Eye-Candy

   Sunday - February 05, 2012

a personal thought

Some of you may not keep track of things of this nature and normally I don’t either.
It just so happens however, that for some odd reason I remembered Hitler’s birthday.
Not mind you that I celebrate the date.

The other birthday (my wife aside) that I have always remembered is the birthday of a woman who I had the longest crush on and used to call her Your Highness whenever we met.  That would be Loretta Lynn, April 14th.  I used to celebrate that date.
When I was a DJ, I hosted a large party at a local restaurant in Paducah, Ky., even though Loretta wasn’t in attendance.  But her record company gave me lots of help with free give aways etc.  So anyway …. this post isn’t about her and I don’t mean to use her noble self on the same page as AH and hope is does her no harm.
I’m only saying those are the dates I remember with no prompting

The Hitler date has a bit of a story and while I suppose I can understand the folks who questioned having a concert to celebrate Wagner on the same date as the birthday of AH, I think to cancel a concert just because he liked Wagner and a concert was scheduled on that date, is just plain silly. And pc I think.

I am not a fan of opera. I don’t understand it and had to put up with a lot of it as a kid, as my mother was a huge fan.  So I heard it a lot and never much liked what I heard.
I belonged heart and sole to Benny Goodman and Artie Shaw and Bix and the Firehouse Five etc.
But who am I?  If even Hitler loved Wagner …. ???

Well, as it happens, Berlin’s biggest opera house, the Deutsche Oper, has been forced to backtrack on plans to stage a re-launched version of Adolf Hitler’s favourite Wagner opera on the Nazi leader’s birthday.  April 20.  I honestly think we can be sure, in light of present day German laws, that the director of the opera house had no intention of celebrating that date.  He’d have risked jail were it intentional.  The date was pencilled in far in advance, the director says. With no thought to the date as anything other then just that. A date on a calendar.  But because AH was a very large fan of Wagner and especially of the one scheduled to be performed on the 100th anniversary of the opera house, it was decided to change the date least the wrong people see it as something else.  And of course, in case anyone might become offended.

OK, so what other events in any other part of the world might be considered a no show day in case the date should fall on the birth date of some infamous historical and criminal character?

Jeesh.

Cheers and enjoy what’s left of your wkend.  I’m off but decided to leave you with this bit of unrelated to anything except the appeal. And nope. Don’t know her b. day. Does it matter? Didn’t think so.

Posted by peiper     on 02/05/2012 at 07:20 AM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy • Personal •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - February 04, 2012

Ewww Ewww Ewe!

Animal sex abuse is on the rise in Germany, with bestiality brothels being set up across the country, according to a state animal protection officer demanding stronger laws to protect mankind’s furry and feathered friends.

Madeleine Martin, the animal protection official for Hessian state government, said the law needed to be changed to make sex abuse of animals – known as zoophilia – a crime.

“It is punishable to distribute animal pornography, but the act itself is not,” she told the Frankfurter Rundschau daily paper on Friday.

“There are even animal brothels in Germany,” she said. Sex with animals was being increasingly seen as a lifestyle choice, and thus more acceptable.

“Zoophilia must be completely banned in the reformed animal protection law,” said Martin, referring to the governments plan to rework that section of the law.

Sex with animals was banned until 1969, when the animal protection law was introduced, but failed to include a specific ban on zoophilia, the Frankfurter Rundschau said.

What gives with the Germans? They have the sickest porn this side of Japan, and now this. Whattsa matta, German girls aren’t good enough anymore?

Posted by Drew458     on 02/04/2012 at 10:48 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Eye-Candy • Humor •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - February 02, 2012

eye candy

calling it a night and leaving you with something to build a dream on.

Posted by peiper     on 02/02/2012 at 04:05 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - January 31, 2012

Are We There Yet?

Even though the weather has been quite mild here, January has just dragged on forever for me.

It feels like it’s been January all year.

D’oh!!! It has!

So here’s Brit soap actress, undie model, and “sex poppet” Jorgie Porter. Why not?

Posted by Drew458     on 01/31/2012 at 02:46 PM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - January 30, 2012

a few photos to glorify the eye candy at 50 and over

Just to change things a little. 

I happen to see someone in the paper who I had never heard of, and they said she’s turned 50.  For those who have and watch TV, I guess you know Marcia Cross.  But I didn’t.
Anyway, I thought just for a change I would find a few ladies who still had ‘it’ and who were past 45.  I ended up with a few who were 50 and over and who I thought still really looked good. Of course there are dozens and more then that, but I arbitrarily settled on the few here.
I’m not interested at all in seeing former beauties on the skids. I want to remember them while they still have the allure (to a degree), that makes em eye candy.
I really, really love this lady.

CAROL VORDERMAN - 52

MARCIA CROSS - 50

I think her age shows a fraction in her hand. But darn if she isn’t still beautiful.

MARIE HELVIN - 60

I don’t think she’s 60 here unless there’s been a lot of touch up. But she’s pretty so what the heck.

not quite the end .....  I know what some of you expect and so to keep you happy, not for me you understand, I make this great sacrifice.

Posted by peiper     on 01/30/2012 at 05:05 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - January 28, 2012

eye candy

the end

Posted by peiper     on 01/28/2012 at 03:34 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - January 27, 2012

the mane attraction

As one who becomes ever more follicularly challenged every day (D’oh!!!), I find myself mesmerized and fascinated by those who take for granted what I never ever even came close to having. Clicky clicky.


hair today, gone tomorrow?

Posted by Drew458     on 01/27/2012 at 01:06 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - January 26, 2012

red and white

but no blue suede shoes ... playin’, playin’ in the snow.

Posted by Drew458     on 01/26/2012 at 01:22 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - January 23, 2012

eye candy, special edition?

Any gender questions?

Posted by peiper     on 01/23/2012 at 03:08 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - January 20, 2012

EYE CANDY

Posted by peiper     on 01/20/2012 at 01:56 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - January 19, 2012

News To Me

We’re nearing the end of the dead period on American television, that six to eight week hiatus that all the shows seem to take as soon as winter sets in. Nothing on but repeats. With our cable company giving us the On Demand feature, we’ve been able to avoid most of this, and have been watching old episodes of shows we don’t ordinarily watch. We’ve also been exploring several of the few hundred channels we never look at, just to find something new or at least interesting to watch. New episodes are starting up this week and next, so we’re saved for the next couple of months.

I watched one of the BBC documentary shows last night, a new one called The Queen’s Palaces. The episode was on Buckingham Palace. Fantastic. Mind blowing. My God, such wealth spent so lavishly. Stunning. But I’m not jealous, or envious, or resentful. The Crown had the money, and that’s how they spent it, and it was all a long time ago, so so what? [ although I am more than a little piqued about an ad they kept running for the Bill Moyers show (who??)that flashed dozens of famous faces across the screen with a series of vocal sound bites, and one of them goes “The opposite of poverty is not wealth. The opposite of poverty is justice.” which is an infuriating bit of undiluted Marxism in my opinion. ]

But it was late in the evening, and being a guy I couldn’t help but be continually distracted by the presenter for the show, one Fiona Bruce, as she legged it around the palace, up and down the grand staircases, in and out of one sumptuously detailed enormous room after another. Damnation. Horry Clap what a pair of legs that woman has. And that’s in her old sensible heels, flats, and jodhpurs ( they stuck her on a horsey for one scene, but I don’t think she rides regularly ). It’s not like she was trying, wearing the same old blue dress she’s had for ages, and that makes it all so much more appreciable.

A tiny bit of net research this morning shows me that this is not news to any of you Brits, as you’ve had her as a news show person and TV presenter for years and years, that she is very well paid by the BBC, and that controversy sticks to her like glue over jealous charges that she’s just too darn sexy for the job. As if. Or too dim-witted or common. At least she has some appearance of class, and isn’t some mostly naked bit of pantie-less dumpster slut falling out of her clothes at every opportunity.  She isn’t even all that pretty, though she is rather striking and quite easy to listen to. Personally, I think she’s in damn fine shape for a woman half her age and I hope BBC One continues to keep her walking about on camera and presenting everything. Better than that Cat Deeley stretched out bit of vacuous fluff.

Posted by Drew458     on 01/19/2012 at 09:39 AM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - January 18, 2012

Precious

Posted by Drew458     on 01/18/2012 at 12:54 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - January 16, 2012

eye candy

Posted by peiper     on 01/16/2012 at 02:54 PM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - January 13, 2012

eye candy I just could not resist posting

Posted by peiper     on 01/13/2012 at 10:28 AM   
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner