Wednesday - March 30, 2011
police mistake leaves gorilla in the mist free to rape for 20 years
I’ve held off this one for a number of days and I think unless something else on the same order happens, I may quit the crime thing for a few days. This guy might not have been frightened even if there were a death penalty. But there damn well should be.
Here ... take a look at one of his victims. She’s the one on the left in red.
This guy has been on the loose due to police error for 25 years.
This nigger actually assaulted old men as well as old women. Hey, no discrimination with this slug.
Now here’s a really funny gag to go with this horrible story.
The police ask him to what?
“use his “conscience” and “come forward”
No, I guess that isn’t funny at all. Conscience? Sub humans have none but authorities seem to be unaware of that.
He would leave his victims – some of whom were as old as 93 – without electricity or a telephone line. Right, and the cops are looking for a conscience.
Night Stalker Delroy Grant has been convicted of being one of the most prolific and depraved sex attackers in British history. The 53-year-old rapist was found guilty of preying on the elderly in a campaign of perverted terror lasting 17 years. Former minicab driver Grant was responsible for some of the most “awful and disturbing crimes” ever investigated at Scotland Yard, senior detectives said. A jury at Woolwich Crown Court convicted him of claiming at least 18 victims - but it is feared the total may be more than 500.
The family of a 93-year-old woman, who died just weeks after being attacked in her home by Delroy Grant, have called for him to be charged with manslaughter.
Night Stalker: timeline of offences and investigation
Here is a timeline highlighting how it took more than 25 years for Delroy Grant, the Night Stalker, to be brought to justice.By Martin Evans 11:44AM GMT 24 Mar 2011
October 1992: An 84-year-old woman is attacked in her home in Shirley, Croydon becoming the first recorded victim of the Night Stalker.1997: After a five year gap, a series of similar attacks on elderly women are reported across south London, Surrey and Kent.
July 1997: An 88-year-old woman is brutally raped twice in her bungalow in Orpington. The attack was so savage she almost died from loss of blood and spent three months in hospital.
July 1997: The following day Night Stalker attacks again
1998: Operation Minstead is launched.
May 1999: Witness sees Night Stalker’s car at the scene of burglary and give the registration to police. A police blunder means detectives investigate the wrong Delroy Grant and eliminate him from the inquiry.
August 1999: Savage attack leaves victim fighting for her life.
2001: Police given the name Delroy Grant for a second time by a Crimewatch viewer, but having previously discounted the name they ignore the tip off.
October 2002: After a three-year break Night Stalker strikes again attacking a 75-year-
old woman in Shirley. This time he leaves a significant clue. Detectives find a footprint from a distinctive size 10 Nike Air Terra Contego training show.Summer 2003: 10 further attacks in a short period lead the Met’s Specialist Crime Directorate to issue an appeal to all police officers across London for assistance to catch the Minstead Rapist.
March 2004: Police carry out DNA testing of possible suspects in South London.
July 2004: Detectives announce they have narrowed the initial list of 21,000 potential suspects to 1,000.
September 2004: The first break-in for 18 months sees Night Stalker steal £1,000 for an 84-year-old woman, but he is talked out of assaulting her.
October 2004: An 81-year-old woman is sexually assaulted in her home in Welling.
January 2005: An 82-year-old living on her own in Sanderstead, near Croydon, comes face to face with an intruder who steals cash and valuables but does not harm her.
October 2006: Police issue a direct appeal to the rapist to give himself up, encouraging him to use his “conscience” and “come forward” to seek help for his behaviour.
November 2007: A 93-year-old woman is attacked in her home in South Norwood.
November 2008: Frequency of attacks increases.
June 2009: Night stalker attacks and sexually assaults a 93-year-old woman in her home in Shirley. Traumatised by the assault she dies three months later.
October 2009: Operation Minstead is given a new impetus after recently appointed Met Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, demands results. Major surveillance operation is launched across south London.
November 2009: Grant’s car is spotted at the scene of a break-in and finally after 19-years the Night Stalker is arrested and charged with multiple breaks-ins, rapes and sexual assaults.
Grant preyed on pensioners for nearly two decades, breaking into their homes in the middle of the night and sexually assaulting them. He attacked 203 victims from 1992, but detectives believe the real number is at least 500, with many victims too ashamed to come forward.
But in 1999 the Metropolitan Police had an opportunity to catch Grant, yet a basic error meant he was allowed to go free. In the following ten years he attacked at least 143 pensioners.The error followed a burglary at a house in Bromley in May 1999. A car seen leaving the scene was found to belong to Delroy Grant, but officers focussed on a man with a similar name and so Grant was eliminated from the enquiry.
Today Scotland Yard apologised for the embarrassing blunder.
Posted by peiper
on 03/30/2011 at 08:47 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Outrageous •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - March 29, 2011
one of the sickest posts I’ve done, and one I want ppl to see.
How many more times, how many more crimes like this will be allowed, before the liberally correct ass wipes understand that ONCE is enough to earn the death penalty. The very thought that this miserable excuse for a human could ever be free again is disgusting and frightening. WTF is it with ppl who think that criminals of this sort can ever be redeemed? Never mind that. Even if one could, what about the lives they alter forever?
This is one of worst and sickest posts I’ve done since joining BMEWS.
It’s an example though of the state of what is supposed to be a justice system. What justice exactly? What kind of justice is there for a 7 yr old boy who was assaulted and a four yr old brother who had to watch and was then assaulted also? People will no doubt ask what could possibly be going through the mind of the rapist. Who gives a shit? What’s really of concern is what’s happening to the development of two young kids and what they think.
Why oh why does the criminal system allow a low life worthless rotten SOB to be on parole, when he has a record of crime? Why can’t liberals get it through their fuckin thick heads that there are actually people who shouldn’t be allowed to breathe. That actually deserve the final penalty of death. And NOT by injection. It should hurt! And especially in a crime like this.
Take a look. If it doesn’t piss you off big time, you’re reading the wrong blog site.
Convicted paedophile freed to attack brothers aged 7 and 4 in McDonald’s toilet is jailed
By TAMARA COHEN
Last updated at 12:03 PM on 29th March 2011Boys were out on a family lunch after attending church
At the time of attack, Simon Archer, 23, was on licence for sexual offences involving childrenA paedophile freed on licence attacked two young brothers after their father had allowed them to go to the lavatory in McDonald’s by themselves.
Simon Archer lay in wait as the boys, aged just seven and four, went in together, just yards from where their family were sitting in the restaurant.
In a horrifying attack, Archer, 23, raped the elder boy and sexually assaulted his younger brother.
Their terror only ended when the younger boy collapsed crying on the floor but the ordeal continues to have a devastating effect on their lives.
Only weeks earlier Archer had been released midway through a jail sentence for previous child sex offences and was on strict licence conditions prohibiting him from being alone with children.
Yesterday Judge Michael Carroll jailed Archer for an indeterminate period, and said he was a ‘dangerous sexual predator’ who may never be released.
The boys, from a religious family who had spent the morning together at church, were so traumatised they said nothing to their father at the time, Woolwich Crown Court in London was told.
Their ordeal only came to light several days later when the boys’ mother suggested returning to the restaurant in Welling, Kent, as a treat and her sons became upset and refused to go in.
Based on a description from the boys, police found CCTV footage showing bare-chested Archer going into the bathroom just after spotting the children enter at around 2.30pm on July 4 last year.
Judge Carroll said: ‘The father allows the children, as all fathers do, to go to the lavatory unattended except with a sibling, when this happens.
‘A complete stranger walks in, commits these offences and walks out as cool as a cucumber. That kind of behaviour is heinous.’
He told Archer he would serve a minimum term of seven years before he could apply for parole and it was likely to be ‘many years’ before he was released.
He added: ‘You entered the McDonald’s looking for prey in your undoubted role as an extremely dangerous sexual predator.
‘It is relevant to remark upon the fact you appear to have travelled some distance from your home and carried out these offences in a manner which suggests to me, planning and determination.
‘Your demeanour upon leaving the scene of your abhorrent crimes shows an air of calmness which is chilling.’
A jury took just two hours to convict Archer of one rape charge and two sexual assaults last month
At the time of the attack, he had just served half of a nine-month sentence imposed in February 2010 at Ipswich Crown Court for engaging in sexual activity in the presence of children and asking them to perform sex acts.
In August 2009 he served half of a 22-week sentence for exposing himself to children. The offences were in London and Suffolk.
This followed an incident in 2007 in which he exposed himself to an 11-year-old which resulted in him being placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register and he spent time in a youth offenders’ institution.
Michele Elliott, of the charity Kidscape, said: ‘This is a horrible case.
‘If this man had been properly assessed as a danger after his previous offences, these two little boys would not have had to go through this, which will stay with them for the rest of their lives.
‘It’s an outrage, he should have been in secure accommodation and monitored.
‘The father was absolutely right to let the boys go to the toilet together and should not feel guilty. This man should never be let out of prison.’
Archer, of Belvedere, Kent, who wore a red tracksuit in court, showed no emotion during the hearing.
Acting Detective Inspector Jon Summers of the Metropolitan Police Sapphire sex crimes unit which caught him, said: ‘Simon Archer is every parent’s worst nightmare.
‘He is a predatory paedophile who is now where he belongs, safely behind bars. ‘What the victims went through will never leave them.
‘We can only hope and pray that this sentence reassures them and in some way helps them to put this dreadful ordeal behind them.
‘We cannot rule out the possibility that he may have committed crimes against others and I would urge anyone who has been a victim of a sex crime to contact the police.’
Would someone who understands law please explain to me why judges feel it necessary to inform the criminal of what he did. He already knows and the vast majority do not care. It just seems stupid to me.
And he doesn’t “belong safely behind bars,” he belongs at the end of a noose. After the castration without benefit of drugs.
Posted by peiper
on 03/29/2011 at 02:30 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • Justice - LACK OF •
• Comments (11)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - March 23, 2011
Dead_Goblin_Count += 1;
Armed Beauty Queen Fatally Shoots Intruder in Florida Home Invasion
When a burly ex-convict forced his way into a posh Florida home last week, he had no idea what awaited him—a 25-year-old beauty queen with a pink .38-caliber handgun.
Meghan Brown, a former Florida pageant queen, shot and killed 42-year-old Albert Franklin Hill during a home invasion March 12 at the 2,732-square-foot house she shares with her fiance in Tierra Verde, Fla.
Hill barged into the home at around 3 a.m. after Brown responded to a knock at the front door, according to a police report. He allegedly grabbed the 110-pound Brown around her nose and mouth and dragged her to an upstairs bedroom. The woman’s fiance, Robert Planthaber, said in an interview that he was quickly awakened by the altercation and ran to Brown’s side.
“I attacked him and took a severe beating to the head,” Planthaber told FoxNews.com. “But I got him off of her long enough for her to scramble to the room where she keeps her pink .38 special.”
TIERRA VERDE—A couple involved in a deadly home invasion on Saturday say they were fighting for their lives. Robert Planthaber and Meghan Brown said they were asleep when someone knocked on their door about 3 a.m. Brown thought it might be a friend, so she answered the door.
“Basically, all I had to do was unlatch the lock and the knob was already turned and that’s when the door was pushed open,” she said, “I turned to run and he grabbed me from behind. He had his hand over my mouth and he’s dragging me up the stairs.”
Planthaber heard what was happening and confronted the man, who has been identified as Albert Hill. A struggle began and Brown ran into the bedroom and grabbed a gun. She returned and shot Hill.
Planthaber said, “We’re glad this guy is off the streets and if it didn’t happen this way, we’d probably both be dead.”
The English press goes a bit more towards the Wild West details, which don’t seem to be in any other news article:
The fight between the two men broke the dining room table and chairs but, as they tussled, Miss Brown produced her pink gun from her bedside table. ‘I had my gun drawn, focused in on him - as he moved, my gun moved. I waited for my shot and when I saw an opening, I fired,’ she told the newspaper. Miss Brown said she was ‘glad’ it had been her, because not everybody else would have been as prepared as she was.
‘The way I see it is, the guy was a really bad guy and if it wasn’t my bullets, it probably would have been the police officer’s bullets,’ she said.
Other online papers also note how well off the couple are. They live in a 2780 square foot Spanish style house in Pinellas County with at least 3 giant TVs in the living room. She wears a $60,000 diamond engagement ring and they routinely pay for delivery pizza with $100 bills. He’s 42, she’s 25. The guy is an arborist - a tree surgeon; a cross between a landscaper and a lumberjack - and makes this kind of money? Damn, I’m in the wrong business.
The burglar had a rap sheet as long as your arm and had spent half his life behind bars for numerous violent offenses.
Here’s the link to the original story.
Posted by Drew458
on 03/23/2011 at 10:11 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Guns and Gun Control •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - March 21, 2011
law and disorder and a swift kick below the belt brings an ASBO.
So the guy faces surgery and she gets an ASBO? WTF.
What I don’t understand is why he got no help subduing the slag, and once he had her on the ground, why didn’t he slam her face into the floor enough times to disfigure her forever. If he needs surgery, why shouldn’t she?
I’m serious ppl. I really don’t understand why he didn’t rearrange her face.
Caught on CCTV: The eye-watering moment frenzied woman kicks hotel manager in the groin
By Daily Mail Reporter
This is the toe-curling moment a hotel manager received an excruciating kick to the groin while carrying out a citizen’s arrest.
Shocking CCTV footage shows Phil Burke fending off an attack by a woman in a Manchester hotel.
Gemma Ryan, 23, flew into a rage when she was stopped by suspicious staff from walking up to a room as she could only give the partial name of the guest she was visiting.
Ryan, of Mossley Road, Ashton under Lyne, later admitted common assault.
Last week, Ryan was given a two-year anti-social behaviour order that prevents her from entering the Britannia Hotel and the Ramada Hotel in Manchester city centre.
Now police have released CCTV footage of the drama showing the painful confrontation.
Mr Burke, a leading member of Manchester’s Pub and Club Network, said: ‘I was on the third floor and I heard her being abusive to the staff. I came down and spoke to her and she punched me in the chest, although this was not captured by the CCTV. She ran at me, hitting and punching me. She kicked at colleagues.
‘It frightened me. Not only was I being physically and verbally attacked, other people who were coming into the hotel were also targeted.’
Mr Burke, a 41-year-old married father, said that he had undergone two CT scans and was awaiting surgery to his groin after the incident.
Posted by peiper
on 03/21/2011 at 12:38 PM
Filed Under: • Crime •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - March 13, 2011
Who Says Crooks Are All Stupid?
A man who broke into a house in Portland, Oregon, called police—afraid the homeowner may have a gun.
The suspect, Timothy James Chapek, was in the bathroom taking a shower when the homeowner returned to the house Monday night, Portland police said in a statement.
Accompanied by two German shepherds, the homeowner asked Chapek what he was doing in the house.
Chapek locked himself in the bathroom and made an emergency call, police said. He said he had broken into the house, the owner had come home, and that he was concerned the owner might have a gun.
The homeowner also called the police to report that he had found a man in the house.
Police with dogs took Chapek, 24, into custody “without incident,” they said. He was booked for criminal trespass.
They did not say if the homeowner did in fact have a gun.
That’s gotta be worth at least one Hell Yeah!!
thanks to Doc Jeff!!
Posted by Drew458
on 03/13/2011 at 09:17 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Humor •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - February 23, 2011
We Need Better Laws
The father of a 20-year-old woman from Iraq, run over because she allegedly had become “too Westernized”, was convicted Tuesday of second-degree murder.
The Maricopa County (Arizona) Superior Court jury convicted Faleh Hassan Almaleki, 50, in the 2009 death of Noor Faleh Almaleki.
It also found him guilty of aggravated assault, for causing serious injuries to Amal Edan Khalaf, the mother of Noor’s fiance, and two counts of leaving the scene.
Almaleki, an Iraqi immigrant, was acquitted of more serious first-degree murder and first-degree attempted murder charges.
He could receive up to 22 years in prison on the murder charge alone. Sentencing testimony begins Wednesday.
Noor Faleh Almaleki died in November 2009 at an Arizona hospital, nearly two weeks after being run over by a Jeep in a parking lot in the Phoenix suburb of Peoria, authorities said.
There is something wrong with our laws when premeditated murder is not murder in the first degree. He planned it, he stalked her, he ran her down with a car and almost killed her companion as well. All because of his own failure to assimilate. So he gets jail? 22 years, out in 10 for good behavior? No. Pluck out his eyes, saw off his face, impale him, and burn him at the stake. That would be the Iraqi way, and since he couldn’t come to grips with being an American, he should be punished the “old country” way.
Posted by Drew458
on 02/23/2011 at 09:59 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • RoPMA •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - February 21, 2011
take note cwinamals … cwime wil not bee tolerated hearboutes ..this iz kwik wesponce to cwrime.
To the ppl responsible for finding a woman guilty of THEFT by FINDING .. (WTH)
This isn’t a new story. In fact, I’m just a week late in getting to it. No doubt some of you may have already seen it. For those who haven’t, well , this is how serious the criminal justice system is in the nanny state. By gosh and by golly these folks will not put up with this sort of criminal behavior you betcha.
H/T Current.com
A woman was handcuffed and ‘treated like a hardened criminal’ after she helped herself to food worth £200 that had been thrown away by a Tesco store following a power cut.
Dozens of people could not believe their luck after the outlet of the supermarket giant bagged up thousands of pounds of spoiled stock and left it out in the street.
Sasha Hall, 21, helped herself to potato waffles, pies and ham from outside the Tesco Express in Great Baddow, Essex.
But she was stunned when police arrived at her home and arrested her for suspected ‘theft by finding’ and took her to the station in handcuffs.‘There was £3,000 worth of food going to waste on the street,’ she told the Essex Chronicle. ‘It had been thrown out, so I thought I could put it to better use.
‘When the police came round I was so upset. I felt like a terrible criminal.’The shop worker said the supermarket - which has the motto ‘Every little helps’ - should have been pleased that the food would be put to good use.
She said: ‘I would think the police have better things to be doing with their time than going after people who pick up potato waffles from the street. It’s all been blown totally out of proportion.
‘Tesco clearly did not want the food. They dumped it and rather than see it go to waste, I thought I could help feed me and my family for a week or two.’
Ms Hall, from Great Baddow, said she was shocked by the way the police dealt with the incident.‘They knocked at the door and said if I didn’t open up they would use a battering ram,’ she said. ‘They handcuffed me and treated me like I was a hardened criminal and when we left they raided my house.
‘I haven’t got lots of money. I only make £600 a month. I’m on the brink of getting kicked out of my flat because I can’t pay my arrears.’
A Tesco spokesman said: ‘We are assisting the police with their inquiries. We seek to minimise waste in all our stores and where possible will seek to reuse and recycle it.’
Ms Hall, who works part-time at a rival supermarket in Chelmsford, is to appear in magistrates court on February 16 charged with theft by finding.
CURRENT DOT COM AND THE DAILY MAIL
I haven’t seen any updates yet to know how the trial went.
Posted by peiper
on 02/21/2011 at 11:23 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - February 15, 2011
gremlin sues his victim for ruining his reputation. i’d have thought he did that all by himself
It might seem to many a rather extreme solution I suggest for stalkers but ... I see them as extremely dangerous people, never to be trusted unless made crippled or dead. Preferably the latter as it’s certain they’ll never again be a problem. I see that as fairly reasonable solution to many crimes where warnings are made, the gremlin goes to jail, comes out and does it again. Anyway, this is a pretty interesting case.
This animal has been stalking a woman for a very long time. She turns to the law and gets help, but her life was turned upside down and so she blogged her experience.
Now he’s suing her for ..... well, take a look.
Stalker takes legal action against victimA stalker who Googled his victim 40,000 times has taken legal action against her for “ruining his reputation” with comments on her website
Elliot Fogel, 35, a former Sky News producer, was jailed for four months last year for breaching a lifetime restraining order by harassing 35 year-old complementary therapist Claire Waxman.
But it has now emerged that after being released from prison Fogel launched a civil action against Mrs Waxman in an attempt to force her to stop writing about him online.
His legal action came to light last week at a court case to determine whether it amounted to a breach of his restraining order.
Fogel, of Isleworth, West London, had been arrested and charged again after his representative contacted Mrs Waxman.
This appeared to put him in breach of the order, imposed in 2005 by Brent Magistrates’ Court, which prohibited Fogel, or anybody acting on his behalf to contact Mrs Waxman.
At Wood Green Crown Court on Wednesday the CPS dropped two charges that Fogel breached the restraining order on or before November 17, last year by initiating civil proceedings and attempting to retrieve material from Mrs Waxman on or before November 1.
“She is writing about me on a website and readers are invited to leave comments,” complained Fogel outside court. “All I am trying to do is bring proceedings that stop this.”
CPS lawyer Martha Godwin announced: “An issue was raised during this case, which required the CPS to take some expert legal opinion.
“The opinion confirmed that a restraining order cannot be used to stop someone from accessing civil courts as happened in this case. This meant we could not pursue this prosecution and we offered no evidence.”
Fogel developed an unhealthy interest in Mrs Waxman when they were both college students in St. Albans, Hertfordshire, where she had to continually tell him to leave her alone.
After leaving college in 1993 she heard nothing for ten years until receiving a dinner invitation from Fogel, which she declined.
A few months later, in December 2003, Fogel was spotted jogging on the spot outside her home and spent more and more time loitering around her workplace.
He even posed as a prospective parent at the nursery Mrs Waxman’s daughter attended, paid for background searches on her husband Marc and her father and collected her wedding photos.
She was forced to move home five times, developed an eating disorder and claims stress caused by Fogel caused a miscarriage.
Posted by peiper
on 02/15/2011 at 02:22 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - February 14, 2011
UK Crime: What a Mesh
Looks like Peiper has today off, so I’ll do a UK looney bin post for him.
A spate of thefts in several towns and villages in Kent and Surrey over the past few months led to many householders taking action to protect their property.
Some have been warned by police that using wire mesh to reinforce shed windows was ‘’dangerous’’ and could lead to criminals claiming compensation if they ‘’hurt themselves’’.
Thieves target sheds to steal lawnmowers, power drills, bicycles and a variety of DIY tools.
Thomas Cooper, of Tatsfield, Surrey, used wire mesh to protect three of his garden sheds after two break-ins over the past four years. He decided to take action after reports of a rise in garden raids in the area.
Mr Cooper said: “I reinforced my shed windows with wire mesh, but was told by the police I had to be very careful because thieves can actually sue you if they get hurt.
Dave Bishop, of Tatsfield, said: “The law is so stupid, and you never know what decision judges are going to make. People do get fed up with these people trying to help themselves to things which you have worked hard to gather together.”
Pc John Lee, a crime reduction officer for Tandridge, said: “We are constantly advising home owners to protect their property and the contents of their shed or garage, however, a commonsense approach needs to be taken.
“To properly secure your sheds, Surrey Police strongly advises people to invest in items such as good-quality locks and bolts, and not to resort to homemade devices, as this could cause injury.”
A police source added: “Homemade devices can cause injury and there have been cases where criminals have sued for injuries they have suffered while committing a criminal act.
‘’We are advising people to do whatever they can to protect their property, but wire mesh is not one of the suggestions we would make.”
No, I wouldn’t recommend it either, because they’re going about it wrong. Working closely with Wile E. Coyote, I was able to quickly put together an effective window mesh crime stopper.
Posted by Drew458
on 02/14/2011 at 02:18 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • UK •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - February 12, 2011
Big Brother, Now With Less CFCs
October 2010: In the Netherlands’ port city of Rotterdam, crime is way down, thanks to ... a little scientific innovation. Hoping to reel in the number of robberies, police began dishing out DNA spray to beleaguered restaurants and jewelry stores. The spray, which emits a mist laced with synthetic DNA markers unique to the business’s location when activated by employees, both marks the would-be robber and alerts police that a crime is occurring. The intention is to intimidate crooks, say police.
A sign on the front door of one previously burgled McDonald’s reads: “You Steal, You’re Marked.” Police, who note they haven’t yet made an arrest by using the mist, say such tactics are working, and report a significant decline in crime rates.
The mist, which is now being used in nine countries and coming to the U.S. soon, shows up under ultraviolent light and contains a DNA code that police stations scan for when they bring in criminals. The unique code irrefutably links criminals to the scene of the crime.
“The word DNA spreads fear into even the most hardened criminals,” said Jason Brown, business director of Selectamark, the company that created SelectaDNA Spray.
...
The mist is so fine, it’s unlikely a robber would know he’s been hit. It sinks into the target’s skin and hair where it sits for weeks.“You can take a shower three times a day, but the DNA stays on,” said Jean-Paul Fafie, the manager at one of several McDonald’s restaurants in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, that had the spray system installed.
The spray, which was developed in 2008, is being used in a series of European countries from Belgium to Hungary. The Bank of New Zealand has just invested in the product and will have all of its branches installed with the spray by next month, Knight said.
Multiple SelectaDNA Spray heads can be fitted at the entry points of premises and on activation emit a burst of SelectaDNA solution onto the offenders. The solution contains a UV tracer and a unique DNA code, linking them irrefutably to the crime scene. The DNA Spray can be armed by a panic button and/or linked to an existing intruder alarm system. As the DNA fear-factor amongst criminals is high, it is likely that sprayed intruders will flee the crime scene before stealing any goods.
Comments one Nederlander who just had these things installed in his neighborhood:
Personally, I’m glad criminals are so stupid, because they’ve never heard of UV ink solvent or protective clothing to wear under their own. God forbid that they actually go out and get themselves a black light to check.
Another issue that bugs me ... for street crimes, if somebody is watching the crime happen through the Big Brother network of spy cams, why not just call the cops instead, since the people who are watching usually ARE the cops? If you have to push the button to make the spray go off, you could set the law on them just as easily.
From a merchant’s perspective, I’d want to know “How much for just the signs then?”
Posted by Drew458
on 02/12/2011 at 10:56 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • High Tech •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 03, 2011
jailed rapist who targets white girls, claims ill treatment in jail. says rights not observed.
Just looking at these animals makes me sick. What’s sicker still is why they are being given a platform instead of being dead.
How come this fella who I can’t refer to as what many of you will, oh hell. This is as good an example of nigger as there is. Anyway, how is it that there aren’t any race charges against this scum. Oh right. That only works the other way.
‘It makes me sick to think that this evil man came over specifically to rape and assault white girls.
‘He wanted to hurt us because we were white. While he has shattered my life, he has the dream life he came here for - a comfy bed, a TV to watch whenever he likes and hot food three times a day.
‘Where is the justice in that?’
There’s another question not asked in the article. Just askin mind you.
What the sam hill was a white girl doing with this filth? Did she somehow believe she was being invited to a church service? I’m not saying any woman deserves to be raped. Not even if she stupidly leads a creep on. And you know some women do that. But I find it hard to understand the attraction she might have had.
Be sure to see the link for another bizarre side story on the most violent and dangerous prisoner in England whose name happens to be, unfortunately, Charles Bronson. He thinks his “rights” aren’t being seen to properly. Maddening.
‘They’re bullying us’: Rapist who targeted white girls whines from jail cell about losing PlayStation
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 3:48 PM on 3rd February 2011
A rapist who deliberately targeted white women has complained that prisoners are being ‘horribly treated’ by having PlayStations and DVD players confiscated.
Illegal immigrant Amos Moobeng, who was jailed for nine years in 2009 after being found guilty of raping a teenager he had lured her back to his flat in Exeter, said he was ‘horrified’ at the recent crackdown.
Black South African Moobeng, now 37, said bosses at the 646 prisoner-capacity HMP Dartmoor in Devon were ‘bullying’ convicts by removing privileges.
He said: ‘There is something rather alarming going on here at HMP Dartmoor. I will call it Operation Dis-enhancement - a massive and ruthless campaign to take away every prisoners enhanced status and make us all standard or basic.
‘Whether this is a cost-cutting exercise or simply because the screws cannot stomach seeing us with DVDs, PlayStations, and wearing our own clothes - now banned on visits, incidentally - is something only they know.’
Moobeng, who raped an 18-year-old after luring her and a friend back to his home in 2007, said he was hauled before the prison governor and asked to justify his status as an ‘enhanced prisoner’.
Prisoners on ‘enhanced’ status - handed out by the Incentives and Earned Privilege Scheme (IEP) - get access to certain items they own such as PlayStations and DVDs in their cells.
The rapist, in a letter published in prisoner’s magazine Inside Time this week, added: ‘It all started one afternoon when we returned from work and found a slip tucked under every door instructing us to appear before the governor and explain why we should not lose our Enhanced status.
‘The onus of proof used to be on staff as to why they would downgrade a prisoner from Enhanced to Standard or Basic, but now it is up to us to prove why we should remain on Enhanced.
Posted by peiper
on 02/03/2011 at 02:15 PM
Filed Under: • Crime •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - January 29, 2011
Mom Got Schooled
Ohio mother convicted of felony because she said her kids lived with their father so that they could attend a better, safer public school. Now she’s a felon, and her career as an aspiring teacher is over.
Kelley Williams-Bolar, a 40-year-old mother of two, was convicted of a felony last week and sent to jail for 10 days. Her crime? Falsifying records so her kids could attend a safer school in the district where her father lives.
Uh-oh! Sounds like two little girls were trying to get a free education off the back of hard-working tax payers, and if that’s not worth a felony charge, I don’t know what is. Williams-Bolar, according to the prosecution, lives in subsidized housing in Akron, Ohio, and not with her father in Copley Township—as she claimed on several official school forms when she enrolled her two daughters. The Copley schools are, it seems, better and safer than the schools in Akron. (They are also whiter. Williams-Bolar is black. But obviously race has nothing to do with this case!)
The school district grew suspicious enough about the Williams-Bolar kids to, apparently, hire a private detective, who filmed Williams-Bolar dropping her children off at a bus stop near her parents’ house.
According to the presiding judge, Patricia Cosgrove, who spoke with The Akron Beacon-Journal, “the state would not move, would not budge, and offer Ms. Williams-Bolar to plead to a misdemeanor,” despite several pretrial hearings.
Williams-Bolar, a teaching assistant, is working towards a teaching degree, but her felony conviction will likely derail that.
Looks like the father and grandfather are also in a bit of trouble over this. Williams-Bolar was released early from jail and is now making a big fuss and demanding complete exoneration.
A whole bushel of links on the story can be found here.
Interesting situation. A black woman wants her kids out of the lousy and dangerous local black school, so she says they live with the other parent, who has an address in the better, whiter school district. Both districts are within the city of Akron, so it isn’t like neither parent was paying school taxes into the city system. Or were they? I would assume Mom is on some level of public assistance, since she lives in subsidized housing, but she works at least part-time. Does the father work? He lives elsewhere, with his father, but everyone still seems to be on speaking terms. Are they married? Were they ever married? Is he working but living with his father only so that she and the girls can get rent free housing? Did the Copley Township schools only push this case to court because she’s black? (a dozen cases a year like this come up, but none ever go to trial, much less conviction). Had Williams-Bolar tried for a waiver before this, or did she just decide to falsify things from the get-go?
If you try to make things better for your children by following the rules and get nowhere, is it Ok to bend or break the rules to get what you want? This case is a victimless crime, isn’t it?
Or perhaps the whole thing is a big miscarriage of justice. According to one article I read,
The effect of divorce on a student’s residence also is a factor for districts. A child in joint custody with parents in different districts has a right to go to either, said Russell Chaboudy, superintendent of Coventry school.
Any $2 lawyer could get “divorce” interpreted as “living separately” considering how rare actual marriage is these days. If Chaboudy is paraphrasing actual law, then this case may have been really poorly handled if certain legal priorities exist. By which I mean the “divorce” rule overrides the “actual residency of the child” rule, which it certainly could if parental custody was exactly 50-50.
I read several articles about the case, but not all of them, and it does not look like she is overtly playing the race card. That in itself is interesting, because a quick look at the other dozen cases per year that come up would point out any racial bias, and you’ve got to wonder about it, since the Copley school board hired a private detective to make their case, which is something they’ve never done before. And with all the other cases clogging up the court system, and plea bargains buzzing around like mayflies, the prosecutors were 100% unwilling to make any kind of deal on this case? So maybe she ought to be playing it for all it’s worth. Or maybe it’s in play just by having her picture in the paper. Or maybe, just for once, race is merely coincidental to the case.
h/t to careyb
Posted by Drew458
on 01/29/2011 at 09:02 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Education • Racism and race relations •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - January 18, 2011
one lone tuff lady rushes into gang of thugs and saves a man while ppl watch
This was one hell of a brave woman, whoever she was. These scum could have easily turned on her. And they would have had she been a white woman.
Take a look at the video. And take a look at two of the scum involved. Look at those faces and tell me if you see anything human there.
Woo-hoo. One is just a child of 18 and so goes into a “young offenders program.”
Take a good look at that ‘young offender.’
CCTV reveals lone woman rushing to save defenceless man during mob attack - as onlookers simply watch
By Daily Mail ReporterArmed with only a bag of shopping, these images show a lone woman bravely intervening as a defenceless man was savagely beaten by a mob - whilst other onlookers walked on by or stood around to watch.
The woman was picking up groceries when she saw the victim being chased down the street by a gang of yobs, one on a bicycle, before being dragged to the ground.
The hoodie-wearing thugs, who were described by a judge as behaving ‘like wild animals’, repeatedly kicked and stamped on the 26-year old man’s head and body as passersby watched.
Posted by peiper
on 01/18/2011 at 11:07 AM
Filed Under: • Crime •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - January 17, 2011
this is one result of what is laugingly the justice system here.
Ok I know what anti-gun ppl will say. Yes but if guns were easily available, these scum suckers would have used them.
Well, perhaps if their victims had access to one, one or all might be alive today. But forget that for now.
Seems to me killing someone for their ins. and luring someone to their death, is pretty premeditated and cold blooded.
So, why are folks like this out free among us.
Forget that. Lets talk instead about how screwed up America is, with all our gun crazed loonies on the right who love Sarah.
Lets discuss how America puts more of our citizens in jail then anyone else. Could it perhaps be because while our criminal system may be fouled up, and while we may make the same sort of bone head move as made here, we still manage to put away people life forms that Europeans and Brits let out to roam free.
Just a thought for any surfing foreigners out there of a more liberal bent who think we’re a tad too harsh on the criminal class.
And before I forget, a reminder to BMEWS readers. Please take a good look at the comments following this article. I wonder if some of the hand wringers would invite any of these women to dinner. Or, maybe help look after an elderly relative. Or babysit. Hey, ya never know. They might be just liberal enough.
Take a look at this insanity.
Three female convicted murderers given jobs at same Travelodge
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:39 PM on 17th January 2011Three women convicted for murder have been employed at the same branch of a popular hotel chain.
The killers currently work at a Travelodge in York, serving customers who are oblivious to their evil crimes.
Linda White, 55, a guest-room cleaner, stabbed her ex-partner John Sandilands to death after a row
Pat Bulmer, 48, who works as a receptionist, lured her husband Robert to be knifed to death by her lover so she could claim over £30,000 from his life insurance policy.
Julie Richardson, 42, also a cleaner at the hotel, scalded her own father with a red-hot iron before battering him to death with two accomplices.
The news that these dangerous criminals, all jailed for life, have been quietly integrated back into society has shocked and angered relatives of the murder victims.
Robert Bulmer’s sister Hepsy told The Sun: ‘It’s disgusting. What are the authorities thinking of?
‘I don’t suppose the customers know a thing. If you’re staying at a hotel you don’t expect to find three killers working there.’
The trio applied for the jobs at the hotel branch in Piccadilly, York, while serving sentences at Askham Grange Prison as part of a scheme to get offenders into jobs soon after they are released.
Travelodge spokesman Jon Hendry-Pickup defended his company’s decision to employ the ladies.
He said: ‘The workers from the rehabilitation programme are constantly assessed and have proven to be dedicated and hard-working individuals.’
Posted by peiper
on 01/17/2011 at 12:49 PM
Filed Under: • Crime • Justice - LACK OF • UK •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
LAAR She Blows! Part One
(2 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Planes Ideas Blog
[...] CABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEB [...]
On: 07/12/11 01:57
The Tactical Cowboy
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Sights Service Blog
[...] E LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE [...]
On: 07/10/11 08:30
Nasty Dirty Money
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Money Reviews Blog
[...] ONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLES [...]
On: 06/17/11 08:31
Amazing aerial images taken by daring Allied pilots on secret missions during WW 2
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Hookers and Booze
peiper over at Barking Moonbat EWS found some absolutely kickass aerial photos from WWII. I grabbed this one because I’m a big fan of the movie A Bridge Too Far.…
On: 11/23/09 04:14
Clear Thinking and Straight Talk
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at baldilocks
Let Them Fight or Bring Them Home Read all of it--and tell every American you know to do so. (Thanks to BMEWS) UPDATE: The author of the above blog is…
On: 10/02/09 09:29
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
