Monday - April 25, 2011

an editorial follow up to Bristol rioting

Just recently I ignored an event in a city named Bristol, which Drew then posted and did a far better job of it then I would have done.

Just to be clear about something.  According to what the radio said, police had information of suspected bomb makers in the building where the squatters were located. And sure enough they found the evidence.  Now that’s my understanding.

I wish the media types would quit using the false term, “protesters” because they aren’t really protesting some injustice to mankind.
They are simply punks, thugs, they are criminals in the guise of would be do-gooders.  What they do, they do for the pure hell of it, every single one of the bastards should by rights be stood against a wall and shot in a painful place and left to die.  They’re very brave so long as they know (and they do) that little if any real harm will come to them.

Tesco Express in Bristol is what Americans would call a convenience store.
They have store recently opened in the USA btw. Again, not a major supermarket like the ones they have here in the UK, because they don’t want to try and go head to head with our large chains back home.  I suppose they were allowed into the US based on an agreement that they wouldn’t. I don’t personally know that but it’s a guess. 

Their stores in the USA are called Fresh and Easy.

One more point which is made below and doesn’t need me, but I’ll state the obvious anyway.  Many of the punks on parade with vandalism in their pea brains, are also leftists, outspoken anti capitalists and anarchists.  Adequate words just fail me in trying to describe my hatred for all these groupings of filth and slime.

Which brings me finally to an excellent editorial comment in the morning Telegraph by someone calmer then I am, and with no death wish for miscreants.
I am posting his entire commentary here.

It’s time Tesco haters stocked up on facts

Supermarkets are so successful because they provide what we want at a reasonable price.

By Stephen Pollard

It is fashionable among the Left-liberal intelligentsia to view supermarkets as some sort of uncouth offence against decency, fit only for the proles who subsist on multipacks of turkey twizzlers. Instead of driving off to shop at rapacious retail beasts we should be pottering down the high street, exchanging mid-morning pleasantries with our butcher, baker and candlestick maker.

So when, on Friday, a group of layabouts in Stokes Croft in Bristol decided to riot in protest at the opening of an 18th Tesco store in the city, there were frissons of excitement elsewhere. Violence might not be so easy to support, but how wonderful that someone is standing up against the supermarket juggernaut. As one writer put it in the Guardian on Saturday: “The damage caused to Tesco’s property last night is relatively insignificant compared to the damage Tesco has been able to inflict.”

Like most such fashions, this latest is built on a combination of hypocrisy and idiocy. Because you can bet your shopping bill on the fact that, at the very dinner parties when the anti-supermarket pieties are trotted out, almost everything has been bought from one of the chains.

Given that one in every seven pounds spent in the UK is spent in Tesco alone, it barely needs restating that supermarkets are the retailer of choice of almost everyone. Well over 90 per cent of us, in fact, use supermarkets regularly. We do so because they offer what we want: quality, value, range and convenience. And the better they get at it, the more custom we give them, and the bigger their profits.

So when Tesco announces record profits of £3.8 billion, as it did last week, that’s something to be celebrated, not scorned. Its growing profits are a badge not of shame, as some idiots claim, but of pride – built on more of us choosing to shop there, and spending more, because we value what and how it is selling.

When Tesco or any supermarket opens a new store, it stands or falls by customer demand. The retail sector is brutally competitive: 94 per cent of us have access to at least three brands of supermarket within a 15-minute journey of where we live, and customers use, on average, three different supermarkets a month. As huge businesses, supermarkets spread their costs over massive volumes and so take a minimal margin on each item. So although the operating profit margin of big suppliers such as Proctor and Gamble, Unilever and GlaxoSmithKline was found in a 2007 study to be 20 per cent, 13 per cent and 32 per cent respectively, the margin of the big four supermarkets was only between 2.2 and 6.2 per cent. That’s one reason why, despite their massive profits, we spend a smaller proportion of our income on food than any other EU country.

But the facts are irrelevant to UK Uncut, an anti-capitalist protest group that has sprung up over the past year and which is heavily involved in protests against Tesco (along, in the Bristol protests, with the gloriously named but astonishingly silly Peoples Republic of Stokes Croft).

UK Uncut claims to be peaceful, involved only with sit-ins and orderly demonstrations at businesses it targets such as TopShop, Boots and Vodafone. But many of its activists seem, by a remarkable coincidence, to have been at the scene of a number of the riots and public order disturbances in recent months. Its beef is tax avoidance, arguing that the businesses it targets are culpable because they structure their affairs to minimise tax liabilities. In other words, they structure their affairs entirely legally, in accordance with tax rules, and avoid paying what would in effect be additional voluntary tax.

Were it not for what seems inevitably to accompany its activities, UK Uncut would be laughable. The Institute for Economic Affairs recently published a report that rips apart its contradictory, ill-informed, juvenile arguments. Indeed, in an unintentional self-parody of the group’s deep-seated ignorance, UK Uncut staged a sit-in at Fortnum & Mason during last month’s anti-cuts march, “over the tax dodge of over 40 million by its owners Whittington Investments which have a 54 per cent stake in Associated British Foods who produce Ryvita, Kingsmill and others and own Primark. ABF have dodged over £40 million in tax”.

Ignore the illiteracy of UK Uncut’s press release – is it Whittington Investments or ABF which have supposedly dodged £40 million in tax? – and the fact that it provided not a word of evidence for its claim. Rather, focus on the fact that ABF, Wittington Investments and Fortnum & Mason are all owned by the Garfield Weston Foundation, the 14th largest charitable foundation in the world. Not exactly the unacceptable face of capitalism.

Now it has its sights set on Tesco. Its website informs us that “Tesco control 30 per cent of the UK grocery market and have over 2,000 stores in the UK”. There is no explanation as to why this is objectionable. It just is, it seems. But then it details Tesco’s real crime: “In 2010 they made a profit of £3.4 billion, yet they will still go to great lengths to avoid paying tax.” The swines! Tesco have the nerve to employ accountants to structure their affairs to comply with the law and pay every penny of the tax they owe.

TELEGRAPH

Oh and btw .... Here’s a letter from someone who lives in the city.  Quite interesting I thought.

The riot against Tesco

SIR – In four years living near Stokes Croft, Bristol, I can say that the new Tesco is the best thing to have happened to the area.
Stokes Croft cannot be described as having an “independent culture”. The place is a pit of crime, fuelled by drink, drugs and prostitution. No wonder more than half its residents are squatters.

People there claim that the Tesco will destroy local trade. But the poorly supplied off-licence seems largely to supply local tramps with their bottles of super-strength cider. To protect its trade, the new Tesco has not been granted a licence to sell alcohol.

In these times, we are relying on the private sector to pull us out of recession. Tesco (and supermarkets in general) is good at triggering regeneration of areas and creating jobs for the unqualified.

I am in my sixth year working in a supermarket and have been able to transfer to different stores while I move with my degree study. Otherwise, I would not have been able to finance my degree.

The thugs using the new Tesco store as an excuse to riot are the problem in this instance. Those who ran havoc in Stokes Croft caused Tesco little trouble. As usual, the police and the taxpayer have taken the brunt of the blow.

Matthew Stimpson
Bristol

Posted by peiper     on 04/25/2011 at 02:31 PM   
Filed Under: • Commies •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner