a pig up in a tux, call him friend and invite him into your house but .... it will still be a pig. Won’t it?

The young women who are all muslims it is claimed, were drunk. Take a look at the defense these filthy black and brown sluts put up and the fuckin idiot judge who one can only hope becomes the victim (hopefully a close family member as icing on the race cake as well) of some drunk black muslim. We can only hope.
And yeah, I am pissed.  Imagine how the victim must feel.

Here’s a statement from the stupid idiot mof***er judge about the boy friend trying to defend his girlfriend. PLEASE see the video bmews. What’s it look like to you?

he accepted the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from Mr Moore as he tried to defend his girlfriend, and handed the defendants a suspended sentence.

Everybody is now the victim.

EXCEPT THE VICTIM!

Girl gang who kicked woman in the head while yelling ‘kill the white slag’ freed after judge hears ‘they weren’t used to drinking because they’re Muslims’

· Yobs ripped lump of hair from Rhea Page’s head during High Street attack

· Three sisters and cousin escape with six-month suspended sentences

· Maximum term for assault occasioning actual bodily harm is five years’ jail

· Judge: ‘Those who knock someone to the ground and kick them in the head can expect to go inside, but I’m going to suspend the sentence’

By ANDY DOLAN and KATHERINE FAULKNER

A gang of Muslim women who attacked a passer-by in a city centre walked free from court after a judge heard they were ‘not used to being drunk’ because of their religion.

The group – three sisters and a cousin – allegedly screamed ‘kill the white slag’ as they set upon Rhea Page as she waited for a taxi with her boyfriend.
Miss Page, 22, was left with a bald patch where her hair was pulled out in the attack and was left ‘black and blue’ after suffering a flurry of kicks to the head, back, arms and legs while motionless on the pavement.

Ambaro Maxamed, 24, students Ayan Maxamed, 28, and Hibo Maxamed, 24, and their 28-year-old cousin Ifrah Nur each admitted actual bodily harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment.

But Judge Robert Brown gave them suspended jail terms after hearing mitigation that as Muslims, the women were not used to being drunk. The Koran prohibits Muslims from consuming alcohol, although Islamic teachings permit its use for medicinal purposes.

After the sentencing, Ambaro Maxamed wrote on her Twitter account: ‘Happy happy happy!’, ‘I’m so going out’, and ‘Today has been such a great day’.

Yesterday Miss Page, a care worker, called the sentence ‘disgusting’ and said the gang deserved ‘immediate custody’.

free pass for black muslim scum because of who they are. pix and video and more to read.

And here’s a bit of afterthought from one of the gang of sluts.

‘I’m not proud of it, it’s not something I want to talk about. I just want to get on with my life.’

When asked if she wanted to apologise, she replied: ‘What, to the public? I really don’t care.‘

A couple of years ago I posted an article about a fellow who grew tired, frustrated and finally very angry with his black neighbor. At issue was the neighbor blocking his driveway on a number of occasions.  He complained but that got him nowhere.  Well, one day the black bastard parked across the driveway, the white guy couldn’t get out until he got him to come out and move it and losing his temper, referred to his neighbor in terms that accurately described exactly what he was.  Namely, a black bastard.
He was arrested and charged with anti-social behavior and race hate. He was fined a goodly sum although I don’t now recall how much.
I only mention it here as one example of I’m certain many more, where one set of sub-human life forms seem to have the judges and the law on their side.
And I’d apply that equally to white criminal scum as well.

Everybody is now the victim, except the victim. 

Posted by peiper     on 12/07/2011 at 07:50 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • muslims • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - December 02, 2011

muslim prayers trump new york parking laws.

Oh for heavens sake why won’t the authorities grow some back bone and rid our world of this virus. This scab on society. 
Whatever country they infest, things must follow their faith and things convenient to it.  Never mind local customs or traditions.
I wish we could cut out this cancer once and for all time. With no exceptions. Out,out damn spot!

I am not posting the photos but they are well worth seeing if you haven’t seen em yet.

SEE THE PIX HERE

The upmarket Manhattan block that grinds to a halt at prayer time… as Muslim taxi drivers illegally park outside Islamic center
By DANIEL BATES

With a sea of yellow stretching into the distance, it looks like the taxi queue at a busy airport.

But this picture was actually taken outside a Mosque during a prayer service - with 200 Muslim cabbies illegally parked.

Residents of the wealthy Upper West Side of Manhattan are outraged that their streets are being taken over multiple times each day for the 45-minute service.

The taxi drivers are double and triple parking in a huge line that forces traffic into the oncoming lane.

The situation has flared up and on one occasion a cop telling a taxi driver to move on was swarmed by other hacks - and had to call for reinforcements.

When several other police cars arrived the taxi driver was handcuffed and led away.

Muslims have been parking illegally at the Islamic Cultural Centre for four years but the row has blown up because a road that connects to it that has been closed for the whole time has now reopened.

Prayers take place five times a day but the busiest is on Fridays at lunchtime when up to 300 worshippers - and 200 taxi drivers - are in attendance.

Most of the taxi drivers appear unrepentant with one claiming: ‘I have to pray. I have no choice but to break the rules.’

Cabbie Abdoulaye Diallo, a 30-year-old immigrant from Guinea, told DNA info that he had got several $75 fines for parking illegally outside the mosque but he did not care.

He said: ‘For me, my prayer is more important, because that’s what I’m going to take with me the day I die’.

Residents however are increasingly anxious that they cannot cross the road safely.

‘It’s an accident waiting to happen, said James Beale, the resident manager at a Trump tower block that is next to the mosque.

‘It’s a very dangerous situation. It’s like all the rules of the road are thrown aside,’ he told DNA info.

Abdur Rahman, an assistant imam at the mosque, said it had told worshippers to respect the parking rules but they had failed to do so.

But he also claimed that the parking rules should be more flexible to accommodate worshippers’ needs.

A few comments on the subject by DM readers.

It happens here as well. I recently visited my childhood neighbourhood one Friday. I couldn’t drive my car down the street because of illegal parking near one of the many mosques in Green Street Upton Park. And not a plod to be seen anywhere. Perhaps they’ll take action if an MP gets killed in a fire and the rescue services are unable to reach them.
- Brian Cohen, Jerusalem

America should step on this - NOW!. These people think nothing of complaining when we do something they don’t like.
- A. Green, Bournemouth, England.,

I bet they would complain if taxi company would stop employing muslims for the same reason. Then it would be an issue of human rights,right?
- Lola, Belgium,

wtf? Abdu what?  Abdoulaye?  Jeesh. How about making it more American sounding so we can say it.
How about ...
Abscess.  Vermin in human cloths and walking upright.  How long they been walking that way? Need to find the rocks they live under.  Oh whoops. That looks like a hate thought in progress.

Posted by peiper     on 12/02/2011 at 12:50 PM   
Filed Under: • muslims • USA •  
• Comments (7) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - November 23, 2011

Why is it always white Europeans, and only them ….

I’ve been busier then a duck in a flood since yesterday but especially today.
I seem to have come face to face with that old expression, the faster I run the more behind I get.  I guess that happens when we put off things need doing sooner rather then all at once later. 
So …. checking out my Europe News site I came across this, which they grabbed from Gates of Vienna.  It isn’t too long but the parts that really caught my attention were the following.  See link for all of it and some interesting comments.

Islamophile Illusions
by Fjordman

The Nordic countries’ greatest advantage, historically speaking, has been an ethnically homogeneous population. Our greatest competitive advantage is now being destroyed by state-sponsored politics. As an analogy, let’s say you had a big pile of gold and professor Thomas Hylland Eriksen told you to flush half of the gold down the toilet because this was supposed to be economically beneficial.

Hylland Eriksen said in an interview in 2008 that “The most important ‘blank spot’ now consists of deconstructing the majority so thoroughly that it can never be called the majority again”. If he had said that Somalis or Pakistanis should be deconstructed, this would have triggered strong reactions. Why is it always white Europeans, and only them, who are to be deconstructed and have their countries and cultural history taken away from them?

more at the source

Posted by peiper     on 11/23/2011 at 10:52 AM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • muslims •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - November 18, 2011

Saudi women with attractive eyes may be forced to cover even them.

Hey .. have you folks seen the latest demand the Saudis, well some at least, are making of their women?
You’d think the rop had gone about as far as it could in their control of women.  Apparently not as some want more restrictions. Not the women of course.
Feel sorry for them.

Look at this.

Saudi women with attractive eyes may be forced to cover even them up, if resolution is passed

Islamic state fears effect of ‘tempting’ eyes on men

Says it ‘has the right’ to issue repressive edict

Women must already cover their hair and wear full-length black cloak

By LEON WATSON

Women with attractive eyes may be forced to cover them up under Saudi Arabia’s latest repressive measure, it was revealed today.

The ultra-conservative Islamic state has said it has the right to stop women revealing ‘tempting’ eyes in public.

A spokesperson for Saudi Arabia’s Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, Sheikh Motlab al Nabet, said a proposal to enshrine the measure in law has been tabled.

Women in Saudi Arabia already have to wear a long black cloak, called an abaya, cover their hair and, in some regions, conceal their faces while in public.

If they do not, they face punishments including fines and public floggings.

They are also banned from driving by religious edict and cannot travel without authorisation from their male guardians.

In September, a Saudi women sentenced to 10 lashes for defying the driving ban was only spared when King Abdullah stepped in to stop the public flogging.

Also in September, the king announced that women would be given the right to vote for the first time and run in the country’s 2015 local elections.

The CPVPV, which employs around 3,500 religious police, has repeatedly been accused of human rights violations.

Founded in 1940, its function is to ensure Islamic laws are not broken in public in Saudi Arabia.

In 2002 the committee refused to allow female students out of a burning school in Mecca because they were not wearing the correct head covering.

The decision contributed to the toll of 15 people who were killed in the fire.

source

Posted by peiper     on 11/18/2011 at 12:00 PM   
Filed Under: • muslims • RoPMA •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 15, 2011

kills wife and daughters and would do again as honor demands it

Animal shit murders wife and daughters in ‘honor’ killings and has this to say.  One was only 13 but hey, islam demands honor.

‘May the devil...(defecate) on their graves. Is that what a daughter should be? Would (a daughter) be such a whore?’
Mohammad Shafia

What the F*** is wrong with western culture? Why are these lower then bug life forms even allowed to settle in the west?  Most will never conform to western habit and beliefs. Yeah, maybe a few but damn few. 
I really can’t think of anything else to say. Anything I say will only be a string of swear words which won’t add to anything. 
And they want to bring their stone age thinking here and make it a state religion for us all to follow.

‘I would do it again 100 times’: Muslim father ‘murdered his THREE daughters in honour killing for dating wrong boys’

· Mohammad Shafia ‘spoke to second wife about “treacherous” daughters’
· Both standing trial in Ontario with son, charged with first degree murder
· Afghani father felt ‘ashamed’ that eldest daughter had married Pakistani boy

By RICHARD HARTLEY-PARKINSON and MARK DUELL

A Muslim father charged with murdering his three daughters in apparent honour killings has said he would do it again - even if they came back to life 100 times.
Mohammad Shafia, 58, cursed his daughters Zainab, 19, Sahar, 17, and Geeti, 13, saying they were ‘treacherous’ as he likened them to prostitutes during a conversation that was recorded by police.

He is on trial for their murders after they were found dead in the family car along with their mother, Rona Amir, 50, in the Rideau Canal, located in the Kingston area of Ontario in Canada in 2009.

Shafia, who moved to Canada from Afghanistan with his family, is polygamous and after his arrest was heard telling his second wife, Tooba Yahya, that his daughters had brought shame on the family.

He said: ‘Even if, God forbid, they hoist us onto the gallows… we accept it wholeheartedly’, a day after his arrest.
The court heard the recordings in which Shafia talks about his daughters and the fact that they were dating while ranting about the family’s honour.
Zainab had married her boyfriend - a Pakistani man - angering Shafia and causing family turmoil.

here for the rest + photos

Posted by peiper     on 11/15/2011 at 01:42 PM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • muslims •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - November 11, 2011

a bit of stoning and regular killing. the taliban. just regular folks.

After reading this article I wasn’t sure if the killings were as the headline implies, or just another personal killing. Pretty bad whatever but what registered most was this statement and just a reminder please, these are the kind of people some in govt. believe we can “negotiate” with. Sure. They’re just folks like us.
Uh huh.

‘Anyone who knows about Islam knows that stoning is in the Koran, and that it is Islamic law.
‘There are people who call it inhuman - but in doing so they insult the Prophet. They want to bring foreign thinking to this country.’

Of course, not that those stone age grizzly bearded bastards don’t want to do that in the west. They wouldn’t be satisfied with simply bringing their thinking here, which they’ve managed in great measure to do already, they’re willing to do it at the point of a sword.  Or a suicide bomb.
Just regular folks.

Afghan mother and daughter stoned and shot dead after Taliban accused them of ‘moral deviation and adultery’

Last updated at 4:18 PM on 11th November 2011

Armed men stoned and shot dead a widow and her daughter in Aghanistan after the Taliban accused the women of ‘moral deviation and adultery’, according to reports.
The killing happened on Thursday in the Khawaja Hakim area of Ghazni city, the BBC reported, and two men have now been arrested.
Officials - who blamed the Taliban for the attack - told the Corporation that armed men went into the house where the two women lived, took them to the yard outside and they were stoned and then shot.
‘Neighbours did not help or inform the authorities on time,’ an official told the BBC.
A neighbour of the executed women told M&G.com he heard shots but was afraid to go out.
‘When the women in the neighbourhood washed the bodies of the killed women, they saw signs of stoning.

However, Ghazni provincial police chief Zilawar Zahid denied the reports that the women were stoned to death.
He told reporters: ‘They were killed inside their house.

An investigation is under way to find out why they were killed and Afghan police have arrested two men in connection with the case.’
Officials told the BBC that religious leaders had been issuing fatwas - edicts - asking for reports on anyone who was ‘involved in adultery’.
Earlier this year horrific video footage emerged of Taliban insurgents stoning a couple to death for alleged adultery in northern Afghanistan.
It took place in the district of Dashte Archi, in Kunduz, and was met with outrage in the West.

However, a Taliban spokesman defended the practice, saying: ‘Anyone who knows about Islam knows that stoning is in the Koran, and that it is Islamic law.
‘There are people who call it inhuman - but in doing so they insult the Prophet. They want to bring foreign thinking to this country.’

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 11/11/2011 at 01:53 PM   
Filed Under: • muslims •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - November 07, 2011

they never run out of things to be offended by.

These are long articles and so I won’t post everything. Interesting material and but no surprises here.
People coming from places with stone age thinking demanding that the folks already here and native born, knuckle under to a foreign way of life.  That’s not even news anymore. Is it?

A Satire Draws Fire

FrontPage Magazine 7 November 2011
By Mark Tapson

Here we go again. Charlie Hebdo, a humor magazine in Paris which had produced a spoof issue “guest edited” by, as The New York Times and other media outlets refer to him, the “Prophet Mohammed?,” was firebombed early Wednesday just as the special edition was on its way to the newsstands. Hackers had also disrupted its website with a message in English and Turkish cursing the magazine: “You keep abusing Islam’s almighty Prophet with disgusting and disgraceful cartoons using excuses of freedom of speech.

The magazine had announced the special issue in satirical salute to the “Arab Spring” victory of an Islamist party in Tunisian elections: “Charlie Hebdo has asked Mohammed to be the special editor-in-chief of its next issue,” the magazine said in a statement. “The prophet of Islam didn’t have to be asked twice and we thank him for it.” It renamed itself Charia Hebdo, a pun on the word “shariah,” for the occasion, and featured an editorial by Mohammed entitled “Halal Aperitif” and a women’s supplement called “Madam Sharia.” On the cover was a cartoon of Mohammed announcing, “100 lashes if you don’t die of laughter.”

But Islamic law forbids depictions of its prophet, and as Iran’s glowering Ayatollah Khomeini? once famously remarked, “There is no fun in Islam.” Muslim fundamentalists were apparently not amused by the magazine’s mocking tone, and a Molotov cocktail was thrown through the window of Charlie Hebdo’s offices in the wee hours of the morning, devastating the premises.

Its editor, Stephane Charbonnier, said,

We can’t put out the magazine under these conditions. The stocks are burned, smoke is everywhere, the paste-up board is unusable, everything is melted, there’s no more electricity.

But the issue will appear as scheduled and the magazine’s website appears to have been restored.

read more here

Europe’s veil of fear

Ynetnews 7 November 2011
By Giulio Meotti

The office of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo was badly damaged by a firebomb on Wednesday, after it published a spoof issue “guest edited” by the Prophet Muhammad to salute the victory of the Islamist party in Tunisia’s elections.

The magazine had announced a special issue for publication, renamed “Charia Hebdo,” a play on the French word for Islamic law. The magazine’s website has also been hacked with a message in English and Turkish. The fatwa said: “You keep abusing Islam’s almighty Prophet with disgusting and disgraceful cartoons using excuses of freedom of speech. Be Allah’s curse upon you!”

Charlie Hebdo is the latest in a series of “blasphemous pencils” – European cartoonists, writers and journalists threatened with death for their criticism about Islam. They are people who need a level of personal protection unconceivable even in Israel, a country well-known for its attention to security. And it happens all over Europe.

Kurt Westergaard is the most famous of them. I spoke with him immediately after the attack in Paris. Westergaard is the Danish artist who created the controversial cartoon of the Prophet wearing a bomb in his turban: “Few days ago the police discovered another terrorist plan to attack my newspaper, the Jyllands Posten,” Westergaard said. “My house is protected as a bunker with cameras. I am always guarded by the policemen. Few months ago I had to attend a book presentation in Oslo. But the day before the Norwegian police asked me to cancel the event due to the terrorist threats.”

Five years after the publication of the cartoons, Westergaard still needs the same level of security of a Danish prime minister.

VEIL OF FEAR CONT.

I guess it may a bit harder for these stone age lunatics to get away with as much in the USA.

For Now.

Posted by peiper     on 11/07/2011 at 09:25 AM   
Filed Under: • muslims •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner