BMEWS
 
Sarah Palin is the only woman who can make Tony Romo WIN a playoff.

calendar   Tuesday - November 05, 2013

this just may be the dumbest thing you’ll have read this year. they really are down the drain

Please tell me it’s April 1st and the newspaper is just having me on.
These schmucks are seriously f****d!
What kind of system, what sort of country would allow this?
Over the past year we’ve seen all sorts of dumb judgments and read about the insanity.
But this really does take the prize I would think.
If anyone out there reading this has something to top it, I’d sure like to know.  Or wait ... maybe I wouldn’t.

Look at this arrogant scum, this insect with his negro gang signs. Oh how cool a pose.

Oh, and his brother apparently is covered by Brit largess also.

That 10,000 in our dollars is over $16,000 and that is only the beginning.

You won’t believe what ur about to read. And there’s more at the link below.

Taxpayers’ £10,000 bill to teach failed asylum seeker to fly: Ethiopian given lessons despite Government saying he must leave country next year

Yonas Admasu Kebedemm will also get up to £10,000 in living expenses

Court rules council must meet his education costs after leaving school

Critics call decision ‘blank cheque’ which is ‘deeply unfair’ on taxpayers

Council also funding his younger brother to start a degree in Manchester

By Eleanor Harding

Taxpayers face a bill of tens of thousands of pounds so a failed asylum seeker can train to be a pilot.

image

Yonas Admasu Kebede will be given flying lessons costing £10,000 even though the Government says he must leave the UK next year.

The 21-year-old from Ethiopia will also get up to £10,000 in living expenses.

A council is being forced to pay up after a court ruled it must meet Mr Kebede’s education costs after leaving school.

Critics called the decision a ‘blank cheque’ which is ‘deeply unfair’ on taxpayers and questioned whether learning to fly should be paid from the public purse.

The council is also funding Mr Kebede’s younger brother, Abiy, 20, to start a degree at Manchester Metropolitan University.

The Kebedes came to the UK with their older brother and father in 2004. Their asylum application was refused but they were granted discretionary leave to stay in the UK until November 2014.

Shortly after their arrival, they were abandoned by the older family members. They were placed in council care in Newcastle and attended a local comprehensive, where they attained GCSEs and A-levels.

By law, local authorities have a duty to help meet training costs of those with no parents so that they can enter the workplace.

Usually, these costs are living expenses for apprenticeships and college courses – not the enormous sums associated with a degree or professional qualification.

But the brothers’ lawyers argued that the council should pick up the bill as their immigration status barred them from applying for a student loan.

Labour-controlled Newcastle city council fought the claim in the Administrative Court and the Court of Appeal, but lost, in a ruling likely to set a precedent for other claims.

It now faces providing loans of up to £20,000 per year to each brother, with the amount to be repaid once they start work.

The brothers plan to apply for indefinite leave to remain in the UK but there is no guarantee it will be granted. They may be able to transfer to a normal student loan arrangement if their application is successful – which could see them repaying some of the cost of their education.

Mr Kebede is taking the lessons at Flight Training London at Elstree Aerodrome, Hertfordshire, and hopes to then apply for a degree in aviation.

The training for a private pilot’s licence involves a minimum of 45 flying hours and seven theoretical exams as well as a flight test.

The flying school charges £165 per hour-long training session, while a flight test costs £185.

READ THE REST OF IT HERE

the amount to be repaid once they start work.

Yeah right. Good luck with that. You’ll have to catch em first and you know, it’s like Jimmy the Greek once said about these ppl
They run real good because ....


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 11/05/2013 at 07:17 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINEIllegal-Aliens and ImmigrationInsanityTaxes •  
Comments (3) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

born here, raised here, move there …

Kinda hard for me to tell exactly where the first woman is from. That is, I’ve heard that accent before and my guess is that her former neighborhood was a gang infested place. Who knows, she may be better off where she is than where she’s from.
Anyway, just judging by her speech I’m not too surprised. Not very articulate and I find it impossible to believe she attended any college, unless some unaccredited institution that takes this sort. Or, since standards had been lowered to accommodate her class, I suppose it it possible.
What always surprises me are those like the second young woman who seem on the surface anyway to have some kind of working brain, to take up a religion and lifestyle so very different from the western norm.
Why leave a country that guarantees equality of the sexes, my god it’s written in stone here and America too, for a religion and a place where you will always be 2nd class and subordinate to the whims and fancy of the male.
I know there are those of both sexes who enjoy being dominated, but this seems a step over the top. 

Finally ....  okay.  Democracy is way short of perfect.  Freedom without any break or responsibility sucks and isn’t freedom at all.  That’s anarchy near as I can tell.  I don’t think most rational people, even barbarians like myself want anarchy.
However ...
How in the world does anyone with a working brain buy this?

found on a wall somewhere.

image

H/T http://exposingislam.blogspot.co.uk/ for the video.  Good visit.


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 11/05/2013 at 10:17 AM   
Filed Under: • Insanitymuslims •  
Comments (1) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Thursday - June 13, 2013

the mau mau were what?  It’s official. They were Freedom Fighters. Not in a sane world tho.

Foreign Secretary William Hague has announced a £19.9 million compensation settlement for Kenyans tortured during the Mau Mau uprising in the 1950s. He said the “British Government recognises that Kenyans were subject to torture” and “sincerely regrets that these abuses took place”.

$29,842,038.10 USD , or 21 plus million depending on what newspaper you are reading.

One of the savages has had this to say.

“It is not quite enough because of the punishment we had”

Kenyans tortured by British colonial forces during the Mau Mau uprising will receive payouts totalling £20m, Foreign Secretary William Hague has announced.
He said the UK government recognised Kenyans were tortured and it “sincerely regrets” the abuses that took place.

A lawyer for the victims said they “at last have the recognition and justice they have sought for many years”.
Thousands of people were killed during the Mau Mau revolt against British rule in Kenya in the 1950s.

Mr Hague also announced plans to support the construction of a permanent memorial to the victims in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi.

Might that include the white civilian victims as well? 
Hmm. Right. Didn’t think so.

Wambuga Wa Nyingi, 85, detailed his torture at the hands of the British colonial authorities in a witness statement.
He was a tractor driver and member of the pro-independence Kenya African Union - but never took the Mau Mau oath.
He survived the Hola massacre in 1959, when 11 Kenyans were beaten to death by prison guards in a detention camp.

He said: “I was battered on the back of my head and around my neck repeatedly with a club. I believe that the beating went on for up to 20 minutes…
“I lay unconscious with the 11 corpses for two days in a room where the corpses had been placed awaiting burial.
“The people who put me there thought I was also dead.”

“I would like to make clear now, and for the first time, on behalf of Her Majesty’s government, that we understand the pain and grievance felt by those who were involved in the events of the emergency in Kenya,” he told the Commons.
“The British government recognises that Kenyans were subject to torture and other forms of ill-treatment at the hands of the colonial administration.
“The British government sincerely regrets that these abuses took place and that they marred Kenya’s progress towards independence.”

Mr Hague said 5,228 victims would receive payments totalling £19.9m following an agreement with lawyers acting for the victims, who have been fighting for compensation for a number of years.

The compensation amounts to about £3,000 per victim and applies only to the living survivors of the abuses that took place.

Mr Hague said Britain still did not accept it was legally liable for the actions of what was a colonial administration in Kenya.

Christian Turner, the British High Commissioner to Kenya, also made a statement on the settlement to members of the Mau Mau War Veterans’ Association in Nairobi.
Gitu wa Kahengeri, secretary-general of the association, said it was the “beginning of reconciliation between the Mau Mau freedom fighters of Kenya and the British government”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22790037

The above link is a week old but … Of course NO SURPRISE ….

This is just an hour old. Take a look.


Mau Mau veteran families seek more from UK

http://www.nation.co.ke/Counties/Mau-Mau-veteran...seek.../-/index.html
1 hour ago – Relatives of Mau Mau fighters tortured during the British colonial rule are demanding more compensation from the UK.

· They want the British Government to compensate them with an amount equivalent to one kilogramme of gold for each year of the 70 years of colonial rule.
· A kilogramme of gold is estimated to be worth $39,041 (Sh3,318,485) in the black market.

So for no good or just reason, the Brits were just mean and nasty racist white guys and the Mau did nothing to warrant the treatment they received. 

How many other peoples and tribes will now demand, com – pen – say – shon?

The Brits would have been justified in wiping out the entire tribe of butchering savages.  How about compensation to the families of the white farmers who were murdered by these vermin?  Will they have to part with any of that new found free money to their victims? Yeah. Sure thing.
Fracked up pc world. 


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 06/13/2013 at 03:02 PM   
Filed Under: • InsanityPolitically Correct B.S. •  
Comments (3) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Thursday - April 11, 2013

It just keeps getting queerer and queerer

Lots of queer news out there today:

First up: Homo couple face trial for raping adopted sons

A judge on Friday allowed two Glastonbury men, accused two years ago of sexually assaulting two of their nine adopted boys, to withdraw their no-contest pleas and take their cases to trial.

The unusual action came during what was to be a sentencing hearing for George Harasz and Douglas Wirth, who entered pleas in January to one felony count each of risk of injury to a minor. They agreed to suspended prison sentences. The only issue for Friday’s hearing was to be whether each would be required to register as sex offenders.

But a new allegation of sexual assault against Harasz by one of the victims, contained in a pre-sentence investigation of Harasz, helped scrap the plea agreement. The case was further clouded Friday by disclosure in court of new allegations of abuse by three other of the nine children. No new criminal charges have been filed.

Bet they wanted to be Boy Scout leaders too!

Then there’s this gem: State to help infertile ‘gay homosexual couples

My first question is: How would you know? The answer is…

But the state’s new proposal, AB 460, the “Health care coverage: infertility” proposal by California homosexual advocate Tom Ammiano takes the state’s pro-homosexual actions to a whole new level.

AB 460 would extend the idea of “non-discrimination” to homosexuals and lesbians regarding fertility, allowing them to be classified as “infertile” if they are unable “to conceive a pregnancy or to carry a pregnancy to a live birth after a year or more of regular sexual relations without contraception.”

They would then be eligible for insurance coverage for “treatment of infertility, except in vitro fertilization, under those terms and conditions as may be agreed upon between the group subscriber or the group policyholder and the plan or the insurer.”

Seems to me that if they can do “year or more of regular sexual relations” instead of their ‘irregular’ ones then they can do it for life. With a ‘regular’ spouse of the opposite sex.


avatar

Posted by Christopher   United States  on 04/11/2013 at 01:48 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINEDemocrats-Liberals-Moonbat LeftistsGay Gay Gay!Insanity •  
Comments (5) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Wednesday - April 10, 2013

What do you mean ‘your’ child?

I’m conflicted over this. On one hand it’s totally ludicrous; on the other hand, if ‘our’ kid is out-of-line or rude I’m gonna backhand him into next week! Also, ‘Pull up your pants, kid! You’re an embarassment to the community!’


avatar

Posted by Christopher   United States  on 04/10/2013 at 10:40 PM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat LeftistsFamilyGovernmentInsanity •  
Comments (6) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Sunday - March 10, 2013

Homosexuals and Scouting don’t mix

As a local Boy Scout leader, I got an email to participate in a survey of Scout leaders. As you may know, for some strange reason, the Home Office is struggling with whether or not to let homosexuals in as members or leaders. I saved each and every question for future reference, but I was astounded at what was missing. Should the Boy Scouts, as an organization, adhere to the Scout Oath?

In case you don’t know or remember, the Scout Oath is:

On My Honor
I Will Do My Best
To Do My Duty
To God and my Country
And to Obey the Scout Law.
To Help Other People at all Times;
To Keep Myself Physically Strong,
Mentally Awake,
And Morally Straight.

That’s how I learned it back in 1968 when I joined the Cub Scouts. We’ve seen the havoc the Catholic Church has had to deal with by letting homosexuals become priests. Let’s not repeat the mistake. Homosexuals will prey on young men, whether in church, or on the campground. Period. Let’s keep the Boy Scouts morally straight.


avatar

Posted by Christopher   United States  on 03/10/2013 at 03:24 AM   
Filed Under: • Gay Gay Gay!InsanityStoopid-People •  
Comments (8) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Friday - February 08, 2013

traditional Muslim values of hospitality and tolerance .

A short followup to that story about the muslim patrol on a street in London.

The video sucks and you won’t want to watch it all. But a few seconds will give you an idea of the mentality of some of these wankers.

Lets face it.  Not all muzzies think this way, not all of them would so openly go this far and not all of them would approve of this.
The problem is of course, that too damn many do. And there are plenty who do not want to identify themselves with a group like this, but who are quite willing to have them do it cos they don’t like the infidel either. You’ll note I’m sure the Brit accent on the masked idiot.  Some of them are actually born here. 

Which reminds me of something else but has to do with American born, white muslim terrorists.

Read in the paper today about “protests” over the guy who will be CIA director and the use of drones which the idiot protesters say, also kill, Americans.
First of all, I am so freeking sick of those two words. Protester and activist. Use either or both together and it automatically give credence to their position.
What the hell sort of profession is activist anyway.  I keep hearing people introduced in news programs that way.
As far as I’m concerned, any so called American fighting on the other side is NOT an American. It used to be called Traitor but Jane Fonda put paid to that I suppose.  Anyway, I would think anyone going to Pakistan and joining a terror group would forfeit any claim to citizenship. Wouldn’t they?  So why the bru-haha and the signs carried by these protesting idiots referring to drones that kill Americans?  Why the hell isn’t anyone taking a rifle or anything else that goes boom, to these .... “activists?”

Originally found this story on Front Page Magazine

Before becoming Prime Minister, David Cameron wrote, “If we want to remind ourselves of British values – hospitality, tolerance and generosity to name just three – there are plenty of British Muslims ready to show us what those things really mean.”

And the Muslim Patrol is busy reminding everyone of the traditional Muslim values of hospitality and tolerance in their latest video.

Many of the younger Islamists are wannabe rappers and their Islamist ad-hoc militias fuse thug culture with Islamism. It would be an awkward combo with any other religion, but Islam was born out of violent thuggery by Mohammed and his followers who raided and raped their way across the desert.

There’s lots of pre-recorded gun sounds and what looks like the world’s worst vlog as our intrepid Islamist hero leers behind his mask while attempting to scream his message of hate down at the camera without falling into it or having his mask fall down.

There are the usual cheerful messages of tolerance and hospitality like “Islam is here in London… this is not a Christian country… Christianity can go to hell…Allah Akbar”

and

“… the Kuffar can go to hell… we need the Sharia…the Kuffar cannot stop us… we are coming to implement Islam.”

Followed by a warning to Prime Minister David Cameron, “anyone who tries to stop us, we will take their alcohol, we will tell the naked women to cover up and implement Islam upon your own necks, David Cameron.”

Before the election, Cameron said, “No Muslim I’ve ever met is offended by Christmas, or supports its replacement with ‘Winterval’. But many Muslims I’ve talked to about these issues are deeply offended by the use of the word ‘Islamic’ or ‘Islamist’ to describe the terrorist threat we face today.”

Perhaps David will care to take that up with these Islamists.

FRONTPAGEMAG.COM


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 02/08/2013 at 01:24 PM   
Filed Under: • InsanitymuslimsTerroristsUK •  
Comments (2) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Sunday - January 27, 2013

law without justice or order, country signs its own death sentence

To be a judge in the UK do you have to go on an “How to rid yourself of all common sense “ course ? Most of our judges seen to have passed with high marks !
- bglad1 , littlehampton, United Kingdom

I’m feeling suicidal by hearing about my poor old once great country being battered by idiot judges who give every lowlife the right to reside here no matter how dangerous but give us no human rights to be safe in our own country.
- fed up taxpayer now a ukip voter

Just a couple of notes from the readers of the Mail, and there are other similar comments.  So what has their knickers in a twist?  The same sort of insanity that people with sense in any country would feel, faced with what the Brits see everyday. How are they supposed to feel when they can do nothing as a weak legal system, systematically destroys their faith in what is supposed to be a, justice system. They see no justice.  You do not have to be a ranting right wing hang em all Nazi to despise what the system has actually become.  A haven for criminals of the worst sort, and employment human rights lawyers as well as for judges who lack any kind of common sense, and judges who feel their hands are tied by the rules as written and so can do little or nothing.  Some judges judges have indeed spoken out. The problem is, nobody is listening who can set things right.  In a country where the death penalty is banned, life in prison for vicious killers should damn well mean life.  But as we know, even in the USA, the death penalty doesn’t discourage would be rapists or killers because it takes so long to execute even the worst. And life does not always mean life in the states either.  Having said that, with whatever complaints Americans justifiably have with the incorrectly named “justice” system, the people of Britain face far worse. 

Here are a couple of examples that belong to a growing list of like examples. And this is not even the worst that I can report on.  So far, sad and frustrating to say, the people here have lost all reasonable means of national self protection or justice through their courts. 

Human Rights laws stop Algerian terror suspect with links to gas plant massacre group being deported because he is suicidal

· The 43-year-old does not dispute he is a threat to national security
· Came to Britain in 1995 on a fake passport and claimed asylum
· Suspected supporter of the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat - group involved in deadly attack on Algerian gas plant earlier this month
· Mr Justice Mitting rules he must stay because he has a history of depression

By Steve Robson

An Algerian terror suspect has been allowed to stay in Britain because a judge believes he may commit suicide if he is forced to go back home.
The 43-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, does not dispute he is a risk to Britain’s national security and is believed to support one of the terrorist groups which carried out the deadly attack on an Algerian gas plant earlier this month which claimed the lives of 39 hostages including six Britons.
He is also suspected of providing fake passports and travel arrangements to terrorists.
But in another blow for the Home Office, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) has allowed the married man to remain on British soil today because deporting him would breach his human rights.
Making his ruling, Mr Justice Mitting - who recently allowed hate preacher Abu Qatada to stay in the UK - said: ‘We must look at the totality of the psychiatric evidence in the round.
‘We are persuaded by it that the risk that G would commit suicide, especially after arrival in Algiers, is very high.
‘It may be containable in the UK but no special arrangements have been negotiated with Algeria to cope with it.’
In the same judgment, Mr Justice Mitting told six other Algerian terror suspects they must leave.
But the senior immigration judge warned there was still ‘no end in sight’ in attempting to put the men on a flight home because they are likely to appeal the decision.

more to read

Are we to believe that this negro scum thought up the idea of suing all on his own?  Or did some ambulance chasing human rights scumbag attorney tell him he had rights that were violated. Whatever, at least in this case his case was shot down and so he won’t collect “compensation” from the taxpayer. But unfortunately, he is still here. Most likely collecting benefits as well.

Child-sex attacker can’t be deported because his African tribe is ‘persecuted’

· Jumaa Kater Saleh, 24, arrived in UK in 2004 hidden in a lorry
· He was convicted of having sex with a 13-year-old girl in May 2008
· Judge said today it was ‘not possible’ to deport him back to Sudan

· Saleh attempted to claim damages for unlawful detention

By Jack Doyle and Ryan Kisiel

An African migrant who lured a vulnerable schoolgirl to a house for sex cannot be deported – because he is a member of a ‘persecuted tribe’.
Jumaa Kater Saleh, 24, was convicted as part of a predatory sex gang for the ‘deliberate, targeted abuse of a young and vulnerable girl’, who was aged 13 at the time.
But he was allowed to remain in Britain under human rights law because he faced mistreatment if sent back to Sudan.
He claimed he was a member of the Zaghawa tribe, which has been persecuted by government forces and Arab tribe militia.
And it has been ruled he can stay indefinitely, unless a court decides the ‘threat’ diminishes and it is safe for him to return to Africa.
Details of the case emerged as Saleh went to court to demand compensation from the Government for locking him up. He claimed he was unlawfully detained following his prison sentence, when he was kept behind bars to protect the public.
But the judge rejected his claim saying he had posed a ‘substantial’ risk to the public and keeping him locked up was necessary.

The decision to allow Saleh to stay sparked outrage.

Tory MP Peter Bone said: ‘I take the very simple view that if someone comes to this country and then breaks the law then he should be sent back to where he comes from.

‘Any arguments about his human rights disappear when he has violated, violently, the rights of a young girl.’

Saleh arrived in the UK in November 2004 hidden in the back of a lorry.

In January 2005 he claimed asylum but this was rejected.

However, because he was under 18, he was allowed to remain until he reached adulthood in October 2006.
He was still in the country in May 2007, when arrested and charged with the sex offences. In February 2008, he was convicted of two charges of sexual activity with a 13-year-old girl.

He was in a group of five immigrants who lured schoolgirls – including three aged 13 and one aged 14 – to a house for sex.

read more


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 01/27/2013 at 04:20 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINEDaily LifeIllegal-Aliens and ImmigrationInsanityJudges-Courts-LawyersJustice - LACK OFUK •  
Comments (2) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Tuesday - January 15, 2013

One Round, One State, One Lunatic

Connecticut Plays “Can You Top This” With Gun Control


Introduced in the Connecticut state legislature by Senator Ed Meyer, proposed Bill No. 122:

AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That the general statutes be amended to establish a class C felony offense, except for certain military and law enforcement personnel and certain gun clubs, for (1) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate, transport, possess or use any gun except one made to fire a single round, (2) any person to fire a gun containing more than a single round, (3) any person or organization to receive from another state, territory or country a gun made to fire multiple rounds, or (4) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate or possess a magazine or clip capable of holding more than one round.

Forget “assault weapons”. Forget “semi-automatics”. Forget “high capacity”. CT State Senator wants to turn the clock back to 1685 and limit you to only single shot weapons. And I can guarantee you he’ll be blatting that “that’s what guns were when the Second Amendment was written, so that’s the kind of guns the Founding Fathers had in mind, so that’s the ONLY kind that should be legal’ leftist line of bullshit. Which is a total lie, as multiple barrel weapons were around even then, along with a couple of halfway-reliable recharging systems (ie a way to reload a gun quickly, built into the gun itself).

This bill would make the overwhelming majority of EVERY repeating firearm built since 1867 illegal. Every double barreled shotgun or rifle. Every lever action. Every revolver. Every pump action. Ever semi-automatic. Every everything. Period. The man is batshit insane.

Legislation; registration; limitization; criminalization and then confiscation.

Will such a bill even get out of committee? In any sort of normal bizzaro world, no. But we are no longer living in a normal bizzaro world. Today we live in inside-out, upside-down, mentally unhinged, off the left hand cliffs of insanity, totalitarian bizzaro world. So I would put this bills chances at 50:50. AT WORST.

I can’t write any more. My hands are shaking. I need to go lie down in the dark, and find my happy place. God damned shame that my happy place only exists in my dreams. Once it was my entire country.

Behave today comrades. For the government is watching, and tomorrow you will be a felon.

The Constitution isn’t just being shredded. It’s being burned into ash and swept under the rug.


avatar

Posted by Drew458   United States  on 01/15/2013 at 04:30 PM   
Filed Under: • Guns and Gun ControlInsanity •  
Comments (10) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Tuesday - December 11, 2012

hark comrades, glorious allies to gather for freedom and smite newest foe. who’s next?

This front page greeted us this morning.

I’ve already done my rant on the subject, maybe too often.  It’s one of those non rocket science events where this sort of thing was expected.

So this is all there is for this post. 

It’s nice that us and our most glorious former empires are not going to set boots on the ground. Of course, we can afford it. Money no problem.
Just take it from the public who always have plenty of spare cash to toss at various foreign adventures. It’s all for democracy so nobody will mind.

image


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 12/11/2012 at 10:49 AM   
Filed Under: • FREEDOMInsanityInternationalUKUSA •  
Comments (1) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Thursday - August 09, 2012

how to deport scum without violating their human rights. it keeps getting dumber.

If ever a people and nation have been taken to the cleaners time and time again, and knowing all the time that they were, this nation and these people are it.
That old and much used expression, words fail, come to mind in sharing this bit of insanity. And there’s more then just this article, which is bad enough.
No more from me. Read this from the Daily Mail.

UK pays to refit foreign prisons: Taxpayers foot bill to revamp jails in Nigeria and Jamaica so criminals can be deported without breaching their human rights

UK jails house inmates from 156 countries, including 900 Jamaicans and 594 Nigerians

Government is spending £3million modernising foreign jails

By JAMES SLACK

British taxpayers are paying to make jails in Jamaica and Nigeria more comfortable in a desperate bid to persuade foreign criminals to serve their sentences at home.

Ministers have resorted to the tactic – designed to satisfy the human rights of inmates – after it emerged that the UK’s own prison system has turned into a ‘United Nations of crime’.

Research by the House of Commons library, seen by the Mail, reveals how our jails contain inmates from a staggering 156 countries – more than three out of every four member states of the UN.

Worryingly, the total number of foreign prisoners is rising – despite pledges by David Cameron to fix the mess.

By March this year, there were 11,127 behind bars, at an estimated cost to the UK public purse of more than £420million. This is up from 10,778 in 2011.

The group, which includes rapists, murderers and burglars, now makes up more than one in every eight convicts.

The figures were disclosed as the Prime Minister faced more criticism yesterday over his foreign aid commitments.

Mr Cameron was taking part in a radio phone-in when a pensioner called to tell him it was wrong that she was denied a cancer drug while billions were spent on overseas aid.

Meanwhile, it emerged that the dire need to create space in our packed jails has prompted ministers to take the extraordinary step of establishing a £3million annual pot to make it easier for convicts to serve their sentences back home.

Splashing money on prisons abroad is certain to prove controversial. But officials insist it will be cheaper in the long run than the annual £38,000 bill for keeping a single prisoner locked up here.

Currently, money is being spent in Jamaica to ‘assist Jamaican authorities in modernising their prison service and rehabilitation and reintegration activities’.

In Nigeria, one project supports the provision of ‘human rights training for prison officers’.

THE REST OF THIS STORY

“officials insist it will be cheaper in the long run than the annual £38,000 bill for keeping a single prisoner locked up here.”

Why has it not occurred to anyone that if they want to save money, a quick and very quiet deletion might be cheaper yet. Set up a lice removal service and bingo.  Problem solved. I guess tho they’d rather put up with this.

image

This island is filling up, it’s drowning in scum and to make matters worse, the courts and civil rights industry do not help matters. They add to the problem.


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 08/09/2012 at 12:37 PM   
Filed Under: • CrimeCULTURE IN DECLINEInsanityJudges-Courts-LawyersStoopid-PeopleUK •  
Comments (0) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Wednesday - July 18, 2012

ASS-WIPE JUDGES, BLOODSUCKING LAWYERS AND LEFTY WHITE VERMIN

I read this in yesterday’s paper and must share the idiocy.  Hastings is right, and many Brits are outraged at the idea.  But not apparently, the asinine judges who make dumb decisions.  But then, after all.  What can you expect from a place run by lunatics who let off criminals who assault ppl with the excuse that it wasn’t the gremlin who was responsible but the booze they drank.  Why should anyone expect more from a place run by apologists and hand wringing leftists who are actively working to destroy this country.  And trust me. They are.

If only the Queen would utter the words, “Who will rid us of these left wing nut cases,” surely some patriots would rise to the occasion and slay the red dragons.
At the rate things are progressing, maybe the things I didn’t think would happen as soon as in my lifetime, will.
And will ya get a load of those goofball names below. Jeesh. Bunch of letters strung together. Now who do you suppose convinced these life forms who normally grunt and swing thru trees, to launch a legal action?
Stupid fuckin guilty white folks and their leach like vampire lawyers.

I despair.  I really do. 

be sure and see the link for all of it and all the photos.


The folly of judges, vulture lawyers and a nation addicted to masochism

By MAX HASTINGS

At the High Court in London yesterday, the hearing began of a case in which three elderly Kenyans — Paulo Muoka Nzili, Wambuga Wa Nyingi and Jane Muthoni Mara — are suing the British Government for appalling injuries allegedly inflicted on them during the Mau Mau insurgency almost 60 years ago.

image

The British Government sought to argue at an earlier hearing that the defendants’ claim should be thrown out ‘given the length of time elapsed and the complex legal and constitutional questions the case raises’.

However, a judge rejected this appeal to common sense and decreed that the claim should go forward.
In the weeks ahead, we shall hear a banquet of evidence deeply unflattering to the British colonial regime, with evidence from academic witnesses and revelations from hitherto secret government files.

There is no danger that the lawyers who earn fat fees from all this will find the rich seam of taxpayers’ gold running out. There is much more where the Kenya case has come from.
Alleged atrocities are being resurrected from the Fifties Malayan Emergency (the 1948-60 conflict fought between UK, Commonwealth and other security forces against Communist insurgents in Malaya).

The Metropolitan Police has just established a task force of 30 officers to prepare prosecution cases against potential British Army murder suspects for Bloody Sunday in Londonderry in 1972. Their inquiries are expected to last three or four years.

All this, to my mind, represents an exercise in state masochism to which no other society on Earth would subject itself. It is just the latest venture for the human rights and compassion industry, with almost unlimited scope for profitable expansion.

As a historian, I am under no delusions about the shortcomings of British behaviour during the uprising of the Mau Mau, who wanted to drive the white man from Kenya and to which I will return in a moment.

What seems extraordinary is that, after the lapse of many decades, we can subject ourselves at vast expense to legal flagellation by foreign claimants.
Who can imagine that any British plaintiff with similar grievances would have a cat’s chance of securing redress in any overseas jurisdiction?
British prisoners who suffered appallingly at Japanese hands during World War II, and, for that matter, Chinese women who were forced into sexual slavery, have whistled in the wind for a hearing in Japan for almost 70 years.
Martin McGuinness, a career killer for the IRA, shook the Queen’s hand the other week. He commanded the Derry Brigade. Who could suppose that if the dependants of victims of Irish terrorism sought to take McGuinness, Gerry Adams or their comrades before an Irish court, they would get past first base?
The Mau Mau insurgents were exceptionally brutal people who, mostly between 1952 and 1954, murdered some 2,500 of their own people and around 100 whites, terrorised villages and inflicted ghastly atrocities on those who refused to take their blood oath.
But when Kenya became independent in 1963, Mau Mau veterans became celebrated as freedom-fighters.

In rather the same fashion, the two Jewish terrorists who murdered the resident British minister Lord Moyne in Cairo in November 1944, and were hanged for the crime the following year, were exhumed in 1975 at the insistent request of the state of Israel, and reinterred in the nation’s Hall of Heroes.

Much the same has happened to several old Irish nationalist killers. Although it may seem deeply repugnant that old terrorists should be raised to national heroic status, most of us can live with it as the way of the world.
But it is cringe-making to watch the spectacle of citizens of former colonies that have been independent for many decades turning up in London to exploit our feeble-minded justice system.

judges see things differently. I fear that the human rights bonanza has gone to their heads.
Such is their conceit that they believe they can divine truth across the fog of decades. Such is their contempt for real life that they care nothing about the colossal waste of taxpayers’ money over which they preside.

Look, for example, at Lord Savile, who squandered £200 million conducting his Bloody Sunday inquiry, and still cannot understand what the rest of us think he did wrong. 
If the former Mau Mau plaintiffs win their case at the High Court and receive a truckload of cash, this will open the way for thousands more claimants from every corner of the old Empire.

Some enthusiasts say the opening of this case was a proud day for British justice, showing our determination to face up to our dirty colonial past, and our commitment to human rights.

To many of us, however, it merely highlights the folly of the judiciary and their inability to bring the smallest crumb of common sense to the lofty business of administering justice.
The Kenyan case is properly the business of historians, not of Britain’s legal vulture culture.

READ MORE PLUS PHOTOS


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 07/18/2012 at 03:37 PM   
Filed Under: • CommiesCULTURE IN DECLINEDemocrats-Liberals-Moonbat LeftistsCorruption and GreedInsanityJudges-Courts-LawyersPolitically Correct B.S.Typical White People: Stupid, Evil, Willfully BlindUK •  
Comments (0) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Wednesday - June 13, 2012

muslim scum to sue french police, claims his killer son was murdered by cops.

I guess if there’s anything to get really angry about, as in steamed, RCOB, it’s this maddening story.

Use your imagination, and think of the very worst things that can be done to vermin like this.

You’ll recall the story that made the world’s headlines recently, where that islamic pond scum in France, shot dead a number of ppl which included a little girl.

Well ..... the French police are facing legal troubles because the scumbag,verminous father got himself a lawyer. Says the police “murdered” his lovely son.
And he found a filthy rotten slag lawyer.  I’d better stop here.

BBC NEWS

Father of Toulouse killer Mohamed Merah sues for murder

Mohamed Merah’s gun attacks shocked France.
The father of Mohamed Merah, the Islamist gunman killed by French police after shooting seven people, has formally sued over his son’s “murder”.

A lawyer for Mohamed Benalel Merah, who lives in Algeria, said the suit was against those “who gave the orders at the top of the police”.

The gunman was shot dead at his flat in Toulouse after a 32-hour siege.

He had confessed to killing seven people, including Jewish children, in a rampage which shocked France.

Mohamed Benalel Merah said soon after his son’s death on 22 March he intended to sue the French government.

On Monday, French lawyer Isabelle Coutant-Peyre, who is assisting Algerian lawyer Zahia Mokhtari, filed the suit in Paris.

“This is a suit against unnamed persons for murder with aggravating circumstances concerning those who gave the orders at the top of the police,” said Ms Coutant-Peyre.

In all, Merah, 23, shot dead three soldiers, three children and a teacher, filming his attacks.

He was dubbed the “scooter killer” because of the stolen vehicle he used in the three separate shootings in Toulouse and the nearby town of Montauban.

Ms Coutant-Peyre was quoted by AFP news agency as saying: “You’ve got 300 to 400 heavily armed people and a guy shut up all alone in his apartment. That alone is enough to raise questions.”

The father’s suggestion in March that the French authorities had deliberately chosen to kill his son rather than capture him caused indignation in Paris.

“If I were the father of such a monster, I would shut my mouth in shame,” said Alain Juppe, who was then French foreign minister.

BBC NEWS


avatar

Posted by peiper   United Kingdom  on 06/13/2012 at 06:10 PM   
Filed Under: • FRANCEIllegal-Aliens and ImmigrationInsanityJudges-Courts-LawyersmuslimsTerrorists •  
Comments (1) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

calendar   Wednesday - May 23, 2012

Do a good deed? That’s a ticketing!

I honestly don’t believe the stupidity, of both the police officer AND the law cited. Here’s the story:

Last Monday, May 14th John Davis was exiting I-90 at the West 117th ramp when he saw a man in a wheelchair. The man was pale, thin and holding a sign that had a religious sentiment and also a request for help.

Maybe I should add the possible stupidity of Mr. Davis for falling for what I already suspect was a scam. If the guy really was disabled enough to be in a wheelchair (how did he get to the exit ramp?) there’s an almost infinite number of Federal, state, and local programs to help him. Add in friends, family, private charities and this guy shouldn’t be panhandling anyway. But I digress. Let’s continue:

John reached into his wallet and grabbed a couple of bucks to give to the man. As he approached the light at the exit, he rolled the money up vertically and stretched his arm out of his window. He says, the man touched the cash and one of the dollars fell to the ground.
The man then bent over and picked it up.
Moments later as John travelled North on West 117th he says a Cleveland police officer pulled him over.
“He proceeds to tell me he’s pulling me over for littering,” said John.

Obviously Cleveland police have solved all other crimes. Since when is money trash? Doesn’t it have to be trash to be considered litter. In any case, the ‘litter’ was immediately picked up! Am I going to be ticketed for littering every time I drop something and immediately pick it up? That’s the stupidity of the police officer. Now let’s get to the law cited:

The ticket cited Section No: 613.06 of Cleveland’s Municipal Codes, which is littering from a motor vehicle.
His offense was listed as, “Throw paper out window,” and in parenthesis, “money to panhandler.”
John said he was confused because money is paper but it’s not trash.

I made that point earlier. Plus the money wasn’t ‘thrown’. It was handed to someone. But now it gets even better:

Cleveland police can’t comment on the ticket at this time but according to a spokesperson there is another code that may have been violated.
There is a code which states that it is illegal to panhandle or give money to panhandlers near a highway or street including a berm, shoulder, treelawn or sidewalk.

Have you ever encountered a panhandler anywhere else? Ticket the panhandlers then. But last time I checked, If I own something, including the money in my wallet, I can give it to who I wish to.

Section No: 471.06 states in part that “No person shall stand on a highway for the purpose of soliciting…contributions…”
It also reads that “No driver” is to “transfer currency….to any person standing on a street or highway.”
But John says that’s not what he was ticketed for. He was cited for littering from a motor vehicle, and the officer advised him to “take it up with the courts.”

The person in question was not ‘standing’ on a street or highway. He was sitting in a wheelchair. A technicality? Yes, but if you’re stupid enough to write a law, you better cover every possible variation. Anyway, Mr. Davis is going to fight it.

John does plan to challenge the ticket in court, mainly because it carries a hefty fine. It could cost him $500 once you add the fine plus court costs.
John says he has always had a deep admiration for Cleveland police, and he isn’t trying to start trouble, but that’s a lot of money for helping out someone less fortunate.

No word on if the panhandler was ticketed also. Probably not, since he wasn’t ‘standing’. I’d certainly bring that up in court.

Maybe Cleveland should adopt how Dayton handles panhandlers. They are legal if they’re licensed. Their licenses must be prominently displayed, usually hung on a cord around their neck. In other words, the City gets their cut.


avatar

Posted by Christopher   United States  on 05/23/2012 at 05:17 PM   
Filed Under: • CrimeGovernmentInsanityJustice - LACK OFOutrageousStoopid-People •  
Comments (3) Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  
Page 2 of 18 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »

Five Most Recent Trackbacks:

The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We've Been Waiting For
(2 total trackbacks)
Tracked at 香港特首曾荫权和部分高管分别用步行或搭乘公共交通工具的方式上班
西安电加热油温机 香港盛吹“环保风” 专家指市民已从被动变主动 中新网9月29日 淮安导热油电加热炉 电 据香港中通社报道,9月29日晚由香港某环保团体举行的“无冷气夜”,吸引了5万名市民及超过60间企业承诺参加。这是香港最近环保活动不断升温过程中的大型活动之一。 进入九月,香港各界环保活动渐入高潮,层出不穷。特首高官与各界市民齐齐参与,是其中一个最大特色。…
On: 03/21/18 04:12

meaningless marching orders for a thousand travellers ... strife ahead ..
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Casual Blog
[...] RTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPL [...]
On: 07/17/17 08:28

a small explanation
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at yerba mate gourd
Find here top quality how to prepare yerba mate without a gourd that's available in addition at the best price. Get it now!
On: 07/09/17 07:07

The Real Stuff
(2 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Candy Blog
[...] LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE J [...]
On: 06/11/17 10:40

when rape isn't rape but only sexual assault
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Trouser Blog
[...] took another century of Inquisition and repression to completely eradicate the [...]
On: 06/07/17 03:37



DISCLAIMER
Allanspacer

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
  1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
  2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
  3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
  4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.


Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner



GNU Terry Pratchett


Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
free counters