Tuesday - November 11, 2014
STFU Already
Michael Brown’s parents address U.N.: ‘We need the world to know’
The parents of Michael Brown, a Missouri teen killed by police, testified before a U.N. committee Tuesday because they want the world to know “what’s going on in Ferguson.”
Lesley McSpadden and Michael Brown Sr. spoke to the United Nations Committee Against Torture—which also works against cruel or degrading treatment or punishment by government authorities.
“We need the world to know what’s going on in Ferguson and we need justice,” McSpadden told CNN in Geneva, Switzerland.
“We need answers and we need action. And we have to bring it to the U.N. so they can expose it to the rest of the world, what’s going on in small town Ferguson.”
Wow, and you thought Obama was a laughingstock.
In a statement, the Browns’ attorney’s office said the couple planned to “testify on behalf of many supporters who join in the appeal for global intervention in the way policing currently functions in America.”
...
Michael Brown Sr. said he and his wife were offering “an outlook on what’s going on in the United States and all over the world with the police, police brutality, no justice.”
This is a new low, even for the professional victim class.
And actually, it’s pretty funny. AS IF the world gave a squat. As if ISIS cares. Or Boko Haram. Or communist China. Or North Korea. Or any banana republic anywhere, where the federales shoot anyone they feel like whenever they want. Or the drug cartels do it instead. Maybe the parents could meet directly with Castro, or with Assad, or whats-her-commie down in Brazil. Places where the garbage dump monkeys are always fed golden bananas, by respectful white gloved zoo keepers. AS IF.
At this point, I really can’t wait for that grand jury to return a NO verdict. No threats, just an unspoken promise. Not In My Backyard. A promise I think might be shared by millions, just waiting. Let Ferguson burn. Who cares? Then plow it under, or just leave it to rot. Not a cent in aid, no a penny for rebuilding.
Posted by Drew458
on 11/11/2014 at 11:05 PM
Filed Under: • Racism and race relations • REALLY WORTHLESS and PUTRID PEOPLE • Stoopid-People • United-Nations •
• Comments (7)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Oh right, like this is even news
Such hypocrisy (or should I say hip-hop-crisy?) in the news the last couple of days: OMG, it’s come to light that University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, has been putting it’s best football and basketball athletes in bogus classes for years and years. And the majority of them were black!!
Well, snap me in the nutz with a wet towel. Who’da ever thought such a thing was possible, anywhere in any school at any level in America?
What a load of turds. What a cart full of poo.
I am absolutely certain that there is not one single college or university anywhere in the nation that doesn’t cut it’s top athletes significant academic slack. I have grave doubts that there is even one high school that doesn’t also do this to some extent. It’s what being a jock is all about.
But now the horse is out of the barn, so here comes at least two weeks worth of denial, finger pointing, false outrage, and blaming the system. Which means White People, whether that is stated explicitly, implicitly, or buried under some faux-intellectual shuck and jive.
The University of North Carolina made this accommodation; many athletes were enrolled in phantom courses in the department of African and African-American studies. The discovery and resulting scandal are simply the tip of the iceberg and a symptom of a much larger problem.
A UNC learning specialist hired to help athletes found that during the years 2004 to 2012, 60 percent of 183 members of the football and basketball teams read between fourth- and eighth-grade levels. Eight to 10 percent read below a third-grade level. These were black high-school graduates, and their high-school diplomas were clearly fraudulent.
How cruel is it for UNC to admit students who have little chance of academically competing on the same basis as its other students? Black students so ill-equipped run the risk of ridicule and reinforcing white stereotypes of black mental incompetence. If these students are to retain their athletic eligibility or minimum GPA requirements, universities must engage in academic fraud.
... blah blah blah ...
Unfortunately, and to the detriment of black people, there is broad support among black members of the academic community for practices that lead to academic fraud. In the wake of the UNC scandal, the Carolina Black Caucus — a campus group of administrators, staff and faculty — rushed to the defense of the black athletes and the department of African and African-American studies, claiming an unfair investigation and unfair public and media attack. One campus student group said that the student-athlete fraud scandal is actually a result of “white supremacist, heteropatriarchal capitalism.”
Focusing solely on the academic problems of blacks at the college level misses the point. It is virtually impossible to repair 12 years of rotten primary and secondary education in the space of four or five years of college. Proof of that is black student performance on postgraduate tests, such as the GRE, LSAT and MCAT. The black-white achievement gap on those tests is just as wide as it is on the SAT or ACT, which high schoolers take. That’s evidence that primary and secondary education deficiencies have not been repaired during undergraduate years.
Don’t be manipsinatin me now#; Walter Williams writes a good essay on the subject, and he is 100% correct in asserting that college can not correct educational deficits that primary school instilled. He sees the real issue clearly:
The high academic failure rate among blacks means one of two things. Either black students cannot learn; or primary and secondary schools, parental choices, black student attitudes, and cultural values regarding education are not conducive to what young blacks need for academic excellence.
... although my cynicism says that this doesn’t have to be an either/or (XOR, right Christopher?) situation.
Personally, I’d say the solution is obvious: drop all team based college athletics, everywhere. Make your entry standards color blind. Change the curriculum so that all students have to take several semesters of advanced math, science, philosophy, accounting, law, and English. And Western Civ!. (Best class ever aside from Geology 101.)
You want to raise athletes? Fine. Send them all to muscle camps. Dojos. Training centers. Ball World. And don’t even bother with academics. Let those institutions feed the “early adult” venue of quasi-professional ball players. Train your Pokemon to the max, and drug the daylights of them with Human MiracleGro. Let the rest of us get on with getting an education, a job, and a future.
Is there a middle ground? Sure. Athletes have to maintain a 2.75 GPA, and are subject not just to random urinalysis, but also to monthly academic examination with a “B” grade being the unwavering bar for staying on the team. Fail a test, get benched until you pass it next month. Fail that, no more sports until next year. Oh, and no athlete is allowed to take a class that isn’t open to regular students, and peopled at least halfway with them. Thus, no special invisible BS secret sinecure classes for jocks.
Posted by Drew458
on 11/11/2014 at 03:27 PM
Filed Under: • Racism and race relations • Sports •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • We Don’t Deserve No Respect
ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber said that lack of transparency was a major part of getting ObamaCare passed, and that it was written in such a way as to take advantage of “the stupidity of the American voter.”
Gruber, the MIT professor who served as a technical consultant to the Obama administration during ObamaCare’s design, also made clear during a panel quietly captured on video that the individual mandate, which was only upheld by the Supreme Court because it was a tax, was not actually a tax.
Gee, isn’t that special? Americans were subjected to a daily hammering lecture from El Residente nearly every single day for well over a year - the same pResident who just yesterday shared his unshaken belief that the only reason his policies failed is because he didn’t sell them to us hard enough - and even after that, far less than half the country wanted this rancid rotting albatross around their necks. Yet it was rammed down our throats by a Democrat heavy legislature. And it was based on a lie. Which (burn in Hell, Roberts, you turncoat) the Supreme Court turned itself inside out and created an alternate reality exactly opposite of how the bill was sold, in order to claim it was valid (yes, it is too a tax!).
But the core of the whole thing was based on the sneering elitist attitude that YOU the voter would be TOO STUPID to see through the smoke and mirrors. Gosh, thanks for that show of respect.
Remember always, how there was no time to read the bill, and that it was so damned urgent to pass it right this second that “you’ll have to pass it to see what’s in it”. Pig in a poke, what a sick joke.
“This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. Okay, so it’s written to do that. In terms of risk-rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in – you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed… Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass… ”
And the fools voted this goon squad in for a second term. Maybe Gruber was right after all. Video at the link.
Conservative pundit David Limbaugh puts it all together, but stops just short of calling for impeachment:
You can see the mindset that these people have. There is no mistaking it. They know better than we “stupid” American people what is good for us, so they’ll do whatever is necessary, including purposely deceiving us, to advance their political agenda.
This is the stuff of outright tyrants — arrogant, unaccountable, cavalier despots. This is political fascism. This is not representative government. This type of behavior nullifies the Constitution and disenfranchises the American people.
It’s one thing to have strong ideological views. It’s altogether another to impose those views at any cost and in derogation of the people’s rights. This is who this president is. These are the people he surrounds himself with.
Obama and his team are not chastened, much less repentant, over the recent election results. They remain undeterred, and they intend to continue using whatever means they deem necessary, in their self-assessed superior wisdom, to accomplish their political ends, beginning with immigration.
Posted by Drew458
on 11/11/2014 at 02:57 PM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Health-Medicine • Obama, The One •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • But Who Will Run The Country?
Valerie Jarrett Is Now Scapegoat-in-Chief
The media have identified the problem with the Obama presidency and want her tarred and feathered.
Or just fired. Or sidelined. Or made an ambassador to some faraway land.
Her name is Valerie Jarrett.
White House aide and longtime Chicago pal of Barack and Michelle Obama has been a target roughly from the day she stepped foot in Washington.
But now, in the wake of the Democrats’ midterm wipeout, the press is really unloading on her. She has become the scapegoat-in-chief.
The notion that a single staff person is responsible for most of the administration’s shortcomings over the last six years is rather far-fetched. Whether it’s ObamaCare or the VA or immigration or ISIS or Syria, it’s the president who is making the decisions and selling them. If the principal problem, as the president told Bob Schieffer on “Face the Nation,” was a failure to adequately communicate his policies, then the man with the bully pulpit must take most of the blame.
But the press has a shakeup mentality: all major political defeats must be followed by some kind of housecleaning. And reporters are getting tired of the story line about Obama essentially brushing off the debacle. So the journalistic knives are out for Jarrett.
It’s not hard to understand why. As a personal pal, Jarrett is easy to cast as the embodiment of the insularity of the White House. As the president’s protector, she has a track record of ticking off other administration officials. At the same time, Jarrett has no public successes attached to her name. And when she’s on television, she appears a rather robotic defender of her boss.
The article goes on to say how everyone in the White House hates and fears her because ... she’s a woman. Of course. Hey, wasn’t the Rethuglicans who were hosting the War On Women?
Riiight.
Posted by Drew458
on 11/11/2014 at 02:04 PM
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Obama, The One •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Karate Robot!
This one has a huge wow factor. I want to know how it got on the pile of cinderblocks.
Be sure to check some of the other videos at the end. The current state of robotics is getting interesting. I’ve seen videos of a 4 legged robotic pack mule that gives me the willies. It’s a wonderful piece of technology, but there’s just something unnatural about it.
Follow the link for the full video and Daily Mail article: The robo karate kid! Terrifying.... (I didn’t make up the headline - honest)
Posted by Dr. Jeff
on 11/11/2014 at 09:14 AM
Filed Under: • Miscellaneous •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • awww
somehow this reminds me that I want a new puppy. Alas, no puppies allowed here in the condo park.
Posted by Drew458
on 11/11/2014 at 12:25 AM
Filed Under: • Miscellaneous •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • One From Rich
Mises’s greatest contribution: his demonstration that socialism cannot function as a rational economic system and that private ownership of the means of production is necessary if value is going to be maximized and waste is going to be minimized in the production process.
...
Mises’s arguments, and the arguments of those who have followed him, do not merely undermine arguments for pure, global socialism. They also undermine arguments for interventionism more generally.
A nice little essay about, and with links to, the works of an actual modern liberal, economics theorist Ludwig von Mises.
Or, as Rich put it,
“The champions of socialism call themselves progressives, but they recommend a system which is characterized by rigid observance of routine and by a resistance to every kind of improvement. They call themselves liberals, but they are intent upon abolishing liberty. They call themselves democrats, but they yearn for dictatorship. They call themselves revolutionaries, but they want to make the government omnipotent. They promise the blessings of the Garden of Eden, but they plan to transform the world into a gigantic post office. Every man but one a subordinate clerk in a bureau.”
-- Ludwig von Mises
Posted by Drew458
on 11/11/2014 at 12:15 AM
Filed Under: • Economics • Philosophy •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - November 10, 2014
Liberal Compassion
Isn’t that an oxymoron?
Liberals enjoy pointing out that, unlike their mean-spirited and heartless conservative counterparts, they actually care about other people. The New York Times’ Paul Krugman, for one, writes that conservatives are “infected” with a “pathological mean-spiritedness” and want to “give you an extra kick” when you’re down on your luck. President Barack Obama, on the other hand, says that “kindness covers all of my political beliefs.”
So far, since I’ve been unemployed for 4 out of 6 years of the Obama Misadministration, I can say that liberals are heartless. As for the job’s he’s allegedly created? They are all part-time jobs. Thanks Obola! while you open our borders to asshole, jackoffs, and scum from Third-world countries. You give them freebies that me and my wife (citizens and taxpayers all our lives until you fucked the system) don’t qualify for. We’re the wrong race, we’re the wrong color, wrong Party, too old, etc.
Please show up on my doorstep Mr. president (yes, he’s a small man.) I got a knuckle sandwich with your name on it.
Posted by Christopher
on 11/10/2014 at 09:16 PM
Filed Under: • Obama, The One • Personal •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Net Neutrality - Is Obama Right?
One of the main values of the internet is that it has been mostly wide open. Anyone could do almost anything. We have all benefited from the freedom of the internet, yet many people want to end the freedom that has served us so well.
However it seems to be human nature to regulate things, whether they need it or not. There’s something in human nature where people want regulations on everything for the “good of society”. On the internet, from the beginning, there have been questions about the regulation of political speech, religious speech and pornography to name three. Then there are the economic questions, sales tax, use tax, access to service, fee for service and more.
There have been various proposals of how to maintain what is generally called Net Neutrality. Most of them have been more about enhancing one group’s rights at the expense of other groups. They haven’t been very neutral.
Obama is now claiming to be for Net Neutrality and is proposing a set of changes.
I don’t trust Obama any farther than I can throw an Abrams tank. Could he actually be on the right side this time? Are his proposals any good?
With Obamacare, critical information was deliberately withheld, what nasty clauses is he be hiding in his proposal?
From The Daily Mail:
Obama backs net neutrality as he calls for tough ‘open Internet’ rules - and says online access should be classified as a public utility
WHAT IS NET NEUTRALITY?
Under the plans for priority usage, Netflix and other video providers would pay extra to use fast lanes to get the maximum amount of bandwith to its customers, and maintain and improve streaming quality and reliability.
This is being heavily criticised by net neutrality campaigners.
At the heart of net neutrality is an open internet in which all data being sent from websites to customers is treated the same, regardless of size or destination.
All this traffic is given the same priority along the same lanes and no site is given preferential treatment.
Although it seems like a fair model, in which sites that use the most bandwith pay the most money, campaigners claim it will drastically impact on industry competition.
For example, Netflix has the money to pay for better service, using the fast lanes, while smaller companies don’t.
This means smaller companies may have the same range of content, but because they can’t stream at the same quality, they are effectively priced out of the market.
To address these claims, the new rules include a ‘competition test’.
ISPs would need to decide if a website meets the critieria to be given priority access and that this bar must be set high enough to protect competition.
Posted by Dr. Jeff
on 11/10/2014 at 07:46 PM
Filed Under: • Miscellaneous •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Take My Money, Please
After spending a couple of chilly hours raking out the garden, Drew goes online to do some early holiday shopping research ...
Unbelievable. There isn’t an official Comedy Central authorized line of Brickleberry stuff. Not even t-shirts.
Because, damn, I want a Malloy sleeper, ladies petite. Or a Brickleberry T, men’s 2XL.
They don’t exist. What’s going on? Is Comedy Central a bunch of anti-capitalist commies? Don’t they know how easy it would be to send a few cells over to Cafe Press and get the ball rolling? It’s, like, free advertising.
Brickleberry is a fantastic cartoon. It’s so wrong. So wrong, wrong, wrong ... that it’s just right!
Let me give all the fake outrage enthusiasts a head start on their Change.org petitions, their Facebook protest groups and their calls to television execs concerning Comedy Central’s new animated series Brickleberry. Here are the things about which you’ll be outraged: the making fun of a child quadruple amputee, animal abuse, overt racism (against blacks, Mexicans, Colombians and Koreans), jokes about AIDS, jokes about abortions, jokes about alcoholism, making light of the Klu Klux Klan, the implied imminent rape of a bear cub, jokes about rednecks and making fun of war veterans. Allow me also to apologize in advance if you feel I’ve missed anything once you’ve watched (for research purposes only, of course) the series premiere on Sept. 25 at 10:30 pm.
On his Comedy Central show “Tosh.0,” the comedian Daniel Tosh sometimes seems to be trying his very hardest to offend us by making the most sexist or racist comments possible. But he gets away with this because his targets, usually people who have made fools of themselves on viral videos, have set themselves up for ridicule. More importantly, his jokes are witty.
Although Tosh is the executive producer of the channel’s new animated series “Brickleberry,” it has neither of those redeeming qualities. The writers seem to think that being “outrageous” — by invoking stereotypes about minority groups or by going for gross-outs — is funny by itself. But the wearying onslaught of pointless, witless, mean-spirited jokes will depress viewers, with the possible exception of 12-to-14-year-old boys.
...
Other bad jokes have little to do with the plotlines. Denzel says he likes dating old ladies because “they’re sweet, loyal, and they can take out their teeth.” Steve throws an amputee Cub Scout into a lake, presumably letting him drown. The show opens with a wide shot of wild animals having sex, including some practices that used to be called unnatural acts.
You betcha, lowbrow humor in its rawest form. And no one is safe. Which is why the show is simply awesome. Comedy Central, Tuesday nights at 10:30. It’s not for children.
Posted by Drew458
on 11/10/2014 at 05:47 PM
Filed Under: • Humor • Television •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • law enforcement officials discussing their asset forfeiture wish lists
Blatant violation of Amendment IV of the Bill of Rights:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
“IF IN DOUBT … TAKE IT!”
That’s the advice in a slideshow presented to New Jersey prosecutors pursuing civil asset forfeiture cases, an obscure process which allows the government to take citizens’ property even if they have not been convicted or charged with a crime.
This is the kind of government that the Second Amentment was designed to allow us to fight against.
I always love anti-gun Democrats, Liberals, and Rinos, who always say the support ‘the right to hunt.’ In fact, hunting isn’t mentioned in the Second Amendment. Every time I’m a a rally or City commission hearing and I ask that… silence.
Brand New Mercedes and Flat Screen TVs
Posted by Christopher
on 11/10/2014 at 06:09 PM
Filed Under: • Guns and Gun Control •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Interesting tactic!
More than 80 wounded U.S. combat veterans and their families have filed suit against several of the world’s largest banks, which they accuse of facilitating financial transfers on behalf of Iran that directly led to the killing and wounding of U.S. troops in Iraq, according to court documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
U.S. Veterans Sue Big Banks for Facilitating Iranian Terrorism
If they can prove it, go for it!
Posted by Christopher
on 11/10/2014 at 05:40 PM
Filed Under: • Military • Terrorists • War On Terror •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - November 08, 2014
What The Fawkes?
In which a Yank shows off his dangerously thin understanding of English History, and asks a seemingly obvious, yet perhaps amazingly stupid question ...
Ok, so they’ve just had Guy Fawkes Day in England. Every November 5th, they have big bonfires and fireworks to recall the failure of The Gunpowder Plot, one of the first acts of terrorism.
In 1605, for reasons of religious intolerance, Guy Fawkes and his conspirators tried to take over the country by blowing up King James I and his Parliament. A huge amount of black powder was hidden below Parliament. 100 barrels - firkins and hogsheads - amounting to a couple tons worth of boom dust. But too many plotters spoil the plot, and somebody ratted them out. Caught at the very last second, Fawkes held up under torture for two days before giving away his fellow conspirators, all of whom had fled. But they were tracked down, and died in a big shootout. Something like that. Only Fawkes was tried, and for his traitorous act was sentenced to be hanged, drawn, and quartered. He cheated the hangman, but not Death, by leaping off the gallows once the noose was on him, snapping his own neck and dying. But they chopped him into bits anyway.
Right. So the Crown has a big investigation afterwards, rather like our 9/11 Commission, and it turns out that, gosh whaddya know, the gunpowder never would have gone off, because “it was decayed”.
Decayed? Black powder is not a chemical compound. It’s just a mixture. Potassium Nitrate (aka Saltpeter), Charcoal, and Sulfur. All ground fine and mixed. But each ingredient has different specific gravity, so over time the powder will un-mix, with the heaviest part, the saltpeter, filtering out to the bottom.
PROBLEM. This un-mixing stuff had been known about since forever. The Plot was in 1605 - the early 17th century. Gunpowder had been in use since the middle 14th century, the 1300s. The separation problem had long been solved by the additional step in manufacturing called “corning”. The smallest spark or bit of static electricity can light off dry gunpowder, and mixing it around and around and around in a big vat could probably build up some static. Not safe. So the survivors - the smart powder makers - added a bit of water or some horse urine to the mix, which dampened things enough, and then mixed up a nice batter. Into loaves called mill cakes. Which were then squeezed through a sieve, just like a Play-Doh Factory, with nippers on the output end cutting the “spaghetti” into uniformly sized little bits, which were then laid out to dry. And the result gives you uniform grains, which all burn at the same rate. And once corned, the powder never un-mixes. And that was how gunpowder was made, made everywhere, always, since 100 years or more before Columbus set sail.
So how did Fawkes’ gunpowder decay? It couldn’t have. It was corned. And stored in firkins, of the barrel maker’s art. So it was dry too. Sure, a minor technical detail. But a detail that shows how the king and his MPs were never really in any danger to begin with. Furthermore, gunpowder manufacture was nearly a government monopoly, or under strict government control,from the very beginning.
Or was the “it was decayed” line a story, just like our FBI and how they immediately declare everything to be workplace violence, not terrorism, and certainly not affiliated with Al Qaeda in any way shape or form?
PS - I think we ought to celebrate Guy Fawkes Day here in the USA as well. Because if he had succeeded, there would have been a huge backlash against Catholics in England. A total pogrom. And in that pogrom, radical Protestant groups would be more tolerated, possibly even become mainstream. Edge groups, belligerent outcasts like the Puritans. Who, suddenly finding themselves accepted and popular, may have had no reason to run off to Holland and then to America. And while that would have kept several women safe from being burned as witches, any America that later formed would have been without our natural cussed attitude of “my faith is my business, screw you” we have ensconced in the First Amendment. Because those Pilgrims really were some intolerant bastiges. It was their way or the highway. Which is why colonial expansion in New England happened in the first place. Rhode Island, Connecticut, down east Long Island, etc. All settled because different flavors of the same faith couldn’t get along.
Posted by Drew458
on 11/08/2014 at 01:45 PM
Filed Under: • History • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Blue Ribbon Red
If you’re old enough, the title of this post ought to kick off an old advertising jingle in your memory.
If you think you sort of remember it, but need a little reminder ...
Posted by Drew458
on 11/08/2014 at 11:40 AM
Filed Under: • Eye-Candy •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
Once Again, The One And Only Post
(4 total trackbacks)
Tracked at iHaan.org
Thｅ advantage to having a guide with you is thɑt an expert will haѵe very first hand experience dealing and navigating the river with гegional wildlife. Tһomas, there are great…
On: 07/28/23 10:37
The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We've Been Waiting For
(3 total trackbacks)
Tracked at head to the Momarms site
The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We’ve Been Waiting For
On: 03/14/23 11:20
Vietnam Homecoming
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at 广告专题配音 专业从事中文配音跟外文配音制造，北京名传天下配音公司
专业从事中文配音和外文配音制作，北京名传天下配音公司 北京名传天下专业配音公司成破于2006年12月，是专业从事中 中文配音 文配音跟外文配音的音频制造公司，幻想飞腾配音网领 配音制作 有海内外优良专业配音职员已达500多位，可供给一流的外语配音，长年服务于国内中心级各大媒体、各省市电台电视台，能满意不同客户的各种需要。电话：010-83265555 北京名传天下专业配音公司…
On: 03/20/21 07:00
meaningless marching orders for a thousand travellers ... strife ahead ..
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Casual Blog
[...] RTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPL [...]
On: 07/17/17 04:28
a small explanation
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at yerba mate gourd
Find here top quality how to prepare yerba mate without a gourd that's available in addition at the best price. Get it now!
On: 07/09/17 03:07
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
