Monday - February 21, 2011
take note cwinamals … cwime wil not bee tolerated hearboutes ..this iz kwik wesponce to cwrime.
To the ppl responsible for finding a woman guilty of THEFT by FINDING .. (WTH)
This isn’t a new story. In fact, I’m just a week late in getting to it. No doubt some of you may have already seen it. For those who haven’t, well , this is how serious the criminal justice system is in the nanny state. By gosh and by golly these folks will not put up with this sort of criminal behavior you betcha.
H/T Current.com
A woman was handcuffed and ‘treated like a hardened criminal’ after she helped herself to food worth £200 that had been thrown away by a Tesco store following a power cut.
Dozens of people could not believe their luck after the outlet of the supermarket giant bagged up thousands of pounds of spoiled stock and left it out in the street.
Sasha Hall, 21, helped herself to potato waffles, pies and ham from outside the Tesco Express in Great Baddow, Essex.
But she was stunned when police arrived at her home and arrested her for suspected ‘theft by finding’ and took her to the station in handcuffs.‘There was £3,000 worth of food going to waste on the street,’ she told the Essex Chronicle. ‘It had been thrown out, so I thought I could put it to better use.
‘When the police came round I was so upset. I felt like a terrible criminal.’The shop worker said the supermarket - which has the motto ‘Every little helps’ - should have been pleased that the food would be put to good use.
She said: ‘I would think the police have better things to be doing with their time than going after people who pick up potato waffles from the street. It’s all been blown totally out of proportion.
‘Tesco clearly did not want the food. They dumped it and rather than see it go to waste, I thought I could help feed me and my family for a week or two.’
Ms Hall, from Great Baddow, said she was shocked by the way the police dealt with the incident.‘They knocked at the door and said if I didn’t open up they would use a battering ram,’ she said. ‘They handcuffed me and treated me like I was a hardened criminal and when we left they raided my house.
‘I haven’t got lots of money. I only make £600 a month. I’m on the brink of getting kicked out of my flat because I can’t pay my arrears.’
A Tesco spokesman said: ‘We are assisting the police with their inquiries. We seek to minimise waste in all our stores and where possible will seek to reuse and recycle it.’
Ms Hall, who works part-time at a rival supermarket in Chelmsford, is to appear in magistrates court on February 16 charged with theft by finding.
CURRENT DOT COM AND THE DAILY MAIL
I haven’t seen any updates yet to know how the trial went.
Posted by peiper
on 02/21/2011 at 11:23 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - February 15, 2011
gremlin sues his victim for ruining his reputation. i’d have thought he did that all by himself
It might seem to many a rather extreme solution I suggest for stalkers but ... I see them as extremely dangerous people, never to be trusted unless made crippled or dead. Preferably the latter as it’s certain they’ll never again be a problem. I see that as fairly reasonable solution to many crimes where warnings are made, the gremlin goes to jail, comes out and does it again. Anyway, this is a pretty interesting case.
This animal has been stalking a woman for a very long time. She turns to the law and gets help, but her life was turned upside down and so she blogged her experience.
Now he’s suing her for ..... well, take a look.
Stalker takes legal action against victimA stalker who Googled his victim 40,000 times has taken legal action against her for “ruining his reputation” with comments on her website
Elliot Fogel, 35, a former Sky News producer, was jailed for four months last year for breaching a lifetime restraining order by harassing 35 year-old complementary therapist Claire Waxman.
But it has now emerged that after being released from prison Fogel launched a civil action against Mrs Waxman in an attempt to force her to stop writing about him online.
His legal action came to light last week at a court case to determine whether it amounted to a breach of his restraining order.
Fogel, of Isleworth, West London, had been arrested and charged again after his representative contacted Mrs Waxman.
This appeared to put him in breach of the order, imposed in 2005 by Brent Magistrates’ Court, which prohibited Fogel, or anybody acting on his behalf to contact Mrs Waxman.
At Wood Green Crown Court on Wednesday the CPS dropped two charges that Fogel breached the restraining order on or before November 17, last year by initiating civil proceedings and attempting to retrieve material from Mrs Waxman on or before November 1.
“She is writing about me on a website and readers are invited to leave comments,” complained Fogel outside court. “All I am trying to do is bring proceedings that stop this.”
CPS lawyer Martha Godwin announced: “An issue was raised during this case, which required the CPS to take some expert legal opinion.
“The opinion confirmed that a restraining order cannot be used to stop someone from accessing civil courts as happened in this case. This meant we could not pursue this prosecution and we offered no evidence.”
Fogel developed an unhealthy interest in Mrs Waxman when they were both college students in St. Albans, Hertfordshire, where she had to continually tell him to leave her alone.
After leaving college in 1993 she heard nothing for ten years until receiving a dinner invitation from Fogel, which she declined.
A few months later, in December 2003, Fogel was spotted jogging on the spot outside her home and spent more and more time loitering around her workplace.
He even posed as a prospective parent at the nursery Mrs Waxman’s daughter attended, paid for background searches on her husband Marc and her father and collected her wedding photos.
She was forced to move home five times, developed an eating disorder and claims stress caused by Fogel caused a miscarriage.
Posted by peiper
on 02/15/2011 at 02:22 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - February 14, 2011
UK Crime: What a Mesh
Looks like Peiper has today off, so I’ll do a UK looney bin post for him.
A spate of thefts in several towns and villages in Kent and Surrey over the past few months led to many householders taking action to protect their property.
Some have been warned by police that using wire mesh to reinforce shed windows was ‘’dangerous’’ and could lead to criminals claiming compensation if they ‘’hurt themselves’’.
Thieves target sheds to steal lawnmowers, power drills, bicycles and a variety of DIY tools.
Thomas Cooper, of Tatsfield, Surrey, used wire mesh to protect three of his garden sheds after two break-ins over the past four years. He decided to take action after reports of a rise in garden raids in the area.
Mr Cooper said: “I reinforced my shed windows with wire mesh, but was told by the police I had to be very careful because thieves can actually sue you if they get hurt.
Dave Bishop, of Tatsfield, said: “The law is so stupid, and you never know what decision judges are going to make. People do get fed up with these people trying to help themselves to things which you have worked hard to gather together.”
Pc John Lee, a crime reduction officer for Tandridge, said: “We are constantly advising home owners to protect their property and the contents of their shed or garage, however, a commonsense approach needs to be taken.
“To properly secure your sheds, Surrey Police strongly advises people to invest in items such as good-quality locks and bolts, and not to resort to homemade devices, as this could cause injury.”
A police source added: “Homemade devices can cause injury and there have been cases where criminals have sued for injuries they have suffered while committing a criminal act.
‘’We are advising people to do whatever they can to protect their property, but wire mesh is not one of the suggestions we would make.”
No, I wouldn’t recommend it either, because they’re going about it wrong. Working closely with Wile E. Coyote, I was able to quickly put together an effective window mesh crime stopper.
Posted by Drew458
on 02/14/2011 at 02:18 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • UK •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - February 12, 2011
Big Brother, Now With Less CFCs
October 2010: In the Netherlands’ port city of Rotterdam, crime is way down, thanks to ... a little scientific innovation. Hoping to reel in the number of robberies, police began dishing out DNA spray to beleaguered restaurants and jewelry stores. The spray, which emits a mist laced with synthetic DNA markers unique to the business’s location when activated by employees, both marks the would-be robber and alerts police that a crime is occurring. The intention is to intimidate crooks, say police.
A sign on the front door of one previously burgled McDonald’s reads: “You Steal, You’re Marked.” Police, who note they haven’t yet made an arrest by using the mist, say such tactics are working, and report a significant decline in crime rates.
The mist, which is now being used in nine countries and coming to the U.S. soon, shows up under ultraviolent light and contains a DNA code that police stations scan for when they bring in criminals. The unique code irrefutably links criminals to the scene of the crime.
“The word DNA spreads fear into even the most hardened criminals,” said Jason Brown, business director of Selectamark, the company that created SelectaDNA Spray.
...
The mist is so fine, it’s unlikely a robber would know he’s been hit. It sinks into the target’s skin and hair where it sits for weeks.“You can take a shower three times a day, but the DNA stays on,” said Jean-Paul Fafie, the manager at one of several McDonald’s restaurants in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, that had the spray system installed.
The spray, which was developed in 2008, is being used in a series of European countries from Belgium to Hungary. The Bank of New Zealand has just invested in the product and will have all of its branches installed with the spray by next month, Knight said.
Multiple SelectaDNA Spray heads can be fitted at the entry points of premises and on activation emit a burst of SelectaDNA solution onto the offenders. The solution contains a UV tracer and a unique DNA code, linking them irrefutably to the crime scene. The DNA Spray can be armed by a panic button and/or linked to an existing intruder alarm system. As the DNA fear-factor amongst criminals is high, it is likely that sprayed intruders will flee the crime scene before stealing any goods.
Comments one Nederlander who just had these things installed in his neighborhood:
Personally, I’m glad criminals are so stupid, because they’ve never heard of UV ink solvent or protective clothing to wear under their own. God forbid that they actually go out and get themselves a black light to check.
Another issue that bugs me ... for street crimes, if somebody is watching the crime happen through the Big Brother network of spy cams, why not just call the cops instead, since the people who are watching usually ARE the cops? If you have to push the button to make the spray go off, you could set the law on them just as easily.
From a merchant’s perspective, I’d want to know “How much for just the signs then?”
Posted by Drew458
on 02/12/2011 at 10:56 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • High Tech •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 03, 2011
jailed rapist who targets white girls, claims ill treatment in jail. says rights not observed.
Just looking at these animals makes me sick. What’s sicker still is why they are being given a platform instead of being dead.
How come this fella who I can’t refer to as what many of you will, oh hell. This is as good an example of nigger as there is. Anyway, how is it that there aren’t any race charges against this scum. Oh right. That only works the other way.
‘It makes me sick to think that this evil man came over specifically to rape and assault white girls.
‘He wanted to hurt us because we were white. While he has shattered my life, he has the dream life he came here for - a comfy bed, a TV to watch whenever he likes and hot food three times a day.
‘Where is the justice in that?’
There’s another question not asked in the article. Just askin mind you.
What the sam hill was a white girl doing with this filth? Did she somehow believe she was being invited to a church service? I’m not saying any woman deserves to be raped. Not even if she stupidly leads a creep on. And you know some women do that. But I find it hard to understand the attraction she might have had.
Be sure to see the link for another bizarre side story on the most violent and dangerous prisoner in England whose name happens to be, unfortunately, Charles Bronson. He thinks his “rights” aren’t being seen to properly. Maddening.
‘They’re bullying us’: Rapist who targeted white girls whines from jail cell about losing PlayStation
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 3:48 PM on 3rd February 2011
A rapist who deliberately targeted white women has complained that prisoners are being ‘horribly treated’ by having PlayStations and DVD players confiscated.
Illegal immigrant Amos Moobeng, who was jailed for nine years in 2009 after being found guilty of raping a teenager he had lured her back to his flat in Exeter, said he was ‘horrified’ at the recent crackdown.
Black South African Moobeng, now 37, said bosses at the 646 prisoner-capacity HMP Dartmoor in Devon were ‘bullying’ convicts by removing privileges.
He said: ‘There is something rather alarming going on here at HMP Dartmoor. I will call it Operation Dis-enhancement - a massive and ruthless campaign to take away every prisoners enhanced status and make us all standard or basic.
‘Whether this is a cost-cutting exercise or simply because the screws cannot stomach seeing us with DVDs, PlayStations, and wearing our own clothes - now banned on visits, incidentally - is something only they know.’
Moobeng, who raped an 18-year-old after luring her and a friend back to his home in 2007, said he was hauled before the prison governor and asked to justify his status as an ‘enhanced prisoner’.
Prisoners on ‘enhanced’ status - handed out by the Incentives and Earned Privilege Scheme (IEP) - get access to certain items they own such as PlayStations and DVDs in their cells.
The rapist, in a letter published in prisoner’s magazine Inside Time this week, added: ‘It all started one afternoon when we returned from work and found a slip tucked under every door instructing us to appear before the governor and explain why we should not lose our Enhanced status.
‘The onus of proof used to be on staff as to why they would downgrade a prisoner from Enhanced to Standard or Basic, but now it is up to us to prove why we should remain on Enhanced.
Posted by peiper
on 02/03/2011 at 02:15 PM
Filed Under: • Crime •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - January 29, 2011
Mom Got Schooled
Ohio mother convicted of felony because she said her kids lived with their father so that they could attend a better, safer public school. Now she’s a felon, and her career as an aspiring teacher is over.
Kelley Williams-Bolar, a 40-year-old mother of two, was convicted of a felony last week and sent to jail for 10 days. Her crime? Falsifying records so her kids could attend a safer school in the district where her father lives.
Uh-oh! Sounds like two little girls were trying to get a free education off the back of hard-working tax payers, and if that’s not worth a felony charge, I don’t know what is. Williams-Bolar, according to the prosecution, lives in subsidized housing in Akron, Ohio, and not with her father in Copley Township—as she claimed on several official school forms when she enrolled her two daughters. The Copley schools are, it seems, better and safer than the schools in Akron. (They are also whiter. Williams-Bolar is black. But obviously race has nothing to do with this case!)
The school district grew suspicious enough about the Williams-Bolar kids to, apparently, hire a private detective, who filmed Williams-Bolar dropping her children off at a bus stop near her parents’ house.
According to the presiding judge, Patricia Cosgrove, who spoke with The Akron Beacon-Journal, “the state would not move, would not budge, and offer Ms. Williams-Bolar to plead to a misdemeanor,” despite several pretrial hearings.
Williams-Bolar, a teaching assistant, is working towards a teaching degree, but her felony conviction will likely derail that.
Looks like the father and grandfather are also in a bit of trouble over this. Williams-Bolar was released early from jail and is now making a big fuss and demanding complete exoneration.
A whole bushel of links on the story can be found here.
Interesting situation. A black woman wants her kids out of the lousy and dangerous local black school, so she says they live with the other parent, who has an address in the better, whiter school district. Both districts are within the city of Akron, so it isn’t like neither parent was paying school taxes into the city system. Or were they? I would assume Mom is on some level of public assistance, since she lives in subsidized housing, but she works at least part-time. Does the father work? He lives elsewhere, with his father, but everyone still seems to be on speaking terms. Are they married? Were they ever married? Is he working but living with his father only so that she and the girls can get rent free housing? Did the Copley Township schools only push this case to court because she’s black? (a dozen cases a year like this come up, but none ever go to trial, much less conviction). Had Williams-Bolar tried for a waiver before this, or did she just decide to falsify things from the get-go?
If you try to make things better for your children by following the rules and get nowhere, is it Ok to bend or break the rules to get what you want? This case is a victimless crime, isn’t it?
Or perhaps the whole thing is a big miscarriage of justice. According to one article I read,
The effect of divorce on a student’s residence also is a factor for districts. A child in joint custody with parents in different districts has a right to go to either, said Russell Chaboudy, superintendent of Coventry school.
Any $2 lawyer could get “divorce” interpreted as “living separately” considering how rare actual marriage is these days. If Chaboudy is paraphrasing actual law, then this case may have been really poorly handled if certain legal priorities exist. By which I mean the “divorce” rule overrides the “actual residency of the child” rule, which it certainly could if parental custody was exactly 50-50.
I read several articles about the case, but not all of them, and it does not look like she is overtly playing the race card. That in itself is interesting, because a quick look at the other dozen cases per year that come up would point out any racial bias, and you’ve got to wonder about it, since the Copley school board hired a private detective to make their case, which is something they’ve never done before. And with all the other cases clogging up the court system, and plea bargains buzzing around like mayflies, the prosecutors were 100% unwilling to make any kind of deal on this case? So maybe she ought to be playing it for all it’s worth. Or maybe it’s in play just by having her picture in the paper. Or maybe, just for once, race is merely coincidental to the case.
h/t to careyb
Posted by Drew458
on 01/29/2011 at 09:02 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Education • Racism and race relations •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - January 18, 2011
one lone tuff lady rushes into gang of thugs and saves a man while ppl watch
This was one hell of a brave woman, whoever she was. These scum could have easily turned on her. And they would have had she been a white woman.
Take a look at the video. And take a look at two of the scum involved. Look at those faces and tell me if you see anything human there.
Woo-hoo. One is just a child of 18 and so goes into a “young offenders program.”
Take a good look at that ‘young offender.’
CCTV reveals lone woman rushing to save defenceless man during mob attack - as onlookers simply watch
By Daily Mail ReporterArmed with only a bag of shopping, these images show a lone woman bravely intervening as a defenceless man was savagely beaten by a mob - whilst other onlookers walked on by or stood around to watch.
The woman was picking up groceries when she saw the victim being chased down the street by a gang of yobs, one on a bicycle, before being dragged to the ground.
The hoodie-wearing thugs, who were described by a judge as behaving ‘like wild animals’, repeatedly kicked and stamped on the 26-year old man’s head and body as passersby watched.
Posted by peiper
on 01/18/2011 at 11:07 AM
Filed Under: • Crime •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - January 17, 2011
this is one result of what is laugingly the justice system here.
Ok I know what anti-gun ppl will say. Yes but if guns were easily available, these scum suckers would have used them.
Well, perhaps if their victims had access to one, one or all might be alive today. But forget that for now.
Seems to me killing someone for their ins. and luring someone to their death, is pretty premeditated and cold blooded.
So, why are folks like this out free among us.
Forget that. Lets talk instead about how screwed up America is, with all our gun crazed loonies on the right who love Sarah.
Lets discuss how America puts more of our citizens in jail then anyone else. Could it perhaps be because while our criminal system may be fouled up, and while we may make the same sort of bone head move as made here, we still manage to put away people life forms that Europeans and Brits let out to roam free.
Just a thought for any surfing foreigners out there of a more liberal bent who think we’re a tad too harsh on the criminal class.
And before I forget, a reminder to BMEWS readers. Please take a good look at the comments following this article. I wonder if some of the hand wringers would invite any of these women to dinner. Or, maybe help look after an elderly relative. Or babysit. Hey, ya never know. They might be just liberal enough.
Take a look at this insanity.
Three female convicted murderers given jobs at same Travelodge
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:39 PM on 17th January 2011Three women convicted for murder have been employed at the same branch of a popular hotel chain.
The killers currently work at a Travelodge in York, serving customers who are oblivious to their evil crimes.
Linda White, 55, a guest-room cleaner, stabbed her ex-partner John Sandilands to death after a row
Pat Bulmer, 48, who works as a receptionist, lured her husband Robert to be knifed to death by her lover so she could claim over £30,000 from his life insurance policy.
Julie Richardson, 42, also a cleaner at the hotel, scalded her own father with a red-hot iron before battering him to death with two accomplices.
The news that these dangerous criminals, all jailed for life, have been quietly integrated back into society has shocked and angered relatives of the murder victims.
Robert Bulmer’s sister Hepsy told The Sun: ‘It’s disgusting. What are the authorities thinking of?
‘I don’t suppose the customers know a thing. If you’re staying at a hotel you don’t expect to find three killers working there.’
The trio applied for the jobs at the hotel branch in Piccadilly, York, while serving sentences at Askham Grange Prison as part of a scheme to get offenders into jobs soon after they are released.
Travelodge spokesman Jon Hendry-Pickup defended his company’s decision to employ the ladies.
He said: ‘The workers from the rehabilitation programme are constantly assessed and have proven to be dedicated and hard-working individuals.’
Posted by peiper
on 01/17/2011 at 12:49 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • Justice - LACK OF • UK •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - January 15, 2011
Somali woman lied to claim asylum and £250,000 in benefit, described Britain as easy money.
I am not going to spend a lot of time, in fact very little, ranting on about this worthless unwashed looking bag of filth.
Just another example of the burden we all know about except in this case ... the burden is being accepted willingly without a fight.
I want you folks to see how easy it was for someone to screw the state, and then find protection by that same state, who refuses to protect itself from the likes of her.
They say they can’t deport her cos she’s a Brit citizen. The damn fools. She became one giving false information. She screwed you, she lied to you to get what she wanted. Revoke her damn citizenship idiots. She doesn’t deserve to have it.
btw .. as you will read, she screwed the Swedes also.
Oh hell. Never mind. The descendants of and those still alive paying taxes who fought for this country will pay the bill. No problem.
Next?
‘The land of easy money’: How the Somali woman who lied to claim asylum and £250,000 in benefit handouts described Britain
By Tamara Cohen and Tom Kelly
Last updated at 5:20 PM on 15th January 2011
A woman who lied about being gang raped in Somalia to claim more than £250,000 in benefits had moved to Britain after boasting it was the ‘land of easy money’.
Ayan Abdulle was jailed this week after investigators discovered that the story she used to win asylum – and later UK citizenship – was a pack of lies.
Now the Daily Mail can reveal the full scale of her fraud and how easily she was able to milk the benefits system for years.
Abdulle, who also used the fake name Amina Muse and is from Somalia, was living in Gothenburg when the authorities insisted immigrants learn Swedish if they wanted to continue to claim handouts.
She told a friend she couldn’t be bothered and moved to England where she knew it would be far easier to collect benefits.
She made up a story to gain asylum and gave herself and five of her six children false names and dates of birth, fraudulently claiming benefits on both the real and invented identities.
And she somehow managed to continue claiming benefits in Sweden for three years after leaving.
Abdulle was born in Mogadishu in 1969 but moved to Sweden in 1994.
Her friend Hodan Abdullahi Egal, who lives in Gothenburg, said yesterday: ‘Ayan liked life here. She never worked, just took things easy and spent her time meeting up with old friends from Mogadishu.
‘But she couldn’t be bothered to learn another language. Instead she decided to move to England.
She said it was the land of easy money. She was convinced she would have no problems there because the system there made it far easier to collect money without proper checks.’
Abdulle arrived in London in 2004 with her first five children, now aged eight to 17, and her husband Raghe Adan, and claimed asylum under the name Amina Ali Muse.
In her application, she said militiamen had targeted her home in Somalia on December 1, 1998, shooting her brothers dead.
She claimed she had been gang raped while three months pregnant, leading to a miscarriage, and that her niece had been raped, tortured and beaten.
In fact, on that date Abdulle had been in Sweden giving birth to a daughter.
Between June 2004 and May 2010, Abdulle, who was living in Neasden, North-West London, claimed £261,358.14 in handouts.
The cash came from almost every welfare benefit possible, including income support, disability living allowance, carers’ allowance, jobseekers’ allowance, housing benefit, council tax benefit, tax credits and child benefit.
Friends and neighbours in London and Sweden said the only man who ever visited her flat was husband Adan. But in Sweden she registered herself as having married a 41-year-old named Hassan Mohamed Osman in 2007.
And the father of her sixth child, born in 2009, was given as Abdirashid Mohamed Omar, a Somali who arrived in Britain from Kenya in 2006 claiming to be the husband of Amina Muse. He was granted indefinite leave to remain as her spouse.
Abdulle was exposed when she fell out with some members of her family who revealed her fraud to the authorities.
A former friend in London said: ‘She was very secretive. I never saw her with a husband in six years. She changed her mobile phone number every day, you could not contact her.
‘She went back and forth to Gothenburg a lot and she once went to Africa, but via Sweden even though it was more expensive.’
Jailing her for four-and-a-half years at Harrow Crown Court for multiple counts of fraud and deception, Judge Stephen Holt described her actions as a professionally planned ‘cynical and dishonest manipulation of the whole system of asylum’.
Abdulle, who showed no remorse, cannot be deported after finishing her sentence because she was granted British citizenship in 2009.
Posted by peiper
on 01/15/2011 at 04:34 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Illegal-Aliens • UK •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - January 01, 2011
Bust ‘em
- Roland
Michelle Malkin essays on the snowmageddon fiasco in New York City.
Posted by Drew458
on 01/01/2011 at 01:29 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • Corruption and Greed •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - December 23, 2010
Extreme violence of this nature is rare, says a cop who should know better, or is an idiot.
Detective Constable Darcia Babb said: ‘This was an outrageous and prolonged attack on a defenseless victim by a gang of thugs.
‘Extreme violence of this nature is rare but when it does happen we will make sure those responsible are brought to justice.
Scuze me while I take some time off to figure out just what planet the lady constable is on. Not this one. Is she dizzy er what? Crimes of this nature are most certainly NOT rare. And as for brought to justice, gimme a break. Justice? She isn’t dizzy. She’s crazy. Gotta be. Justice? For what these sub-humans with unpronounceable names did? What justice? Where’s it hiding? I saw it somewhere a long time ago. Must have got lost in the immigration shuffle along with the mad hatters that voted Labour and allowed those traitorous lefties to totally screw up the country and the police and the courts.
Take a good look at this ... and take a gander at the time these pukes will serve. A guy gets beat up this badly and some of the thugs are charged with,
violent disorder? wtf! What’s with that? And what the hell were the ppl in the restaurant thinking when they closed the door on the victim, afraid to allow him sanctuary. Jeesh what a fucked up world.
The way the headline reads, you immediately think they’re gonna be in jail for a long time. Not so cos it’s 20 years split up among the whole gang of punks.
Grab the link for a couple of photos of the sub-human scum. This is what England and most of Europe will one day look like. I’m glad I won’t be around to be witness to it. But sure as hell it’s on the way. Can it be halted? Sure. Maybe. Depends on how serious the electorate get about crime. How far they are willing to go to set examples to discourage others. Somehow, someway the people have to make lawmakers sit up and take notice. It might be they have to organize vigilantes along the line of San Francisco in 1849. String up a few lawyers who defend scum like these. Take out a weak judge or two. And by all means do away with some of the violent thugs who’ve been let out early and committed crimes while on release. You think I’m over the top?
In the news this week is a story of unimaginable horror. The guy is called the Crossbow Cannibal. He even ate one of his victims raw. How’s that for bad?
AND ... he’s just another case where he could have been stopped had authorities not been asleep. Another case also of some mentally deranged wacko who was deemed ok and safe to release, you got it, he killed a total stranger. Want more? Some punk darkie released from prison for violent crime, killed someone 6 months after his release. You’ve heard it all before and many times I’d bet. Same crap but different names.
Just how much is the public supposed to be subjected to? And to add insult to injury, be expected to support these miserable bastards either on benefits or while in jail. Why? For what purpose? Of what use can they be, unless used for medical experiments.
Gang who battered pedestrian with crowbar in brutal road rage attack jailed for nearly 20 years
By Rebecca Camber
A gang of thugs who stabbed a pedestrian in a road rage attack, torturing him with a crowbar, hammer and broken bottle have been jailed for almost 20 years.
A 30-year-old man was subjected to a brutal attack after almost being run over by a car as he left a popular Indian restaurant in Whitechapel, east London.
When the pedestrian swore at the driver in anger, he was confronted by three thugs who got out of the convertible BMW and another car following behind.
Rashel Hussain, 20, and his friends, twin brothers Jubhare and Taharak Hussain, both aged 21, battered the victim with a crowbar, causing serious injury to his left hand.
Terrified, the man ran back to Tayyabs restaurant - regarded as one of the best Indian restaurants in London - only to find himself trapped in the doorway as the doors had been locked by frightened staff.
Taharak knifed the man a number of times before running off with the others to get more weapons.
As the victim attempted to get help, stumbling towards the Royal London Hospital nearby, his attackers returned with a larger group of men who leapt on him.
Rashel Hussain battered him with a hammer, while another man, Shah Alom, 22, slashed him with a glass bottle and two others, Jubhare Hussain and Shofiqul Islam, 21, rained down punches on the defenceless man leaving him with serious neck, arm and thigh injuries.
The extraordinary onslaught of violence was caught on CCTV, which showed the bloodied victim desperately attempting to escape.
Horrified members of the public who witnessed the attack around 9pm on Sunday, May 30 this year called 999 for help.
Two police officers rushed to the scene and wrestled with the attackers, pulling them off the victim and saving his life.
Rashel Hussain was arrested at the scene while the others fled. But detectives later rounded up the other members of the gang.
On Monday they were sentenced to a total of almost 20 years at Snaresbrook Crown Court.
Rashel Hussain, 20, was jailed for six years after pleading guilty to grievous bodily harm and violent disorder.
Taharak Hussain, 21, got seven years for grievous bodily harm.
His non-identical twin Jubhare, 21, received a two year sentence for violent disorder.
Two other gang members, Shofiqul Islam, 21, got a two year sentence and Shah Alom, 22, was sentenced to 27 months for violent disorder.
Let me tell you just how frightened some are of the law and the police. If you are aware of the “student” riots last month, here’s something you probably didn’t
know. One of the very left groups, not all students btw, give points for damage to property, maybe 50 points for assaulting an officer, 100 points for injury and drawing blood. I haven’t a clue what they do with the points but what I’m saying is, does that sound like a society in control of itself? Does that look to you like a culture in charge? Does that look like a country that’s pointed in the right direction? Not to me it doesn’t. Vandals do their best to rile and entangle the cops doing their job, bullying cops if I can use that term and it sure looks like bullying. But cops aren’t supposed to smack em down. It ok to spit at a cop and then sue the city if the cop defends himself cos as we all know, cops are all guilty all the time. I really am sick to tears of all the BS flung about and the useless thugs of all colors running the show. The state may be holding them off somewhat. But what the state is not doing, is fighting back. They won’t even use water canon on rioters, I have read. What does that tell you?
And I haven’t even started on the unions. I’ll leave that for another time.
Posted by peiper
on 12/23/2010 at 06:40 PM
Filed Under: • Commies • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • Editorials • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - December 20, 2010
Harry Potter actress threatened with honor killing for dating a non-muslim. rop. uh huh. right.
Why do these medieval creeps insist on immigrating to a western country that does not abide by their backward , controlling religion.
She’s too frightened to go to court and so the slimy scum will simply get away with their abuse. Figures.
These folks will NEVER change. Ever. That’s ok except, they’ll keep coming here bringing their twisted thinking with them.
Harry Potter actress was ‘beaten and branded a prostitute by her family after dating man who was not a Muslim’By Daily Mail Reporter
A Harry Potter actress was beaten, called a ‘slag’ and threatened with death by members of her family after she met a young man who was not a Muslim, a court heard today.
Victim Afshan Azad, 22, played Padma Patil, a classmate of the teenage wizard, in the blockbuster Hollywood films based on the children’s books by JK Rowling.She was assaulted and branded a ‘prostitute’ after meeting a young Hindu man, a relationship which brought anger from her father, Abul Azad, 53, and brother, Ashraf, 28, Manchester Crown Court heard.
The frightened star, who has featured in four of the popular films, later fled through her bedroom window after threats were made to kill her.
But despite attempts to get her to come to court for the trial of her father and brother, Miss Azad, who is believed to be living with friends in London, would not attend voluntarily, the court was told.‘The father, having been awoken from his slumbers, with his son shouting: “Sort out your daughter! She’s a slag!”
He continued to further assault her, in disputed Bengali, shouting, “Just kill her!”‘The assault continued. There was a discussion where she was being called a prostitute.’
The threats to kill her apparently continued, the witness told police in a statement.Reading from the victim’s statement, Mr Vardon added: ‘My father began saying he would do it, a reference to kill her, as he did not want his sons to have her blood on their hands and he would do time for it.
‘Then she began to feel very scared.
Posted by peiper
on 12/20/2010 at 01:22 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • muslims •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - December 17, 2010
update on yestyerday’s update … illegal scum allowed to stay
I recently did a ranting post on justice or lack thereof, in regard to a couple of cases here in the UK.
I can’t let go of this story. It bothers me that much.
And just for the official record.
I would hate this miserable and worthless pile of useless shit if he were a WASP. The crime isn’t worse because he belongs to a protected minority, it’s sadder and it’s worse because it did not have to end with the painful, lingering death of a 12 year old girl.
The more I see this kind of thing, the more convinced I am that nothing short of a police force with the powers of a Gestapo will bring relief and order and an end to this sort of madness.
There needs to be wholesale slaughter of the left. Examples made publicly to reinforce the idea that criminality will not be tolerated, nobody will be called Mister in jail, the reinstatement of the death penalty with NO appeal in cases like this one. Lawyers wanting to defend scum like this shot dead. The closing of borders to more immigration except for highly skilled. Current prisoners being held for violent crimes to be eliminated.
An END to political asylum. ALL illegals deported or shot. Choice is theirs and only five minutes to decide. Churchmen who think hiding illegals a good thing, eliminated. It’s a start. But of course we all know full well it won’t happen. Well, maybe if some libtard judges and politicians become victims, but what needs to be done will not be done and so look for more stories like this very sad and depressing case.
I was and like many others here, am still angered and outraged that an originally illegal immigrant with a long criminal record, has been given the freedom to settle in this country. As bad, he killed that little girl and received only four months in jail. Four months for a man who wiped out the future of a little kid.
He was not even supposed to be driving in the first place, having already been in trouble for unlicensed driving, driving minus ins. and other offenses.
But the miserable muslim bastard took no notice of course because no doubt western infidel laws don’t apply to him.
Well anyway, as already reported his human (?) rights have to be protected and so he won’t be deported. I can not help but wonder if he’s now on benefits.
After leaving jail he was right back to his old tricks again. And why not? He’s beaten the system thus far, and the system has been found to have no teeth.
Here’s a partial update to my update and the rest is at the link as always. My blood still boils over this case. Read the Prime Minister’s letter at the link as well. It won’t make anyone feel any better. The gremlins really do have the upper hand, and as Pat Condell points out with regularity, these bastards are on a roll.
Take a look at this.
It actually starts in 2001 when the slimy muslim filth snuck into this country as an illegal.
2002: Caution for criminal damage.
Jan. 2003: Fined for driving without insurance, license or vehicle registration.
June 2003: Six month ban for the same offenses.
Oct. 2003: Banned for further nine months for driving without ins. license, and bad tire tread.
Nov. 2003: Driving while banned, he kills girl. He is sentenced to four months in prison.
2004: Convicted of possession of cannabis.
2005: Caution for burglary and theft.
2006: Convicted of driving while disqualified and without insurance. Given two year supervision order, banned from driving for three years and given a curfew.
2009: Convicted of harassment.
Posted by peiper
on 12/17/2010 at 11:08 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Illegal-Aliens • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - December 16, 2010
once you grasp the idea that it’s about ‘human rights,’ you’ll feel better about the stupidity.
Right. Sure you will.
Leading off I can’t ignore the subject matter of this even tho I haven’t got a link. And lord knows I have tried every which way.
Since a previous post I did said all I had to say I’ll just give you the lunatic facts of the case.
Here’s the headline I saw in the Telegraph, but as usual for them, no on line copy that I could locate,
FAMILY OF DEAD DRUG MULE CAN SUE CUSTOMS, SAY JUDGES
So here’s what essentially happened.
A professional drug smuggler swallowed 116 packages of raw cocaine. He was arrested as he was about to go thru customs in London after arriving on a flight from Brazil. The packets showed up clearly on x-ray. At the hospital he was taken to, he refused all food or drink for a week in an attempt to stop the drugs passing out of his system. Just after he gave up his hunger strike, he died. Scratch one gremlin.
His name was Anthony Daniel, the paper reports. His wife is ... Ayesha Al Hassen-Daniel. Just thought I’d add that for whatever.
Well, she and his father are now suing for a “substantial” amount, but they claim it isn’t about money. Nooooooo. It’s to do with “RIGHTS.” Isn’t it always?
Their lawyers say there were violations of his rights under the Euro-pee-on Convention on Human Rights.
Now then, in spite of the fact that this Daniel fella was the person responsible for his own demise, apparently the law allows for a law suit altho a high court judge say that he doubts the family can win its case. BUT, of course the Customs service will have to spend money defending itself. Won’t it?
I think in a case like this, it should be allowed but with a difference. If the Customs people win .... then the lawyers for the family should be put against a wall and shot graveyard dead! If the family wins .... then add the family to the wall along with the lawyers and stop their breathing also.
That might put the brakes on similar cases waiting for a hearing or trial.
Now then .... as long as the subject is human rights, and lets please stay with the topic cos things really do get dumber ... I offer you these.
This next item is kind of a surprise because I never thought a female would approve of this.
Take a look.
Sex offenders including paedophiles should be allowed to adopt
Rules which bar sex offenders from working with children are ‘unfair’ and even convicted paedophiles should have the right to adopt, a leading legal academic has said.
By Rosa Prince, Political Correspondent
Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, called on Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to relax rules which automatically ban sex offenders from caring for children, saying that this could breach their human rights.
In an article in the respected Child and Family Law Quarterly, Miss Reece suggested that reoffending rates were not high among sex criminals, adding: “despite growing public concern over paedophilia, the numbers of child sex murders are very low.”
A review is currently ongoing into the Vetting and Barring Scheme, introduced following the 2002 Soham murders, amid concerns by ministers that it is too heavy handed.In her article, Miss Reece suggested that the review should also introduce an assumption that sex offenders including child abusers posed no threat once they had served their sentence.
She said: “There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them.
“The Vetting and Barring Scheme and other legislative measures single out sex offenders for unfair special treatment and they destroy the principle that a prisoner pays his or her debt by serving their sentence before re-entering society on equal terms.”Individuals are placed on the “Barred List” and banned from working with youngsters or vulnerable adults if they are convicted of a sexual or violent offence, or one involving the mistreatment of a child.
Miss Reece criticised the rules for leading all sex offenders to be “tarred with the same brush,” saying that while “careful screening” was “important,” the issuing of a “blanket ban” violated the rights of criminals who wanted to adopt or work with young people.
She highlighted the case of a grandfather with a conviction for having sex with a 15-year-old dating back to when he was 29, who was refused permission to adopt his own grandchildren.
The ban could contravene the principle of non-discrimination enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, and may leave the Government open to legal challenge, Miss Reece warned.
OK, before making up your mind on the issue, read the entire story. There might be places where she may be correct. BUT ...
“re-offending rates were not high among sex criminals” and “the numbers of child sex murders are very low”
Come on. If you’re a parent, hearing that the numbers of murders are low or that the re-offending rate isn’t high, is still not reassuring. Is it? And does anyone want to take the responsibility of the risk with regard to allowing a sex offender to have kids in their care?
Pedophiles and kids somehow do no strike me as a thing to aspire to. I don’t know if it’s really a sickness but think whatever else it might be, it’s a terrible evil. Just doesn’t sit well.
So while we’re on the subject of “human rights” even tho all too often the ppl involved aren’t human at all ... here’s an update on an older story with no surprise. Remember now ... it’s okay cos it’s all about “RIGHTS!”
Failed asylum seeker who left girl, 12, to die after crash can stay in UK as deporting him would ‘breach his human rights’
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 5:46 PM on 16th December 2010* Father says ‘criminals have free rein’ after losing battle to deport killer
* Failed asylum seeker Aso Mohammed Ibrahim had a string of convictions
* Outcome ‘may have been different’ if Iraqi didn’t have children, judges sayA failed asylum seeker who left a 12-year-old girl dying under the wheels of his car while banned from driving will be allowed to remain in the UK, judges ruled today.
Aso Mohammed Ibrahim, 33, an Iraqi Kurd, was jailed for four months over the 2003 crash which cost Amy Houston her life.
Her father, Paul Houston, 41, begged judges at a recent deportation hearing to bring ‘my seven years of hell to an end’ by sending Ibrahim back to Iraq.
Today two senior immigration judges rejected a final appeal by the UK Border Agency to have him deported. Ibrahim will now be allowed to live in the UK permanently.
The UK Border Agency said they were ‘extremely disappointed’ with the decision - and that Ibrahim should have been removed.
The Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber sitting in Manchester also heard Ibrahim, given leave to remain in the UK, had a string of criminal convictions.
Ibrahim’s lawyers argued that his human rights would be impinged if he was sent back to Iraq.
Mr Houston was left to make the decision to turn off her life support machine hours after the crash in Blackburn, Lancashire, in November 2003.
He has since campaigned to get Ibrahim deported in a tortuous legal battle.
Last month he handed in a letter to judges, containing an impassioned plea asking for Ibrahim to be deported.
Mr Houston, from Darwen, Lancashire, said he was ‘frustrated and angry’ at the decision.
‘I’m really angry. We should all be angry. It is a ridiculous state of affairs,’ he said.
Angry: Paul Houston, father of Amy, said today: ‘This is a perversity of our society.’Angry: Paul Houston, father of Amy, said today: ‘This is a perversity of our society’
‘I’m battling away here on my own. This is a perversity of our society.
‘What are the judges saying here? They are saying it doesn’t matter what you do when you come here, who you kill, what laws you break, as long as you have a child here you can stay?
‘You work hard, play by the rules, pay your taxes and this is how you get treated. What does that say about politicians, our leaders and the legal system? It’s a joke.
‘They are obsessed with the rights of others from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq. Where are my human rights?
‘This man is a criminal, do we have no say who we allow in this country?
‘He’s not a life-saving surgeon or a Nobel prize winner. He was a criminal before, a criminal now and he will continue being a criminal.
‘The Human Rights Act is for everybody, not just asylum seekers and terrorists.
‘How can he say he’s deprived of his right to a family life? The only person deprived of a family life is me. Amy was my only family.’
Ibrahim’s lawyers claimed human rights laws permitted him to remain in the country, as his right to life and to family life trumped attempts to return him to his native Iraq.
Mr Houston was not allowed to address judges at the last appeal hearing.
Lawyers for the Border Agency asked for Ibrahim to be deported on the grounds that the judge who originally allowed Ibrahim leave to remain on the basis of his right to a family life did so incorrectly.
Although he now has two children, there was little evidence to suggest he was living at the same address so could not claim a right to family life, it was argued.
The judges were also told of Ibrahim’s convictions, including a further incident of driving while disqualified in 2006, harassment and possession of drugs.
But Senior Immigration Judges Lane and Taylor, in a reserved judgment made public today, rejected the Border Agency appeal.
They said the original decision should stand but added that the outcome might well have been different if the process to remove Ibrahim had begun before he had children.
If you aren’t sick enuff by now, I have more I can share. I sincerely hope the idiot judges before long will personally feel what her family feels and go through the same agony.
Here’s a few reader comments.
Time this country woke up and started voting all the parties out of office who dont care for the Britsh citizen any more.Disgusting that we cant deport a criminal from another country back home.In the real world the goverment would ignore the judges and still deport him
- british justice, edin uk,
What a marvellous country the UK is - safe haven for the scum of the world.
WHEN ARE WE GOING TO WAKE UP -
When are we going to START TAKING ACTION TO GET OUR COUNTRY BACK.
Even the French would not have allowed this !!!!
Anne Smith, Grey & Sad & Weary UKHope you human rights leftys are happy with this. This is what you wanted, this is what you got.
How would you feel if this was you or your family going through what Paul Houston has to deal with?- mick, Glos UK
So for him it's "dangerous" to go back to Iraq, well it looks like it is "dangerous" for Brits with him as a squatter in the UK.
- Joyce, Ft Worth, TX USA
Posted by peiper
on 12/16/2010 at 02:44 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •
• Comments (7)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
LAAR She Blows! Part One
(2 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Planes Ideas Blog
[...] CABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEB [...]
On: 07/12/11 01:57
The Tactical Cowboy
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Sights Service Blog
[...] E LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE [...]
On: 07/10/11 08:30
Nasty Dirty Money
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Money Reviews Blog
[...] ONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLES [...]
On: 06/17/11 08:31
Amazing aerial images taken by daring Allied pilots on secret missions during WW 2
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Hookers and Booze
peiper over at Barking Moonbat EWS found some absolutely kickass aerial photos from WWII. I grabbed this one because I’m a big fan of the movie A Bridge Too Far.…
On: 11/23/09 04:14
Clear Thinking and Straight Talk
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at baldilocks
Let Them Fight or Bring Them Home Read all of it--and tell every American you know to do so. (Thanks to BMEWS) UPDATE: The author of the above blog is…
On: 10/02/09 09:29
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
