Tuesday - November 10, 2009

KEYSTONE KOPS NOW BAN THE USE OF THE TERM, ‘GANG RAPE’ AS BEING TOO “EMOTIVE”

Well what can I add to this?  ??  ???  I’m thinking - I’m thinking. 

It is not a funny subject but it is hard not to make some sort of wise crack about how stupid it appears.  Instead of gang rape they want to use,
‘multi-perpetrator rapes’ instead.
I guess that’s what it is okay but it somehow doesn’t have the force of the other term. Would it make a difference to a jury?  And maybe instead of ivory tower “academic studies” the authorities should have done an in depth study among women and especially victims. Or maybe it makes no difference what they call it.  The guys who do it all need to be given a close shave with a dull razor or a pair of garden shears.

Scotland Yard has instructed officers not to use the phrase ‘gang rape’ to describe such crimes because it is too ‘emotive’ a term.

By Stephen Adams
Published: 7:00AM GMT 10 Nov 2009

Under new guidance, they have been told to refer to sex attacks that involve more than one culprit as ‘multi-perpetrator rapes’ instead.
The move has been criticised by the Plain English campaign as “politically correct nonsense”.
Almost six years ago Sir John Stevens, then the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, ignited a row by objecting to use of the term ‘gang rape’ in an article by The Daily Telegraph, choosing to refer to it as “group rape”.
Now the force has taken the decision that the phrase “multi-perpetrator rape” should be used as the “overarching term”, following academic research.

In his report ‘Multi-Perpetrator Rape and Youth Violence, Detective Chief Inspector Mark Yexley admitted that the “common parlance” for such attacks was “gang rape”. But he argued that did not mean it was the right phrase to use.
He wrote: “‘This is an emotive term – but it is used widely in the public domain.

“There have been instances in the past where the term ‘gang’ has come to mean different things – either groups known to each other, criminal networks or peer groups.”
His report, for the Metropolitan Police Authority, followed academic research into the “cultural context” of gang rape, commissioned by the that showed many instances of ‘gang rape’ did not involve gang members.

He continued: “When examining rapes committed by multiple perpetrators, it should be noted that the number of offenders involved and the methods used by assailants, vary.
“Analysis on such offending is primarily based on victim testimony and any other supporting evidence, so links to ‘gangs’ cannot necessarily be established.”

However, Chrissie Maher founder of the Plain English Campaign, said: “I am disgusted to my very bones and weep for the victims of gang rape.”
She added: “Jargon has been used to hide and confuse all sorts of things, that’s why Plain English Campaign was started. But using jargon clean up crime is the last thing I ever expected to see.

“Ask any victim – rape is an emotive crime – it deserves an emotive term not some sterile, politically correct nonsense.”
Others welcomed the move, saying gang rape had been used for too long as an inaccurate shorthand for a variety of attacks.
Dr Nicole Westmarland of Durham University, former chair of Rape Crisis and an academic expert on the issue, said many ‘gang’ rapes did not involve gangs at all.

But she thought the term ‘gang rape’ was still worth using when gangs were involved.
The police report also highlighted that there number of gang rapes in the capital is growing, that the age profile of victims is getting younger, and that a greater proportion of the victims are black.

There were 93 such crimes reported in 2008-9 compared to 71 in 2003-4. Almost two-thirds (64 per cent) of victims are now aged 19 or under, compared to 48 per cent in 1998-9. The proportion of black victims has also doubled over the last decade, from 17 to 34 per cent.
A Metropolitan police spokesman confirmed the report did amount to new guidance.

She said: “Recent academic studies have suggested that the term ‘Multiple Perpetrator Rape’ should be used as the overarching term for offences involving two or more perpetrators.”

TELEGRAPH

A LAST MINUTE ADDITION TO THE SUBJECT OF RAPE.

100 rapists are let off with a caution: The serious offences that never come to court

By Steve Doughty
Last updated at 10:22 AM on 10th November 2009

More than 100 rapists have been let off with a police caution, it was revealed yesterday. The 111 cases included 66 incidents of child rape.

The extent to which police forces have handed cautions to rapists, whose crime carries a maximum sentence of life in jail, was made public as Justice Secretary Jack Straw announced a full-scale review of the system of punishing crime with cautions and on-the-spot fines.

MORE ON THIS HERE

Posted by peiper     on 11/10/2009 at 07:11 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Sunday - November 08, 2009

So now it’s come down to this low. Muggers attack two-year-old girl. I’m not even shocked.

So forget surprised.  Yes I think it’s shocking that any low life pile of human garbage would hit a two year old in a robbery attempt.  I’m just not shocked that anyone actually did it.
What ppl can get away with and what ppl do, just doesn’t have a very high surprise factor anymore.

Like so many posts I do, this wasn’t on my radar this morning till I booted to catch the morning paper before it’s been delivered to our door in another hour.
If caught, what are the chances these perps will EVER get the kind of punishment that would deter them from this kind of life?
My solution? Some serious acid scaring on the face so when free the public can be immediately aware of a potential problem coming their way. Some broken hands might be a good idea as well.  Extreme?  Maybe.  But so is street crime.  Trust me.  If caught, these slags won’t suffer whatever they put the victims through.

A two-year-old girl was punched in the head by two teenage girls during an attempted robbery in north-west London.

By Julie Henry
Sunday Telegraph

CCTV of two teenage female muggers who punched a two year old toddler in the head. Photo Pixel

The girl was with her mother when the pair were targeted by two female suspects in Preston Road, Wembley, at about 4.45 pm on Thursday.
They demanded money from the mother before punching her in the arm and attacking her daughter.

The attackers are described as being of Mediterranean appearance and aged between 14 and 18.

“Although the victim and her daughter do not have any visible injuries, this was a frightening experience for them,” said Det Insp Rebecca Reeves, of the Metropolitan Police.

“We have released images in the hope that someone may recognise the suspects and report them to the police.”
One was around 5ft and was wearing a white jacket, black mini-skirt, tiger stripe leggings, black flat shoes and was carrying a large black fake leather bag.
The second wore a black jacket, blue denim “skinny” jeans, black Ugg-style boots and had a large brown fake leather bag with gold details.

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 11/08/2009 at 03:03 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Thursday - November 05, 2009

JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF “RIGHTS” IN THE WRONG PLACE!

Just another daily example of how civil and human rights are seen in this place.  What a load of crap.
And take a look at the ugly smirking face of the vandal.

This sort of thing could so easily be turned around by the removal of say, one hand.  Or maybe break all the bones in one hand and rip a tendon or two.  Something that this creep can remember for a lifetime.  Wanna bet he’d never try again.  And if implemented nation wide, I’ll bet the rate of crime might go down too.  It’s really all a matter of the gremlins KNOWING they won’t get off scott free.  But I’m dreaming.  We know that isn’t gonna happen.
Look at that face and tell me he won’t repeat the same thing again.  The face of modern Britain?  One of em anyway. 
Meanwhile, young ppl his age are dying in some far off hell hole not earning what he has done in damage in a week or two.

Couple ‘named and shamed’ thug on boarded-up window… then police warned them it harms the vandal’s civil liberties

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 3:02 PM on 05th November 2009

A couple shamed a yob by writing his name in the shop window he smashed only to be told to remove it by police - in case it harmed his civil liberties.

Dennis and Christine Lusby wrote ‘Damage Done by Ben Hill’ on the boarded up windows of their village shop after he went on a drunken rampage - and they have decided to defy the police advice.

Hill, 20, caused £3,000 worth of damage during the spree which also saw him attack cars, homes, farm buildings and a football club.

Dennis and Christine ‘named and shamed’ Hill by writing his name outside their shop in thick black pen after he handed himself in to police.

The couple claim their local PC told them to remove the sign - in case it infringed the lout’s human rights.

Dennis, 60, of St Breward, Cornwall, has refused to remove the name of the well-known local yob and says it will stay there until the windows are replaced.

He said: ‘Even in the smallest villages in the country there is a thug problem. Our shop window was smashed to pieces.

‘The lad was caught straight away but people kept coming in to ask us what had happened and who was responsible.
Ben Hill was jailed for 74 days after his wrecking spree in Cornwall

‘Eventually Christine wrote his name up there on the window boards. We thought we’d let everyone know who had done all the damage.

‘But then we were warned by the police for writing it because they say it’s taking away his civil liberties What about our civil liberties? We chose to quietly ignore the police advice.’

A spokesman for Devon and Cornwall police yesterday said officers advised Mr Lusby to remove the sign in case it ‘inflamed’ the situation.

He said: ‘The officer felt that the offender had been dealt with and punished for the damage he had caused.

‘By publically naming him in this way could inflame the situation and possibly tempt one of his friends to carry out further acts of vandalism on the shop.

‘The beat officer knows the patch and his advice was given for the sake of the store owner.’

During his rampage on October 29, Hill caused £300 worth of damage by kicking open a football club door and smashed a window of a farm house.

He also caused £725 damage to a newly-laid floor at another property as well as damaging a Skoda to the tune of £600.

Hill threw a giant boulder of granite at another home before smashing the windows of Dennis and Christine’s car and their St Breward Stores.

He then handed himself in and was jailed for 74 days at Bodmin Magistrates Court after he pleaded guilty to possession of an offensive weapon and three offences of criminal damage.

Dennis said Hill had been causing problems in the village for years, but his latest rampage was the ‘final straw’.

‘This village is a low crime area, but when anything goes wrong he is always mixed up in every bit of bother. He turns up in our shop quite often, being
rude, turning up drunk.

‘We shouldn’t have to tolerate it and I can’t see any reason why everyone shouldn’t know about what he has done.

‘We’re not completely intolerant but this is ridiculous - he’s terrorised the whole village.

SOURCE AND OTHER PHOTOS

Posted by peiper     on 11/05/2009 at 10:10 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Wednesday - November 04, 2009

Drunken yob got more than he bargained for when he challenges his betters.

The video runs three minutes, pretty frustrating at times cos it’s often hard to see what this article is describing. But you’ll still get the sense of things and what ordinary ppl are putting up with here, and especially in London.  Altho of course it isn’t restricted to that location.
See this LINK for the still photos.

This looks to have taken place around 6:20pm. Hell, I suppose any downtown city anywhere in the world can be a problem.  I get to feeling a bit guilty always hammering on about this sort of thing here in the UK.  I don’t mean to make it appear a unique thing to this culture and lord knows we have enough bad guys in the states. Right?  Maybe I need to read more USA based news and I’d find an equal amount. Ya think?  Cos honestly I have my doubts about that.  What I mean is, I doubt there’s the same kind of street crime in America on the same level.  Partly no doubt because so many are armed at home.  I don’t think we have the binge drinking all hours in the USA that they have here.  And we sure as heck don’t issue ASBOs, unless we do but under another name.  Our criminal justice system is surely just as fouled up. I know that.

Oh, btw ...  another poor soul was kicked to death this week by a gang of five men and two women, it has been reported.  That’s what I mean.
I have my doubts that kind of thing occurs in the USA with the frequency that it does here. If it happens at all and I’m sure it must given the nature of the criminal animal.

Caught on CCTV: The moment BBC presenter floors taunting yob with his karate expertise

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:41 AM on 04th November 2009

This drunken yob got more than he bargained for when he picked a fight with a BBC presenter who used to be an international martial arts champion.

Reporter Paresh Patel had been followed for half an hour through Manchester city centre by two youths, who subjected him to a barrage of abuse as he attempted to set up a live broadcast.

The North West Tonight journalist had been preparing a report in Sackville Gardens, central Manchester, when a group of drunken louts began harassing him and his cameraman Steve Capstick.
Watch the video below

He floored one of the unsuspecting thugs with a kick to the groin followed by a lightning-quick punch in the face.

The dazed victim can then be seen in CCTV footage scrambling to his feet just as police arrive to arrest the man as Mr Patel, dubbed the ‘BBC Bruiser’, calmly walks away.

A spokesperson for the Crown Prosecution Service said: ‘The accused persistently followed the victim and told him not to call the police and a woman poured a pint over him at one point. 

‘The other two defendants continued to follow Mr Patel to Princes Street, where the victim was punched in the face and threatened with violence. 

‘One of them picked up a bit of street furniture and also threatened the victim - he tried to walk away but still he was followed by the suspects. 

‘Both had been drinking and appeared very drunk. But what they hadn’t realised was that the victim was a black belt in karate.’

Mr Patel can be seen in the footage punching one of them in the face before kneeing him in the groin after being attacked as he planned a live broadcast from the statue of Alan Turing in Sackville Gardens, following Gordon Brown’s decision to grant the computer pioneer a posthumous apology. 

Sean Brady, prosecuting, told Manchester Magistrates’ Court that when Mr Patel phoned his studio, two of the group John Nugent, 22, and David McKenna, 27, thought he was ringing the police and started swearing threatening him.

At the sentencing of the pair, Judge David Hernandez said: ‘He defended himself, he delivered a blow. I say good for Mr Patel.

‘He had no reason to be subjected to that level of abuse and threat by you.’

The CPS spokesperson added: ‘The defendants claimed that Mr Patel has threatened them and told had them not to “mess with him” because he was a “Thai boxer” and that he would “sort them out”.

‘They insisted they were just having a laugh. And that they only picked up the chair so that he could have a sit down.

‘Even when they were shown the CCTV footage they came up with the same explanation.’

Gee, what patience the BBC guy showed.  If I were fortunate enough to have his skill and training, I would not have waited that long before turning on the damn punks.

Posted by peiper     on 11/04/2009 at 06:36 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Saturday - October 31, 2009

THE STATE OF THE LAW AND THE WORLD ….. NOT SO GOOD!

Drew’s very disturbing post yesterday with regard to the gang rape and ppl taking pictures, shows just how far the left has carried us as a culture.
With hand wringing libs, the aclu and every other ‘rights’ group that scream “RACE” whenever a favored minority is injured or arrested, nothing surprises us anymore.  We’re all disgusted, of that there is no doubt.  But surprised?  Not likely.

This past week two 10 year old boys were arrested for the rape of an eight year old girl.  Outraged? Sure. Surprised? Nope.  And worst of it is those boys will learn nothing and receive NO retribution.  You can bet they’ll do it again at some point in the future.

Yet another man with a record of crime and who was supposed to have been watched, somehow managed to entice a young and very foolish girl of 17 to meet him. They met of course on the net. He killed her.  He should have been in jail long ago and never released.  His victim would still be foolish but perhaps alive.  And how often have you heard that line?  But they say the prisons here are crowded to overfilling, many have been let loose but the authorities say they don’t represent a danger to the public.  HA!  How often have we heard that in the past?

This past week the story about a man killing his cheating wife came to light.  And this is one of two cases like it.
Married 21 years, he had problems (don’t they all?) and after putting up with him for a long time, his wife said she wanted a divorce and that she no longer loved him.  Meanwhile, he somehow found a note or email that she sent to another man who she claimed she was in love with.
So, using more then one knife he repeatedly stabbed her, something like thirty times, in front of the kids.

The courts here accept the “driven to it by adultery excuse) and so there is no murder charge.  It’s manslaughter and he’ll be out in three years.
He also claimed (as has the other guy in another case) diminished responsibility.  Bullshit!  The bastard knew exactly what he was doing 30 times.
Adultery is not a reason to take away another person’s future.  Any court that accepts that is mad.  But the age we live in makes all sorts of excuses for bad behavior.  And not just capital crimes.  And here’s another example and while not a capital crime, the reaction of the criminal’s friends and apologists is yet another sign of these sorry assed times.  There is hardly any reason at all for the gremlins to be fearful unless it’s fear of an armed citizenry.  And that would not have been an option in the gang rape case of a 15 year old girl in California.

Premier League star jailed for punching girl in face ‘will find another club when he is released’

By Sam Greenhill

Disgraced millionaire footballer Marlon King will be signed by another club when his jail sentence is finished, his agent insisted today.

The player was sacked by Wigan yesterday after being jailed for 18 months for groping a woman and then smashing her in the face after she rejected him.

But today his agent Tony Finnigan said that prison would change King for the better and that he would have good career prospects on release.

Oh right. This fugitive from a jungle where he belongs, is gonna change and be Mr. Nice Guy.  He claims a case of mistaken identity in spite of the fact that dozens of folks on the scene saw and identified him including, A MEMBER OF HIS OWN FREEKIN TEAM!
Let’s take a quick peek at Mr. Nice Guy’s past to see where he’s come from.

If you have any trouble reading this here, see the link below the story.

In a criminal career that ran parallel to his sporting one, the 29-year-old was given a succession of fines and community service orders - but only once was he actually jailed.

Yesterday he lost both his liberty and his job as a soccer player after a Southwark Crown Court jury found him guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and sexual assault by touching.

Within minutes of the verdict, he was sacked by his club Wigan Athletic.

Chairman Dave Whelan, who said he learned details of the trial only days ago, said: ‘He is absolutely sacked.

‘We will not tolerate football players who get sent to jail for 18 months.’

But the £40,000-a-week star will still earn earn another £228,000 from behind bars during a 40-day notice period.

King is now a convicted sex attacker who must sign the Sex Offenders Register.

That means that if the Jamaican international ever returned to football in Britain he would have to notify police of any intention to travel abroad for matches.

King had been on a boozy night out with friends in December last year to celebrate news that his wife was expecting their third child and to mark scoring a winning goal for Hull City, where he was on loan.

Just two days earlier he had been banned from driving for eight weeks after speeding at 106mph on a 60mph road.

Onlookers said he appeared to be drunk or on drugs as he tried to force his attentions on girls in the Soho Revue Bar in London’s West End.

When a 20-year- old student objected to him touching her bottom, King sneered: ‘Don’t you know who I am? I’m a millionaire.

‘You’re not even in my league.’

Minutes later, after the slightly-built woman tried to stop him touching her hair, he swung his fist and knocked her to the ground, breaking her nose.

The blow was so hard that two of her friends were knocked to the floor with her.

Yesterday, after the jury brought in 10-2 guilty verdicts, Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith told King to pay his victim £3,125 compensation and £1,600 prosecution costs.

The player showed no reaction as he was convicted but sat open-mouthed as the judge told him: ‘You have shown not a hint of shame for your disgraceful and arrogant behaviour’.

As King’s victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, sat holding the hand of an aunt, the judge continued: ‘You broke her nose, and that can still be seen, and you cut her lip.

‘You are 29, you are just over six feet and you are a professional footballer.

‘She is a comparatively slight woman, just over five feet tall.’

As the sentence was delivered , several of King’s supporters stormed from court, swearing at the judge.

One screamed: ‘This is a clear case of institutional racism.

‘You should not be up there… Up the National Front. Heil Hitler.’

SOURCE WITH PHOTOS

And of course it isn’t the 6ft. bully boy buck who is guilty of anything. It’s all those white folks and a racist judge.  No mention of the jury here altho how two of them didn’t see what ten others did may speak volumes as well.

Posted by peiper     on 10/31/2009 at 07:36 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Racism • Typical White People: Stupid AND Evil • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Friday - October 30, 2009

Guess These Scumbags Are Citizens

I’m nearly amazed that I haven’t seen a scathing post at Michelle Malkin’s blog on the Richmond CA High School gang rape. This is one of the foulest stories I’ve ever run across, outside of torture/genocide and mutilation murders. As far as I’m concerned, take everybody who was at that dance back to the gymnasium, lock the doors, and set fire to the place. Auto da fe the whole damn school, the entire student body, and all the teachers, administrators, and security people who were there that night.

Richmond High is one of the lowest performing schools in California. Overall just 30.5% of all the students are proficient in English, only 20.4% are proficient at math, 71% of the students are on the free meals program and almost everyone there is classified as economically disadvantaged. Ethnically, 76% of the students are Hispanic, 13% are African American, about 1% are Asian, and 1% are White.

So far the arrested include Cody Ray Smith, 15, Ari Abdallah Morales, 16, and Marcelles James Peter, 17, Manuel Ortega, 19, Salvador Rodriguez, 21. Police are saying that as many as 10 or more took part in the 2 1/2 hour long crime, while more than two dozen stood around watching and applauding. Word spread back into the gym where the dance was, and people came out to watch. And nobody did a damn thing to stop it, and nobody called 911 or the cops. But they did all take pictures on their cell phones. Souvenirs they were all proud to have?

But I guess these students aren’t illegal aliens. Otherwise Malkin would be having a tizzy about that. But I’ll cut her some slack; nobody in California is probably even allowed to ask the citizenship question. Even though the juveniles are being charged as adults, and when convicted will get life in jail, it’s damn hard to find booking pictures of them.

A friend of the victim, a white girl who identifies herself and the victim as “majorities” who are minorities in that school, and ostracized because of it. She says that security guards did not check IDs that night, and that they saw what was going on - or at least the crowd of young men - and did nothing. Same goes for the Assistant Principal.

I looked outside of the gym and I saw 12 to 15 guys, sitting there, with no IDs,” Baker said at the hearing. “The officers—not only did they not check the IDs of those students or men sitting outside of of our campus, but the security officers who are employed here did no ... checking either. The assistant principal looked outside and actually saw those men, and did nothing about it.”

Baker took the podium with her younger sister, Barbie, a freshman at the school, who had spent a chunk of Saturday evening with the rape victim.

“This story has disrupted the school’s morale greatly, including my own. I am friends with the girl,” Baker said. “When I started here, I felt extremely unsafe and so did she, due to the lack of police officers and security officers.”

Baker later described the 15-year-old girl as a churchgoer who struggled to fit in at Richmond High. [watch the videos at this link]

Sounds like a Hate Crime to me. Get Back At Whitey Time.

And dozens stood there and applauded. [which is an actual crime in California.]

I don’t buy the “mob mentality” bullshit, unless you are going to punish them all as a mob. Which means every single one of them gets the maximum possible sentence. No, that’s not good enough. Mobs don’t have individual rights or civil rights, so they should be exempt from California’s lenient laws. Put them all to death at the same time. Burn the shit heap school down on top of their sick little heads. And then sterilize their parents.

Posted by Drew458     on 10/30/2009 at 02:16 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Illegal-Aliens •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Thursday - October 29, 2009

THERE REALLY ARE SOME PPL WHO NEED TO BE LYNCHED.  BUT FIRST ….

Break bones and make the these bastards scream for death. 

Doesn’t it just get to ya.  Filthy queer sons a bitches campaign for rights and then do exactly what folks accused of being “homophobic” say they do.

I am not saying ALL queers are like this.  We read plenty about straights who abuse children and it makes me crazy and see red every time.

But these motherF*%*^!s were attacking babies at 3 months!!!!!  Why are these shits still alive?  Why can’t creeps like this be turned over to a mob that would rip them apart?  What’s wrong with that where there is NO question of guilt? 

Rennie circulated photographs of his abuse of a baby boy, which began when the child was three-months-old and continued for four years. He allowed Strachan to join him in the assault and offered the friend’s child to other paedophiles.

An electric screwdriver in the kneecaps to start things off.  And let one watch the other so he can see what’s coming his way.
I don’t understand how any living thing can sink this fuckin low but they do not deserve to be treated as humans.  Even the dumbest animal is a higher life form.  But I suppose (correctly no doubt) they will have lawyers telling the court all about their own abused childhood.  BTW ... any lawyer defending these scum should get the same treatment I suggest for the baby rapers.

Ringleaders of one of Britain’s biggest paedophile networks jailed
The two ringleaders of one of Britain’s biggest paedophile networks, who filmed themselves abusing the children of innocent friends, have been jailed for life.


By Auslan Cramb, Scottish Correspondent
Published: 2:58PM GMT 29 Oct 2009

James Rennie, 38, a gay rights campaigner, and Neil Strachan, 41, a convicted sex offender, assaulted children while babysitting for their parents and distributed the footage on the internet.

The families of their victims said their lives had been devastated by the betrayal of their trust and the “sick” abuse of their children.

Strachan, who attempted to rape an 18-month-old boy and assaulted a six-year-old, was sentenced to a minimum of 16 years, while Rennie, who sexually assaulted a three-month-old boy, will serve at least 13 years.

The pair, both from Edinburgh, held down respectable jobs but led sordid double lives and were said to be at the heart of a “spider’s web of apparently respectable men” who abused children.

The High Court in Edinburgh was told that Rennie, who has spoken in the Scottish Parliament, was “polluted by deviant compulsion” while Strachan, who is HIV-positive, was “sadistic and aggressive”.

Rennie was the chief executive of LGBT Youth Scotland, which offers advice to young people on sexual issues, and Strachan, a paint engineer, was the secretary of Celtic East Boys Club.

Rennie circulated photographs of his abuse of a baby boy, which began when the child was three-months-old and continued for four years. He allowed Strachan to join him in the assault and offered the friend’s child to other paedophiles.

The pair were also found guilty during a trial that ended in May of conspiring to gain access to children in order to abuse them.

Strachan, a convicted sex offender, sparked Operation Algebra, which broke up the abuse network, after he left a single indecent image of an 11-year-old boy on a computer he sent for repair.

Six other men, including a bank worker, a civil servant and an IT worker, have already been sentenced for their involvement in child abuse and child pornography and given sentences ranging from two to 17 years.

The operation uncovered 125,000 indecent images of children, as well as 200 more suspects around the world, including 70 in the UK, many of whom have been charged.

SOURCE AND PHOTOS

I even have a problem with the newspaper that printed this.  Why do they INSIST on telling the world just how the scum were discovered? What purpose does that serve?  Except to warn off other child abusers who’ll read this, see the mistake and be careful not to make the same one.

Posted by peiper     on 10/29/2009 at 11:02 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • QUEERS • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Wednesday - October 28, 2009

GUY FINDS BURGLARS IN MOM’S HOUSE, KILLS ONE.  MURDER SAYS IDIOT PROSECUTOR. IDIOT COURT AGREES.

My first post for this Wednesday morning seems so mundane following Drew’s posting of the Melanie Phillips editorial yesterday. Hers is the story of the planned assassination of a culture.  The genocide if I may borrow the term, of an entire history of a country.

I guess my effort here this morning has far less impact except to the poor bastard being charged with murder, for the killing of a slime punk burglar he found in his mother’s house.  Actually, he found two but sadly only wounded the other rather stop his useless breathing.

The court says he used excessive force and his violence was “gratuitous.” How might the court know that exactly?  In the heat of the moment, under stress, can anyone say with certainty exactly and without fail, how they might act?  Whatever. 
I see nothing wrong at all and in fact find it laudatory to kill someone found in a place they shouldn’t be. Like YOUR OWN HOME or your mother’s home.
Way I see it, now there’s one less criminal marauder to commit future mayhem.  And that’s a good thing. 

Accused of murder, council official’s son who knifed two burglars raiding his mother’s home

By Andy Dolan
Last updated at 12:16 AM on 28th October 2009

A man who stabbed a burglar to death after catching him in the act was charged with murder yesterday.

Omari Roberts, 23, was remanded in custody. Roberts had found two teenage burglars in his mother’s house when he arrived to visit her.

After chasing one of the youths, aged 14, from the property, he returned to find 17-year-old Tyler Juett still there.

Tyler Juett, 17, died after he was allegedly stabbed by Omari Roberts

There was a struggle and Juett was fatally stabbed in the chest, Nottingham Magistrates Court was told.

The Crown Prosecution Service said the decision to charge Roberts months after the incident in March had been taken after ‘careful consideration’.

Its lawyers believed he had used ‘excessive and gratuitous force’.

The case echoes that of Norfolk farmer Tony Martin, who became a cause celebre when he was jailed for life for murder in 2000 after shooting dead a teenage intruder at his dilapidated Norfolk home.

His conviction was reduced to manslaughter on appeal and he was released in 2003.

Yesterday the court heard that Roberts’s mother Jacqueline McKenzie-Johnson, 46, a senior official at Nottingham City Council, was not at home when her son arrived on the afternoon of March 13.

Lee Shepherd, prosecuting, said Roberts first discovered the 14-year-old, who was also stabbed during a confrontation.

Roberts chased him down the street before returning to the semi-detached house in Old Basford, Nottingham, to be confronted by Juett.

Applying for bail for Roberts, who is also charged with wounding the younger raider with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, Raj Chand, defending, said: ‘This must have been a dreadful situation for any law-abiding member of the public.

‘Someone said to me earlier that he was in the wrong place at the wrong time, but I said that he was in the right place at the right time. An Englishman’s home is his castle.

‘He says he was in the right. He regrets what happened, but he was defending himself and his property.’

District Judge John Stobart initially said he would take the ‘rare decision’ to grant bail because of Roberts’s flawless record of reporting to police.

But he agreed to remand him in custody at least until today after the prosecution said it wanted to appeal against the decision. Roberts, who did not enter any pleas, is scheduled to appear at Nottingham Crown Court on November 10.

His address was listed in court as his mother’s house, although it is understood he did not live there at the time of the incident.

Before the hearing, CPS lawyer Ian Cunningham said: ‘I have decided that when Omari Roberts disturbed two burglars and caused injuries to them - in one case fatally - his actions were not reasonable.

‘I have looked very carefully at the public interest in this case, and I am satisfied that it requires a prosecution.

‘I also discussed the case with the CPS principal legal adviser and have decided there is sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction.’

Mr Cunningham said legal guidelines made clear that anyone using ‘reasonable force’ to defend themselves would enjoy the full protection of the law.

He added: ‘The law also makes clear that people could be prosecuted if they act with excessive and gratuitous force.’

Nottinghamshire Police said the 14-year-old admitted burglary at youth court in May and was sentenced to two years’ detention.

SOURCE

This is the idiot scum sucking would be burglar filth that happily croaked.  One can only hope that his end was very painful. Types like this deserve no less.  As I looked at this totally revolting photo, I couldn’t help but think, anything that looks like this shouldn’t be allowed to breathe anyway. He’s gone for good.  Hip-hip hooray.  Well done and kudos for the prosecution victim. 

SCRATCH ONE GREMLIN ...

Posted by peiper     on 10/28/2009 at 03:12 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Jack Booted Thugs • Judges-Courts • Oppression • Outrageous • OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Monday - October 26, 2009

IF GIVEN THE CHANCE I’LL KILL AGAIN. IT’S FUN. GOOD BOY. WE’LL CUT YOUR JAIL TIME NOW.

Ha-freeken-ha.  Some joke except it isn’t.  This is another one of those articles that wasn’t on my radar till a minute ago.

Here come de idiot fuckin judge.

The judge said it was wrong not to give McNally the chance of being freed if, at some point in the future, his mental state stabilises to the extent that the authorities no longer consider him a danger to society.

Fine. Then when the bastard is released, I want him housed NOT with idiot judge. Oh no.  I’d like to see him housed with a member of the idiot judge’s family. With no restrictions. 
Never mind he has killed twice and says he enjoys it.  No way I’d trust shrinks who will I just know, one day make the claim that now he’s cured.
Folks like this fellow need to be rounded up and immediately put down for the sake of community safety.  These ppl (term used loosely) are never cured and I don’t care what shrinks say.  They are smart enough however to know how to play the system.  They know what authorities want to hear.

Here, read it yourself. Crazy. Just freeken crazy!  The system, not the criminal.  THE LAW IS AN ASS.

Jailed Satanist who murdered cellmate for kicks has life sentence cut to give him ‘light at the end of the tunnel’
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 2:59 PM on 26th October 2009

Psychopathic: Double murderer Clement McNally described killing his prison cellmate as ‘better than sex’
A psychopathic Satanist jailed for life without parole after he strangled his cellmate while serving a prison term for another murder, has had his sentence cut to 20 years ‘to give him light at the end of the tunnel’.

Clement McNally throttled father-of-one Anthony Hesketh with a T-shirt in September 2003 because he was Satan’s ‘hands and eyes’.
Hesketh, who was serving four months for driving while disqualified, was found dead on the floor of the cell he shared with McNally in Manchester’s Strangeways prison. 
McNally, 34, claimed to worship the devil and decorated his cell with satanic symbols.
He was also diagnosed as ‘psychopathic, narcissistic, paranoid and obsessive-compulsive’.

The killer was already serving a mandatory life term for stabbing a friend to death outside a party in July, 2002, when Hesketh was allocated to his cell.

He was given a life term, with a whole life tariff, for the second killing after pleading guilty to manslaughter due to diminished responsibility at Manchester Crown Court on July 12, 2004.
But now the minimum term has been slashed to 20 years by Lord Justice Hughes, sitting at London’s Criminal Appeal Court.
The judge said it was not right that McNally should be denied a light at the end of the tunnel and never have a chance of release.
McNally, who was prescribed anti-depressants and mood-stabilisers, had told a psychiatrist after being jailed for Mr Skelly’s murder that he had worshipped the devil for two years.

He also claimed prison chiefs allowed him to read books on the occult, some of which came from the prison library.
Nevertheless petty criminal, Mr Hesketh, of Worsley, Greater Manchester, was locked up with him and met his death.
Lord Justice Hughes, sitting with Mr Justice MacKay and Mr Justice Davis, said of Mr Hesketh’s killing: ‘McNally had no particular grievance against his victim - he simply suffered an urge to kill him.

‘He said it was exciting - better than sex. He said Satan told him to do things and it was his job to do as he was told.

‘He said he was not in the least bit sorry for what he had done, but had derived a great deal of pleasure from subsequently thinking about it.
‘He suffers from compulsive homicidal urges and poses an exceptional risk to other prisoners.
‘He made it perfectly clear that he would kill again if the opportunity arose and the urge to kill was of sufficient intensity.’

However the judge said it was wrong not to give McNally the chance of being freed if, at some point in the future, his mental state stabilises to the extent that the authorities no longer consider him a danger to society.
He told the court: ‘The life sentence was plainly correct as he was likely to represent a danger of the gravest kind, for a period which could not be determined.
‘However the imposition of a whole life tariff was a mistaken application of the process of sentencing.

‘The life sentence itself is designed to cater for a prisoner in whom it cannot be seen when, or if ever, they will cease to be a danger to the public.
‘The Parole Board will not release a prisoner under a life sentence until it is convinced that they no longer pose a danger to the public.
‘The minimum term should be set on the basis of the severity of what the offender has done and his level of culpability for it.
‘If this man never ceases to be a danger, he will never be released.
‘But what cannot be known is whether his condition will change in the future.
‘Accordingly, we set aside the order, declining to set a minimum term, and the question of his dangerousness now and in the future is reserved to the Parole Board.

‘His culpability was plainly reduced because he was in the mentally abnormal condition that he was, but the circumstances and gravity of the acts were considerable.
‘It was a second homicide within about 15 months. It was a pointless killing, generated simply to satisfy an internal impulse.
‘The appropriate course now is to set a minimum term which takes account of both the murder and manslaughter offences. We arrive at a minimum term of 20 years.

‘However, the plainest evidence of the absence of a risk would be needed before any consideration could be given to his release.
‘It may very well be that there is never sufficient evidence of an absence of danger, but those decisions lie in the future and, to that extent, this appeal is allowed,’ the judge concluded.
An inquest into Mr Hesketh’s killing heard that McNally turned his back on the Devil 18 months after the murder, but denied fabricating his Satanism.

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 10/26/2009 at 10:10 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Insanity • Judges-Courts • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Friday - October 23, 2009

Animal abuser—Baby abuser—Baby rapist. Threatens to sue to keep “his good name.” AND WINS!

We all know the job of a defense lawyer is to make the indefensible , defensible.  But this carries things to new extremes unheard of before. Or maybe not.  Nothing in todays culture carries any surprise anymore.  Especially where lawyers get involved.

For the first time I find myself on the same side as PETA and for that to happen folks takes one hell of an event.

Some weeks ago or maybe months, I related a story to you about some scum including the mother of a baby abused and finally killed, after months of torture.  The little kid was only 17 months old.  17 months old.  OK I won’t repeat all the things they did to the kid here.  It’s been known as the Baby P case should you want more information.

So just where does PETA come into this?

Well, PETA produced a poster with one of the baby abusers photos. And oh by the way, this absolute rotten excuse for a human had also raped a two year old girl. Keep this all in mind.

Here is the PETA poster.

Well BMEWS, this filthy bastard has through lawyers (proving why some really need to be graveyard dead by any and all means) that his “good name” was being ruined by PETA.  And they had to cave in!  He’s a baby raper and a damn killer and a child abuser BUT .... he still has a “good name.”
Yeah. I suppose in todays world he does. At least among the lawyers who would take and fight this case on his behalf. 

Baby P thug: Poster is ruining my good name
By Vanessa Allen

A sadistic thug who tortured Baby P has threatened to sue a charity for damaging his reputation, it was revealed yesterday.
Steven Barker was labelled a murderer by an animal rights group which used his police mugshot in a billboard campaign.

Now Barker, who was cleared of murder but convicted of ‘causing or allowing’ the death of 17-month-old Peter Connelly, has astonishingly decided that his ‘good name’ has been threatened by the posters.

It believes there is a link between cruelty to animals and violence towards humans.
Moors murderer Ian Brady killed cats and dogs as a child, serial killer Fred West mutilated and killed rabbits, and Soham killer Ian Huntley strangled a puppy and strapped fireworks to animals.

Spokesman Poorva Joshipura said: ‘Whatever the courts call Barker, the fact remains that violence towards animals is evil and if unchallenged it may be a warning that the perpetrator won’t stop there.

‘Abusers are generally cowards who seek out the most vulnerable victims, including children, animals and elderly people.’ Replacing the billboard cost £1,000 but PETA could have faced a much higher bill if Barker had sued successfully.

Baby Peter suffered more than 50 injuries during months of abuse by his mother, Barker and his brother Jason Owen.

The judge at the Old Bailey said neo-Nazi Barker played a ‘major role’ in the toddler’s death in August 2007. Owen was also found guilty of causing or allowing the death of a child, while Baby Peter’s mother admitted the same charge.

SOURCE

I’m really surprised PETA caved in but I also know they have lawyers too.  They were probably told they couldn’t win this.
What a miserable sad day for truth and right.  What a condemnation of where we’ve come.  What a shit world!

Posted by peiper     on 10/23/2009 at 09:16 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Thursday - October 22, 2009

Beaners Busted

300-Plus Arrests Made in ‘Project Coronado’ Drug Cartel Raids

Attorney General Eric Holder calls it the largest single strike at a Mexican drug cartel operating in the U.S. — the arrest of more than 300 people in a series of drug raids across the country.

Holder said at a news conference that the arrests over the past two days were aimed at the U.S. operations of the La Familia cartel. Holder said La Familia is the newest and most violent of Mexico’s five drug cartels.

More than 3,000 federal agents and police officers made the arrests in more than a dozen states. The raids are part of a long-running anti-drug operation that has led to nearly 1,200 arrests over almost four years.

Many of the charges are centered on the cartel’s operations pumping large quantities of methamphetamine into the United States, and other drug distribution charges involve cocaine and marijuana, the officials said.

Project Coronado has targeted La Familia, a drug-trafficking cartel based in the state of Michoacan in southwestern Mexico.

The cartel claims it opposes the sale of meth to Mexicans, but supports its consumption by Americans.

Officials said states where arrests were made or charges filed include California, Colorado, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington state.

U.S. immigration officials say a six-month, 89-city operation focused on gangs led to the arrests of more than 1,700 people.

The 1,785 arrests are of people suspected of gang and criminal activity or immigration violations. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said Thursday 35 percent have violent criminal histories, 16 are gang leaders and more than 1,400 are suspected gang members. About 905 people face criminal charges.

The operation targeted gangs with largely foreign-born members involved in many types of smuggling. The operation ended Sept. 30. The arrests are part of the Operation Community Shield program that involves federal, state and local law enforcement officers.

Nice work guys, but this is just a drop in the bucket. You could arrest and deport this many gang members and illegal aliens every day for the rest of Obama’s term, and it would hardly make a bit of difference. But it would be a start, so get back to work. And secure that damn border so they can’t get back in again. 

Posted by Drew458     on 10/22/2009 at 12:35 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Illegal-Aliens •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

Don’t Like It Here? Then Stay The Hell Home

Police: Strict Iraqi Father Ran Daughter Down

PEORIA, Ariz. - Peoria police are looking for a father suspected of running down his daughter because she was becoming too “westernized” and was not living according to their traditional Iraqi values.

Peoria police say 48-year-old Faleh Hassan Almaleki of Glendale allegedly ran his daughter down Tuesday at an Arizona Department of Economic Security parking lot in Peoria.

“When I walked out the door I saw two ladies on the ground, so my first thought was some kind of domestic dispute,” says witness Synthia Diaz.

The victim, 20-year-old Noor Faleh Almaleki of Surprise, is hospitalized with life-threatening injuries.

A second woman, Noor Almaleki’s roommate, was also injured. She’s identified as 43-year-old Amal Edan Khalaf, also of Surprise. Khalaf has what are described as non-life threatening injuries.

Faleh Almaleki was last seen driving a grey or silver 2000 Jeep grand Cherokee, Arizona license ADS-9192. He has not yet been apprehended.

Family and friends told Peoria investigators that Almaleki was mad and threatened his daughter for adopting Western ways. Almaleki and his family had moved to Glendale from Iraq.

Southwest citizens: be on the lookout for a silver Cherokee. Beware, the driver should be considered deranged and muslim.

Posted by Drew458     on 10/22/2009 at 11:48 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Muslims • Oppression •  
• Comments (9) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Wednesday - October 21, 2009

SOME VERY WEIRD DISORDERED LAW. Steal..16months. Gang beats crap outta guy, 6months.

Frankly in both cases below the pukes involved should themselves be whipped, spend a few days in the stocks and then a long time in jail.

The first case is sad and sick.  This drunk comes upon a guy on the ground, he’s had a heart attack. He may have already been dead. Maybe not. But the town drunk goes through the guy’s pockets and comes up with less then $6 saying, he’s dead and won’t need this anymore.  Pretty cold.
No sympathy for the drunk whatsoever! 
What I am having trouble understanding are the standards of penalties for crime.
The drunk got 16 months.

The other story is an update. Group of drunk women beat the hell out of this poor guy. If you read his statement, he was worried about hitting a woman and so held back.  I think that could be a damn hard thing to do honestly. Yeah, you must defend yourself. You can’t volunteer to be a punching bag.  But the idea of hitting a woman is so foreign to many. We immediately think sisters,mothers,wives,aunts etc.
Thing is though, these scags, these absolute scumbags, these mindless sluts WITH RECORDS, one of whom has eight previous convictions including one for battery, these wasters of air and space got 6 months.  SIX MONTHS!  wtf?

You surely can’t wonder why I continually see things through ARCOB.

‘Britain’s sickest thief’ who rifled pockets of dying bus driver to steal loose change is jailed
By Daily Mail Reporter

A robber who rifled through the pockets of a heart attack victim as he lay dying has been condemned as the sickest thief in Britain’.
Peter Watson took £3 from his victim, saying: ‘He doesn’t need it – he’s dead.’

Last night Watson, who is 30 and unemployed, was branded an ‘animal’ after a judge jailed him for 16 months.
Watson had been walking with a group of friends through a park when they came across Peter Lisowycz, 51, lying on the ground.
The bus driver, who is believed to have had a heart attack, had collapsed and turned blue and was foaming at the mouth.

One of the group tried to put him in the recovery position but was stunned when he looked up to see Watson searching through the dying man’s pockets and helping himself to around £3 in loose change.
A jury at Bolton Crown Court heard how the good samaritan challenged Watson, an alcoholic, and asked him what on earth he thought he was doing, to which Watson replied: ‘He doesn’t need it – he’s dead.’

Last night Watson was condemned by both senior police officers and Mr Lisowycz’s family.
His father Walter Lisowycz, 85, said: ‘I’m just glad that they have caught this man and that he has got what he deserved. He is an animal.’
He said his son, a father of one, had been walking up a hill through the park in Rochdale, Lancashire, when he collapsed.
He said: ‘I can’t stop thinking about Peter. I think he was heading to our house that day.
‘He had been married for a long time and he had a daughter. He was a good worker, he paid his mortgage, had bought a car and was planning holidays when he died.’

A police source said that in more than 20 years of service he had never come across such a contemptuous act of theft.
He said: ‘This man has to be the sickest thief in Britain. It was a truly shocking thing to do and an appalling crime committed on a dying man.’
After the incident the good samaritan called an ambulance as Watson sauntered off down the street. Paramedics could not revive Mr Lisowycz and he was later pronounced dead.

The helper was so appalled by what Watson had done that he reported him to police.
Watson, who admitted theft but denied making the ‘He doesn’t need it’ comment, smirked throughout the court hearing.
Jonathan Lally, defending, said Watson recognised what he had done was wrong but said he had major personal difficulties including an alcohol problem-that began at the age of 13.

A VERY SICK THIEF

Oh wait a minute.  I think I see the difference.  Beating the crap out of some innocent victim for fun is only an, “AFFRAY.”
Screwed up country and culture.  Waaaa .... I wanna be hooooooome.

Shocking CCTV images of girl gang kicking a male victim in drunken attack which left him with footprint on his face
By Chris Brooke
Last updated at 8:22 PM on 20th October 2009
Drunk and baying like dogs, five women brutally attack a stranger in the street.

The women - all from the same family - targeted Matthew Campbell, 38, at random, kicking and stamping on him as he lay prone on the pavement.
Their sickening eight-minute assault was captured on CCTV and resulted in all the women being jailed for six months.

Mr Campbell, a commercial diver, told yesterday how he restrained himself from hitting back because he has never struck a woman before.
The video clearly shows him holding his hands up pleading with the women to stop, but a court heard they acted like a ‘pack of dogs’ to pursue their prey.
The victim, who was walking home after a drink with friends, was lucky to escape the attack in November last year without major injury.
He suffered bruising all over his body, heel marks and scratches on his back and head and had a footprint mark on his face.

All the women, aged between 21 and 42, are members of the same extended family and most of them are well known to the police.
They had been drinking heavily at a birthday party that evening.

Prosecutor David Cammies said they attacked Mr Campbell for no apparent reason outside the Lloyds Arms pub in Grimsby town centre at 11.30pm.
Helen Barber, 29, Rachel Barber, 31, Kelly Macdonald, 32, Belinda Tomlinson, 42, and Katie Tomlinson, 21, all admitted affray.

Recorder Rachim Singh told them: ‘The CCTV showed the sickening, brutal and repeated attack.

Grimsby Crown Court heard Helen Barber, who has eight previous convictions including one for battery, suffered a broken nose in the incident. She was believed to have been hit by Mr Campbell in self-defence.

Yesterday Mr Campbell said he had become ‘wary’ of going out in town centres following the incident which left him badly shaken.

Lee Rhoads, 32, also became involved in the attack and was jailed for four months after admitting affray.

The women all live in the Grimsby area. Katie Tomlinson, the youngest of the gang, describes herself on her Bebo site as being ‘born to be wild.’
She adds: ‘Happiest When im all stella’d up n partyin.’

MORE HERE

Posted by peiper     on 10/21/2009 at 08:00 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

   Tuesday - October 20, 2009

Sniff Sniff Sniff

Brian Suozzo voted with an absentee ballot in the Working Families Party primary on Sept. 15 because, as his application stated, he was “at home recovering from medical procedure.”
Jessica Boomhower’s application said she would be attending a “work conference in Boston.” Michael Ward couldn’t vote in person because he was “taking care of elderly parent.” Kimberlee Truell was on a “Bus trip to casino,” as was Miguel Vazques.

The only problem with these absentee ballot records at the Rensselaer County Board of Elections in Troy, N.Y., is that they’re phony, voters and investigators say—and they’ve prompted what’s being called an unprecedented investigation of suspected voter fraud.

Thirty-eight forged or fraudulent ballots have been thrown out—enough votes, an election official admits, to likely have tipped the city council and county elections in November to the Democrats. Candidates would have been able to run both on the Democratic and Working Families Party lines in two weeks, and that could have given the Democrats in the general election.

A special prosecutor is investigating the case and criminal charges are possible. New York State Supreme Court Judge Michael Lynch ruled that there were “significant election law violations that have compromised the rights of numerous voters and the integrity of the election process.”

Among the reasons cited on the fraudulent forms for absentee voting: “traveling to Buffalo,” attending a “screen printing conference in Syracuse,” “working late shift,” “working construction,” and “home - ill.”

“Someone took my signature and voted with it and I felt extremely violated,” Suozzo told Fox News. He is a soft-spoken 28-year-old environmental engineer who says he never saw, let alone signed, the Working Families Party Absentee ballot application that carried his supposed signature. He was flabbergasted that someone would vote for him and submit it.

“The whole thing seems dirty to me,” Suzzo said. “You wonder how often this happens and people don’t get caught.”

“They tried to steal an election,” says Bob Mirch, the majority leader of the Rensselaer County legislature who suspected voter fraud and started the investigation after being alerted to a large number of absentee ballot application requests that were noticed by the Republican Board of Elections commissioner .

“Not only does it undermine the system, but if these people were allowed to do this, we could never have a fair election… I’ve been doing this for 35 years, when I saw this, it sends a chill through my body right now.”

Currently composed of some 30,000 members, the Working Families Party (WFP) is a front group for ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). WFP functions as a political party in New York State and Connecticut, promoting ACORN-friendly candidates. Unlike conventional political parties, WFP charges its members dues—about $60 per year—a policy characteristic of ACORN and its affiliates.

According to the party’s website, WFP is a coalition founded jointly by ACORN, the Communications Workers of America, and the United Automobile Workers. However, ACORN clearly dominates the coalition. New York ACORN leader Steven Kest was the moving force in forming the party, and WFP headquarters are located at the same address as ACORN’s national office, at 88 Third Avenue in Brooklyn, New York.

An outgrowth of the socialist New Party, WFP was created in 1998. According to a 2000 article by the Associated Press, its objective was (and still is) to “help push the Democratic Party toward the left.” In pursuit of this goal, WFP runs radical candidates in state and local elections. Generally, WFP candidates conceal their extremism beneath a veneer of populist rhetoric, promoting bread-and-butter issues designed to appeal to union workers and other blue-collar voters, Republican and Democrat alike.

The Working Families Party benefits from a quirk of New York State (and Connecticut) election law which allows parties to “cross-endorse” candidates of other parties. Thus when Hillary Clinton ran for the Senate in 2000, she ran both on the Democratic Party ticket and on the Working Families Party ticket. Of the 3.4 million popular votes Ms. Clinton received from New Yorkers, the Working Families Party delivered 103,000.

The Working Families Party, in short, is not a political party in any normal sense of the term. It’s a complex tool for well-funded special interests looking to raid the public treasury.  [ which translates as UNION CONTROLLED. And a big GUESS WHO is the main union that feeds them cash? You knew it! Got it in one: ]

Leading the donor pack was the potent health-care workers’ SEIU Local 1199, with more than $300,000—followed by the teachers unions, with $200,000.

And ACORN—itself a major recipient of union cash—has tremendous overlap with the WFP. The two share two Brooklyn office spaces, plus senior leadership: WFP Executive Committee Chairwoman Bertha Lewis also runs ACORN’s New York chapter.

So, rigged elections, fraudulent votes, big union money, shadowy behind the scenes groups, far left agenda ... all tied to Democrats. Par for the course. But this story is news because it looks like they’ve finally been caught red handed, and the ties go right back to the sources. Good. Jail the whole damn bunch.

other links:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/at_last_local_ny_race_turns_up_some_real_alleged_v.php
http://www.redstate.com/soren_dayton/2009/09/29/absentee-ballot-fraud-in-troy-ny/
http://wnyt.com/article/stories/S1173264.shtml?cat=300
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/09/acorn_voting_fraud_in_the_news.html

How long until somebody with balls and a badge is going to step up and prosecute ACORN under the RICO act? This shit goes on in state after state. It’s organized nationally. It’s been going on for years. Decades even. Shut them down and prosecute them already.

And in the mean time, throw out the voter registration data in every state and do the whole thing over. In person. With a photo ID and a fingerprint. And no absentee ballots by mail ever again. If you’re going to be away, you show up at the county seat and cast your ballot before you leave. After showing your voter ID and further proof that you are actually you. And lets put some serious teeth in the penalties for fraudulent voting already. This is bullshit. And it can be stopped overnight if people have the will.

Posted by Drew458     on 10/20/2009 at 01:32 PM   
Filed Under: • Commies • Crime • Democrats • Liberals •  
• Comments (8) • Trackbacks (0) • Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner