Thursday - February 09, 2012
some comments from other places to provoke thought and responses
Received my usual newsletter relating to Europe and things affecting all who live here and as usual clicked on a link.
It had to do with yet another example of those lovers of free speech so long as it theirs (muzzies) while shouting down speakers at a public forum. So typical of them and their lefty liberal lap dogs.
So I clicked and as I say, just the usual and might not have bothered with it until I started reading some of the comments. Which I found to be interesting.
Brussels: University debate disturbed by Muslim fundamentalistsIslam in Europe 9 February 2012
Yesterday ULB university organized a debate between French journalist Caroline Fourest and Hervé Hasquin on the extreme right. The debate was heckled by niqab-wearing activists who shouted “Burqa, bla bla bla” and accused Fourest of Islamophobia.
The activists were mobilized by Souhail Chichah, an economics researcher and assistant at the university, who is known for his extremist views. The debate moderator, Guy Haarscher, urged him to come on stage to speak. According to Le Soir, Souhail Chichah had called for ‘Burqa pride” on social networks, which was dedicated to the ‘stoning of Caroline Fourest’.http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2012/02/brussels-university-debate-disturbed-by.html
There’s a video but it’s in a foreign language so unless you speak French .... But you will hear the attempted disruption. And lets face it, that isn’t even news anymore. Never mind that they haven’t a coherent argument themselves. Their reason for being is simply to impeded others from speaking.
But as mentioned, I was more interested in the comment section. Here’s a few examples. Which btw covered another subject which had to do with muzzies and dogs. I guess what I’m trying to show is that there is resistance to the plague of islam all over Europe. It just isn’t well enough organized, and I have my doubts it ever will be because the right keeps attacking the wrong targets.
Here. See what you think.
Dude, here in Sweden the prime minister is suggesting raising the retirement age to 75, allowing those over 54 to qualify for ‘student loans’ (apparently they don’t as it stands) so they can LEARN A NEW TRADE. This is in a country that has a 25% consumer purchase tax on everything & brings retarded Somalians & asylum seeking Afghani’s by the THOUSANDS. And what do they do once they are here? WELL besides mass gang rape, murder, child molestation, drugs, robbery, assault & driving drunk without a license, NOTHING!! Except live on the dole, continue to rain kids down upon us & complain that their free sh*t isn’t good enough or big enough.
I just read one 23 yr old Afghan asylum seeker has already been jailed for assault 4 times (including against a cop) driving no license twice, drunk driving once, drug dealer of steroids, heroin, pills, threatened to kill a 15 yr old girl if she did not sell drugs for him AND was one of 12 men arrested for the gang rape of a 29 year old Swedish mother of 2 at the asylum housing center. They beat her very badly & she was raped by at least a dozen men, him being one. And he has not even been offered up for DEPORTATION! He will never work, and has never worked - he is violent and poses a threat to humanity here, yet WE support him !! Apparently Swedes will have to work until they DIE in their tracks to support a fat hog somalian woman with 10 kids that follow her in a row like ducklings each one 4 inches taller than the last. I saw this one lady, my god, her kids looked like clones of each other - fat cow buying 100 rolls of toilet paper at the store (even though muzzies always say they don’t use toilet paper) and 20 gallons of oil, while I can afford only 1 litre of cooking oil at a time for my family of 5. Because WE WORK.
Nobody can convince me this isn’t premeditated destruction of our cultures, our countries, and our way of life. By our own governments.
They cannot achieve what they desire until all countries and cultures are the same, and since they cannot raise the rest of the world up to our level, they will bring us down to the rest of the worlds.
Islamonausea, not Islamophobia
Our language needs a term that describes what many critically thinking people feel about Islam according to their own terms, not according to what Muslims wish us to feel or what the PC establishment diagnoses to scare us into allowing more voters for the Left into our countries. We need a term that simultaneously invites Muslims to realize what they need to change about their behavior and religion if they wish to advance from an embarrassing last place in the evolution of civilizations and to earn some real respect among the world community.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/01/islamonausea-not-islamophobia.html
Islamonausea deserves its own article on Wikipedia. Help get Islamonausea into our dictionaries by using the word on blogs, in articles and in Letters to the Editor, and in everyday speech.
I kind of favor that. It does have a ring to it but might not be acceptable to the left here. I’d bet it would become another word branded as, “hate speech.”
If the Dutch have to choose between keeping dogs in their country and keeping Moslems, I hope they have the sense to keep the dogs.
How many Dutch have been killed by dogs? How many by Moslems?
How many Dutch have been raped by dogs? How many by Moslems?
How many Dutch have been mugged by dogs? How many by Moslems?
How many arsons in the Netherlands have been set by dogs? How many by Moslems?
I think the answers are clear: the Moslems out-score the dogs by ratios of hundreds to one.
However here’s a question where the scores are probaby about equal:
How many Dutch have been bitten by dogs? How many by Moslems?The Dutch should not have to be made to choose.
1) Muslims come to their new country
2) Muslims bring their culture...some are stupid, some are idiotic, most are repulsive. (from the hair cover to honor killings)
3) Its not the muslim that changes to suit OUR culkture and traditions,
4) The muslim DEMANDS WE change our culture and traditions to suit them.5) ..and finally. We grow some balls to tell the muslims “either accept OUR culture and traditions, or get out of the country.
http://www.infideltaskforce.com
Yesterday a hellish day.
Went into town on errands overdue. Wife fell when she tripped on a part of paving stone (sidewalk) that was not level. I guess the cold had lifted a small corner and it was her luck to catch it. I only came on the scene after it happened as she’d gone to a market while I continued to the bank.
Nothing broken but banged up a bit. Fell in an odd way and hit one side of her face but fortunately not full on. Landed on her left hand. It being very,very cold, she had lots of layers of clothing. I think they saved her from doing worse.
I don’t know how she managed to drive us home. (I don’t drive here) So anyway, I’m playing caregiver but feel bad that I wasn’t right on the spot to catch her or help. Had to cancel the monthly visit with friends for coffee morning. Just not up to it today.
Posted by peiper
on 02/09/2012 at 10:06 AM
Filed Under: • International • muslims •
• Comments (9)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - February 07, 2012
muslim activists seek restriction on how press reports on muslims and islam.
Not that anyone is surprised.
H/T Stonegate
British Muslims Try to Ban Negative Reporting of IslamHudson New York 7 February 2012
By Soeren KernA Muslim activist group with links to the Muslim Brotherhood has asked the British government to restrict the way the British media reports about Muslims and Islam. The effort to silence criticism of Islam comes amid an ongoing public inquiry into British press standards following a phone-hacking scandal involving the News of the World and other British newspapers.
The Leveson Inquiry, established by British Prime Minister David Cameron in July 2011, is currently considering how to increase government oversight of the British media.
But in a move that many worry will result in government regulation of the Internet, Lord Justice Leveson, a British judge who serves as Chairman of the inquiry, now says he wants to include Internet bloggers into any system of press regulation that he proposes.
Observers say the Leveson Inquiry’s effort to regulate blogging, combined with the Muslim attempt to ban negative reporting about Islam, poses a clear threat to free speech in Britain.
Appearing before the Leveson Inquiry on January 24, Muslim activist Inayat Bunglawala said the amount of negative stories about Muslims in Britain is “demonizing” Islam and fuelling a “false narrative.” He called on the government to do all it can to “ensure a fairer portrayal, a more balanced portrayal of the faith of Islam” in the British media.
In a separate written submission, Bunglawala complained about the “enormous impact of coverage that is proven to be inaccurate, inflammatory, prejudicial and detrimental” to the representation of Islam in Britain.
He continued: “British Muslims as a social group collectively suffer from poor media practices, whether this be the excessive attention granted to fringe Muslim groups, like Muslims Against Crusades, by the media or poor fact-checking prior to publication. Improving media practices and media responsibility on portraying and reporting fairly on Islam and British Muslims, without bias or discrimination or intent to incite anti-Muslim prejudice, is an urgent concern.”
British Muslims as a social group collectively suffer from poor media practices
Oh right. No bout adoubt it.
Like when some grizzly bearded scummy creeps carry signs saying, “Behead those who mock islam.” Or that by now brilliant classic, “To hell with democracy.”
Or issuing death threats to writers of books that most muzzies never even read for themselves. Death threats against cartoonists. Threats against the very culture and countries where they settle and accept benefits. Poor media practices. Right. Like reporting on the ban on Rushdie just recently in India, which prevented him from attending a book fair due only to fear of muslim reaction. With good cause one might say because his life was threatened if he tried to attend. Yeah, all that bad press is unfair. Why, those mean and nasty Brit newspapers reporting on the muslim gangs targeting white girls for forced prostitution. (Eastern European mostly gypos do the same and recently have been found to be taking homeless off streets and shippling them to eastern europe and placed in forced servitude.)
Forget that what they do produces the kind of coverage given the vermin.
Anyway, it’s all Bush’s fault. Or the Jews and their Christian friends.
Meanwhile, most ppl have already given up on the hope (misplaced) that there might be a large moderate muslim protest rally against the terrorists.
There could be hope of course as it’s rumored that one moderate muzzie was found hiding under a bed. The location is secret as death threats have already been reported and protest posters being prepared in the event this moderate is found. Alive.
OH! And let us not forget the twisted thinking that produces ‘honor killings’ as a normal way of dealing with family issues. Or in fact, sees honor in murder.
Lets not report all that as it might create the correct impression of a stone age religion and way of life that militant islamists will force on the globe if allowed.
Posted by peiper
on 02/07/2012 at 10:38 AM
Filed Under: • muslims • UK •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - February 06, 2012
some vermin, their history and their human (?) rights
The links are provided should anyone want to read the full stories. You’d think we’d all be tired of this kind of thing by now. Well, yes. It is about the same old same old. But ..... it’s happening right here and it’s on going. Emotions run the gamut from concern to fright to downright anger. And of course frustration.
Lots and lots of that. Seem Europa and it’s union and too many Brit lawyers and civil rights types, are very concerned about the rights of the vermin shown here and less about the right to life of the many victims these bastards would enjoy taking away. And in the most horrific manner they could arrange.
Terrorists may be mad dogs, they may want to return to the dark ages, they are filthy, grubby and unwashed looking creeps.
But they most certainly are not stupid. Well not all of them are. But even the dumbest among them doesn’t require a degree to turn himself into a flaming bomb at the behest of these scum. They know how the west works (and doesn’t work) and how to use the western system against itself. They are smart enough for that. And those who aren’t have smart lawyers clearing a path for them. And not only that. How’s this strike you?
Here’s a story regarding a group of MPs (Members of Parliament).
MPs visit Abu Hamza at Belmarsh to canvass his views for a report. He is referred to respectfully throughout as ‘Mr Abu Hamza’ Here’s a guy who says that it’s perfectly okay to kill anyone for no other reason then they aren’t muslims.
These animals shouldn’t be given refuge anywhere and when caught should be deleted with extreme prejudice. And fuck the ass-wipes at the Euro-pee-on court of human rights. Deleting them might not be a bad idea either.
Here’s some quick snaps for you to look at and think about. You should you know. After all, you are all on their murder list. And these vermin are only three.
SubHuman Vermin #1 for your consideration.
Abu Hamza
It took years to jail him, but now MPs visit Abu Hamza at Belmarsh to canvass his views· Al Qaeda is trying to recruit female suicide bombers in Britain, MPs warn
· Internet often to blame for radicalising extremists, report warns
· Select committee blasted by family of 7/7 victim for interviewing hate preacher Abu Hamza
By JACK DOYLE
A group of MPs who visited hate-preacher Abu Hamza in his jail cell have published his views in an official report.
Members of the home affairs select committee went to high-security Belmarsh prison to interview the cleric who was jailed after telling his followers that the murder of non-Muslims was justified ‘even if there is no reason’.
Their report on violent radicalism is published today and includes an uncritical summary of Hamza’s comments. He is referred to respectfully throughout as ‘Mr Abu Hamza’.Families of terror attack victims condemned the committee and its chairman, Labour MP Keith Vaz. Graham Foulkes, whose 22-year-old son David was murdered in the Edgware Road bombing on July 7, 2005, said the visit was ‘deeply inappropriate’.
He said: ‘I think what they are doing by visiting him in jail is legitimising his claims and his beliefs, which are to kill and maim men and women and to destroy our society.
‘The worrying thing is that as a result Hamza will tell his followers, “Look, they are taking me seriously”.’‘A substantial number of terrorist attacks at home and abroad have happened because of Abu Hamza.
Vermin #2
Saajid Badat
‘Shoe-bomb’ terrorist to be released from jail on opening day of the Olympic GamesBy EMMA REYNOLDS
The notorious terrorist who plotted a shoe-bomb attack on a plane is to be freed from jail just hours before the Olympic Games begin.
Saajid Badat’s release will only add to security fears at the high-profile event in London, which opens on July 27.
The 32-year-old was jailed for 13 years in 2005 after conspiring with two other radical Muslims to blow up a passenger jet - but he will be released after serving just eight years and eight months.
The religious teacher from Gloucester admitted to conspiring with Brit Richard Reid and Belgian terrorist Nizar Trabelsi to blow up flights to the U.S. in 2001.
But now he is due to be freed two-thirds of the way through his sentenceon the official opening day of the biggest sporting event in the world, according to the Daily Mirror.
People are furious this guy is being released on that day but it’s just a quirk of fate,’ said a security source.He had even booked a ticket for a flight from Amsterdam to the U.S., but he had a last-minute change of heart and never boarded the plane.
His fellow plotter Reid was overpowered by fellow passengers on a flight from Paris to Miami while trying to detonate the bomb in his shoes, and is now serving a life sentence in America.
and our last subhuman of this group.
Vermin #3
Abu Qatada
Osama Bin Laden’s ‘right-hand man in Europe’ Abu Qatada could walk from prison today despite being ‘extraordinarily dangerous’
Lawyers are arguing he should be released on bail after being held for six and a half years
By CHARLES WALFORD
Hate preacher Abu Qatada could today walk free from prison to a life on benefits with his wife and five children.
Qatada, who has cost the UK taxpayer more than £1million in benefits, prison and legal fees, is currently being held at Long Lartin high security prison in Worcestershire after breaching previous bail terms.
British diplomats continue to seek assurances from the Jordanian authorities that evidence gained through torture would not be used against him.
The issue was the key reason why Qatada won an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights last month.
The judges ruled that sending Qatada back to face terror charges without such assurances would deny him his right to a fair trial and be a ‘flagrant denial of justice’.
Mrs May vowed that Qatada, who has been held for six and a half years, would be kept behind bars while she considered all legal options to send him back and the Home Office said he ‘poses a real risk to national security’.
But Qatada’s defence team convinced an immigration judge to release him at a hearing in central London.
Abu Qatada read all of it here
Posted by peiper
on 02/06/2012 at 10:23 AM
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • EUro-peons • muslims • Terrorists • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - February 04, 2012
muslim prayers
Some of our regulars may recall the stories and photos of muslims taking over streets in Paris to pray.
Last year I posted photos like this one taken in France.
It was one of several areas in Paris where streets are often blocked.
Since then, it is my understanding that the French passed a law last year making it illegal to do this. Folks who aren’t muslims but who may for circumstances out of their control and who live in these areas, find it impossible to get around or into their own homes at times. That is what they claim but then it’s probably just islamophobia. Anyway, the muzzies said that they would just ignore the ban and continue as usual. I haven’t checked for any updates to that original story.
But this photo is current.
And it isn’t Paris, France.
The Mecca of the city: In a London street, the faithful find a way to pray as their mosque overflowsBy DAILY MAIL REPORTER
In the shadow of the glass and steel skyscrapers of London’s Square Mile, hundreds of Muslims kneel in the street for Friday prayers.
Yesterday’s hour-long service a stone’s throw from the heart of the financial district proved so popular that worshippers filled the streets around the tiny community mosque.
City workers in pinstripe suits mixed with Muslims from the local Bangladeshi community, cramming into the streets beside a Bentley and other parked cars.
The Brune Street mosque, in Spitalfields, East London, is the nearest mosque for Friday prayers for many City workers and others from Brick Lane and Whitechapel.
It is a one-room community mosque with a maximum capacity of 100, so when some 300 turn up for Friday midday prayers locals have become accustomed to seeing worshippers kneeling in the surrounding streets, all facing Mecca.
One worshipper said: ‘It’s grown and grown in recent years. It started off as just one room in the mosque, but now people come from all over the City and there just isn’t the room for them in the building.
That’s how it starts okay. You see one insect inside your house and you hafta know there’s millions more just waiting to come out.
Posted by peiper
on 02/04/2012 at 12:46 PM
Filed Under: • muslims •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 02, 2012
a plot inspired by al-Qaeda but conceived entirely on British soil.
Police have broken up a terrorist ring. But damn it, these filthy sub human muslim scum can be out and free in 6 years. Why? Because .... well here.
Read it yourself.
Some of these sub humans are Brit born. Some would say they’re actually British as well as human. Well some would be mistaken.
Interesting however. How times and attitudes change with the help of the weepy eyed left.
After WW2, the Brits murdered a fellow known as Lord Haw-Haw. OK, They executed him then, for treason. Thing is though, he was not a Brit nor was he a Brit citizen, having accepted German citizenship. He was in fact, an American originally. But the victors in any war require blood revenge and so they killed him.
In actual fact btw, his wife was closer to committing treason as she was Brit born and raised. I guess her role working for the Germans was lesser. ??
He made propaganda broadcasts that most Brits laughed at, they were usually so bizarre.
So fast forward to 2012 and guys who were plotting to kill on a grand scale and support foreign terrorists though born here, go to jail for a few years and then will be free. I guess what these vermin were planning wasn’t treason. ??????
My take? After the war the left wanted Haw-Haw dead. Today the left wants to keep these scum alive cos killing them might violate some sort of rights issue.
Big Ben bomb gang out in six years: Outrage as terror plotters plead guilty in turn for light sentencesThe conspiracy involved nine Muslim defendants
They were all British, living in London, Cardiff and Stoke-on-Trent
Al-Qaeda inspired radicals arrested FOUR days before they planned to plant bombs in London Stock Exchange toilets
By REBECCA CAMBERA terror gang who planned a Mumbai-style bomb blitz in London could walk free in less than six years after striking an extraordinary 11th-hour plea bargain.
The four Muslim fanatics intended to unleash a Christmas campaign of atrocities with targets including the Stock Exchange, Big Ben, Westminster Abbey, the Palace of Westminster and the London Eye.
They and five others had been facing a five-month trial at Woolwich Crown Court and could have expected sentences of 20 years.But at the 11th hour they decided to plead guilty after a judge indicated they would receive lesser sentences for admitting the plot.
The Crown wanted to avoid both the estimated £2.5million cost of a high-security trial and the possibility of acquittals.
So a rare so-called ‘Goodyear’ direction hearing was arranged in which defence barristers receive guidance from the judge about how long he plans to jail those accused if they admit their guilt.
In this case, Mr Justice Wilkie suggested ringleader Mohammed Chowdhury, 21, would receive no more than 13½ years and his 28-year-old accomplice, Shah Rahman, 12 years.
He said the case did not merit an indefinite imprisonment for public protection because their plans were not developed, and he took account of Chowdhury’s youth.
Chowdhury is likely to spend less than half of his sentence behind bars owing to time already served on remand, while Rahman can expect to be out in five years.
Following the Goodyear hearing, others who had lesser roles in the plot swiftly pleaded guilty knowing that they would attract even more lenient jail terms when they are sentenced next week.
Tory MP Patrick Mercer said a term of five or six years ‘does not seem particularly serious’ for acts of terrorism which could have killed many innocent people.
MORE TO SEE AND READ HERE. DAILY MAIL , VIDEO REPORT
IN DEPTH SAME STORY IN THE TELEGRAPH
Posted by peiper
on 02/02/2012 at 02:40 PM
Filed Under: • muslims • Terrorists • UK •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - January 25, 2012
REMEMBERING DANIEL PEARL
Lest we forget, and honestly I never did. I lifted this from Front Page today. I don’t know what I can say that would add anything. I think the article says it all.
I thought I should share it and I think you should read it. The rest is as usual, at the link.
The Unlearned Lessons of Daniel Pearl’s Murder
Bruce Thornton
Ten years ago this week, Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped by Islamic terrorists in Pakistan, after he had been lured into what he thought was an interview with Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani about the links between al Qaeda and the “shoe bomber” Richard Reid. The shadowy Pakistani group that kidnapped Pearl accused him of being a spy for the CIA, and made several demands, including the release of Pakistani detainees from Guantanamo. Nine days later, Pearl was murdered and beheaded, and on February 21, a video was released called “The Slaughter of the Spy-Journalist, the Jew Daniel Pearl.”
The footage showed Pearl’s “confession” and brutal decapitation, interspersed with images of dead Muslims, George Bush shaking hands with Ariel Sharon, and Palestinians allegedly killed by Israeli Defense Forces, including 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura, whose death was later exposed as a Palestinian fabrication. Later, captured 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would brag to interrogators that he personally had beheaded Pearl. As for his abductor, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, though tried and condemned to death, still lives in a Pakistani jail cell, from which according to some reports he has planned other terrorist attacks.
The killing of Pearl concentrated much of what Andrew McCarthy calls the “willful blindness” of many in the West to the Islamic roots of the perpetrators’ violence. At the time, most of the media mainly decried Pearl’s death because he was a reporter. Worse yet were the comments that scolded the terrorists for not understanding that American journalists are neutral observers whose impartiality could help them get their story out. As a New York Times editorial put it,
“The terrible irony of Mr. Pearl’s murder is that he and other independent journalists have been trying to present a detailed and informed portrait of the mindset, motives and grievances of the Islamic fundamentalists in the wake of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 and the war in Afghanistan. That work will continue despite the killing, but the kidnappers have only undermined their cause by their acts.”The professional corruption of the mainstream-media was revealed in this statement, with its claims that journalists are objective (mostly false) and have no loyalties to their own country and people (mostly true), and that the murderers had a legitimate “cause” and “grievances” (moral idiocy and cowardice).
Posted by peiper
on 01/25/2012 at 11:53 AM
Filed Under: • muslims • Terrorists •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - January 22, 2012
Taliban executes 15 Pakistani soldiers.
Nose buried in weekend papers and mags but this article comes from the net. No surprise. Less then an hour ago.
These are the folks our troops are ordered to treat ‘humanely.’
I don’t normally like to simply post an article and let it go. But heck. What can I say? The photos alone speak for themselves. I have one posted here but there are 6 more at the link below if you need that many to show what these vermin are like.
Handcuffed, blindfolded and shot in the back of the head: Taliban releases horrific video of executions of 15 Pakistani soldiers
The paramilitary troops were abducted on December 23
‘God is greatest’ the Taliban yelled as they fired AK-47 rifles
Horrific video has been copied and distributed in street marketsBy JILL REILLY
A video showing fifteen Pakistani soldiers being lined up and shot dead by a firing squad has been released by the Taliban.
The paramilitary troops were abducted on December 23 in what the terror group described as an operation to avenge the deaths of insurgents in Pakistan.
The release of the horrific video is intended to serve as a warning to Pakistan’s 600,000-member army, which has failed to break the back of the insurgents despite superior firepower and a series of offensives against their strongholds in mountain regions.
The abducted soldiers were stood blindfolded, handcuffed to each other on a barren hilltop as one of their bearded Taliban captors held an AK-47 rifle and spoke with fury about revenge.
‘Twelve of our comrades were besieged and mercilessly martyred in the Khyber Agency (area),’ said the militant.
‘Our pious women were also targeted. To avenge those comrades, we will kill these men. We warn the government of Pakistan that if the killing of our friends is not halted, this will be the fate of you all.’
Before death, one of the men described how dozens of Taliban fighters stormed their fort in the northwestern Tank district and kidnapped the soldiers.
‘They attacked us with rockets, killed a sentry. One ran away. The Taliban entered the fort and captured us with our weapons,’ he said, sitting in rows with other soldiers with their arms folded and legs crossed in front of Taliban banners.
‘They tied our hands, put us in a Datsun and took us away.’
Posted by peiper
on 01/22/2012 at 11:49 AM
Filed Under: • muslims • Terrorists • War-Stories •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - January 13, 2012
muslim councillor in court for expense fiddling. for the second time.
A small blurb in this morning’s Telegraph caught my eye. Not cos it’s a super exciting kind of thing. Really dull in it’s own way but no surprise.
Yawn.
A councillor has admitted being a benefits cheat.
FOR THE SECOND TIME
Jeesh. What sort of incentive did the powers that leach give her to convince her she’d committed a crime. It’s stealing. Period.
Her name is Shelina Akhtar, but I’d guess where she originally comes from that kind of thing is par for the course.
Take a look.
councillor convicted of second benefit fraud
By Andrew Gilligan
A key supporter of Tower Hamlets’ extremist-linked mayor, Lutfur Rahman, today pleaded guilty to three counts of dishonestly claiming housing and council tax benefits – the second time she has been convicted of such offences.
Councillor Shelina Akhtar failed to turn up in court at the start of the case today, claiming that she was unwell and unfit to stand trial, but the judge dismissed her claim and issued a warrant for her arrest. When she finally appeared this afternoon, Judge Platt told her: “I make you no promises today. This is the second time you have committed fraud against the state regarding benefits to which you are not entitled. The court needs to know more before deciding on the appropriate sentence.” Akhtar cheated the taxpayer of just over £1100 in benefits. She will be sentenced next month.The prosecutor, Michelle Fawcett, said: “She is a local councillor and the case, therefore, was more serious. This defendant has previous convictions for identical matters.”
In 2010 Akhtar, of Blackwall Way, was handed 100 hours of unpaid work and ordered to pay £250 costs after being found guilty of dishonestly claiming jobseeker’s allowance, housing benefit and council tax benefit during a case at Thames Magistrates’ Court.
Akhtar is one of eight Tower Hamlets councillors who were expelled from the Labour Party after deciding to support Lutfur, who was sacked as Labour’s candidate for mayor for his close links to an extremist Muslim group, the Islamic Forum of Europe. Lutfur took the Telegraph to the Press Complaints Commission - and lost – after we described Akhtar as a “Lutfur Rahman councillor.” He tried to claim that she was not connected to him. (He has also tried to claim that he is not linked to extremism – he lost that complaint, too.)
To be fair now, cause we don’t wanna be accused of islamophobia or nuttin’ like it, she comes from a different country and a different culture. And like others of her ilk, many others in fact, (way,way too many) the rules of the country they move to of course does not apply to them. Neither do the laws.
So I guess some slack has to be cut to insure fairness and understanding. Not that these folks would reciprocate of course.
Yesterday, coming under much criticism for a law in Israel regarding pals, an Israeli politician whose name I can’t recall but whose statement I can, said that “human rights was no excuse for committing national suicide.”
I think many Brits would agree with that. Now if only they could get their leaders to understand.
Posted by peiper
on 01/13/2012 at 09:27 AM
Filed Under: • Justice - LACK OF • muslims •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - January 06, 2012
a mosque for athens.
Except for their money troubles and the euro, we don’t seem to hear much from the Greeks. In fact, I don’t think they ever make the news in any big way.
But .... this caught my eye today and so I guess they have problems other then finance.
In other words, many of them don’t want this but govts. keep pushing. And if it wasn’t a misprint, some have been pushing since 1939.
Greek group appeals against plans to build mosque in AthensA group of Greeks that includes bishops, academics and military officers have appealed against a parliamentary bill that will allow the construction of a mosque in the Greek capital.
According to the Greek press, a petition submitted to the Council of State in December was signed by Greek Orthodox Metropolitan Seraphim of Piraeus, as well as a university professor, naval officers and five residents of the area in which the mosque is planned to be built. The appeal argues that the construction of a mosque would be in violation of the constitution and harmful for national unity. It also cites the high cost of the building project in the face of Greece’s financial crisis.Known for his far-right views, Seraphim said the bill constituted an anti-Christian action and described it as disrespectful to Christian martyrs. He went on to condemn the Greek parliament for approving such a bill.
The controversial bill was passed in 2006 under the New Democracy party government. Renewed debate over the construction of the mosque began in November after the former Papandreou government made a commitment to complete the project by spring 2012, according to the Greek press.
Although the municipal government of Athens gave the permission required for the mosque to be constructed in 2006, the project remains unfinished due to ongoing resistance. Navy officers have refused to vacate a disused naval base in Athens’ Votanikos district, where the mosque is planned to be built.
Athens is unique among the capital cities of the original 15 member states of the EU in that it does not have a dedicated mosque. Until now, Muslims in Greece have been worshipping in makeshift mosques in basement apartments, coffee shops, garages and old warehouses.
Debate over the construction of a mosque in Athens is not unprecedented. Several resolutions on this issue have been discussed by the Greek parliament since 1939 and a further, draft bill was approved in 2000. However, Muslims in Athens have not enjoyed access to a dedicated mosque due to opposition by the church and previous governments.
Posted by peiper
on 01/06/2012 at 09:31 AM
Filed Under: • muslims •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - January 05, 2012
Muslim immigrants will find it more difficult to obtain French citizenship
Seems to me to be a bit late in the game. But maybe better late then never. It will really be interesting to see how this pans out. For the sake of France, I hope it works well and to their benefit. But I tend towards pessimism in today’s world. I don’t think much of politicians anywhere, I tend to not even trust the ones I think I like.
According to the media here, French president Sarkozy has dropped a lot in popularity and some are saying he might not survive the next election.
I don’t follow much in French politics and I’ll be honest. All I do know which isn’t a lot, I have learned only from Brit newspapers and radio news. Which is hardly serious research. So it’s really more superficial info.
However, every now and then I do run across other sources, like this one from Stonegate. I haven’t posted the entire article but it’s worth a read.
I still have a raging cough and cold bug, back on antibiotics so this is my only post today.
I wish the French much good luck but …… once they opened those pc gates to hell, I think it could be all over except the jihad, which happened by stealth.
France’s Tottery Effort to Reverse Creeping Islamization
by Soeren Kern
Muslim immigrants will find it more difficult to obtain French citizenship from now on.
New citizenship rules that entered into effect on January 1, 2012 will require all applicants to pass exams on French culture and history and also to prove that their French language skills are equivalent to those of a 15-year-old native speaker. Moreover, candidates seeking French citizenship will be required to pledge allegiance to “French values.”The new measures—drawn up by Interior Minister Claude Guéant—are part of a concerted effort by the French government to push back against the Islamization of France.
Muslim applicants make up the majority of the 100,000 people who are naturalized as French citizens each year; there is also rising frustration that the country’s estimated 6.5 million Muslims are not integrating into French society.
Guéant has said that immigrants who refuse to assimilate should be denied French citizenship.
According to Guéant, a member of President Nicolas Sarkozy’s ruling UMP party, the citizenship process should be “a solemn occasion between the host nation and the applicant” and that immigrants should be integrated through language and “an adherence to the principals, values and symbols of our democracy.”
From now on, applicants for French citizenship will also be required to sign a new charter establishing their rights and responsibilities. Drafted by France’s High Council for Integration (HCI), the charter reads: “Becoming French is not a mere administrative step. It is a decision that requires a lot of thought … applicants will no longer be able to claim allegiance to another country while on French soil.” The new rules, however, will not affect dual nationality, which will still be allowed.
Separately, Guéant also announced a proposal to require non-French children born in France who would normally be automatically naturalized at the age of 18 to formally apply for citizenship.
In addition, Guéant announced plans to reduce the number of legal immigrants coming to France annually from 200,000 to 180,000 and has called for those convicted of a felony to be expelled from the country.
The new citizenship requirements form part of a larger government effort to reverse decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged the establishment of a parallel Muslim society in France.
In February 2011, Sarkozy denounced multiculturalism as a failure and said Muslims must assimilate into the French culture if they want to be welcomed in France. In a live-broadcast interview with French Channel One television, Sarkozy said: “I do not want a society where communities coexist side by side …
France will not welcome people who do not agree to melt into a single community.
We have been too busy with the identity of those who arrived and not enough with the identity of the country that accepted them.”
Question. So will France be allowed to deport those who don’t want to be citizens? Unlikely.
But the biggest threat to France that I see is many who will become citizens. And then vote. And that’s the point at which you can start the count down to the demise of what was once a great country. Whatever their faults they were once a great country. Whatever their supposed faults, they weren’t stone age.
Posted by peiper
on 01/05/2012 at 10:44 AM
Filed Under: • FRANCE • muslims •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - January 03, 2012
someone wants to ban Muslim call to prayer on the basis of noise pollution. fatwah to follow?
H/T The Jerusalem Post
It isn’t so much that I’m making fun of someone’s religion. ok. Maybe just a little. But for some time now I have found it rather odd, that more hasn’t been heard of about this problem. Here and there a few times over the last year or so but nothing really outstanding that I’ve been aware of.
I’d think it might be very hard to live in an environment where these calls are made by ppl who sound as if they have a belly ache. And then amplify it.
If people are really serious about their faith, wouldn’t an alarm clock work as well? Or perhaps not. Whatever, I’d sure hate to have to listen to this stuff at four in the morning.
I guess a fatwah will be in the offering soon against Mrs Michaeli and any who agree with her. Cos muzzie rights always trump the rights of others.
Silencing the Muezzin
By ARIEH O’SULLIVAN / THE MEDIA LINE
Michaeli wants to ban Muslim call to prayer on the basis of noise pollution.
Before the dawn rolls in from the east, Muslim worshipers have already been summoned to prayer by the muezzin’s call. Echoing off the stone walls of houses and apartments in Jerusalem, the summons is heard in Muslim, Christian and Jewish neighborhoods alike.
Not everyone likes it, particularly not at four in the morning. A move by Israel Beiteinu MK Anastasia Michaeli to have speakers removed from mosques aims to tone down this age-old, sacred call to prayer.
Michaeli, who drafted the bill, says it’s not singling out Muslims but rather going after noise pollution.
“We respect the freedom of religion, the freedom of thinking, the freedom of staying in the place they want to stay, but at the same time we need to respect the people who want to sleep at four o’clock in the morning,” Michaeli told The Media Line.
A mother of eight, Michaeli, 36, says she’s particularly concerned for the children who are wakened by the call. “This noise pollution disturbs them.”
Embraced by some as a long overdue measure and dismissed by others as everything from racist to superfluous, Michaeli’s bill has highlighted the complexities involved in coexisting in the Jewish state with a large Muslim minority in towns and cities that are becoming increasingly mixed.Cities like Jaffa, Acre, Nazareth, Ramle, Lod and Jerusalem with their sizeable Arab neighborhoods are particularly affected by the call, known as the adhan, which is recited five times a day. Michaeli toured these cities recently, garnering support from some of the mayors and a large chunk of the Jewish population who she says are losing tolerance for the wail.
“I hear the call to prayer at night and it bothers me and the kids. They have raised the idea about lowering the volume of the speakers but nothing has ever been done. It continues,” says Motti Gabai, a resident of Jerusalem’s Gilo neighborhood whose house borders the Arab neighborhood of Beit Safafa.
Michaeli says attempts in the past to get the muezzin to lower the volume have failed. She bemoans the failure by officials to enforce existing noise pollution codes, saying police have complained they don’t have adequate meters for determining noise level. Michaeli proposes using new, less intrusive, electronic forms of summoning the devout to prayer such as internet alarms and personalized radio broadcasts.
Reactions to Michaeli’s bill have been vocal and thousands of Israeli Arabs have protested in the streets against it.The bill is not against their religion. I know that they have to pray five times a day and I respect that. Let them pray but not at a [noise] level that disturbs others,” Michaeli says.
“In Israel there is no limit on the number of speakers that can be placed on a mosque and the speakers are directed in all directions,” Michaeli says.
Posted by peiper
on 01/03/2012 at 04:05 AM
Filed Under: • Israel • muslims •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - December 22, 2011
not exactly just another rop story … this really exposes how stupid and backward they are
They are so damn pig ignorant. Barely even humans. Hey, are pigs really ignorant? Can’t be as ignorant as the sheep who follow the RoP. Right?
The French have been trying, as I understand the reports, to make these stone age life forms assimilate more and become part of the French culture. Waste of time and effort. The only thing they (the French) will achieve will be the eventual watering down and demise of their own culture. With traditions forgotten and apologies made to former colonies and with cross culture/ religion marriages etc., they will kiss goodbye to a 1,000 years of art, science, culture, language and learning, and a thousand years of annoying the Brits. Of course, they’ll continue with that but by then all men will be bearded and women covered head to toe and French might become a dead language.
How’s that for a Christmas horror story?
Yeah I know, we do get our jollies cracking wise about them from time to time. Especially the Brits. And especially now with the veto handed down recently by the Prime Minister, David Cameron, on the eurozone issue. Pissed off Sarkozy of France so much, he had a few words to say about Call Me Dave and another minister in the French govt. mouthed off about the Brit economy and then backed down.
Well the long and the short of it was that instead of becoming the honcho calling the shots from Paris, poor Mr. Sarkozy suddenly found himself isolated as the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, showed her diplomatic skills by not threatening England but instead has offered a compromise to placate the Brits and be friends. Sarko not a happy camper tonight.
Anyway .... the man in question below can’t be French as reported. Not if he’s a muzzie. No way.
But I got sidetracked again. Here’s what this post is all about.
French Muslim jailed for punching nurse who tried to remove wife’s burqa during childbirth
By IAN SPARKSA Muslim man who punched a nurse for trying to remove his wife’s burqa during childbirth has been jailed in France.
Nassim Mimoune, 24, had already been expelled from the delivery room for branding the midwife a ‘rapist’ as she carried out an intimate examination of his wife.
Then through a window he spotted the nurse taking off his wife’s burqa as she prepared to give birth.
He smashed open the locked door and hit the woman in the face, demanding she replace the full Islamic face veil.
As his wife delivered a baby boy, Mimoune was ejected from the building by security men from the hospital in Marseille and arrested for assault.
A judge in the southern French port jailed Mimoune for six months on Wednesday, telling him: ‘Your religious values are not superior to the laws of the republic.’
SOURCE FOR MYTHICAL FRENCH MUZZIE STORY
Posted by peiper
on 12/22/2011 at 02:09 PM
Filed Under: • FRANCE • muslims •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - December 21, 2011
honor killing BS. it’s murder period.
So they immigrate to a civilized country but continue as always to drag along their stone age religion and foreign ways.
Worse yet, the west continues to allow them in, where they thrive and they multiply like insects on the way to becoming the majority. Who will vote.
Welcome to multi culture and diversity in the 21st century.
Muzzies won’t do us in. The political pygmies running things in the west will do it all for them.
There is no reasoning or any possible accommodation with ignorant turd world scum.
How would it possible to try and talk reason to a jerk who think honor means killing the baby AND the family. Funny thing, don’t hear much about them killing themselves. Do we? After all, surely if they carried that much ‘shame’ they’d want to check out of this life in search of their 72 virgins. Oh no. It’s always others have to buy the farm.
Baby born to Muslim mother after affair must be adopted to stop honour killing attempts by ‘shamed’ grandfatherUnmarried mother ran away after becoming pregnant because she feared what her father would do
One-year-old baby girl will be adopted by Muslim family
Natural father wanted child to live with him and his wife
By ROB COOPERA baby born to a Muslim mother after an affair must be adopted to prevent the child becoming the victim of an honour killing, the Court of Appeal ruled today.
The baby’s mother, who is not married, was so ‘terrified’ of how her family would react to her affair with a married man and becoming pregnant that she ran away from home.
She then concealed her pregnancy by wearing loose clothes and travelling to the other side of town for her antenatal care.
The baby’s maternal grandmother had told police that if her husband found out about the child ‘he would consider himself honour-bound to kill the child, the mother, the grandmother herself and the grandmother’s other children’.
Today Lord Justice Munby, Lady Justice Black and Lord Justice Kitchin said in a joint ruling that the child was at risk if she was not adopted.They said if the grandfather discovered the affair ‘it would be a matter of intense almost unimaginable shame to him and his family’.
Posted by peiper
on 12/21/2011 at 01:56 PM
Filed Under: • muslims • UK •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - December 19, 2011
more law and disorder and the joke named justice
Tiz always thus. One rule and law for one group, and another set of standards for another.
These stories have made the news and passed pretty quickly cos more important stories take their place. Like how the evil American empire, so described on the radio here by the lawyer of that queer traitor Bradley Manning, is treating his baby faced innocent client. The other person interviewed (for the prosecution) holds the view and correctly I believe, that Manning could not have had the time to read all 125,000 docs he stole and gave to Wikileaks. So the claim of his altruistic intention is rubbish. I sidetracked myself again. That isn’t the subject of this post.
This is.
Ok, fair is fair and if someone fiddles at the expense of the taxpayer, they damn well should face the humiliation of fines and exposure and jail time. These are the leaches that sit on fat asses passing regs and new laws and more rules that the rest of the population is made to live by and with. The average person doing the same thing sometimes does go to jail. Ah but, some things depend on who and what you are.
The crooks here are white, so far. And not members of any favored minority. They are, or were, members of the Labour Party. Think left wing. Or as Lyndon refers to it, the Lie-bour Party. I believe he has a few more colorful names as well. They’ve wrecked this country.
(this does not let off crooks of a conservative bent btw)
MPs’ expenses: jailed trio ordered to pay back legal costs
Three former Labour MPs who were jailed for fiddling their expenses have been ordered to pay back a total of £125,000 – less than half of the money spent on their court cases.But a fourth disgraced politician was spared any repayment on the grounds he is already bankrupt.
Elliot Morley, David Chaytor and Eric Illsley, exposed for claiming too much on their Parliamentary allowances after the landmark investigation by The Daily Telegraph, were told by a judge they must give back their legal aid funds and contribute to prosecution costs.
They have already been denied the “parachute” payments given to most MPs when they leave Westminster, and forced to pay back their fraudulently claimed expenses.
So that’s one little part of the expenses fiddle by crooks in control of the public purse.
Here’s another that made the news in the last week. Just a small item which set me to thinking.
Recently a fellow named James Lunn, was working for the Ministry of Justice. Which as we all know doesn’t really exist anywhere in the world anymore. In addition to the crime of being white and middle class, Mr lunn apparently has sticky fingers and has been caught with his paws in the ministry cookie jar. The headline said that he used his MOJ credit card like a piggy bank. His piggy bank. So not an altogether honest man we may all agree.
His lawyer said that his client was working in an enviorenment where everyone abused their expenses.
Oh well, if everyone does it .... Anyway, Mr. Lunn is now facing a year in jail and well deserved as this is not the first time he’s tried to glom money from the public cookie jar. You might interested to learn that the sum he stole was £3,400. Or in our dollars at the current rate. $5,270.15. Not a small sum but then not the Great Train Robbery either.
But for real chutzpah (Yiddish for nerve, in spades. ) take a look at this one. And just so you know, she’ll be entitled to draw money just for signing in when the dust settles. But whatcha gonna do? She came to this country at the age of 13 and has learned well how to fleece the infidel. She was made a Peer, the first muzzie female peer I believe. She’s a baroness FYI. Might be a token jest-ture to prove there isn’t any anti female anti islam feelings and it’s quite pc too.
Take a look at this. Has she drawn a year in the pokey for a hundred thousand plus fiddle? Uh huh. I see you know the answer already.
She was raised to the peerage as Baroness Uddin, of Bethnal Green in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, for life by Letters patent in the afternoon of 18 July 1998, at the House of Lords.
She was the youngest woman on the benches and the only Muslim and Bangladeshi woman to be appointed to the House of Lords. She was invited to the House of Lords for her contribution to the advancement of women and disability rights, swearing in by saying “Almighty Allah” as she took her seat in the parliament. Since entering the House of Lords, besides claiming the maximum possible amount she could fleece the taxpayer for, she has supported a handful of initiatives.
In 2010, The National Executive Committee of The Labour Party suspended Uddin indefinitely from the Party in light of the expenses claim allegations.
In October 2010, Under the recommendation of The Privileges and Conduct Committee of The House of Lords a suspension is to be handed down to Pola Uddin until Easter 2012 at the earliest for claiming expenses “to which she was not entitled”. The Committee also acknowledged a repayment agreement for expenses wrongly claimed.Uddin claims on her House of Lords Expenses that a flat inMaidstone, Kent is her main residence on which she has claimed £30,000 per annum in tax-free expenses since 2005. This is said to have allowed her to also claim the second home allowance on her London property, a scheme that ostensibly exists to compensate politicians living outside London for the cost of accommodation close to Parliament. Residents living near the flat in Maidstone reportedly said they had not seen any occupiers in the flat since Uddin purchased it and that it has remained completely unfurnished, but Uddin claims: “The Maidstone property is furnished and I strongly deny that I have never lived there” Uddin’s husband even denied having a property in Kent when questioned on the issue
She also has one of the highest claims for overnight subsistence of any member of the Lords.
Uddin’s home in Wapping, where she lives and is registered to vote, is a housing association property. Spitalfields Housing Association received a public subsidy of £37.8 million in 2008. The average rent for its properties is £104 a week, a sixth of the market rate. The allegations of fraud led the Tory opposition leader in Tower Hamlets, Peter Golds, to state, “Lady Uddin is depriving a low-income family of a home which was built for the needy at public expense.” On 5 May 2009, one of the senior Lord’s official, Clerk of the Parliaments, has announced the House of Lords authorities are investigating the report by the Sunday Times. Uddin welcomed the review: “I welcome this review and will co-operate fully with him in the hope of a speedy resolution and clarity that I did not break the rules of the House.”
On 23 November 2009, Uddin’s cases was passed to the police for possible prosecution for fraud. The Daily Telegraph later reported that she was refusing to cooperate with the police investigation, refusing to answer any questions.The Crown Prosecution Service announced on 10 March 2010 that Baroness Uddin would not face any charges on the grounds that a senior parliamentary official ruled that a Peers “main house” might be a place they visit only once a month. There were no indications that the expenses would be paid back.
On 18 October 2010, the House of Lords Privileges and Conduct Committee ruled that Baroness Uddin had ‘acted in bad faith’ and recommended that she should be asked to repay £125,349 as well as being suspended from Parliament until Easter 2012.In November 2011, it was revealed that no formal mechanism existed to prevent Baroness Uddin’s return to the House of Lords, even if she refused to repay the expenses that were fraudulently claimed, leading many members of her own party to call for her to resign rather than bring the House of Lords into further disrepute.
The amount of money quoted in her case (£125,349) is probably the largest amount in any of the House of Commons or House of Lords expenses scandals.Bangladesh Mansion
Further expenses claims by Uddin were later discovered when The Sunday Times revealed that she owns a mansion in Bangladesh. The mansion was described as made out of Italian marble with tiles, mosaics and with a balcony.’ An investigation of this has been acquired to whether she does have a home in Bangladesh. The mansion was believed to be built after Uddin became a peer in 1998, costing £140,000 which was organised by her husband Komar, located in Jawa Bazar in Chhatak; this is where many of her in-laws are originally from. However Uddin claims that the land was bought by her husband’s family, purchased by Kumar’s father in 1980.
FULL UNEDITED WIKIPEDIA VERSION HERE
OH BTW .... SHE IS NOT PAYING BACK ONE SINGLE DIME.
Now then, if Mr. Lunn, thief tho he may be were a member of her privileged group .... any questions?
Posted by peiper
on 12/19/2011 at 07:10 AM
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Finance and Investing • Government • muslims • UK •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
LAAR She Blows! Part One
(2 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Planes Ideas Blog
[...] CABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEB [...]
On: 07/12/11 01:57
The Tactical Cowboy
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Sights Service Blog
[...] E LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE [...]
On: 07/10/11 08:30
Nasty Dirty Money
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Money Reviews Blog
[...] ONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLES [...]
On: 06/17/11 08:31
Amazing aerial images taken by daring Allied pilots on secret missions during WW 2
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Hookers and Booze
peiper over at Barking Moonbat EWS found some absolutely kickass aerial photos from WWII. I grabbed this one because I’m a big fan of the movie A Bridge Too Far.…
On: 11/23/09 04:14
Clear Thinking and Straight Talk
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at baldilocks
Let Them Fight or Bring Them Home Read all of it--and tell every American you know to do so. (Thanks to BMEWS) UPDATE: The author of the above blog is…
On: 10/02/09 09:29
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
