Sunday - August 15, 2010

Education?

Remember when going to school meant you got an education?

I gave a speech at my local Toastmaster’s club about this. I remember being anxious about 4th grade. Seems that 4th grade had a hard subject called ‘Civics’. I’d never had ‘Civics’ before. It had the biggest, heaviest textbook. (good thing I lived right across the alley from the school. Back then me and my sisters went home for lunch. But that’s for another post.) You studied the Constitution, three branches of government, etc. Mom was the one who made me anxious: she didn’t like ‘Civics’ class when she was in school. She thought it was ‘hard’.

As it turned out, I found it an easy subject. We’d already covered similar subjects in Indiana history and government in 3rd grade. (I wonder what do they teach now in 3rd grade?) But… they were preaching the ‘living Constitution’ nonsense we’ve come to expect from liberals. At that time I thought it was neat. But I was thinking that the ‘living’ part meant the amendment process. I got a bit older and found out how wrong I was…

This also made it into my Toastmaster speech: my sister, two years younger than me, didn’t have ‘Civics’ in 4th grade. Ditto for my baby sister two years after her. Coincidence? A plan to dumb down the electorate? Or were the NEA ‘teachers’ just too stupid to teach the subject?

I report; You decide.

Posted by Christopher     on 08/15/2010 at 08:44 AM   
Filed Under: • Editorials • Education •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - May 12, 2010

No it didn’t

Charlotte NC: A gun went off inside a student’s desk, the bullet, missing the 20 or so students in the classroom and hitting a wall.

Parents rushed to pick up their kids, worried about what could have happened.

But CMS didn’t inform parents that the incident involved a loaded gun until almost two hours after school let out.

Many parents we talked to were concerned because they didn’t know exactly what was going on.

One parent told us she got the initial message from CMS, which stated, “A serious incident occurred in a University Meadows classroom this afternoon.”

The gun was a .22-caliber handgun “small enough to fit in the palm of your hand,” said CMPD Sgt. David Schwob, who said he wasn’t certain if the discharge was accidental.

Police are investigating the boy’s father who came to the school in the afternoon [after the shooting]. Schwob said investigators were interviewing the boy, his parents and other students in the class.

The boy was locked up in a detention facility and investigators were trying to figure out how he got the gun.

Police say the gun was fired around 1 p.m. while it was inside a desk. The bullet hit a wall, according to WCNC-TV, the Observer’s news partner.

No one was injured. Police didn’t release the name of the third-grader they say brought the gun because he is a minor. He was charged with possession of a gun on school grounds and was being held late Tuesday at a juvenile detention facility in Gaston County.

Sure, the weapon may have discharged, but only because there was a 3rd grader’s finger on the trigger. Pulling it. Period. Even if the kid was Jayson Williams’ son, the gun did not go off by itself.

Now, why did a 3rd grader have a loaded gun in his desk? How did he get the gun in the first place? No public answers to those questions at this time.

A statistical analysis of the students at University Meadows Elementary can be found here. It’s a pretty good sized school, with more than 850 kids in grades K-5.

Posted by Drew458     on 05/12/2010 at 04:52 PM   
Filed Under: • Education • Guns and Gun Control •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - April 06, 2010

IZ DIS DE WAY TO LEARN KIDS IN SKOOL WHAT WILL LOOK MAYBE FOR FUTURE JOB? education?

Oh boy. Where to begin?  To think that there are people in authority who think this way and can have influence on education is not only scary, it is bizarre beyond all understanding.  Is it April 1st again?  How could any adult buy this crap? 

One of the things need doing here as folks know, is clearing up our categories. Here I am mentally adding another one called, YOU COULDN’T MAKE THIS UP.
Or similar wording.

Since this is a post is on education I will mention in passing that a report I saw today calls for teachers to smile at pupils and that is NOT a suggestion. It looks to become a new rule if I read correctly.  Also, some teachers are complaining about having to be reviewed when applying for their job, by kids between the ages of 11 and 16.  ? Could you have made that up?  Bizarre world the unfortunate Brits have built for themselves.  PLEASE, do not believe that all Brits are this stupid. They aren’t.  It’s a different culture with different traditions and a long standing belief in fair play which has been turned against them. There’s so much to explain but I’m the wrong person to do it.  Six years here have not made me any kind of expert on England. But I know folks are disgruntled, many hate the socialist govt. they have but don’t trust the cons any more then the lefties of the Labour Party. They call the Tories, Labour Lite. So that shows you the pickle they are in.

Sorry to be so long winded but I feel strongly about this place, even if it isn’t my country, and I hate to see it doomed.

Pupils who plagiarise from the web will get bonus marks

Michael Deacon uncovers some of the forthcoming initatives to make education more pupil-centred.

By Michael Deacon

Telegraph

School days are the best of your life. Well, unless you’re one of the staff. Teachers are complaining that their authority is being undermined by contentious initiatives intended to “empower” pupils. At one school in Kent, pupils have been given iPhones on which to email senior management with feedback on teachers’ “performance”; in other schools, pupils get a say in the hiring of teachers.

Staff will not be comforted by a confidential report I’ve uncovered from the Institute for the Development of Innovation-Oriented Teaching Skills (IDIOTS). It lists forthcoming initiatives that are as far-sighted and progressive as the above. Here are its highlights:

• Teachers must discontinue their antiquated practice of penalising pupils who do not give so-called “correct” answers. The concept of “correct” answers is elitist, as it discriminates against pupils who do not know them. Instead, pupils should be rewarded for demonstrating qualities such as imagination (for example, imagining that 6x4=32) and original thinking (for example, thinking that the capital of France is Africa, or that Winston Churchill invented the potato).

• The custom of grading pupils according to the merit of their work is divisive, as it fosters the outdated belief that it is better to be “clever” and “hard-working” than “stupid” and “lazy”. All pupils should be awarded identical grades, irrespective of ability.

• To avoid stigmatising pupils, teachers should refrain from employing negative terminology. Instead of telling a pupil that his answer is “wrong”, the teacher should tell him that it is “factually divergent from the norm”. Instead of calling a pupil “disobedient”, the teacher should call him “behaviourally unorthodox”. Instead of writing in the register that a pupil was “late”, the teacher should write that the pupil’s attendance was “deferred”. And instead of telling a pupil that he has “failed”, the teacher should tell him that he has “passed”.

• The teaching of history will be abolished, on account of its backward-looking focus on the past. In its place will be a new, more up-to-date and relevant subject known as The Present, the study of which will consist of the continuous monitoring of Twitter feeds.

• Pupils found to have plagiarised essays from the web will be awarded bonus marks for having demonstrated technological expertise.

• Finally, teachers should not inhibit pupils’ creativity by insisting that they follow arbitrary and obsolescent rules; for example, punctuation, spelling, homework deadlines or the law.

IDIOT SOURCE

PS:  Not that it has anything to do with the subject here.  A young man in college and a brain for sure has won a contest with his team of other very bright scholars. He really is smart and he is head of his science fiction club at school.  You might say he is their ‘chairman’ unless you’re very pc in which case the word used these ridiculous days is, ‘chairperson.’ Pretty stupid huh?  Well BMEWS, here’s another I could not make it up.
The young fellow in question is referred to in the press as, ‘CHAIRBEING.’

Posted by peiper     on 04/06/2010 at 05:59 AM   
Filed Under: • Education • UK •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - April 03, 2010

Teacher who allowed brother to kill his wife could return to the classroom in a year

It’s a very short and telling article that caught my eye this morning.  Yet this slag is being allowed to continue teaching in schools. ??? Hey, not for me to say I realize. But wouldn’t you think this is a person who should only be cleaning floors or something?  Honest, I don’t know but I’m surprised.
Here’s what I’m on about. Jeesh.

PS:  I think she’s evil.

A teacher who stood by while her sister-in-law was murdered in her family home could return to the classroom in less than a year.


By Laura Roberts
Published: 8:00AM BST 03 Apr 2010

Uzma Khan, 25, failed to intervene as Shazad Khan beat his wife, Sabia Rani, 19, to death in Leeds, West Yorkshire, in May 2006.

She was jailed for two years along with her mother and sister, but following her release the General Teaching Council (GTC) for England has only imposed a 12 month ban from teaching.

The former science teacher at West Leeds High was sentenced in January 2008, after a judge said he could not believe a woman of her education and intelligence could have failed to realise her sister-in-law was being abused.

However, the GTC has concluded: “We have no doubt that you do not present a risk to children or pupils.”

After bludgeoning his wife, Shazad Khan carried her body through the house and put her in the bath in the communal bathroom before filling it with cold water.

The three women claimed they hadn’t realised Miss Rani was dying as a result of sustained, regular beatings.

After being subjected to three weeks of attacks by her husband she died only a few months after marrying Khan and moving from Pakistan.

A pathologist described her injuries as the worst he had ever seen and Judge James Stewart told Ms Khan the jury found her “lacking” when it came to “common humanity within your own home”.

A GTC professional conduct committee said: “In our judgment your conviction for allowing the death of a vulnerable adult has material relevance to your fitness to be a registered teacher.”

However, it concluded: “We believe that you have the potential to teach effectively in the future and you have the passion, desire and professional commitment for teaching.”

lets hear it for education. moonbat source

Posted by peiper     on 04/03/2010 at 05:34 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Education • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - March 27, 2010

School Daze, school days, Barking mad in Britain

School Daze, school days, Barking mad in Britain

I don’t enjoy posting articles like this, and it sure doesn’t make a country whose traditions and history I’ve admired look very good.  That’s because it just plain doesn’t look so well anymore.  The left wing social engineers and bleeding hearts and all their political correctness have wrecked this place.  Not totally, not yet, but I think they’re working hard at it.

There is absolutely no excuse in the world to tolerate this kind of crap.  It’s clear from this article and much else I’ve read, that there doesn’t seem to be enough support for the teacher in the classroom or for harsher punishment to deal with the class thugs.  Some of these little monsters are already so far out of control, that there does not appear to be any other way to deal with them except hanging.  Basically they’re bullies and cowards and I believe that if a few executions were to take place and watched by their peers, the problem might solve itself.  Or at least diminish to a point where other students and teachers will be safe in their own schools.  But there aren’t any examples being made that would deter the other punks. 

Yesterday a gang (up to 20) of black school (children?) went after one boy and caught him at a subway station and in front of a crown, stabbed him to death.

Schoolgirls in murder gang: Teenagers face quiz over stabbing that terrified commuters

There were also girls involved in that mob violence.  Turns out that they had been causing problems for some weeks before this, armed with screwdriver and knives.  The paper reported in this case that they were blacks and it just reminded me that while it was never on this horrible scale, 60 years ago in my country it was generally blacks and Puerto Ricans who carried blades and roamed in groups.  You just had to stay out of their territory.  They seldom ventured into the city center or a bus station or train station attacking news stands and destroying merchandise and stabbing anyone who happened to be there. I mean to say, it wasn’t a normal thing.  It wasn’t a normal thing in this country either, not until these folks suddenly discovered they had, RIGHTS! All sorts of RIGHTS. And the lawyers to back them up all paid for of course by the very people who are always at their mercy.  The taxpayer.  Who else has the money?

Another case came to light this week and again I simply ignored it due to the nature and it bothered us beyond imagination.  I mention it now because of the story being posted here and the one I described above.

A 13 yr old boy was caught raping a three year old baby. Come to find out, he’d abused her a few days previous to that.  He was caught by the girl’s mom.
The paper didn’t go into any great detail and nothing was mentioned as to whether or not she beat the creep up. Perhaps he was too big for her. Who knows.
Due to his tender age of course the courts don’t allow for his name or photo to be made public.  That’s a dame shame cos if anyone deserves hanging from the nearest tree, but only after having parts of him removed, this bastard does.  Again, it will never happen.  And so future victims are being created even as I type this rant.  And that’s what always gets my dander up and I lose the old temper.  Because I’m convinced beyond all doubt that future victims are out there all because a system that calls itself justice, dispenses little of that or none at all.

The unteachable pupils sent back to terrified staff despite assaults and sex attacks

By Laura Clark

It is a shocking document which lays bare the realities of teaching in increasingly unruly schools.

One teacher reports the case of a 14-year-old boy who attacked her and sexually assaulted a female classroom assistant.

Another boy, this time aged only five, threatened to stab a member of staff with a pair of scissors and threw chairs in his reception class.

Most disturbingly, the culprits have all been returned to the classroom against the wishes of teachers - often after initially being excluded or expelled.

Nine ‘unteachable’ children are described in a dossier produced by the NASUWT union. Five were expelled by head teachers only to be reinstated by governing bodies.

The union accuses governors of being more concerned with placating parents of troublemakers than protecting staff.

In the other four cases, head teachers themselves failed to take firm action, leaving classroom teachers in what they describe as an impossible position.

Chris Keates, NASUWT general secretary, said the dossier highlighted a ‘deeply worrying’ assault on teachers’ authority.

‘Governors seem to be taking the line of least resistance to placate the minority of parents rather than to protect the majority of pupils and their staff,’ she said.

‘If governors do not back head teachers’ professional judgment in these matters then staff and school leaders cannot manage behaviour with confidence.

‘Equally concerning is that, in the other cases, which were all serious incidents, the school took either no action or made the very weak response of temporary exclusion.’

MORE OF THE STORY HERE

Posted by peiper     on 03/27/2010 at 06:40 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Education • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - February 18, 2010

School ‘spied on pupils at home through webcams’ …..  stand by for legal action …

This came through about a half hour ago. When I saw the headline I immediately thought it was here. But no. The USA.  Woo-Hoo.  Gonna be trouble now you betcha.
How could they (the school obviously) be so damn stupid? With all the law suits for doing less, with all the talk about big brother etc., the person or persons responsible sure weren’t thinking too clearly. No wait.  They weren’t thinking at all.

Administrators of a wealthy suburban school district have been spying on students and their families at home after giving them laptops fitted with webcams, according to a lawsuit filed by parents.

By Tom Leonard in New York
Published: 6:40PM GMT 18 Feb 2010

The Lower Merion School District, which administers a Philadelphia suburb that is one of the wealthiest parts of Pennsylvania, issued all 1,800 students at its two high schools with laptops so they could access school materials at home.

However, according to a civil action filed in the local US district court, neither parents nor their children were ever warned that the access worked both ways.

Michael and Holly Robbins claim they were alerted to the snooping when an assistant principal at Harriton High School warned their son, Blake, in November last year that he was “engaged in improper behaviour in his home”, citing a photo taken on his laptop webcam as evidence.

Mr Robbins said he later verified through the assistant principal, Lindy Matsko, that the school district was able at any time to “remotely activate” the webcam in a student’s laptop and “view and capture” whatever image was in its line of sight, all without the user’s knowledge or permission.

The lawsuit also argues that “many of the images captured and intercepted may consist of minors and their parents or friends in compromising or embarrassing positions” including “various stages of undress”, the lawsuit adds.

SCHOOL SPYS

Posted by peiper     on 02/18/2010 at 02:14 PM   
Filed Under: • Education • Stoopid-People • USA •  
• Comments (12) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - February 16, 2010

It’s a start

Faced with a terrible school situation in a town in Rhode Island, a place where just 7% of the 11th grade students are proficient in math, the school superintendent came up with a plan to improve things. The teachers would have to do some tutoring, eat lunch with the kids once in a while, and work less than half an hour longer per day.

The teachers get paid in the $70-$80K bracket. Plus bennies. Average income in the town is $22K.

The teachers union said no.

So the superintendent fired the whole damn bunch of them.

Posted by Drew458     on 02/16/2010 at 10:49 PM   
Filed Under: • Education •  
• Comments (14) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - February 12, 2010

History of England starts at 1700, says university

Academics have attacked a decision by a top university to scrap research into English history before 1700.


By Graeme Paton, Education Editor

It was claimed that the move by Sussex University risked jeopardising the nation’s understanding of the subject and “entrenching the ignorance of the present”.
Under plans, research and in-depth teaching into periods such as the Tudors, the Middle-Ages, Norman Britain, the Viking invasion and the Anglo-Saxons will be scrapped, along with the Civil Wars.

The university will also end research into the history of continental Europe pre-1900, affecting the study of the Napoleonic wars and the Roman Empire.
The university said it was “reshaping” its curriculum and research following a £3m cut in Government funding.

Last week, universities across the country were told their budgets were to be slashed by £449 million next year, including a £215m reduction in teaching funding, with threats of further cuts in the future.

Well now I can understand that.  Budget cuts have to be made.  Especially when you have to find the money to fund the 2012 Olympics, the immigrants on state aid, the illegal immigrants on state aid, the asylum seekers who find their way to the UK and get to stay, terrorists and former (they claim) terrorists and various groups who have a human right to the money which I think might be everyone who wants a free lunch. Well heck.  You can see they have to make cuts in their budget to accommodate ,,, stuff.  Oh right.  Lets not forget all the MPs and their expenses. 

Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, has claimed that institutions can use the opportunity to focus resources on their strongest areas.
But in a letter to The Daily Telegraph, 17 leading historians said the move was short-sighted and risked undermining the public’s understanding of the past.
“To cut everything but the most modern puts in peril the public function of history, entrenching the arrogance of the present and making a mockery of the claim by the minister behind these cuts that ‘we also wish to keep this country civilised’,” said the letter.

The academics, who all trained at Sussex, said that the decision to sever ties with European history before 1900 was a particularly retrograde step.
“For a university which has long prided itself on its European links to abandon the serious study of such pivotal areas of modern history as the French Revolution will mean depriving Sussex graduates of the mental furniture of educated Europeans,” said the letter. “The university risks damaging its reputation as a centre of knowledge for European culture and history more widely.”

The letter to the Telegraph was signed by historians from universities including Nottingham, Southampton, Trinity College Dublin, Michigan, Sydney University and the University of London Institute in Paris.

Sussex is among dozens of universities being forced to make savings following savage budget cuts announced by the Government.
The University and College Union estimated that more than 15,000 jobs – the majority academic posts – could disappear in the next few years.
Positions are being cut at King’s College London, Westminster, Leeds, Sheffield Hallam and Hull, while entire campuses belonging to the universities of Cumbria and Wolverhampton are being shut.

Several loss making courses are also being scrapped across the country. The University of the West of England has already scrapped French, German and Spanish, and Surrey has dropped its BA in humanities.
The letter called on the university to stop proposals to withdraw from “research, and research-led teaching, in English social history before 1700 and the history of continental Europe before 1900”.

Prof Paul Layzell, deputy vice-chancellor, said: “The proposal put forward by the University of Sussex to withdraw from certain areas of research and specialist teaching in history reflects three factors: first, a strategic determination to focus our research in areas of sustainability and strength; second, to align undergraduate provision with areas of demonstrable demand; and, thirdly, a need to reflect the Government’s financial policy for higher education.
“The history degree at Sussex, as befits a programme offered by one of the top 20 departments in the country, will continue to be broad based and intellectually challenging.”
He insisted there were no plans for teaching to be “entrusted with non-specialists”.

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 02/12/2010 at 01:27 PM   
Filed Under: • Education • UK •  
• Comments (11) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - February 08, 2010

EDUCATION, IMMIGRATION, STUDENT VISA SCAMS. WHAT NEXT? HOW ABOUT A FIRE SALE?

It wasn’t long after I arrived on these shores that I discovered and was vocal about, what I perceived to be the giving away of this country.  It wasn’t rocket science or a great mental leap of any kind.  It was just obvious.  I suggested to some friends here that if Brits were in so big a hurry to give away their country, and it seemed to be that way, then why drag things out?  Why not just put the country up for sale on eBay and be done with it quickly. 

The town where pupils speak 150 different languages

By Daily Mail Reporter

Schools in just one town are having to cope with pupils who speak 150 different languages, a survey has found.

They range from the Ghanaian dialect of Akan, through the African language of Chichewa and the ancient Aztec tongue of Nahuatl to the Indian language of Telugu.

This is as well as the more common foreign languages of Urdu, Punjabi and Polish.
The survey in Reading, Berkshire, shows how schools are being put under mounting pressure by the rising levels of pupils who do not speak English as their first language.

SOURCE

White Cliffs of Dover to be sold to the French to help reduce Government’s debt

By Vanessa Allen

For generations Dover has stood as an indomitable symbol of Britain’s freedom and independence.

The town, with its white cliffs, port and sprawling castle stood at the very edge of the nation’s frontier with the Continent.

But now part of that proud history is up for sale and the leading bidder is revealed as the former age-old enemy – France.

The Port of Dover is being recommended by Government advisers for sale to the French authorities.

It is one of a string of public assets which have been earmarked for privatisation as the Government battles with a record £830billion national debt.

The proposal for the port has prompted outrage.

Prospective Tory MP for Dover Charles Elphicke said: ‘It’s clear Gordon Brown has no sense of the history of our nation or the pride of our town.

‘How dare he consider selling it all off to the French? Dover is the English border. The people of Dover have a clear message for him – hands off our port, hands off the English border.’

MAILONLINE

Oh heck. Just can’t resist one more example, not related to first story at top, which I suppose makes it even worse. And ppl have to be soooo careful when using words as you can all imagine.  Use the wrong pc word or phrase and naturally it goes from being a scam to a bad racial attitude.

New promise to end student visa scams: But the Tories jeer ‘haven’t we heard it all before?’

By JAMES SLACK

Alan Johnson yesterday promised yet another crack down on the rampant abuse of the foreign student visa regime.

The Home Secretary said tougher rules would be introduced requiring applicants to speak English to near-GCSE level and ban those on short UK courses from bringing dependents.

Officials claim the new regulations will lead to a sharp reduction in the 240,000 student visas currently issued by the UK each year - the equivalent of one every two minutes. But the Conservatives accused the Government of ‘floundering around’ as it sought to correct its own mistakes.

Bringing “dependents?” Students have a crying need to bring dependents?  Jeesh.
The rest of the article is HERE

Posted by peiper     on 02/08/2010 at 05:58 AM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • Education • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • UK •  
• Comments (8) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - February 02, 2010

The Pope has made an unprecedented attack on the Government … pay attention to this.

Not fit for much in the way of posting today. Must be the weather.
Then I read this.  POPE & POLITICS. At first I didn’t pay it much attention.  But after awhile, seeing the comments ppl were making and hearing the issue debated on radio, I got to thinking this was more important then I first thought.

There are some folks who claim the pope has no business making any comments re. govts. anywhere. I’m not Catholic and I’m not religious either but, I’m not too sure about that last opinion.  Why shouldn’t the pope make his feelings known?  It isn’t as though it’s the old days when he could galvanize an entire country to do Rome’s bidding.  And I am not so sure he doesn’t have some valid points to make.  You don’t like what he has to say fine.  Then debate the issue without getting nasty.

The homosexual community have spoken out and many have even suggested that his planned visit here should be banned.  And these are the folks always banging on about rights and freedom of speech.  Oh right.  Freedom to express their views but damned if they want others to have the same privilege.

Lets be very clear on something.  The pope’s comments are NOT directed at that community solely.  He has spoken on a number of issues. 
Can anyone tell me why a Catholic school or a Baptist or Jewish school, should be bound by law to admit those who do not in any way share the faith or religion of a school?  And btw, many a non Catholic has received a pretty good education at Catholic schools. 

What most of this has to do with is that nut case Harriet Harperson (Harman) and her “everyone MUST be equal” crap.  It is she and her agency and the govt. that seem intent on interfering in religious schools and dictating to them.  And one really oddball thing about a lot of this is, many of them are not even religious themselves.  But they’re quite willing to tell the religious how their schools should be run, all in the name of ‘equality.’

Pope’s intervention sparks equality bill row

That’s the headline at the link above.  But what “intervention?” Is having an opinion and speaking out as head of a church, intervention?
Maybe it is.  It appears to be open to debate among quite a few people.

This is just one of the issues.

By politics.co.uk staff

Catholic pastors are preparing for their biggest confrontation with the government in years after the Pope encouraged them to take on Harriet Harman’s equality bill.

Benedict XVI has warned the legislation, currently working its way through parliament, imposes “unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities”.

It could strip the Catholic Church in Britain of its ability to discriminate against homosexuals in employment matters and even force them to allow women into the priesthood.

Here are a couple of reader comments on this I found at the Telegraph.

Of course the Pope should comment. I am not a Roman Catholic but this government law is just one more assault on our freedoms. How ridiculous that anyone could consider it reasonable that someone who rejects and even opposes Christian values should be able to insist on working for a Christian organisation. This is a direct attack on the freedom to believe and associate with others who believe the same. I would not find it at all objectionable for a Muslim organisation to insist that its employees should all be Muslim.

I am Reformed and certainly do not agree with Roman Catholic Doctrines; nevertheless, one must ask, why is it that the Archbishop of Canterbury fails to speak out on moral issues with clarity? Is it because he is so liberal and is happy with the staus quo? He certainly gives the impression that he is “wishy-washy” in his theology, and fails to make an impact on society as a whole, far less politicians.

In any event, as I posted elsewhere today in the DT, the Equality Bill is not merely Harriet Harman’s desire; rather, it’s an EU diktat.

But not everyone agrees of course.

If the church cannot stop discriminating it is not serving its purpose, not following the inclusive teachings of the bible but off on its own sick perverted dogma. In our society we need to stop discrimination and the church should be leading that, not continuing to insist of legal permission to discriminate.

“to drive religious belief and practice into the sphere of the private only” Isn’t that where it belongs anyway? Worship whatever you want but don’t try to push it on me. Gay is not a choice. You are born that way or not. So to discriminate against it is the same as discriminating against someone for having a different skin color. It doesn’t make them worse or better just different.

Naturally enough my favorite is this one, no surprise.

I wish the press would stop the misuse of the word GAY. If they mean homosexual or lesbian then say so .

The comments are quite interesting and can be found HERE

Posted by peiper     on 02/02/2010 at 11:35 AM   
Filed Under: • Education • Nanny State • Religion • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - February 01, 2010

Inequality in Britain isn’t down to class but brains. But the left wants to make it something else.

Maybe Ms. King from my previous post should read this. Bet she hasn’t.  She more then likely reads the Guardian and believes it all.  (for folks in USA, the Guardian is a very far LEFT paper.)

I won’t post all of this here but it is an interesting editorial. 

It has been claimed by many that the Brit PM and his party I should add, have been playing the class thing as though those less fortunate in lower incomes say, are there mostly because they are not being given the opportunities to better schools, jobs etc.  The process didn’t start with the PM I don’t think although Lyndon can fill that in for me.  I think the former street brawler who was the Deputy PM under Tony Blair, John Prescott, had a lot to do with that. Long story I’ll muddle if I try and go into all of it. 

Then we have Harriet Harman (referred to as Harperson) the minister of equality. She wants everything to be equal and everyone to be included.
She comes from a very posh very wealthy background, I have read.  What is it about rich folks who want to fit right in there and be one of the poor?
Being on good terms with ppl is fine but when you go so far as to try and drop your natural accent exposing a good education and start talking less posh just to “fit in with working class folks” well, says a lot doesn’t it?  I can not think of a conservative that would think that way. Least I hope not. Seems to be an affliction of the left.

By far the best predictor for income and status is your IQ at 10 or 11, rather than your social class,

By Alasdair Palmer

The National Equality Panel, set up by the Government to examine inequality in Britain, published its findings last week. And surprise, surprise: it found that there is a lot of inequality in Britain. People from poorer backgrounds do not usually achieve as much as people from richer ones.

That this is a basic fact of life in the UK is certainly true – although it is not true, as the NEP report claims, that we are significantly more unequal than most other Western countries. The differences are marginal. Even in the places it cites as egalitarian utopias, Sweden and Denmark, it is still the case that who your parents are has a very significant effect on how your life works out.

Indeed, no country anywhere comes close to the egalitarian ideal of ensuring that everyone, irrespective of their background, has exactly the same chance to succeed. And there is a very straightforward reason: people everywhere care more about themselves and their immediate families than they care about everyone else. We all devote our efforts and ingenuity to promoting our own and our families’ interests rather than those of “society as a whole”; when the two conflict, we prioritise the former. That’s why every attempt to achieve a society in which each person is treated in exactly the same way not only requires state coercion of the most extreme kind, but also always ends in abject failure.

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 02/01/2010 at 11:16 AM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • Editorials • Education • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - January 20, 2010

Here’s Fred on Everything. Topic today, Affirmative Action

I read this guy a lot. In fact, I get his newsletter. He is one heck of a good writer and even at the odd time I question something he says, he says it so damn well I keep reading. 

He has it right on this subject and I know that from some very personal experience. 

I just guess the problem is no less back in the states then it is here.  Wimps in position of authority seem to rule because other wimps just follow along out of fear or maybe not wanting to get themselves involved.  And they are everywhere.  I suppose in the world we inhabit these days, I understand it even as I dislike the idea.

Toward a Gilded Peasantry

Fred Reed

On the website of WLOX 13, “The Station for Southern Mississippi,” I find the story of Gabe Stabler, eight years old. Because he came home crying from the first grade every day, his parents put a tape recorder in his back pack to see what really went on in class. From the tape we learn much about his teacher, a Ms. Williams, and about affirmative action, and about the United States today:

Gabe: “I don’t know what to do on this.”

Ms. Williams: “Well, you’d better find out. It’s not hard. Nobody else didn’t have to ask no questions bout it. You know what to do, you just want somebody to just sit there and pet you about it, but I ain’t gonna do it. You know how to go in that lunch room and tear that food up every day. Ain’t nothing hard bout that sheet.”

Following this Miltonian eructation, we have:

Ms. Williams: “No, do your work. She ain’t goin to be sittin up in here wanting somebody to help her every time she, cause she don’t wanna apply herself to her work. You know how to go in that cafeteria and enjoy that lunch and breakfast every morning.”

Then, waxing ever more lyrical, even Ciceronian,

Ms. Williams: “Where this go?”

Child: “I colored that yesterday.”

Ms. Williams: “It shouldn’t of got changed at all, that ain’t nothing to be proud of.”

Ms. Williams clearly is barely literate, and should be in the first grade instead of teaching it. Gabe speaks better English than she does. In a country not sliding into degradation, a restraining order would keep her from coming within a hundred yards of a school.

Why do we permit this sort of thing? Ms. Williams is black. The story carefully doesn’t say so, but it doesn’t have to. Only the black uneducated speak as she does.

The proper response from parents would be fury. The discovery that this creature is attempting to turn their children into the equivalent of farm animals ought to result in the lynching of the school board of Mississippi. A civilized people with backbone will not allow their their offspring to be made into gurbling iPodded peasants. But we are not such a civilization.

Why is it happening? “Affirmative action.” Since Ms. Williams does not speak the language of the country, the only possible reason for hiring her is that she is black. She is not just slightly unqualified, allowing an expectation that she might catch up—this being the founding fantasy of “affirmative action”—but absolutely unqualified.

The pattern repeats endlessly. Today I have read that the Chicago police contemplate eliminating their entrance examination on the grounds that not enough blacks pass it. Firemen of my acquaintance tell of women too weak to handle a hose, of female paramedics who can’t carry a stretcher. While I was on the police beat at the Washington Times, I encountered a tiny policewoman who never had to drive the paddy wagon because her feet didn’t reach the pedals.

On intercity buses there once were signs, and probably still are, saying, “Seating is without regard to race, creed, color, sex, or national origin.” Today everything seems to be with regard to nothing else. Anything, everything, must be done to keep the affirmative-action classes happy.

This rush to degradation is not new. In 1981 in Harper’s I wrote, in a piece on race in education, “The bald, statistically verifiable truth is that the teachers’ colleges, probably on ideological grounds, have produced an incredible proportion of incompetent black teachers. Evidence of this appears periodically, as, for example, in the results of a competency test given to applicants for teaching positions in Pinellas County, Florida (which includes St. Petersburg and Clearwater), cited in Time, June 16, 1980. To pass this grueling examination, an applicant had to be able to read at the tenth-grade level and do arithmetic at the eighth-grade level. Though they all held B.A.’s, 25 percent of the whites and 79 percent of the blacks failed. Similar statistics exist for other places.”

If you think it desirable to have black teachers, as I do believe it desirable, then get those who are fit to do the job. Plenty of blacks speak English. If you can’t find enough, then do without. The same applies to women who can’t carry stretchers. Fat chance, though.

What price do we pay for this total abnegation of responsibility, civilizational self-respect, reason? One price is a quiet contempt for blacks, and hostility toward them. Competent blacks are no problem, but “If he doan be eatin dis sangwidge…” doesn’t cut it. Women make perfectly good paramedics, but what is anyone, fellow crewman or patient, supposed to think when she can’t lift the stretcher? (Answer: Scorn, anger.) What does a patient think on seeing a black doctor come his way? “Oh god….” The doctor may have gotten through medical school on ability but, given affirmative action, you figure he probably didn’t. Blacks know this of course, and resent it. Knowing that they are despised, they say the hell with it, and content themselves with just getting by. This is useful?

The suspicion of affirmative action pervades American life. After Katrina, a friend in federal employ visited FEMA. It was, he said, very heavily black, on which fact he blamed the disastrous performance of the agency in New Orleans. Was he right? I don’t know. In the absence of affirmative action, the question would not be asked.

Thus the defining principle of American politics arises: If you don’t think in racial terms, if you look only to ability, you are a racist. Count me in.

This leads to another question, seldom asked and never answered: how much does affirmative action really cost the country? If you hire someone to do a job who can’t do it very well, it doesn’t get done very well. This doesn’t strike me as a profound thought, but it seems to elude many people. In the case of Ms. Williams, the damage is great and clear. It isn’t always so stark. When you regularly pass over the first 135 people, all white, on a test for promotion to sergeant in a police department, so as to get to the blacks and Latinos, what kind of police department do you get? If you hire reasonably good female engineers because they are female, instead of very good males, the consequences are less obvious, but there.

And when it becomes a firing offense to notice, the result is a permanent, irremediable drop in the quality of the work force. I don’t suppose it really matters though. The only serious economic competitors the US faces are, oh, Japan, Korea, China, India, Taiwan, Brazil, and the European Union. Piece of cake.

FRED REED

Posted by peiper     on 01/20/2010 at 05:32 PM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Education • Republicans • USA •  
• Comments (8) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - January 07, 2010

UPDATE ON PREVIOUS STORY. SCHOOL DAYS ….  BOY STABS TEACHER, LET OFF WITH A WARNING.

Yeah right.  Just got this update on the last story about the little creep.
A warning.  Uh huh. That’ll really scare the hell out of the shit.  That’s the major trouble with young offenders. They are savvy. They know they’ll get away with things with little or no worry.  A warning.  His next victim will be a victim of that “warning” as much as a victim of the “yoot” involved here.
Best thing for the safety of society would be to do away with him, and harvest body parts for sick kids who really need help and who aren’t thugs.

10-year-old boy who stabbed teacher with a pencil escapes with a warning

By Jaya Narain
Last updated at 5:20 PM on 07th January 2010

A boy of 10 who stabbed one teacher in the chest with a pencil and attacked two others has escaped punishment.

The boy, who cannot be named, attacked the teacher during an incident at his primary school last term.

After kicking a female member of staff, the boy was being led to a ‘quiet room’ when he lashed out again.

He was later charged with the assaults and appeared before a youth court in the town on New Year’s Day.

But yesterday he accepted a warning over his behaviour from police officers after a review of the case was carried out.

The boy had previously been reprimanded for a kicking attack on another female teacher.

Last night union bosses condemned the decision and demanded more action needs to be taken to protect teachers.

John Girdley of the NASUWT said: ‘When pupils attack teachers - and this does happen - we consider this totally unacceptable.

‘Teachers are there to teach they are not social workers and not police officers. The school should take very robust action against a pupil, particularly one who repeats an assault.

‘This is made all the more serious when a weapon is used, however primitive the weapon may seem.’

He said: ‘If one of our members came to us and said they wanted nothing more to do with this child we would support them. That could reach a refusal to teach ballot- a form of industrial action - in extreme circumstances.’

A spokesman for the Association of Teachers and Lecturers said: ‘When a teacher is assaulted we would hope the school would actively pursue prosecution.

‘We would say that if there is an assault the pupil should not return to the school where it took place. If a teacher remains unhappy there is always recourse to private prosecution.’

A member of staff at the primary school said: ‘My colleague was a lucky man. That pencil could have pierced a lung or even worse.

‘To charge the boy, make him appear in court and then to reverse everything and just give him a warning - is that a punishment befitting the crime?’

The age of criminal responsibility in the UK is 10 and the authorities decided to give the boy a warning because of his age.

Angus Craigen, prosecutor, told the hearing in Blackpool that charges against the 10-year-old had been withdrawn.

Trevor Colebourne, defending, said: ‘There were three teachers involved and my client has asked me to apologise to all three. He is now in a different school.’

Last year, a teacher received more than £280,000 compensation for an assault by a teenage pupil which has left her with permanent back pain.

Sharon Lewis, 26, was attacked by a 13-year-old boy, who cannot be named, who jumped on her back and placed her in a headlock.

He ignored her pleas to stop and she eventually fell to the floor hitting a wall and window.

The attack ended her teaching career and left her with constant pains in her neck and down her back.

source

Oh well, the lawyer defending says his client say sorry. That’s all ok then. I think the lawyer needs the feel of something sharp in his chest.  Be interesting to know if he’d ever try and help some other creep for that kind of crime.  Hell, once stabbed he might become a conservative.

Posted by peiper     on 01/07/2010 at 01:26 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Education • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

More, SCHOOL DAZE … Schoolboy, 10, arrested after ‘stabbing teacher in the chest with pencil.

So then. What to do? What to do?  Maybe stick a pencil in the little shit so he knows what it feels like?
I was a sort of a hell raiser in school. By that I mean, I was always joking and generally made ppl laugh. In class, for which I earned a slap on the open palm with a ruler.  Or was made to stand in the corner facing the wall outside the class room. I got to know that corner so well I gave it a name. But it never occurred to me that I should hit a teacher or even use disrespectful language of any kind. How times have changed.

Dunce’s corner banned: It could breach a pupil’s human rights, say councils

By David Wilkes

It has been used as a punishment in schools since Victorian times.

Unruly pupils have been made to stand in the ‘dunce’s corner’ by teachers so that the lesson can carry on without further disruptions.

But now health and safety chiefs have warned that the practice is cruel, describing it as a ‘stress position’ that could breach a child’s human rights.

Schools have received guidelines from local education authorities saying that standing children in the corner is unsuitable and a less physical alternative should be used.

Some teachers won’t use the punishment because it ‘humiliates’ pupils in front of their classmates.

They are now advised to ask the pupil making a nuisance to explain to the class why he is interrupting the lesson.

Traditionalists have attacked the idea, saying teachers will end up with no means left to control disruptive-pupils.

Nick Seaton, chairman-of the Campaign for Real Education, called it ‘a ridiculous idea that compares what goes on in a classroom to Guantanamo Bay’.

He added: ‘Discipline is a major problem in classrooms at the moment and teachers have got to have some solutions for children who disrupt them or the whole system will fall apart.

‘We’re getting to the stage where teachers will not have any punishments at all. The hooligans will end up ruling the classroom.

banned dunce source

Schoolboy, 10, arrested after ‘stabbing teacher in the chest with a pencil’

By Daily Mail Reporter

A ten-year-old was arrested after a teacher was stabbed in the chest with a pencil during a class.
The boy reportedly grabbed the pencil from the teacher’s jacket pocket and then plunged it through the man’s shirt puncturing his chest near his heart.
The stunned primary school teacher then pulled out the pencil himself as colleagues called 999 and paramedics took him bleeding from the wound to Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Lancashire, for emergency treatment.

Police were also called to the school and took the youngster - described as being of very slight build - into custody.
The boy who has just reached the age when he can face the justice system is understood to have admitted what he has done.

A police spokesman said : ‘The teacher was very lucky, another inch and the sharp pencil could have punctured one of his main arteries.’
The incident is said to have occurred as the teacher tried to persuade the boy to go into the school’s quiet room used when a pupil gets unruly and needs time cool down.

The boy refused and claims the teacher tried to grapple him into the room and it was then he allegedly grabbed the pencil and stabbed him with it.
There had reportedly been an earlier incident in which the same boy kicked the same teacher.
Lancashire Police have confirmed the boy was arrested and questioned by officers about the incident.

If it is decided whether to report him for a wounding offence, a Youth Court is likely to impose a referral order on him as he has not been in trouble before.
Such an order means he could go under the guidance of a team of specialist youth workers and may have to write a letter of apology to the teacher.

Blackpool Education Authority said the boy had been excluded from the school as a result of the incident and would receive home tuition in the meantime.
The teacher is recovering from the attack over the festive break and is expected back in the classroom in the New Year.

YOUNG PUNK WITH A PENCIL

Posted by peiper     on 01/07/2010 at 10:20 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Education • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner